Why capital is not flowing into crypto even as Global M2 explodes

ambcryptoPublicado a 2026-03-01Actualizado a 2026-03-01

Resumen

Despite record levels of global M2 liquidity reaching approximately $135 trillion, capital is not flowing into the cryptocurrency market. Instead, it is moving towards traditional safe-haven assets like gold and silver, which have seen significant rallies. The broader market, including Bitcoin and Ethereum, has experienced substantial declines and remains under bearish pressure. This shift is largely driven by ongoing macroeconomic strains and geopolitical tensions, prompting investors to prioritize capital preservation over speculative crypto investments. While some crypto exchanges are diversifying into traditional assets to capture wider capital flows, the crypto market has not yet benefited from the global liquidity expansion.

The broader cryptocurrency market remains under pressure as capital outflows extend over several months.

The decline has been evident across leading digital assets. Bitcoin [BTC] dropped from $126,000 to $67,000, while Ethereum [ETH] fell from roughly $4,980 to $1,990 at press time.

Several other altcoins have recorded similar drawdowns, erasing close to 30% of their prior gains and reinforcing the ongoing bearish structure.

Despite this weakness, macro liquidity conditions tell a different story.

Global liquidity climbs to record levels

Global M2, commonly used as a proxy for worldwide liquidity, continues to expand.

M2 measures the pool of relatively liquid money across major economies. It includes physical cash, checking deposits, savings deposits, and money market funds—capital that can be quickly deployed into financial markets.

Recent data shows that global M2 has climbed to approximately $135 trillion, marking a fresh all-time high.

Historically, rising liquidity increases the amount of deployable capital within the system. In risk-on environments, this excess liquidity often finds its way into higher-yielding and more volatile assets.

Bitcoin, Ethereum, and the broader altcoin market fall squarely within that category.

However, the recent 4.35% rebound in total crypto market capitalization to $2.31 trillion does not yet confirm a sustained bullish reversal. Liquidity may be expanding, but it is not decisively rotating into digital assets.

Safe havens attract the flow

To understand where capital is moving, investors often examine precious metals.

At the time of writing, gold has rallied 19.9% from its low of $4,402 per ounce on the 2nd of February, sustaining strong upside momentum. Silver has also advanced, climbing from $71 to $94 over the same period.

These gains are notable because both assets function as traditional safe havens. During periods of macroeconomic strain or geopolitical tension, investors tend to prioritize capital preservation over speculative exposure.

With tensions persisting between the United States and Iran, defensive positioning has strengthened.

This rotation suggests that the expanding M2 supply may currently be supporting safe-haven demand rather than high-volatility crypto assets.

Data from Hyperliquid reveals that at least one trader has opened a combined $37.3 million short position across gold and silver—$28 million against gold and $9.23 million against silver—anticipating a pullback.

While this signals that some market participants view metals as overvalued, price action remains structurally bullish for now.

Exchanges broaden their reach

Meanwhile, crypto platforms are adjusting to softer trading activity.

Kraken and Coinbase have expanded their product offerings to include select stocks, commodities, and other traditional instruments.

This strategic diversification reflects an effort to capture a wider share of global capital flows as crypto volumes fluctuate.

Over the long term, such integration could strengthen capital access when risk appetite returns.

For now, however, liquidity expansion alone has not translated into sustained crypto upside. Capital appears to favor defensive assets, leaving digital markets in a holding pattern despite record global M2 levels.

Final Summary

Global liquidity is rising, but gold and silver are outperforming crypto assets.
The crypto market has yet to meaningfully benefit from expanding global M2.

Preguntas relacionadas

QWhat is the current trend in the broader cryptocurrency market, and how long has it been under pressure?

AThe broader cryptocurrency market remains under pressure with capital outflows extending over several months.

QDespite the expansion of global M2 to a record high, why hasn't this liquidity translated into a sustained bullish reversal for crypto?

AThe expanding liquidity is currently supporting safe-haven demand (like gold and silver) due to macroeconomic strain and geopolitical tensions, rather than flowing into high-volatility crypto assets.

QWhich traditional safe-haven assets have seen significant gains, and what are their approximate price increases?

AGold has rallied 19.9% from its low, and silver has climbed from $71 to $94, showing strong upside momentum as traditional safe havens.

QHow have major crypto exchanges like Kraken and Coinbase adapted to the softer trading activity in the crypto market?

AThey have expanded their product offerings to include select stocks, commodities, and other traditional instruments to capture a wider share of global capital flows.

QWhat does the $37.3 million short position against gold and silver indicate about some traders' views on these metals?

AIt indicates that some market participants view gold and silver as overvalued and are anticipating a pullback, though the price action remains structurally bullish for now.

Lecturas Relacionadas

Microsoft CEO's Lengthy Post: Two Types of Capital in the Future, Human Capital + Token Capital

Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella published a long essay titled "A frontier without an ecosystem is not stable," expressing deep concerns about the future of enterprises in the AI-driven economy. He argues that AI is fundamentally changing competition by enabling models to absorb and commodify human expertise, potentially allowing a few dominant AI systems to capture disproportionate economic value. To counter this, Nadella introduces the concepts of "Human Capital" (employee knowledge, judgment, creativity) and "Token Capital" (proprietary AI capabilities). He emphasizes that these two forms of capital must create a compounding "learning loop" within organizations, where human guidance drives AI improvement and accumulated institutional knowledge becomes a key competitive advantage. Nadella warns against a future where industries are hollowed out by a few AI models, similar to past outsourcing waves. Instead, he calls for building a diverse AI ecosystem where every company can innovate, retain control over its intellectual property, and ensure value flows broadly across the economy.

marsbitHace 7 min(s)

Microsoft CEO's Lengthy Post: Two Types of Capital in the Future, Human Capital + Token Capital

marsbitHace 7 min(s)

From a $300 Million Valuation to a 'Fire Sale' at Tens of Millions: What Happened to Messari?

On June 12, leading crypto data and capital markets platform Blockworks announced its acquisition of competitor Messari for over $10 million. This price represents a significant discount from Messari's 2022 valuation peak of approximately $300 million, highlighting the survival pressures faced by high-valuation startups during the bear market and a consolidation wave in data infrastructure. Blockworks, founded in 2018, began as a media and events company but has pivoted to focus on institutional-grade data, investor relations, and compliance tools. Its recent Series A extension round, valuing the company at $192 million, aimed to fund this shift and strategic acquisitions like this one. Messari, also founded in 2018, grew as a go-to platform for professional crypto research and data, raising a $35 million Series B at its $300 million valuation in late 2022. However, the prolonged bear market and subsequent internal changes, including founder Ryan Selkis's departure in 2024, increased operational pressures. The acquisition integrates Messari's extensive data platform and API capabilities with Blockworks's strengths in issuer-side disclosure, investor relations, and compliance workflows. The combined entity aims to build a unified "system of record" for the on-chain market. This reflects a broader industry trend where high-quality, structured data is becoming critical for institutional adoption, AI agents, and creating data moats akin to traditional financial platforms like Bloomberg. The deal exemplifies how market consolidation is reshaping the fragmented crypto data landscape.

marsbitHace 7 min(s)

From a $300 Million Valuation to a 'Fire Sale' at Tens of Millions: What Happened to Messari?

marsbitHace 7 min(s)

If the AI Bubble Is Already Bursting, Who Will Truly Survive?

If the AI Bubble is Bursting, Who Will Remain? The debate over an AI bubble is intensifying, with figures like Ray Dalio warning of high levels and Jensen Huang seeing immense, early-stage opportunity. Both views hold truth: a speculative bubble in capital markets likely exists, mirroring the dot-com era, but the underlying technological shift is real and transformative. History shows that while bubbles burst—wiping out overvalued companies and speculative capital—they often leave behind critical physical and digital infrastructure. The dot-com bust, for instance, eliminated many firms but left the global fiber optic networks and data centers that enabled the rise of Amazon, Netflix, and cloud computing. Today's massive AI infrastructure investments (projected at trillions by 2030) in data centers, power, cooling, and GPUs may follow a similar path, creating the foundation for future applications. A key divergence from past bubbles is the "Jevons Paradox" effect in AI. As the cost of AI inference has plummeted by over 99.7% since 2023, enterprise spending on AI has skyrocketed. Cheap "tokens" have unlocked vast, previously uneconomical use cases, moving AI from simple chatbots into core business workflows—code generation, legal document review, scientific simulation, and financial analysis. The market is now in a phase of self-correction, weeding out superficial "API-wrapper" startups, but this cleansing process strengthens the ecosystem. The long-term trajectory is clear. The value is gradually shifting from capital expenditure (CapEx) on hardware to operational expenditure (OpEx) on transformative applications. As AI becomes a utility, the winners will be firms that deeply integrate it to solve vertical industry problems in law, healthcare, finance, and manufacturing. The泡沫 will recede, but the foundational shift towards an AI-powered era across all sectors is irreversible. The underlying productive force of AI contains no bubble.

marsbitHace 39 min(s)

If the AI Bubble Is Already Bursting, Who Will Truly Survive?

marsbitHace 39 min(s)

If the AI Bubble Is Already Bursting, Who Will Truly Remain?

**Summary: If the AI Bubble is Bursting, What Will Remain?** The debate around an AI bubble is intensifying, with figures like Ray Dalio warning of high valuations while Jensen Huang sees immense opportunity. This echoes the dot-com bubble, which saw massive wealth destruction but ultimately left behind critical infrastructure like undersea cables and broadband, enabling future giants like Amazon and Netflix. Similarly, today's AI boom involves trillions invested in data centers, power, cooling, and GPUs, while application-layer revenue remains comparatively modest. This investment-disparity signals a bubble. However, the core technological progress is real and accelerating. AI inference costs have plummeted by over 99.7% since 2023, making intelligence increasingly cheap and accessible. This cost collapse is unlocking vast new demand. Instead of reducing spending, enterprises are tripling their AI cloud expenditure. Cheap "tokens" enable AI to move beyond simple chatbots into complex workflows—automating code writing, legal document review, financial analysis, and scientific research. This follows "Jevons's paradox": improved efficiency leads to greater total consumption. The market is now undergoing a necessary purification, weeding out "API-wrapper" startups with no real moat. The deeper evolution involves a shift from capital expenditure (CapEx) on infrastructure to operational expenditure (OpEx) on value-creation in applications. While hardware vendors currently profit most, long-term value will migrate to AI-native firms solving vertical industry problems. Ultimately, a market correction will cleanse speculative excess but will not reverse the AI+ trend. The massive physical and algorithmic infrastructure being built will endure, becoming a cheap, utility-like foundation. Just as the internet became indispensable to all industries post-2000, AI is poised to empower and redefine every sector, moving society irreversibly toward an intelligence-augmented era. The bubble may burst, but the underlying productive momentum is solid.

链捕手Hace 46 min(s)

If the AI Bubble Is Already Bursting, Who Will Truly Remain?

链捕手Hace 46 min(s)

Microsoft CEO: In the AI Era, How Do You Define a Company's Moat?

Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella argues that in the AI era, a company's true competitive edge, or "moat," is not determined by choosing the single most powerful model, but by its ability to build a continuous "learning loop." This system integrates and evolves by connecting human workflows, domain expertise, organizational judgment, and employee experience. He posits that future companies will accumulate two types of capital: Human Capital (employee knowledge, judgment, creativity) and "Token Capital" (a firm's own built and owned AI capabilities). Importantly, AI amplifies rather than devalues human capital. Human direction is essential to guide progress, as computational power alone is aimless. The core opportunity lies in creating a closed-loop system where human and token capital reinforce each other in a compound, self-improving cycle. A company must be able to preserve its unique institutional knowledge—its "company veteran" expertise—even if it switches underlying general-purpose AI models. This requires private evaluation benchmarks, reinforcement learning environments based on internal data, and queryable knowledge bases. Nadella warns against a future where economic value is concentrated by a few dominant models that commoditize entire industries' knowledge. Instead, the priority should be building a broad "frontier ecosystem" where every company, industry, and nation can own its learning loop. This allows organizations to retain control of their intellectual property, amplify employee capabilities, and ensure the economic value created by AI is captured within their own businesses and communities. True corporate sovereignty in the AI age comes from turning organizational knowledge into a compounding system that creates enduring, defensible value.

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Microsoft CEO: In the AI Era, How Do You Define a Company's Moat?

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Trading

Spot

Futuros