Web3 Fund Global Expansion Guide: Deconstructing the Compliance Frameworks of Six Major Global Crypto Funds

marsbitPublicado a 2026-03-20Actualizado a 2026-03-20

Resumen

A Guide to Web3 Fund Structures: Analyzing Six Major Global Crypto Fund Compliance Frameworks As crypto assets evolve from simple trading to professional asset management, Web3 projects, quantitative teams, and high-net-worth individuals increasingly adopt fund structures. The choice of legal framework is a foundational decision impacting risk isolation, tax treatment, and long-term compliance. This article analyzes six major fund structures suited for different strategies and investor profiles: - **Cayman SPC**: An umbrella company structure allowing multiple segregated portfolios under one entity. Ideal for multi-strategy teams seeking risk isolation and rapid product iteration. - **Cayman ELP**: A limited partnership form common in VC/PE, offering flexible profit distribution, tax transparency, and investor privacy. - **BVI Approved Fund**: A low-cost, fast-setup solution for early-stage teams managing under $100M, with simplified compliance and up to 20 investors. - **Singapore VCC**: An onshore structure with regulatory credibility, umbrella fund options, and potential tax exemptions (13O/13U), suitable for family offices and teams establishing a local presence. - **Hong Kong LPF**: A localized limited partnership offering convenience for Asian-based operations, banking, and legal services, with potential profit tax exemption. - **Hong Kong OFC**: An open-ended corporate structure ideal for liquid strategies, ETFs, or public offerings, supported by government subsidie...

Original Authors: Zhang Qianwen, Cheng Chuying

Introduction

As crypto assets evolve from simple trading activities to professional asset management, an increasing number of Web3 project teams, quantitative teams, and high-net-worth individuals are adopting fund structures to manage crypto assets. In this process, the choice of a fund's legal structure is no longer a matter of formality; it is a fundamental decision directly impacting risk isolation, tax treatment, and long-term compliant operations.

From a regulatory practice perspective, differences in fund establishment systems, regulatory requirements, and tax arrangements across various jurisdictions determine the investment strategies and fundraising targets they are suited for. Whether it's multi-strategy quantitative trading, primary market investments, or family office asset allocation, there is no "optimal structure," only a "suitable structure" that matches the business model.

This article deconstructs six major global crypto fund structures, analyzing their core mechanisms and applicable scenarios to provide reference for managers' compliance planning.

Cayman SPC: The "Umbrella Company" Suitable for Multi-Strategy Operations

The SPC (Segregated Portfolio Company) is a corporate form in the Cayman Islands. Its key feature is the ability to establish multiple, legally independent investment portfolios (SPs) under a single legal entity.

  • Core Mechanism: Risk Segregation

The assets and liabilities of each SP are legally separate. For example, if Strategy A loses money, its creditors can only claim against A's assets and cannot touch the funds of Strategy B. This is crucial in the highly volatile crypto market, effectively preventing one strategy's "meltdown" from dragging down the entire operation.

  • Applicable Scenarios:

When a manager simultaneously runs both high-risk and low-risk strategies, an SPC ensures that accounts are kept separate and do not interfere with each other. Additionally, launching a new product simply involves creating a new sub-fund under the existing SPC, eliminating the need to register a new company. This offers low cost and high speed, making it suitable for teams looking to quickly incubate new strategies.

Cayman ELP: The "Partnership Structure" Suitable for Primary Market Investments

Unlike the corporate structure of an SPC, the ELP (Exempted Limited Partnership) is a partnership structure established under the Exempted Limited Partnership Law. It does not have independent legal personality but is a contractual relationship between a General Partner (GP) and Limited Partners (LPs). ELPs are widely used in venture capital (VC) and private equity (PE).

  • Core Mechanism: Clear Division of Roles

The GP (General Partner) is responsible for managing the money and making investments, bearing unlimited liability (in practice, a limited company is often used as the GP to isolate risk). The LP (Limited Partner) provides capital, does not participate in management, and their liability is limited to their contribution.

  • Applicable Scenarios:

Primary market investments involve complex profit distribution. The Partnership Agreement allows for flexible terms on how and when profits are shared. Furthermore, ELPs are tax-transparent, meaning the fund itself does not pay tax, and the list of LPs does not need to be publicly disclosed, balancing tax efficiency and privacy protection.

BVI Approved Fund: The "Entry-Level Compliance Solution" for Small Teams

For smaller, early-stage teams, the BVI (British Virgin Islands) Approved Fund offers a compliant option with low barriers to entry and controllable costs.

  • Core Mechanism: Filing-Based, Simplified Regulation

Establishment is fast, typically approved within two to three days of submitting materials. It is not mandatory to hire an auditor or a local custodian, significantly reducing operational costs.

  • Applicable Scenarios

Suitable for teams with assets under management below $10 million who are still in the strategy validation phase. It allows for establishing a compliant entity at a lower cost to build a track record. The investor cap is 20 persons, and the asset size cap is $100 million, making it suitable for fundraising within a familiar circle or community.

Singapore VCC: The "Onshore Fund Structure" Balancing Compliance and Practicality

The VCC (Variable Capital Company) is a fund vehicle introduced by Singapore that retains the flexibility of offshore funds while having the regulatory backing of the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS).

  • Core Mechanism: Umbrella Structure + Tax Incentives

The VCC also supports the establishment of multiple sub-funds with asset segregation. Most importantly, it can apply for the 13O/13U tax exemption scheme, where qualifying investment income is tax-exempt, and dividends are not subject to withholding tax.

  • Applicable Scenarios

Suitable for teams looking to set up an office in Singapore, obtain work visas, or establish a family office. It offers an internationally recognized compliant identity while protecting investor privacy (the shareholder register is not public), making it attractive to capital seeking long-term stability.

Hong Kong LPF: The "Cross-Border Fund Channel" Connecting Asian Markets

The LPF (Limited Partnership Fund) is a localized fund structure launched by Hong Kong, modeled on the Cayman ELP. It is registered and managed in Hong Kong and governed by Hong Kong law.

  • Core Mechanism: Localized Limited Partnership

Structurally similar to the Cayman ELP, but all legal matters and bank communication are handled locally in Hong Kong, with no time zone or language barriers.

  • Applicable Scenarios

If the team is primarily based in Asia, the LPF offers convenience in lawyer liaison, bank account opening, and daily maintenance. Coupled with Hong Kong's Unified Fund Exemption (UFE) regime, qualifying funds can enjoy profits tax exemption, offering a friendly tax environment.

Hong Kong OFC: The "Open-Ended Fund Structure" Suitable for Public Offerings or ETF Issuance

The OFC (Open-ended Fund Company) is a corporate-type open-ended fund with independent legal personality, allowing flexibility in handling investor subscriptions and redemptions.

  • Core Mechanism: Variable Capital, Flexible Structure

An OFC can increase or decrease shares based on subscription and redemption demands, bypassing the restrictions of capital reduction in traditional companies. It can be used for private placements or apply for public offerings (requires SFC authorization).

  • Applicable Scenarios:

To encourage OFC development, the Hong Kong government offers a subsidy covering up to 70% of the establishment costs (capped at HKD 1 million per company), effectively reducing startup costs. Additionally, the OFC is currently one of the mainstream structures in Hong Kong for issuing virtual asset ETFs and fundraising from the public, making it suitable for highly liquid trading strategies.

Overview of Core Characteristics of the Six Structures

Based on the above analysis, the legal characteristics and applicable scenarios of the six mainstream fund structures are summarized below:

Conclusion

In the field of crypto assets, the question regarding fund structures is never "whether to establish one," but rather "when to establish it and in what form." Different legal structures correspond not only to how taxes are paid and how regulations are applied but also to how risks are borne, how investors participate, and how the future operational model will succeed.

The fund structures introduced in this article are neither good nor bad in themselves; the key is whether they match your business model, investment strategy, and target investors. For managers who are already operating or plan to operate crypto assets in a fund format, thinking through and finalizing the structure early is itself an important form of risk control.

Preguntas relacionadas

QWhat is the main advantage of using a Cayman Islands SPC structure for a crypto fund?

AThe main advantage is its ability to provide risk isolation through multiple segregated portfolios (SPs) within a single legal entity, ensuring that the assets and debts of one strategy do not affect others.

QWhich fund structure is most suitable for early-stage teams with smaller assets under management (AUM) and why?

AThe BVI Approved Fund is most suitable because it has a low compliance threshold, fast setup (approved in 2-3 days), reduced operational costs (no mandatory auditor or local custodian), and is designed for teams with AUM below $100 million and up to 20 investors.

QHow does the Singapore VCC structure benefit teams looking to establish a presence in Singapore?

AThe Singapore VCC offers regulatory backing from the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS), allows for multiple sub-funds with asset segregation, and provides tax exemptions (e.g., under 13O/13U schemes) on qualifying investment income, making it attractive for setting up offices, obtaining work visas, or establishing family offices.

QWhat makes the Hong LPF a convenient option for teams primarily based in Asia?

AThe Hong Kong LPF is convenient because all legal matters, banking communication, and daily maintenance are handled locally in Hong Kong, eliminating language and time zone barriers, and it benefits from tax exemptions under the Unified Fund Exemption (UFE) regime.

QWhich fund structure is ideal for issuing public offerings or virtual asset ETFs, and what support does it receive?

AThe Hong Kong OFC (Open-ended Fund Company) is ideal for public offerings or ETF issuance due to its flexible capital structure that allows for share redemptions and subscriptions. It also receives government support, including up to 70% subsidy on setup costs (capped at HKD 1 million per company).

Lecturas Relacionadas

The Changing Landscape: What Are Crypto VCs Experiencing?

Title: The Shifting Landscape of Crypto Venture Capital The era of dedicated crypto venture capital funds is undergoing a significant transformation. Once essential for navigating the sector's complexity and high risk, these specialized funds are now facing an identity crisis as the market matures. This shift mirrors historical patterns in other specialized investment classes like cleantech and SPACs, where initial information advantages dissipate as technologies become mainstream and integrated into existing industry frameworks. The article argues that crypto is reaching a critical inflection point, transitioning from a "building phase" to an "integration phase." Major players like Stripe, BlackRock, and Visa now engage with crypto not for its novel mechanics but as a foundational financial infrastructure. Their needs—regulatory compliance, banking partnerships, distribution channels—align with traditional fintech, a domain easily understood by large, generalist funds like Sequoia and Founders Fund. This evolution creates a "barbell effect" within the VC landscape. On one end are massive, diversified platforms that can incorporate crypto as one vertical among many. On the other are small, nimble funds focused on niche, experimental projects. The middle ground—medium-sized dedicated crypto funds—is being squeezed out. Their typical fund size makes it impossible to generate sufficient returns solely from early-stage crypto bets, yet they cannot compete with giants for later-stage deals. Consequently, leading crypto-native firms like Paradigm and Framework Ventures are expanding into AI, robotics, and other sectors, driven partly by LP pressure for better returns amid a broader VC DPI crisis. Others, like Dragonfly and a16z, have narrowed their crypto focus predominantly to financial infrastructure like stablecoins, reframing the sector's core narrative. For crypto entrepreneurs, this consolidation presents challenges. While generalist funds offer larger checks and broader resources, crypto projects now compete fiercely with AI for attention and capital within these firms. Furthermore, the long-term, non-commercial foundational work that built the ecosystem—funded by dedicated crypto VCs—is less likely to attract generalist capital focused on direct returns. The conclusion is that "crypto investor" as a standalone category is becoming obsolete, akin to "internet investor." Crypto is becoming a baseline infrastructure layer. The future will see a barbell structure: large-scale growth financing handled by generalist funds, while pioneering, speculative projects are funded by small, specialized vehicles. The dedicated crypto funds of the 2017-2021 boom, which incubated core infrastructure, are giving way to this new, bifurcated reality.

Foresight NewsHace 16 min(s)

The Changing Landscape: What Are Crypto VCs Experiencing?

Foresight NewsHace 16 min(s)

As Consensus Accelerates, What Are Young Investors Betting On?

Title: As Consensus Forms Faster, What Are Young Investors Betting On? In the rapid evolution of tech investment, a new generation of young investors is navigating a landscape where AI, robotics, commercial aerospace, and quantum computing are advancing simultaneously. Traditional investment logic based on financial models is giving way to a need for deep technical understanding and the ability to act before industry consensus forms. An analysis of trends from the "WAIC FUTURE TECH" list of young investment leaders reveals key shifts in focus. The first major trend is the movement of AI from the digital screen into the physical world. Investment is shifting from large language models and chatbots towards embodied AI, robotics, AI hardware, and edge computing. While demonstrations generate excitement, the real challenge lies in achieving scalable, reliable, and cost-effective delivery in complex real-world environments like factories and logistics. Success depends not just on algorithms but on the integration of sensors, actuators, and control systems. Second, the competitive focus for large models is moving beyond raw capability toward building an "intelligence flywheel." The goal is to create self-reinforcing systems where user interaction generates data, improving the model, which in turn enhances the user experience and attracts more engagement. Companies that successfully embed AI into workflows to create these closed-loop systems can build lasting value that isn't easily erased by the next model upgrade. Third, facing a potential bottleneck in high-quality human-generated data, investors are looking at new underlying technologies. Reinforcement learning and self-play, as demonstrated by AlphaGo Zero, offer paths for AI to generate its own experience. Scientific foundation models, which aim to build general AI capabilities for fields like life sciences and materials discovery, represent a non-consensus direction that could unlock new frontiers of knowledge and data. Finally, in deep-tech areas like quantum computing, commercial aerospace, and space-based infrastructure, patient capital is essential. These fields have long, uncertain development and validation cycles involving complex engineering, supply chains, and regulations. Investment here requires a long-term view, focusing on foundational team capabilities and the eventual emergence of market demand, even if commercial returns are distant. Collectively, these trends illustrate how young investors are adapting to a new era. They are learning to make earlier, technically-informed judgments, balance hype with real-world viability, and provide the patient capital needed to build the deep-tech foundations of the future.

marsbitHace 44 min(s)

As Consensus Accelerates, What Are Young Investors Betting On?

marsbitHace 44 min(s)

Can Japan Buy Growth with AI? Will the Bond Market Believe It?

Japan's cabinet has introduced the 2026 Basic Policy on Economic and Fiscal Management and Reform, shifting its primary fiscal target. The new framework moves away from the traditional annual primary balance goal and instead prioritizes a stable reduction of the debt-to-GDP ratio. This change is tied to a strategy of increased "responsible proactive fiscal" spending, aiming to boost long-term growth through investments in strategic sectors like AI, semiconductors, energy, and robotics. The government estimates total public and private investment in 62 key technologies could exceed 370 trillion yen by 2040. The market reaction has been mixed and cautious. While equity markets may respond to policy signals, bond markets are focused on fiscal credibility. Concerns center on whether the weakening of the clear primary balance anchor could lead to looser fiscal discipline. If investors doubt that these strategic investments will generate sufficient productivity gains, tax revenue, and nominal growth to outpace rising interest costs, they may demand higher yields on Japanese Government Bonds (JGBs). Recent volatility in the yen and JGB yields, with the 10-year yield briefly reaching 2.9%, reflects this skepticism. The success of this new framework hinges on two factors: whether Japan can achieve a nominal growth rate consistently higher than its long-term interest rates, and whether future budgets demonstrate disciplined control over bond issuance. The government's narrative is that strategic investment is essential to break Japan's cycle of low growth, aging, and labor shortages. However, the bond market will continuously assess the credibility of this plan, pricing the risk that it may represent fiscal expansion rather than a viable growth strategy.

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Can Japan Buy Growth with AI? Will the Bond Market Believe It?

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Trading

Spot
活动图片