‘We will never sell’: Metaplanet stands firm as Bitcoin losses top $1.2B

ambcryptoPublicado a 2026-02-20Actualizado a 2026-02-20

Resumen

Metaplanet, a Japan-based Bitcoin treasury firm, has seen its holdings of 35,012 BTC incur over $1.2 billion in unrealized losses amid the market downturn. Despite the significant paper loss, CEO Simon Gerovich firmly stated the company will never sell its Bitcoin, emphasizing a strategy focused on accumulation and increasing Bitcoin per share. He expressed cautious optimism that Bitcoin may have found a floor around $60,000, though he acknowledged market uncertainty. In the short term, demand for put options indicates some traders are betting on further downside, targeting $58K or lower. However, whale accumulation of 200,000 BTC in the past month may help stabilize prices, though a sustained recovery likely requires increased retail demand rather than leveraged trading.

Simon Gerovich, the CEO of Japan-based Bitcoin treasury firm Metaplanet, has acknowledged that the ongoing crypto rout has been painful.

In late 2025, the firm’s stash (35,012 BTC) saw a paper loss of $619 million following the BTC price crash. The unrealized loss has now doubled to over $1.2 billion as of February.

However, Gerovich assured that the firm has no plan to offload its stash if the crypto winter deepens, adding that,

“Our strategy remains unchanged. We exist to accumulate Bitcoin and grow Bitcoin per share, which we increased by over 500% in 2025. We will never sell our Bitcoin.”

On Bitcoin’s next direction, Gerovich, like Fidelity and most analysts, was cautiously optimistic of a potential market bottom around $60K.

“I personally believe Bitcoin may have found a floor around $60,000, though I hold that view with humility. Nobody knows.”

But he maintained that BTC will likely print a new all-time high and slammed critics of Bitcoin treasury firms.

Bitcoin sees spike in downside bets

In the short term, however, demand for downside protection remained strong, with some eyeing a potential BTC price dip below $60K.

According to the Options tracking platform, Laevitas, there was a surge in bearish bets, eyeing $58K and $55K in late February and March.

“Downside protection remains in demand. Over the past few hours: 1864 BTC $58K puts bought for 27FEB26 ($687.72k), 276 BTC $58K puts bought for 6MAR26 ($205.14K). Also, 600 BTC $55K puts bought for 27MAR26 ($551.18K) on Feb 17.”

The above positioning was interesting because the broader put/call ratios were still constructive and leaned bullish.

This underscored that, despite the potential for a rebound, big players remained cautious that another leg down could occur before a true market bottom is formed.

Even so, Bitfinex analysts noted that whales have scooped up 200,000 BTC in the past 30 days. According to them, the ongoing whale accumulation reinforced their price-range outlook, adding to that,

“That can stabilise price, but upside is usually slower and range-bound until retail spot demand increases. Confirmation is spot-led continuation, not leverage-led spikes.”


Final Summary

  • Metaplanet CEO was cautiously optimistic that BTC could bottom out above $60K, adding that the Bitcoin treasury firm won’t sell its BTC holdings.
  • Whales scooped 200K BTC and could drive the sideways structure above $60K, but there was increasing demand for downside protection.

Preguntas relacionadas

QWhat is Metaplanet's current strategy regarding its Bitcoin holdings despite the unrealized losses?

AMetaplanet's strategy remains unchanged; they exist to accumulate Bitcoin and grow Bitcoin per share, and they will never sell their Bitcoin.

QHow much has Metaplanet's unrealized loss on its Bitcoin investment grown as of February?

AMetaplanet's unrealized loss on its 35,012 BTC has doubled to over $1.2 billion as of February.

QAccording to the CEO, what price level does he believe may be a potential floor for Bitcoin?

AThe CEO believes Bitcoin may have found a floor around $60,000, though he holds that view with humility.

QWhat does the surge in bearish bets, as reported by Laevitas, indicate about market sentiment?

AThe surge in bearish bets, such as puts targeting $58K and $55K, indicates strong demand for downside protection and caution among some big players that another price decline could occur before a true market bottom is formed.

QHow much Bitcoin have whales accumulated in the past 30 days, and what is the expected impact on price according to Bitfinex analysts?

AWhales have accumulated 200,000 BTC in the past 30 days, which Bitfinex analysts say can stabilize the price, but upside movement is expected to be slower and range-bound until retail spot demand increases.

Lecturas Relacionadas

Sequoia Dialogue with Jensen Huang: Computing Model Undergoes a 60-Year Transformation; You Won't Be Replaced by AI, But You Will Be Dimensionality-Reduced by 'Those Who Master AI'

NVIDIA founder and CEO Jensen Huang, in a conversation with Sequoia Capital's Konstantine Buhler, argues that we are witnessing the most significant computing shift in 60 years—from retrieval-based to generative computing. Instead of just storing and retrieving data, future systems will generate highly personalized content (text, images, video) on demand, powered by massive "AI factories." Huang envisions a global "intelligence network" that will envelop the planet, following the historical patterns of energy and communication grids. He outlines a five-layer investment framework: 1) Energy, 2) Chips/Computers, 3) Infrastructure (data centers), 4) AI Models, and 5) Applications. He predicts this ecosystem will reach a scale of $20 trillion annually. Crucially, Huang pushes back against fears of AI-driven job loss. He distinguishes between specific "tasks" (e.g., typing, analyzing images) and overall "jobs" (e.g., CEO, radiologist). While AI automates tasks, it increases efficiency and demand for the higher-value problem-solving aspects of professions, thus creating more jobs and "up-leveling" careers. The real risk, he asserts, is not being replaced by AI, but being outperformed by someone who effectively leverages it. He urges everyone to embrace AI as a tool for augmented capability and innovation.

marsbitHace 7 min(s)

Sequoia Dialogue with Jensen Huang: Computing Model Undergoes a 60-Year Transformation; You Won't Be Replaced by AI, But You Will Be Dimensionality-Reduced by 'Those Who Master AI'

marsbitHace 7 min(s)

"I Don't Need a Better Model Anymore": A Panorama of AI Users Under a Reddit Hot Post

Titled "I Don't Need a Better Model Anymore": AI User Reactions on Reddit Anthropic recently released Claude Fable 5, its first publicly available 'Mythos'-tier model, achieving 80.3% on the SWE-Bench Pro benchmark and significantly outperforming its predecessor and competitors. However, a viral Reddit post titled "Claude Fable made me realize I don't need better models anymore" highlighted a growing user sentiment of "good enough." Top comments expressed "model fatigue," with users stating that earlier models like Opus 4.5/4.8 already sufficed for their workflows. High cost was a key concern, as Fable 5's API is nearly twice the price of Opus 4.8, with users questioning the return on investment and suggesting the field has hit a plateau. The most frequent complaint targeted Fable 5's stringent safety filters. Designed to intercept high-risk requests (e.g., cybersecurity), the system was perceived as overly conservative. Users reported frequent rejections for routine security-related tasks, leading to automatic fallbacks to the older Opus model. Paying users were particularly frustrated, feeling they paid a premium for a less usable product. Dissenting voices came from users with heavy, complex tasks. For workloads like high-energy physics simulations with thousands of code lines, Fable 5's improved long-context understanding and error detection represented a significant, worthwhile leap—described as moving from a "college player to an NBA starter." The debate underscores a divergence between benchmark performance and practical utility. For most users, current models meet their needs, making further advances relevant only for extreme use-cases. The discussion also raised concerns about a potential "Public AI Freeze," where the most powerful models (like the restricted Mythos 5) remain exclusive to enterprises and governments, while public offerings stagnate. The launch presents two report cards: one of technical excellence and another of user skepticism. Fable 5's ultimate reception may depend on Anthropic's ability to refine its safety filters and justify its cost for specialized, high-demand users.

marsbitHace 14 min(s)

"I Don't Need a Better Model Anymore": A Panorama of AI Users Under a Reddit Hot Post

marsbitHace 14 min(s)

When AI Traffic Surpasses Humans, How Do You Prove You're Human?

With AI-generated web traffic surpassing human activity, websites face a crisis as AI agents bypass ads, avoid clicks, and scrape data without generating revenue. This disrupts the ad-based internet economy, diverting traffic and reducing site visits. In response, sites are blocking AI crawlers and deploying traps like Cloudflare's "honeypot" pages. Traditional CAPTCHAs are now ineffective against advanced AI. The focus has shifted to behavioral biometrics—analyzing unique human patterns such as cursor movement, typing rhythm, and keystroke dynamics. Companies like IBM and BioCatch use this data to distinguish humans from bots, even detecting fraud through behavioral inconsistencies. Two competing approaches aim to verify human identity centrally. Sam Altman’s World (formerly Worldcoin) uses iris scanning to create unique credentials, though it faces privacy concerns and regulatory bans. Alternatively, cryptographic zero-knowledge proofs offer anonymous verification without revealing personal data, championed by Vitalik Buterin to avoid centralized surveillance. However, both systems have flaws. Centralized solutions risk biometric data misuse, while decentralized models may be exploited through identity rental markets in economically unequal regions. Despite challenges, the author favors cryptographic methods for preserving privacy over pervasive behavioral monitoring that permanently captures and controls personal biometric data.

marsbitHace 23 min(s)

When AI Traffic Surpasses Humans, How Do You Prove You're Human?

marsbitHace 23 min(s)

2026 Landscape of Decentralized AI: Why is Blockchain the Inevitable "Antidote" for AI?

**The 2026 Landscape of Decentralized AI: Why Blockchain is the "Cure" AI Cannot Ignore** Decentralized AI addresses fundamental bottlenecks of centralized AI: scarce and expensive computational resources, excessive control concentration, unverifiable model outputs, and increasing difficulty in acquiring training data due to privacy and regulation. Blockchain offers a path to make intelligence open, verifiable, and economically accessible. The technical stack comprises three layers: 1. **Applications & Services**: The main crypto use cases are "Agentic Finance" (converting natural language into on-chain actions) and "Agentic Payments" for machine-to-machine commerce. Projects like Giza, Infinity Labs, Coinvest AI, and x402 (handling 173M+ transactions) are key players. 2. **Middleware**: This coordination layer enables agents to discover, identify, and transact. Notable projects include Gokite AI (specialized L1), Virtuals (an OS for the agent economy), and especially Bittensor—a network of specialized subnets forming competitive AI micro-economies. 3. **Infrastructure**: The capital-intensive layer providing raw resources. It includes decentralized compute (Akash, Render, Aethir), verifiable inference (Venice AI, OpenGradient), distributed training (Prime Intellect, Templar AI), decentralized storage (Filecoin, Walrus), and privacy/verification layers (Nillion, Arcium, Phala Network) using technologies like ZKPs, MPC, and TEEs. The outlook for 2026-2027 indicates AI demand outpacing infrastructure, with AI agents as a primary growth engine. Computation is becoming an asset class, with on-chain markets as its financial layer. Tokenomics is emerging as a structural advantage for coordinating capital, compute, and data in decentralized AI networks. While still early—with adoption uneven and revenue often trailing token incentives—projects like Bittensor, NEAR, and Virtuals demonstrate a shift from speculative narrative to a new model for coordinating intelligence.

marsbitHace 26 min(s)

2026 Landscape of Decentralized AI: Why is Blockchain the Inevitable "Antidote" for AI?

marsbitHace 26 min(s)

a16z Crypto Partner: Cash Flow is the Moat

Cash Flow as the Moat: A Playbook for Crypto Founders Historically, the most enduring businesses have been built by positioning themselves within the "flow of funds"—facilitating the creation and transfer of value in a network and extracting a portion of it. Cryptocurrency is the first modern technology natively built for this purpose. For startups, failing to architect products and businesses to leverage these principles means missing a major opportunity. Blockchains are inherently network businesses. Each transaction settles on a shared ledger, and every new participant strengthens the underlying network for all. Well-designed network tokens amplify this by aligning users, developers, and validators around growing the network, with value flowing back to contributors in a transparent feedback loop. This model is not new; companies from railroads and Standard Oil to Google, Meta, and AWS have thrived by inserting themselves into critical flows of value (goods, attention, compute). Financial markets make it even clearer: firms like Visa and major market makers generate immense revenue not by predicting markets but by being in the path of transactions. The combination of fund flow and network effects creates one of the most durable business structures. The high margins in traditional finance (payments, custody, lending, FX) represent prime targets. Crypto founders have the opportunity to build the next version—programmable, instant, global, and natively in the flow of funds. The frontier extends beyond finance to areas like computing/GPUs, AI training data, energy, robotics, and space—markets without entrenched intermediaries, ripe for building new, efficient value rails on programmable infrastructure. Founders should ask: Are you in the flow of funds today? Does your revenue scale 10x with the value of activity on your platform? Where in your target market are profit margins highest relative to value created? The opportunity is clear: embed your startup into the new flows of value and let the network effects accumulate.

marsbitHace 28 min(s)

a16z Crypto Partner: Cash Flow is the Moat

marsbitHace 28 min(s)

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片