VanEck Debuts First U.S.-Based Avalanche ETF as AVAX Stays Under Pressure

TheNewsCryptoPublicado a 2026-01-27Actualizado a 2026-01-27

Resumen

VanEck launched the first U.S.-listed Avalanche ETF (VAVX) on January 26, offering direct exposure to AVAX and staking rewards. Despite this, AVAX remained under pressure, trading below $12 with a weekly decline of nearly 7%. The fund will waive fees for the first $500 million in assets until February 28, 2026, and can stake up to 70% of its holdings, potentially reducing market supply. Currently priced at $11.77, AVAX shows weak momentum with a declining trading volume. Key support lies at $11, while a break above $13 could lead to a move toward $14–$15.

Asset Manager VanEck launched the first U.S.-listed Avalanche ETF on January 26, and the product began trading on Nasdaq under the ticker VAVX, offering direct exposure to AVAX along with staking rewards. Despite this, AVAX continued under pressure, trading below $12 and experiencing a weekly fall of almost 7%.

During the period of VanEck Avalanche ETF from January 26, 2026, to February 28, 2026, VanEck will waive the entire Fee for the first $500 million of the assets. If the Trust’s assets exceed $500 million before February 28, 2026, the Fee charged on assets over $500 million will be 0.20%, as per the document.

In addition, the fund can stake up to 70% of its AVAX holdings, which could lock a meaningful portion of supply and reduce tokens available on the open market if demand holds up.

AVAX Price Analysis

With that, AVAX price is currently trading at $11.77, with 1.11% up today. Despite the modest daily bounce, the 24-hour trading volume is declining more than 20%, as it is down nearly 8% over the past month, as of writing.

Then, the open interest climbed 10.43% to $492 million, which indicates that traders are opening new positions despite slowing trading volume, as per Coinglass data. Which is a phase that could lead to a sharper price move once AVAX breaks out of its current range.

AVAX is trading around the $11.50-$12.00 support zone, and the overall trend is staying bearish as prices continue to create lower highs and lower lows.

Further indicators, RSI (Relative Strength Index), which is sitting at 39, a neutral zone, indicate a weak momentum. Meanwhile, MACD (Moving Average Convergence and Divergence) is showing strong selling pressure, as confirmed by the MACD line being below the signal line.

The price has immediate support at $11, with a further pullback potentially exposing the $10; while on the upside, a clear push above $13.00 might allow the price to stretch beyond the $14.00-$15.00 range.

Highlighted Crypto News Today:

‌US Wall Street Indexes Close Higher as Crypto Market Maintains its Trade Price

Preguntas relacionadas

QWhat is the name and ticker symbol of the first U.S.-listed Avalanche ETF launched by VanEck?

AThe ETF is called the VanEck Avalanche ETF and it trades on the Nasdaq under the ticker symbol VAVX.

QWhat is the fee waiver period and condition for the new VanEck Avalanche ETF?

AVanEck will waive the entire fee for the first $500 million of assets from January 26, 2026, to February 28, 2026. Assets over $500 million will be charged a fee of 0.20%.

QWhat percentage of its AVAX holdings can the VanEck ETF stake, and what potential market effect could this have?

AThe fund can stake up to 70% of its AVAX holdings. This could lock a significant portion of the supply and reduce the number of tokens available on the open market if demand holds up.

QAccording to the price analysis, what are the key technical indicators suggesting about AVAX's momentum?

AThe RSI at 39 indicates weak momentum in a neutral zone. The MACD shows strong selling pressure, confirmed by the MACD line being below the signal line.

QWhat are the identified critical support and resistance levels for the AVAX price?

AThe price has immediate support at $11, with a further pullback potentially exposing the $10 level. On the upside, a clear push above $13.00 could allow the price to move toward the $14.00-$15.00 range.

Lecturas Relacionadas

iQiyi Is Too Impatient

The article "iQiyi Is Too Impatient" discusses the controversy surrounding the Chinese streaming platform IQiyi's recent announcement of an "AI Actor Library" during its 2026 World Conference. IQiyi claimed over 100 actors, including well-known names like Zhang Ruoyun and Yu Hewei, had joined the initiative. CEO Gong Yu suggested AI could enable actors to "star in 14 dramas a year instead of 4" and that "live-action filming might become a world cultural heritage." The announcement quickly sparked backlash. Multiple actors named in the list issued urgent statements denying they had signed any AI-related authorization agreements. This forced IQiyi to clarify that inclusion in the library only indicated a willingness to *consider* AI projects, with separate negotiations required for any specific role. The incident, which trended on social media with hashtags like "IQiyi is crazy," is presented as a sign of the company's growing desperation. Facing intense competition from short-video platforms like Douyin and Kuaishou, as well as Bilibili and Xiaohongshu, IQiyi's financial performance has weakened, with revenues declining for two consecutive years. The author argues that IQiyi is "too impatient" to tell a compelling AI story to reassure the market, especially as it pursues a listing on the Hong Kong stock exchange. The piece concludes by outlining three key "AI questions" IQiyi must answer: defining its role as a tool provider versus a content creator, balancing the "coldness" of AI with the human element audiences desire, and properly managing the interests of platforms, actors, and viewers. The core dilemma is that while AI can reduce costs and increase efficiency, it risks creating homogenized, formulaic content and devaluing human performers.

marsbitHace 51 min(s)

Jensen Huang Publicly Challenges Google and Amazon, Is the Chip Business Entirely Sustained by Anthropic?

In a candid interview, Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang challenged competitors like Google and Amazon, admitted past strategic errors, and criticized U.S. export controls on AI chips. He framed Nvidia’s role as turning “electricity in, tokens out,” emphasizing the complexity and value of AI inference. Huang dismissed rival custom chips like Google’s TPU and Amazon’s Trainium as inflexible and niche, claiming their growth relies heavily on clients like Anthropic. He also acknowledged missing early investment opportunities in OpenAI and Anthropic. On China, Huang warned that export restrictions risk pushing the country toward self-sufficiency and could cost U.S. leadership in AI. Finally, he explained Nvidia’s acquisition of Groq as a move to serve premium, low-latency token markets. Throughout, Huang emphasized ecosystem trust and Nvidia’s central role in global AI infrastructure.

marsbitHace 57 min(s)

Jensen Huang Publicly Challenges Google and Amazon, Is the Chip Business Entirely Sustained by Anthropic?

marsbitHace 57 min(s)

ARK's SpaceX IPO Investment Guide: $1.75 Trillion Valuation, 95x Price-to-Sales Ratio, Where Is the Money Going?

ARK Invest, a major investor in SpaceX, provides an analysis following SpaceX's confidential IPO filing on April 1, 2026, targeting a $1.75 trillion valuation and up to $75 billion in funding for a Nasdaq listing around June 2026. This would be the largest IPO in history. The valuation implies a price-to-sales ratio of ~95x based on ~$18.5B in projected 2025 revenue. ARK argues this reflects future potential, not current reality. Key drivers include Starlink, with over 10M users and $20B+ in 2026 revenue, launch services which have reduced costs by ~95% since 2008, and the strategic merger with xAI in February 2026, enabling vertically integrated AI and orbital computing. ARK’s investment thesis is based on SpaceX's proven execution of ambitious goals, like reusable rockets and global satellite internet. The firm notes that significant value creation often occurs pre-IPO, and its Venture Fund offers exposure to SpaceX’s earlier private stages. Post-IPO, the fund will manage the position per standard lock-up and rebalancing processes, maintaining flexibility to reinvest in other private innovations. The analysis is based on public estimates and ARK research; the S-1 filing is not yet public. This is not investment advice.

marsbitHace 58 min(s)

ARK's SpaceX IPO Investment Guide: $1.75 Trillion Valuation, 95x Price-to-Sales Ratio, Where Is the Money Going?

marsbitHace 58 min(s)

Stablecoin Hype Overblown? Moody’s Says Banks Aren’t In Danger

The article discusses the legislative stalemate in the US over the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act of 2025 (CLARITY Act), which aims to regulate crypto assets. A key point of contention is whether stablecoins should be allowed to pay interest, with crypto companies opposing a ban and banks supporting it. Moody's analyst Abhi Srivastava states that, for now, stablecoins do not pose a significant threat to traditional banks due to existing efficient payment systems and the current prohibition on yield-bearing stablecoins. This limits their appeal for pulling deposits from banks at scale. However, with the stablecoin market cap exceeding $300 billion and growth in tokenized assets, banks could face future pressure from deposit outflows. The crypto industry warns that failure to pass the bill could lead to stricter regulatory crackdowns. Negotiations continue with little progress, despite both sides desiring a resolution.

bitcoinistHace 1 hora(s)

Stablecoin Hype Overblown? Moody’s Says Banks Aren’t In Danger

bitcoinistHace 1 hora(s)

Not a Price Hike, but a Supply Cut? Oil Prices Have Crossed the Tipping Point

The global oil market has passed a critical point, shifting the focus from price increases to potential physical supply shortages. The core issue is a time mismatch: even if the Strait of Hormuz reopens, shipping disruptions have already caused significant delays, which will continue to deplete onshore crude inventories for weeks. Refinery behavior acts as an amplifier. Reduced runs in Asia and Europe don’t reflect weaker demand but instead shrink product inventories, raising fuel prices and refining margins, which in turn encourages higher runs—creating a self-reinforcing cycle. If the Strait remains closed beyond April, traditional pricing models may fail. The market could face an unprecedented physical shortfall of 11-13 million barrels per day—roughly four times historical disruption levels. In such a scenario, price becomes an inadequate balancing tool. The only way to rebalance the market would be policy-driven demand destruction, similar to COVID-era lockdowns. Current prices around $95/barrel are insufficient to balance the market. Key signals to watch include inventory levels, policy announcements, and the pace of involuntary demand contraction. Geopolitically, the situation appears likely to worsen before improving, with little room for compromise between the US and Iran.

marsbitHace 3 hora(s)

Not a Price Hike, but a Supply Cut? Oil Prices Have Crossed the Tipping Point

marsbitHace 3 hora(s)

Trading

Spot

Futuros