US Stock Market Signal Master Serenity: Leading Institutions in Low Position Building, Annual Return 3840%

marsbitPublicado a 2026-05-26Actualizado a 2026-05-26

Resumen

Serenity, an anonymous online trading figure known as the "Stock Call King," has gained significant attention by reportedly achieving staggering annual returns of 3840% in 2026 and 2256% over two years. Operating primarily on social media platform X, he shares free investment insights focused on the AI and semiconductor supply chains. His core strategy, the "Chokepoint" investment theory, involves identifying small, critical "bottleneck" companies within the AI infrastructure that are essential yet undervalued before major institutional investment. Examples include his multi-year call on stock AXTI, which saw gains exceeding 10,000%. Despite his popularity, Serenity's true identity and the specific dollar amounts behind his percentage gains remain undisclosed, leading to some skepticism. Critics question if he manipulates low-market-cap stocks, while supporters see him as disrupting traditional finance by providing free, high-quality research. He advocates against paid communities and emphasizes that his goal is to empower retail investors with information before institutional players act. Whether Serenity represents a genuine market visionary or a sophisticated narrative-driven player remains an open question debated by his followers and observers.

Author|Golem(@web 3_golem)

As an investor focusing on US AI and semiconductor stocks, if you haven't heard of Serenity, chances are your investment research is still at a novice level.

Why do we say that? Because he is currently the hottest US stock signal master online. From retail investors to Wall Street, almost everyone is reading his reports and copying his trades. Some even package his publicly free insights into paid courses within communities.

On May 24, Serenity announced his investment performance for the year on platform X: an annualized return rate of 3840.39%; just the day before, he also posted his investment return rate for the past two years, which reached as high as 2256.99%.

The "Far Ahead" Serenity

Serenity only joined X in July 2025, but by May this year, his follower count had surged to 358,000, with over 32,000 subscribers—less than 15,000 shy of Elon Musk's subscriber count. Yet, no one knows Serenity's real identity to this day. Public knowledge about his background comes only from his self-written bio:

  • Former famous trader from Reddit WSB, now on X (Odaily note: Wall Street Bets is the largest retail trading community in the US; Serenity was banned in 2022 for recommending a stock with the ticker AXTI, which has since risen over 700% year-to-date);
  • AI and semiconductor supply chain analyst, former RISC-V Foundation member, former AI research scientist;
  • Currently primarily trades "the overlooked bottlenecks."

From this bio, it's clear Serenity positions himself as an expert in the AI field. He has even claimed to have rejected an offer from Nvidia's AI team in 2018. Serenity once stated in a post that his investment approach is also based on a thorough understanding and research of the AI and semiconductor industries. His typical investment research process is: first, conduct initial thesis research; then transform these ideas into actionable plans and trades; followed by subsequent due diligence on the Alpha; and finally, celebrate when the stock price rises.

As shown in the image below, community user @kaikaibtc compiled a list of Serenity's main stock holdings, which are mainly concentrated in sectors within the AI industry chain such as optical modules, silicon photonics, storage, CPO, and substrates. None of these 21 stocks have returns below 100%, with AXTI—the stock Serenity most frequently mentions and has been signaling for over two years—showing returns even exceeding 10000%. He has publicly stated that AXTI is his most legendary trade.

However, what's perhaps more impressive than these exaggerated returns is that before Serenity identified these targets, not only had retail investors not noticed them, but institutional players hadn't entered the market either.

When Serenity posted signals for specific stocks in the past, he was often met with skepticism. It was only months or even a year later, when investors witnessed the stocks' dramatic performance, that they realized he was right—RPI, AXTI, SIVE, etc., are vivid examples. After such cases repeated, the Serenity account naturally became a must-read for retail investors, Wall Street, and even Silicon Valley investors daily.

How does Serenity always stay ahead of the market and unearth those undervalued stocks? The secret lies in his self-developed investment theory focusing on supply chain bottlenecks (Chokepoints).

The Chokepoint Investment Method

Chokepoint is the most frequently appearing word in Serenity's posts and is the core of his investment logic.

AI is undoubtedly the dominant global narrative today, but the AI industry faces a clear supply-demand imbalance. On one hand, internet giants are frantically investing in AI infrastructure in a "military-style arms race"; on the other hand, the supply side is clearly insufficient, with Nvidia orders even entering a "rationing system." Therefore, capital has also realized that the current stage of AI development is not about downstream applications but the upstream supply chain. Whoever occupies a crucial position in the AI supply chain, whoever achieves irreplaceability, deserves to be repriced.

Thus, over the past few months, the market's hype around the AI industry has been progressively deconstructing the supply chain from the initial GPU computing power. The second layer includes storage, data centers, optical modules; further down are power, materials, network equipment, etc. This layered deconstruction of the AI supply chain to find key "chokepoint" companies at each stage is essentially Serenity's Chokepoint investment method, except he acted on it much earlier than most retail and institutional investors.

On March 31, when signaling AXTI, Serenity used an analogy to vividly explain what a chokepoint is. He compared it to the Strait of Hormuz. Over 20% of the world's crude oil supply passes through the Strait of Hormuz, making it a critical chokepoint in global energy trade. Similarly, AXTI's relation to AI optical module companies is akin to the Strait of Hormuz's relation to global energy trade.

The essence of Serenity's ability to obtain excess returns still stems from information asymmetry in the market. It's about using keen insight and foresight to find the "hidden champions" within the AI industry chain that are not fully priced in. These companies are not as glamorous as giants like Nvidia, Micron, or SK Hynix, but they are small-scale monopolies whose shortage or shutdown could cause an earthquake in the downstream trillion-dollar AI industry.

For example, when signaling IQE in February-March this year, Serenity repeatedly stated that both IQE and Landmark are major outsourced epitaxial wafer foundries for photonic chips. However, IQE's overall production capacity is much larger than Landmark's. At that time, Landmark's market cap was around $3.8 billion, while IQE's market cap was only $135 million.

It's worth mentioning that Serenity is not superhuman, knowing every detail of the AI supply chain. He frequently mentions using AI assistance for AI supply chain research, including dissecting the industry chain, uncovering suppliers, and debating ideas with AI.

True Legend or "Photoshop Master"

In the investment field, deifying any individual is extremely dangerous. Serenity's win rate is not 100%. Stocks he recommended earlier this year, like CPSH and INFQ, also experienced significant pullbacks in February and March. Rather than blindly copying his portfolio, retail investors and market participants should learn his research framework and mindset to develop their own systems and ultimately find their own Alpha.

Serenity is also a person with strong idealism and a mysterious aura. All his publicly available personal information lacks third-party verification, and no one even knows his gender. The only private information he has revealed is that he lives an international digital nomad life, currently in Japan learning Japanese; he also lived briefly in mainland China, so he knows some Chinese, and frequently travels to countries like South Korea, the UK, Singapore, and Canada, claiming to have visited at least 28 countries.

Since Serenity only shows return rates and not live trading records, some have questioned whether his profits might be fabricated. Serenity's response to this is: "The reason for not disclosing specific amounts is because the amount is not important." He only wants to prove that users can discover purely valuable information from free posts, and market return rates expressed as percentages are best suited to validate an argument. He also stated that he strongly dislikes traditional KOLs who flaunt money, luxury watches, cars, and private jets.

Opposing paywalls or paid communities is also a distinctive feature of Serenity. Most of Serenity's core market research is published on X, accessible for anyone to read for free—no barriers, no paid communities. His account subscription costs only $1 per month, and the content is just an Excel spreadsheet. Even without subscribing, it doesn't hinder understanding of his core viewpoints.

In this world where "all hustle and bustle is for profit," Serenity's behavior—seemingly uninterested in fame or profit, generously sharing his market views—appears unnaturally altruistic. Therefore, some speculate that Serenity is merely using his influence to manipulate the prices of these low-market-cap stocks: building positions at low prices, then pumping and dumping, leaving a token "ant position" in his account to mislead followers, especially since he never discloses actual profit amounts, only percentages.

This has a taste of "measuring the mind of a gentleman with one's own mean standard." Of course, Serenity has his own gentlemanly explanation.

He believes the stock market is a positive-sum game. His goal is to share key information before institutions "buy-in," allowing retail investors to also walk the right path and reap profits. He feels proud, especially when he sees them accessing wealth-creation insights without paying over $2000 to join any paid community. He claims to be changing the old model, stating that if he didn't tell the IQE story, institutions like AVGO would simply buy out IQE silently, leaving retail investors with no chance for profit.

Which version is the truth? Is Serenity someone who truly sees through the AI supply chain, or a top-tier player harvesting traders under the guise of a "chokepoint narrative"? Currently, we do not know. Whether Serenity will ultimately become a legend or a bubble, we can only leave it to time to answer.

Preguntas relacionadas

QWhat is Serenity's core investment strategy as described in the article?

ASerenity's core investment strategy is the 'Chokepoint' or 'Supply Chain Bottleneck' investment method. This involves identifying small, less-noticed companies that hold a critical, quasi-monopolistic position within the AI or semiconductor supply chain. These companies are essential to the industry but were previously undervalued by the market. The strategy leverages information asymmetry and in-depth industry research to find these key suppliers before major institutions do.

QWhy has Serenity gained significant popularity and attention in the investment community?

ASerenity has gained significant popularity because he claims exceptional investment returns, with a reported annual return of 3840%. More importantly, he shares his high-conviction investment research and stock picks publicly and for free on social media platforms like X. His past calls, such as for AXTI (which reportedly gained over 10000%), have proven successful, making many followers believe in his ability to identify high-performing stocks early, often before institutional investors.

QWhat is a major point of skepticism or controversy surrounding Serenity?

AA major point of skepticism is that Serenity only publishes his investment returns as percentages and does not show actual proof of his trading portfolio or the monetary value of his gains. This has led to speculation that he could be manipulating low-market-cap stock prices by promoting them to his large following (pump and dump), or that the returns he claims are fabricated. Critics argue that without verified real-money accounts, his performance is questionable.

QHow does Serenity's philosophy differ from many other financial influencers or 'KOLs'?

ASerenity's philosophy differs in three key ways: 1) He provides most of his core research and stock ideas for free, opposing paid communities and paywalls. His only paid subscription ($1/month) is for an Excel spreadsheet. 2) He claims his motivation is not to show off wealth (e.g., luxury cars, watches) but to empower retail investors by providing information before institutions act. 3) He focuses on the investment thesis and percentage returns rather than the absolute monetary value of his profits, which he claims is irrelevant to proving his strategy.

QWhat does the article suggest investors should learn from Serenity's story?

AThe article suggests that investors should not blindly follow Serenity's stock picks but should instead learn from his research framework, analytical process, and long-term perspective. While his picks can serve as a starting point, the ultimate goal should be to understand the 'Chokepoint' methodology and the logic behind identifying critical supply chain bottlenecks. This allows investors to develop their own independent research and investment system to find their own profitable opportunities ('Alpha') rather than just copying someone else's portfolio.

Lecturas Relacionadas

From 'Old Guys' to 'New Favorites': How AI Is Revaluing Old Infrastructure from Dell to Nokia?

From "Vintage Tech" to "New AI Darlings": How AI Revalues Old Infrastructure One year ago, tech giants like Dell, Nokia, Cisco, and Western Data were seen as slow-growth, low-valuation stories, far from the AI spotlight dominated by players like Nvidia. Now, these legacy tech stocks are gaining market attention, sparking debate on whether this is genuine industry revaluation or a temporary narrative. As AI moves from model parameters to real-world data centers, the market is recognizing companies with proven delivery and infrastructure capabilities. This shift marks a change in the AI investment thesis: from pure model and GPU focus to the complex systems engineering required for deployment. Companies like Dell, HPE, and Corning are being revalued not for being "sexy" AI innovators, but for their decades of accumulated expertise in supply chains, enterprise delivery, and infrastructure—assets that have become critical in the AI buildout phase. The revaluation is unfolding across three key infrastructure lines: 1. **Servers & System Integration:** Dell and HPE are emerging as crucial system integrators or "general contractors" for AI data centers, translating GPU orders into complete, deployable server racks integrated with power, cooling, and networking. 2. **Networking & Connectivity:** AI's scale demands robust high-speed connections. Corning (fiber optics), Nokia (AI-RAN, 6G), and Cisco (data center switches) are gaining importance for enabling efficient data transfer within and between AI clusters. 3. **Storage:** Beyond high-speed memory (HBM/DRAM), the AI data explosion is driving demand for high-capacity hard drives (HDDs) from companies like Western Digital and Seagate to handle training data, logs, and cold storage cost-effectively. For this revaluation to be substantive and not just a narrative, three criteria are key: 1) Concrete AI-related order and revenue growth (e.g., Dell's AI server sales), 2) Upward revisions to company financial guidance, and 3) Sustainable improvements in profit quality, not just top-line revenue spikes. In essence, AI's transition to a real construction phase is re-pricing "old assets" against "new demand." The opportunity, however, is selective. Only those legacy firms that are demonstrably integrated into the capital expenditure chains of data center and enterprise AI deployment are likely to experience a true "logic re-rating" rather than just a temporary valuation bounce.

marsbitHace 4 min(s)

From 'Old Guys' to 'New Favorites': How AI Is Revaluing Old Infrastructure from Dell to Nokia?

marsbitHace 4 min(s)

The Merger of Codex and ChatGPT Marks the Beginning of a Major Reshuffle in Programming Tools

OpenAI is shifting its strategic focus from ChatGPT to Codex, merging them along with the browser tool Atlas into a unified desktop super-app. This move signals an internal belief that Codex, originally a programming tool, represents the next evolution of AI more than conversational models like ChatGPT. Over the past year, Codex's weekly active users have surged past 5 million. The key distinction is that while ChatGPT answers questions, Codex executes tasks. Enterprises increasingly value this ability to get work done over simply receiving advice. Consequently, Codex is attracting professionals beyond developers, including analysts, bankers, marketers, and product managers. OpenAI's reorganization and increased investment in Codex stem from recognizing that the future of AI competition lies in execution capabilities, not just conversation. The company is launching role-specific plugins (e.g., for data analysis, sales, design) to transform Codex into a broad knowledge work platform that automates and redefines white-collar workflows. Beyond being a tool, Codex reflects OpenAI's ambition to redefine software. New features like "Sites"—which generates interactive websites from documents—and collaborative "Annotations" aim to create a paradigm where the AI understands the goal and handles the tools and steps, functioning more like a digital colleague than traditional software. The ultimate goal is a unified experience where the user cares only about the completed task.

marsbitHace 13 min(s)

The Merger of Codex and ChatGPT Marks the Beginning of a Major Reshuffle in Programming Tools

marsbitHace 13 min(s)

Interpreting Investment Opportunities in the Age of Great Navigation, Invesco Great Wall Fund Releases '2026 Report on Chinese Enterprises Going Global'

Invesco Great Wall Fund has released its "2026 China Corporate Globalization Report," titled "The 'Great Navigation Era' of Chinese Enterprises." The report analyzes the new trends and investment opportunities as Chinese companies expand globally, moving from simple product exports to comprehensive overseas operations involving services, branding, and local production. Driven by factors like trade friction, the pursuit of higher profit margins abroad, and policy support, globalization is becoming essential for Chinese companies. The report outlines an evolution: from early product export ("Globalization 1.0") to the current "Globalization 2.0," characterized by overseas capacity, capital goods investment, consumer brand expansion, and service exports. Chinese firms' competitive advantages are highlighted, including a vast engineer talent pool, low-cost and robust infrastructure, and complete industrial clusters. Specific sectors with significant出海 potential are identified: * **Capital Goods** (e.g., engineering machinery, power equipment): Benefiting from global demand, especially in Belt & Road markets and the AI-driven power grid upgrade cycle. * **Consumer Brands**: Transitioning from cost to brand advantage, leveraging供应链 efficiency. * **Technology & Innovation**: Including AI applications, optical modules within global tech supply chains, and new energy vehicles focusing on local production. * **Pharmaceuticals**: Chinese biotech firms are becoming preferred partners for global pharma, with potential for breakthrough drugs in areas like oncology and weight loss. The report concludes that corporate globalization represents a sustained, core theme for China's capital markets, though companies must navigate challenges like geopolitics and localization.

marsbitHace 25 min(s)

Interpreting Investment Opportunities in the Age of Great Navigation, Invesco Great Wall Fund Releases '2026 Report on Chinese Enterprises Going Global'

marsbitHace 25 min(s)

GitHub, Transfixed by AI

On the night of February 9th, GitHub suffered a major outage caused by a simple configuration change—reducing a cache refresh interval from 12 to 2 hours—that triggered a cascade of failures. This was not an isolated event, but part of a broader pattern. In early 2026, GitHub experienced at least 8 major incidents, failing to meet its promised 99.9% availability. These outages stemmed from structural issues: explosive growth in load, tight service coupling, and insufficient protection against abnormal traffic. This unprecedented load is driven by AI Agents. In 2025, GitHub handled ~1 billion commits. By 2026, weekly commits reached 275 million, projecting to ~14 billion for the year—a 14x increase. AI tools like Claude Code now contribute 4.5% of all public repository commits, with weekly submissions surging 25x in just three months. AI-generated pull requests jumped from 4 million to 17 million per month in half a year. Unlike human developers, AI Agents work continuously, generating commits at a scale that overwhelms infrastructure designed for human rhythms. The surge also shattered GitHub's business model. Copilot's flat-rate pricing, based on assisting human developers, became unsustainable as Agentic AI sessions consumed resources worth hundreds of dollars for a few dollars in fees. In response, GitHub imposed usage limits and, by June 1st, shifted to a pay-per-use "AI Credits" system. Facing this new reality, GitHub realized a 10x scaling plan was insufficient. It announced a need to *redesign* its architecture for 30x current scale—decoupling services, adding fault isolation, and improving change management to prevent cascading failures. Other platforms like Stripe and AWS are facing similar challenges with AI Agents. Fundamentally, GitHub is transitioning from a human collaboration platform to an "exhaust pipe" for automated AI workflows. Its detailed post-mortem reports aim to maintain trust during this turbulent rebuild. The February outage was not just a technical glitch, but a signal of the software industry's entry into a new, AI-driven era.

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

GitHub, Transfixed by AI

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片