US banks could soon issue stablecoins under FDIC plan to implement GENIUS Act

cointelegraphPublicado a 2025-12-16Actualizado a 2025-12-16

Resumen

The Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. (FDIC) has proposed a framework allowing regulated U.S. banks to issue payment stablecoins through subsidiaries, as part of implementing the GENIUS Act. The proposal outlines approval requirements, including assessments of financial condition, management quality, and redemption policies. Once approved, the FDIC would serve as the primary regulator. The GENIUS Act, signed into law by President Trump in July, establishes a comprehensive regulatory framework requiring stablecoin issuers to maintain one-to-one reserves with U.S. dollars or other high-quality liquid assets. The legislation is seen as a way to strengthen the U.S. dollar's global reach, with the stablecoin market exceeding $300 billion, largely dominated by dollar-pegged tokens.

The Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. (FDIC) is moving forward with rule-making under the US GENIUS Act by proposing a framework for how regulated banks could apply to issue payment stablecoins, a key early step in implementing the law’s stablecoin provisions.

In a 38-page document posted to the FDIC’s website, the agency detailed proposed approval requirements for the issuance of payment stablecoins by subsidiaries of FDIC-supervised institutions.

As Bloomberg reported, the proposal is subject to a public consultation period before advancing to the next stage of the rulemaking process.

Excerpts from the FDIC’s proposed framework for bank-issued payment stablecoins. Source: FDIC

Under the proposal, banks would apply to issue payment stablecoins through a subsidiary, with the FDIC assessing both the subsidiary and its parent institution against criteria set out in the GENIUS Act. These include the ability to meet stablecoin issuance standards, the institution’s financial condition, management quality, redemption policies and other safety and soundness considerations.

Once approved, the FDIC would serve as the primary federal regulator overseeing the subsidiary’s payment stablecoin activities.

The FDIC is the US agency responsible for insuring bank deposits and supervising member institutions. In recent years, it has taken a more active role in shaping how banks engage with digital assets, including reconsidering the use of reputational risk in bank supervision. As Cointelegraph reported in October, this shift could impact how financial institutions interact with crypto-related businesses.

Related: US stablecoin rules split global liquidity with Europe, CertiK warns

Washington’s historic embrace of stablecoins

The GENIUS Act — short for Guiding and Establishing National Innovation for US Stablecoins — cleared the Senate in June and was signed into law by US President Donald Trump the following month.

The legislation establishes a comprehensive regulatory framework for payment stablecoins, including requirements that issuers maintain one-to-one reserve backing with US dollars or other approved high-quality liquid assets.

US President Donald Trump signed the GENIUS Act on July 18. Source: Associated Press

The GENIUS Act was widely welcomed by the cryptocurrency industry, with senior executives from major companies including Coinbase, Circle, Robinhood and Gemini attending President Donald Trump’s signing of the bill.

Some industry participants view the legislation as a tool to strengthen US dollar liquidity and extend the dollar’s global reach through stablecoins, a view echoed by US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent.

The total value of stablecoins in circulation has climbed above $300 billion globally, driven almost entirely by US dollar-pegged tokens.

Related: Crypto Biz: Corporate stablecoin race heats up with Citi, Western Union at the helm

Lecturas Relacionadas

Can a Hair Dryer Earn $34,000? Deciphering the Reflexivity Paradox in Prediction Markets

An individual manipulated a weather sensor at Paris Charles de Gaulle Airport with a portable heat source, causing a Polymarket weather market to settle at 22°C and earning $34,000. This incident highlights a fundamental issue in prediction markets: when a market aims to reflect reality, it also incentivizes participants to influence that reality. Prediction markets operate on two layers: platform rules (what outcome counts as a win) and data sources (what actually happened). While most focus on rules, the real vulnerability lies in the data source. If reality is recorded through a specific source, influencing that source directly affects market settlement. The article categorizes markets by their vulnerability: 1. **Single-point physical data sources** (e.g., weather stations): Easily manipulated through physical interference. 2. **Insider information markets** (e.g., MrBeast video details): Insiders like team members use non-public information to trade. Kalshi fined a剪辑师 $20,000 for insider trading. 3. **Actor-manipulated markets** (e.g., Andrew Tate’s tweet counts): The subject of the market can control the outcome. Evidence suggests Tate’sociated accounts coordinated to profit. 4. **Individual-action markets** (e.g., WNBA disruptions): A single person can execute an event to profit from their pre-placed bets. Kalshi and Polymarket handle these issues differently. Kalshi enforces strict KYC, publicly penalizes insider trading, and reports to regulators. Polymarket, with its anonymous wallet-based system, has historically been more permissive, arguing that insider information improves market accuracy. However, it cooperated with authorities in the "Van Dyke case," where a user traded on classified government information. The core paradox is reflexivity: prediction markets are designed to discover truth, but their financial incentives can distort reality. The more valuable a prediction becomes, the more likely participants are to influence the event itself. The market ceases to be a mirror of reality and instead shapes it.

marsbitHace 41 min(s)

Can a Hair Dryer Earn $34,000? Deciphering the Reflexivity Paradox in Prediction Markets

marsbitHace 41 min(s)

First Day Review of "Musk's WeChat" XChat: Even Worse Than Expected

Elon Musk's much-anticipated "WeChat-like" app, XChat, has officially launched after multiple delays. The initial review reveals a product that falls short of expectations, offering an experience largely similar to X Platform's (formerly Twitter) direct messages, despite being marketed as an encrypted communication tool. Key observations from the first-day test include: 1. The app's promoted "end-to-end encryption" and its claimed relation to Bitcoin's architecture were criticized by experts as a superficial attempt to capitalize on crypto buzz, with no real technical connection. 2. Musk's vision of an ad-free "secure communication system" is technically met, but only because the app is currently extremely basic, featuring only a single chat interface. 3. A promised anti-screenshot feature appears inconsistent; it works in X Platform group chats but fails within the XChat app itself, where screenshots still capture avatars. 4. The app supports 45 languages and has a 16+ age rating, indicating a broader tolerance for content compared to WeChat's 13+ rating. 5. A puzzling login process requires users to verify the email associated with their X account. 6. The touted encryption" feels minimal in practice, with its presence only indicated by a simple "Encrypted - Yes" label on messages. 7. Disappearing message timers for groups can be set from 5 minutes to 4 weeks, with the timer starting upon being read by a user. 8. Group invite links are shared with X Platform groups. 9. Group size limits are planned to be increased, aiming for 1000 members, a move that has drawn user criticism. 10. The app offers 8 different colored icons, and its chat bubbles are notably similar to WeChat's. Message deletion options mimic Telegram's. Crucially, many pre-announced features like importing X contacts, integrating Grok AI, X Money payments, and Cashtags are not yet available. The initial release is seen as a bare-bones and underwhelming first step.

Odaily星球日报Hace 1 hora(s)

First Day Review of "Musk's WeChat" XChat: Even Worse Than Expected

Odaily星球日报Hace 1 hora(s)

Trading

Spot
Futuros

Artículos destacados

Cómo comprar SOON

¡Bienvenido a HTX.com! Hemos hecho que comprar SOON (SOON) sea simple y conveniente. Sigue nuestra guía paso a paso para iniciar tu viaje de criptos.Paso 1: crea tu cuenta HTXUtiliza tu correo electrónico o número de teléfono para registrarte y obtener una cuenta gratuita en HTX. Experimenta un proceso de registro sin complicaciones y desbloquea todas las funciones.Obtener mi cuentaPaso 2: ve a Comprar cripto y elige tu método de pagoTarjeta de crédito/débito: usa tu Visa o Mastercard para comprar SOON (SOON) al instante.Saldo: utiliza fondos del saldo de tu cuenta HTX para tradear sin problemas.Terceros: hemos agregado métodos de pago populares como Google Pay y Apple Pay para mejorar la comodidad.P2P: tradear directamente con otros usuarios en HTX.Over-the-Counter (OTC): ofrecemos servicios personalizados y tipos de cambio competitivos para los traders.Paso 3: guarda tu SOON (SOON)Después de comprar tu SOON (SOON), guárdalo en tu cuenta HTX. Alternativamente, puedes enviarlo a otro lugar mediante transferencia blockchain o utilizarlo para tradear otras criptomonedas.Paso 4: tradear SOON (SOON)Tradear fácilmente con SOON (SOON) en HTX's mercado spot. Simplemente accede a tu cuenta, selecciona tu par de trading, ejecuta tus trades y monitorea en tiempo real. Ofrecemos una experiencia fácil de usar tanto para principiantes como para traders experimentados.

131 Vistas totalesPublicado en 2025.05.23Actualizado en 2025.05.23

Cómo comprar SOON

Discusiones

Bienvenido a la comunidad de HTX. Aquí puedes mantenerte informado sobre los últimos desarrollos de la plataforma y acceder a análisis profesionales del mercado. A continuación se presentan las opiniones de los usuarios sobre el precio de SOON (SOON).

活动图片