Trust Wallet Launches Address Poisoning Protection

TheNewsCryptoPublicado a 2026-03-10Actualizado a 2026-03-10

Resumen

Trust Wallet has launched a new security feature called Address Poisoning Protection to safeguard users from a common crypto scam. The tool, available on mobile across over 32 EVM chains, scans transactions in real-time to detect fraudulent addresses and alerts users before they send funds. It uses intelligence from HashDit and Binance Security to identify known scam addresses and provides a side-by-side comparison to highlight differences. This initiative responds to the rising threat of address poisoning, where scammers send small transactions from similar-looking addresses to trick users. Trust Wallet estimates 34,000 such attacks occur hourly, targeting millions. The feature builds on the wallet’s existing security stack, including a transaction-risk tool introduced in 2023. Other platforms like Ledger Live and Safe also offer similar protections against this growing threat.

Trust Wallet has rolled out a new security feature to safeguard users from a common type of crypto scam known as address poisoning. The feature will be accessible on Trust Wallet for mobile over 32 EVM chains, with extra chains planned.

As per the publication, the new Trust Address Poisoning Protection will instinctively scan user transactions to detect false addresses and alert users before any false funds are sent, a scam that comprises sending small transactions from similar wallet addresses to trick users into copying the wrong place.

The tool will leverage aggregated intelligence from HashDit and Binance Security to verify known scam and similar addresses. It will also make a side-by-side comparison to show where the addresses differ.

The chief executive officer of Trust Wallet, Felix Fan, mentioned that the threat is made to be invisible: a few characters buried in the middle of a long string, easy to miss and expensive to ignore.

Others To Permit Automatic Transaction

Address Poisoning Protection is the response to that reality: automatic, real-time alerts that offer users the information they need before they act. Chainalysis has reported recently that around $17 billion was lost to crypto scams in 2025, mainly influenced by the rise of AI-enabled impersonation tactics.

Trust Wallet is not the sole entity to permit automatic transaction protections. Ledger Live, for instance, provides “clear signing” to give complete transaction details along with a whitelisting option for trusted addresses.

Safe, which also provides some address poisoning safeguarding, mentioned that this form of “spoofing” is comparatively new and has been a surging issue in the past few years. Security firm Cyvers mentioned that it has been finding over 1 million address-poisoning preparations per day on Ethereum, while Trust approximates 34,000 attacks occur every hour, aiming at 17 million victims, as per the spokesperson.

For its part, Trust Wallet mentions Address Poisoning Protection is set to be made on its current security stack, comprising a transaction-level risk tool launched in 2023.

Highlighted Crypto News Today:

Nasdaq Collaboration Targets Pan-European Tokenized Securities Trading and Settlement

Preguntas relacionadas

QWhat is the new security feature launched by Trust Wallet and what does it protect against?

ATrust Wallet has launched a new security feature called Address Poisoning Protection to safeguard users from a common type of crypto scam known as address poisoning.

QHow does the Address Poisoning Protection feature work to alert users?

AThe feature instinctively scans user transactions to detect false addresses and alerts users before any false funds are sent. It makes a side-by-side comparison to show where the addresses differ.

QWhich security firms' intelligence does the new Trust Wallet tool leverage?

AThe tool leverages aggregated intelligence from HashDit and Binance Security to verify known scam and similar addresses.

QAccording to the article, how many address-poisoning attacks does Trust Wallet estimate occur every hour?

ATrust Wallet approximates that 34,000 address-poisoning attacks occur every hour.

QBesides Trust Wallet, name another entity mentioned that provides automatic transaction protection.

ALedger Live is another entity that provides automatic transaction protections, such as 'clear signing' and a whitelisting option for trusted addresses.

Lecturas Relacionadas

CLARITY Act: Banking Trade Groups Push For Yield Agreement Revision – Details

US banking trade groups are urging revisions to the stablecoin yield compromise in the upcoming CLARITY Act ahead of a key committee markup. The Act currently aims to ban all passive, deposit-like interest on stablecoins to prevent competition with traditional bank savings, while allowing rewards tied to active uses like staking or transactions. In a letter, groups including the American Banking Association and Bank Policy Institute proposed stricter language to eliminate perceived loopholes for passive yield and prevent deposit flight from banks. However, these efforts are reportedly viewed as minor by some lawmakers. The Senate Banking Committee is scheduled to mark up the bill on May 14, a critical step before it can advance through Congress.

bitcoinistHace 11 hora(s)

CLARITY Act: Banking Trade Groups Push For Yield Agreement Revision – Details

bitcoinistHace 11 hora(s)

This Finance CEO Picks Solana Instead Of Bitcoin — Here’s Why

Finance CEO Raoul Pal prefers Solana over Bitcoin, citing its high throughput and low transaction costs as better suited for the future crypto-AI era. He believes Solana is ideal for machine-to-machine microtransactions and AI-driven DeFi activity, predicting AI agents will soon dominate DeFi users. While Bitcoin serves as a store of value, Pal sees higher growth in networks built for mass, automated transactions. This view was highlighted at Consensus 2026, where AI integration and crypto infrastructure were key themes.

bitcoinistHace 12 hora(s)

This Finance CEO Picks Solana Instead Of Bitcoin — Here’s Why

bitcoinistHace 12 hora(s)

Gensyn AI: Don't Let AI Repeat the Mistakes of the Internet

In recent months, the rapid growth of the AI industry has attracted significant talent from the crypto sector. A persistent question among researchers intersecting both fields is whether blockchain can become a foundational part of AI infrastructure. While many previous AI and Crypto projects focused on application layers (like AI Agents, on-chain reasoning, data markets, and compute rentals), few achieved viable commercial models. Gensyn differentiates itself by targeting the most critical and expensive layer of AI: model training. Gensyn aims to organize globally distributed GPU resources into an open AI training network. Developers can submit training tasks, nodes provide computational power, and the network verifies results while distributing incentives. The core issue addressed is not decentralization for its own sake, but the increasing centralization of compute power among tech giants. In the era of large models, access to GPUs (like the H100) has become a decisive bottleneck, dictating the pace of AI development. Major AI companies are heavily dependent on large cloud providers for compute resources. Gensyn's approach is significant for several reasons: 1) It operates at the core infrastructure layer (model training), the most resource-intensive and technically demanding part of the AI value chain. 2) It proposes a more open, collaborative model for compute, potentially increasing resource utilization by dynamically pooling idle GPUs, similar to early cloud computing logic. 3) Its technical moat lies in solving complex challenges like verifying training results, ensuring node honesty, and maintaining reliability in a distributed environment—making it more of a deep-tech infrastructure company. 4) It targets a validated, high-growth market with genuine demand, rather than pursuing blockchain integration without purpose. Ultimately, the boundaries between Crypto and AI are blurring. AI requires global resource coordination, incentive mechanisms, and collaborative systems—areas where crypto-native solutions excel. Gensyn represents a step toward making advanced training capabilities more accessible and collaborative, moving beyond a niche controlled by a few giants. If successful, it could evolve into a fundamental piece of AI infrastructure, where the most enduring value in the AI era is often created.

marsbitHace 12 hora(s)

Gensyn AI: Don't Let AI Repeat the Mistakes of the Internet

marsbitHace 12 hora(s)

Why is China's AI Developing So Fast? The Answer Lies Inside the Labs

A US researcher's visit to China's top AI labs reveals distinct cultural and organizational factors driving China's rapid AI development. While talent, data, and compute are similar to the West, Chinese labs excel through a pragmatic, execution-focused culture: less emphasis on individual stardom and conceptual debate, and more on teamwork, engineering optimization, and mastering the full tech stack. A key advantage is the integration of young students and researchers who approach model-building with fresh perspectives and low ego, prioritizing collective progress over personal credit. This contrasts with the US culture of self-promotion and "star scientist" narratives. Chinese labs also exhibit a strong "build, don't buy" mentality, preferring to develop core capabilities—like data pipelines and environments—in-house rather than relying on external services. The ecosystem feels more collaborative than tribal, with mutual respect among labs. While government support exists, its scale is unclear, and technical decisions appear driven by labs, not state mandates. Chinese companies across sectors, from platforms to consumer tech, are building their own foundational models to control their tech destiny, reflecting a broader cultural drive for technological sovereignty. Demand for AI is emerging, with spending patterns potentially mirroring cloud infrastructure more than traditional SaaS. Despite challenges like a less mature data industry and GPU shortages, Chinese labs are propelled by vast talent, rapid iteration, and deep integration with the open-source community. The competition is evolving beyond a pure model race into a contest of organizational execution, developer ecosystems, and industrial pragmatism.

marsbitHace 14 hora(s)

Why is China's AI Developing So Fast? The Answer Lies Inside the Labs

marsbitHace 14 hora(s)

3 Years, 5 Times: The Rebirth of a Century-Old Glass Factory

Corning, a 175-year-old glass company, is experiencing a dramatic revival as a key player in AI infrastructure, driven by surging demand for high-performance optical fiber in data centers. AI data centers require vastly more fiber than traditional ones—5 to 10 times as much per rack—to handle high-speed data transmission between GPUs. This structural demand shift, coupled with supply constraints from the lengthy expansion cycle for fiber preforms, has created a significant supply-demand gap. Nvidia has invested in Corning, along with Lumentum and Coherent, in a $4.5 billion total commitment to secure the optical supply chain for AI. Corning's competitive edge lies in its expertise in producing ultra-low-loss, high-density, and bend-resistant specialty fiber, which is critical for 800G+ and future 1.6T data rates. Its deep involvement in co-packaged optics (CPO) with partners like Nvidia further solidifies its position. While not the largest fiber manufacturer globally, Corning's revenue from enterprise/data center clients now exceeds 40% of its optical communications sales, and it has secured multi-year supply agreements with major hyperscalers including Meta and Nvidia. Financially, Corning's optical communications revenue has surged, doubling from $1.3 billion in 2023 to over $3 billion in 2025. Its stock price has risen nearly 6-fold since late 2023. Key future catalysts include the rollout of Nvidia's CPO products and the scale of undisclosed customer agreements. However, risks include high current valuations and potential disruption from next-generation technologies like hollow-core fiber. The company's long-term bet on light over electricity, maintained even through the telecom bubble crash, is now being validated by the AI boom.

marsbitHace 14 hora(s)

3 Years, 5 Times: The Rebirth of a Century-Old Glass Factory

marsbitHace 14 hora(s)

Trading

Spot

Futuros