Treasury Urges Agreement Between Crypto Firms and Banks to Advance CLARITY Act

TheNewsCryptoPublicado a 2026-02-10Actualizado a 2026-02-10

Resumen

Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent is urging crypto firms, banks, and lawmakers to compromise to advance the stalled Clarity Act. With the bill stuck in the Senate, he emphasized that waiting for a perfect law is unrealistic and risks U.S. innovation and global crypto leadership. This push comes ahead of a crucial White House meeting. A key debate centers on whether stablecoin companies should pay users interest. Banks fear this could drain deposits and weaken the traditional system, while crypto firms argue yield is essential for competition. Another contentious issue is crypto firms' limited access to the Federal Reserve's payment system. If no agreement is reached, lawmakers may delay the vote again, creating market uncertainty, despite former President Trump's goal of making the U.S. the "crypto capital of the world."

Scott Bessent, the Treasury Secretary, is pushing the crypto firm, banks, and lawmakers to stop fighting and find a compromise so that the Clarity Act can be moved forward. His statements have come right before the key White House meeting.

Right now, the bill has been stuck in the Senate, and crypto firms and banks met last week but failed to agree. So another meeting is scheduled today to try again. Bessent made it clear that waiting for the perfect law is not realistic, and it could create uncertainty and slow innovation in the U.S.

Scott Bessent’s reply to Brian Armstrong’s statement

Brian Armstrong, CEO of Coinbase, has argued that it may be better not to have a bill instead of passing the bill that creates the problem. Scott disagrees with his statements, and he believes that some regulations are better than none. He warned that a few groups refusing to compromise could prevent the U.S. from becoming a global crypto leader.

Key issue for the Debate

One of the most sensitive issues is whether the stablecoin companies pay users interest. Banks worry that if the stablecoins offer yield, then people would start moving money out of the bank deposit, and this could weaken the traditional banking system. On the other hand, crypto companies argue that yield helps them to compete, and users expect returns similar to those of savings products. Another topic is limited access for the crypto firms to the payment system run by the Federal Reserve. This created more tension between the crypto firms and banks.

Today’s meeting is so crucial and could decide whether the bill moves forward and how stablecoins will work in the U.S. with clearer operating rules for the companies. If no agreement is reached, then the lawmakers may delay the vote again. The analyst says that this would affect the market and create uncertainty. President Donald Trump has repeatedly said that he wants the nation to be the “crypto capital of the world.”

Highlighted Crypto News:

Telegram Moves Toward Built-In Crypto Payments With TON Pay Launch

TagsClarity ACTCrypto

Preguntas relacionadas

QWhat is the main purpose of the Treasury Secretary's push for compromise between crypto firms and banks?

AThe Treasury Secretary is pushing for compromise to advance the CLARITY Act, which has been stuck in the Senate, to prevent uncertainty and avoid slowing innovation in the U.S. crypto sector.

QHow does Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent's view differ from Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong's regarding the proposed legislation?

AScott Bessent believes some regulation is better than none and warns that refusing to pass a bill could prevent the U.S. from becoming a global crypto leader, while Brian Armstrong argues it may be better to have no bill than to pass a problematic one.

QWhat is one key issue causing debate between banks and crypto companies regarding stablecoins?

AA key issue is whether stablecoin companies should pay users interest, with banks worrying this could draw deposits away from traditional banks and weaken the banking system, while crypto firms argue yield helps them compete and meet user expectations.

QWhy is the meeting mentioned in the article considered crucial?

AThe meeting is crucial because it could determine whether the CLARITY Act moves forward and establish clearer operating rules for stablecoins in the U.S.; failure to reach an agreement may lead to further delays in voting and create market uncertainty.

QWhat has been President Donald Trump's stated goal regarding cryptocurrency in the U.S.?

APresident Donald Trump has repeatedly stated that he wants the United States to become the 'crypto capital of the world.'

Lecturas Relacionadas

Those Pre-Bitcoin PoW Protocols Have Recently Been Reimplemented

This article details a recent surge in replicating pre-Bitcoin Proof-of-Work (PoW) protocols, specifically focusing on Hal Finney's 2004 RPOW (Reusable Proofs of Work). Within five days in May 2026, multiple independent builders in the Bitcoin/cypherpunk community launched projects inspired by this early electronic cash proposal. The initiative began with Fred Krueger's `rpow2.com`, a centralized but auditable system that replaced RPOW's original IBM 4758 hardware with Ed25519 signatures. Initially a faithful replica, it later adopted Bitcoin-like features (21M supply cap, difficulty adjustment) and a controversial 5.24% founder allocation. This sparked rapid forks, including `rpow4.com` which incorporated full Bitcoin parameters, a prediction market (`rpowmarket.com`), and a DEX (`rpow2swap.com`). Concurrently, Mike In Space created a prototype of Wei Dai's 1998 b-money proposal (`b-money.replit.app`), pushing the historical exploration even further back. The article contrasts these centralized, server-dependent experiments with Bitcoin's core innovation of decentralized, trustless consensus. It also highlights a parallel development: the `HASH` project on Ethereum, which uses smart contract hooks to enable a purely fair-launch, browser-mineable PoW token with 0% allocations to team or VCs. The collective activity is framed as a meme-driven, educational exploration of cypherpunk history rather than a serious financial movement, with all projects heavily disclaiming any investment value.

marsbitHace 5 min(s)

Those Pre-Bitcoin PoW Protocols Have Recently Been Reimplemented

marsbitHace 5 min(s)

South Korean Exchanges 'Battle' Regulators, Challenging the Boundaries of Enforcement and Legislation

South Korea's cryptocurrency industry is engaged in a rare, direct confrontation with regulators. The Financial Intelligence Unit (FIU), the primary anti-money laundering (AML) watchdog, has recently imposed heavy penalties on major exchanges like Upbit and Bithumb for alleged violations involving unregistered overseas VASPs and AML procedures. However, exchanges are now actively challenging these actions in court and through industry associations. In a significant shift, the Seoul Administrative Court ruled in favor of Upbit's operator, Dunamu, overturning part of an FIU-ordered business suspension. The court found the FIU's penalty criteria and justification insufficiently clear. Similarly, the court suspended the enforcement of a six-month business suspension against Bithumb pending a final ruling, citing potential irreversible harm to the exchange. Beyond legal battles, the industry is contesting proposed legislative amendments. The Digital Asset eXchange Alliance (DAXA) strongly opposes a draft rule that would mandate Suspicious Transaction Reports (STRs) for all crypto transfers over 10 million KRW (~$6,800). DAXA argues this "poison pill" clause violates legal principles and would overwhelm the STR system, increasing reports from 63,000 to an estimated 5.45 million annually for major exchanges, thereby crippling effective AML monitoring. This conflict highlights a structural tension in South Korea's crypto governance: comprehensive digital asset laws are still developing, while regulators rely heavily on AML enforcement. The industry's move from passive compliance to active legal and legislative challenges signifies a new phase, pressing for clearer rules and more proportionate enforcement. While short-term disputes may intensify, this clash could ultimately lead to a more mature and sustainable regulatory framework for South Korea's vibrant crypto market.

marsbitHace 58 min(s)

South Korean Exchanges 'Battle' Regulators, Challenging the Boundaries of Enforcement and Legislation

marsbitHace 58 min(s)

After 50x Storage Surge, Justin Sun Always Looks to the Next Decade

Sun Yuchen, known for his controversial stunts like a $30 million lunch with Warren Buffett (canceled due to a kidney stone) and eating a $6.2 million duct-taped banana, is often overshadowed by a significant fact: his decade-long track record of spotting major investment trends. In 2016, he famously advised young people to invest in Bitcoin, Nvidia, Tesla, and Tencent instead of buying property. A hypothetical $20,000 investment in Nvidia and Tesla from that list would now be worth over 50 million RMB. His latest major call was on November 6, 2025, predicting a "50x storage opportunity" tied to the AI boom, which materialized with Sandisk's stock surging nearly 50-fold by 2026. Looking ahead, Sun now focuses on the next frontier: Physical AI. He identifies four key areas: 1. **Embodied AI/Robotics**: He sees this reaching its "iPhone moment," with companies like UBTech and Galaxy General leading in commercialization. 2. **Drones**: Viewed as the first commercially viable form of Physical AI, revolutionizing sectors from warfare (e.g., AeroVironment's Switchblade) to logistics. 3. **Spatial Computing**: Beyond VR, it's about AI understanding physical space, a foundational technology for robotics and autonomous systems, exemplified by Apple's Vision Pro. 4. **Space Exploration**: After a 2025 suborbital flight with Blue Origin, Sun advocates for space as the ultimate frontier, discussing blockchain's potential role in space asset management and data transactions. His investment philosophy involves betting on entire, inevitable trends rather than single companies. For robotics, he sees Tesla (the body/manufacturer) and Nvidia (the brain/AI platform) as complementary plays. In defense drones, he highlights companies making tanks obsolete (AeroVironment) and those augmenting fighter jets (Kratos). For space, he participated in Blue Origin's flight and anticipates SpaceX's potential IPO to redefine the sector's valuation. Sun Yuchen's vision frames the next two decades not as a revolution in information flow (like the internet), but in the fundamental operation of the physical world through AI-powered robots, autonomous systems, and spatial intelligence, ultimately extending human and AI activity into space. While many still focus on conventional assets, he continues to look toward the next technological horizon.

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

After 50x Storage Surge, Justin Sun Always Looks to the Next Decade

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

The Billionaires Behind the Most Expensive Midterm Election in History

"The Most Expensive Midterm Elections and Their Billionaire Backers" This analysis details the unprecedented scale of spending in the 2026 midterm elections, highlighting the key billionaire donors shaping the political landscape. Jeff Yass, founder of Susquehanna International Group, has contributed over $81 million, ranking third among individual donors behind George Soros ($102.6M) and Elon Musk ($84.8M). Yass is a major donor to Trump's MAGA Inc. and supports school choice and various candidates. Overall, federal committees have raised over $4.7 billion this cycle, with political ad spending projected to reach $10.8 billion. Republican-aligned groups are significantly out-raising their Democratic counterparts. "Dark money" from undisclosed sources continues to grow. The core stakes involve control of Congress and policy direction for Trump's final term. Donors are also motivated by specific issues: Sergey Brin and Chris Larsen are funding opposition to a proposed California wealth tax and supporting crypto-friendly policies. Other top donors include OpenAI's Greg Brockman and his wife Anna ($50M total to MAGA Inc. and an AI-focused PAC), Richard Uihlein ($45.3M to conservative causes), venture capitalists Marc Andreessen and Ben Horowitz (each over $44M to crypto/AI PACs and MAGA Inc.), Miriam Adelson ($42.6M to GOP leadership PACs), Paul Singer ($33.9M), and Diane Hendricks ($25.8M to MAGA Inc.). The article notes that the peak fundraising period is still ahead, with major primaries approaching.

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

The Billionaires Behind the Most Expensive Midterm Election in History

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片