The GENIUS Act can drain $6.6T from U.S. banks – THIS is how

ambcryptoPublicado a 2026-01-08Actualizado a 2026-01-08

Resumen

The GENIUS Act of 2025 has drawn sharp criticism from major U.S. banks, warning it could drain $6.6 trillion from the banking system due to a regulatory loophole. Banking groups, including the Bank Policy Institute, argue that the act prohibits stablecoin issuers from paying interest but allows crypto affiliate companies to offer high yields, effectively acting as shadow banks. This could trigger massive migration of deposits away from traditional banks, potentially restricting credit access for mortgages and business loans. Critics like Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene also opposed the act, fearing it enables a central bank digital currency (CBDC). As the stablecoin market grows—now valued at $317.8 billion—the yield loophole drives adoption. Closing it may reduce stablecoins’ appeal as high-return investments and revert them to payment tools, posing a critical question: whether Congress will act to eliminate this risk or allow crypto shadow banking to persist.

The ink is barely dry on the GENIUS Act of 2025, but a massive crack has already appeared, with the nation’s largest lenders claiming that the act could drain $6.6 trillion from the U.S. banking system.

In a letter to Congress on the 6th of January, the Bank Policy Institute (BPI) and a coalition of powerful banking groups issued a warning.

The letter highlighted a major loophole in the new stablecoin rules, one that lets crypto exchanges operate like high-yield shadow banks.

The chaos around the GENIUS Act

The GENIUS Act bans stablecoin issuers from paying interest, but banks say their affiliate companies are dodging the rule by offering yields that regular savings accounts could never match.

This has sparked fears of a major shift in how Americans store their money.

If stablecoins turn from a payment tool into a high-interest investment, the BPI warns it could trigger a deposit migration.

Such a shift wouldn’t just hurt bank balance sheets.

It could cut off credit to Main Street, making mortgages, business loans, and farm financing harder to get.

The tension isn’t new

During the floor debates leading up to the act’s passage in July 2025, Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene emerged as a vocal critic, though for vastly different reasons.

She said,

“Back in July, I voted NO on the GENIUS Act because it contained a back door to a central bank digital currency (CBDC).”

Greene added,

“I support crypto but I will never support giving the government the ability to turn off your ability to have full control of your money and to buy and sell.”

And, to date, the loopholes seem not to have been addressed.

Recently, providing clarity on the GENIUS Act, Douglas Holtz-Eakin, president of the American Action Forum, noted,

“The problem with a GENIUS Act-like approach is that it is focused only on stablecoins, providing no way to balance competition between stablecoins and other payment mechanisms.”

However, as a solution, he further added,

“A better approach would have a comprehensive approach to regulation, i.e., a Clarity Act, and seek to put all traditional and digital payments and assets on a level playing field and let the chips fall where they may.”

Stablecoin market dynamics

Meanwhile, the total stablecoin market cap surged to $317.8 billion, dominated by Tether (USDT) and Circle’s USDC.

For perspective, USDT alone commanded a market cap of roughly $187 billion, while USDC has seen an aggressive 73% growth over the last year, reaching $75 billion.

As stablecoins continue to grow, the yield loophole has become their main driver of adoption, but closing it could trigger a major shift.

If Congress blocks exchanges from offering interest or rewards, stablecoins may lose their appeal as high-return savings alternatives and be forced back into their original role as simple payment tools.

Thus, this warning signals that crypto’s shadow-banking era is nearing its end, leaving one pressing question: if the rewards vanish, does the $317 billion stay?


Final Thoughts

  • The stablecoin loophole has officially escalated from a regulatory oversight to a systemic risk that banks can no longer ignore.
  • With $317 billion already parked in stablecoins, Congress must decide whether to shut the loophole or risk letting the crypto shadow banking system remain.

Preguntas relacionadas

QWhat is the main concern raised by the Bank Policy Institute (BPI) regarding the GENIUS Act?

AThe BPI warns that a loophole in the GENIUS Act could drain $6.6 trillion from the U.S. banking system by allowing crypto exchanges to operate like high-yield shadow banks, potentially triggering a massive deposit migration.

QHow are affiliate companies of banks reportedly circumventing the GENIUS Act's ban on stablecoin issuers paying interest?

AAffiliate companies are dodging the rule by offering yields on stablecoins that regular savings accounts could never match, effectively turning stablecoins into high-interest investments.

QWhat was one of Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene's primary reasons for voting against the GENIUS Act?

ARep. Greene voted against the act because she believed it contained a back door to a central bank digital currency (CBDC), which she opposes as it could give the government the ability to control individuals' money.

QAccording to Douglas Holtz-Eakin, what is the fundamental problem with the GENIUS Act's approach to regulation?

AHe stated that the problem is it focuses only on stablecoins and provides no way to balance competition between stablecoins and other payment mechanisms, advocating instead for a comprehensive 'Clarity Act' to create a level playing field.

QWhat is the potential consequence for the stablecoin market if Congress closes the loophole allowing exchanges to offer interest or rewards?

AIf Congress blocks exchanges from offering interest, stablecoins could lose their appeal as high-return savings alternatives and be forced back into their original role as simple payment tools, potentially destabilizing the $317 billion market.

Lecturas Relacionadas

Billions in USDT Flee Korea. Police Powerless in the Fight Against Money Laundering

South Korea is facing a severe and rapidly escalating challenge with crypto-based money laundering. Police data shows cases surged 152-fold in the first half of 2026 compared to all of 2025, with laundering now constituting 79.4% of all detected crypto-related crimes. The primary method is the "Hwanchigi" scheme, which uses cryptocurrency transfers to move illicit funds overseas, bypassing the regulated banking system. Tether (USDT) is the preferred vehicle for converting proceeds from drug trafficking, illegal gambling, and phishing into dollars before moving them to offshore exchanges. Despite enhanced monitoring and enforcement efforts, a stark gap exists between detection and prosecution. While authorities tracked and blocked millions in illegal assets in high-profile cases, arrests have lagged dramatically. In the first half of 2026, only 18 arrests were made despite over 1,200 detected cases. Customs seized approximately $4.92 billion in illegal foreign exchange operations, with over 90% of crypto-related crimes for prosecution flowing through unlicensed channels. The situation highlights a systemic disconnect: blockchain analytics can track transactions nearly in real-time, but the judicial process moves slowly. This asymmetry raises questions about whether detection statistics alone are a meaningful measure of effectiveness in combating money laundering, as the low cost and high speed of these schemes allow criminal networks to scale faster than law enforcement can respond.

cryptonews.ruHace 9 min(s)

Billions in USDT Flee Korea. Police Powerless in the Fight Against Money Laundering

cryptonews.ruHace 9 min(s)

The $6.4 Billion CRO Accumulation Plan of Trump Media Group Falls Apart

A $6.4 billion plan to create a publicly-listed CRO treasury company, announced a year ago by Trump Media & Technology Group (DJT), Crypto.com, and SPAC Yorkville, has been terminated. The ambitious deal, which aimed to accumulate approximately 6.3 billion CRO tokens (nearly 20% of supply at the time), never progressed beyond a framework agreement. Related plans for a prediction market integrated into Truth Social and ETF custody services by Crypto.com were also shelved, scaled back to a simple marketing partnership. The collaboration followed significant political alignment, with Crypto.com donating to Trump's inauguration and a pro-Trump super PAC, and its CEO meeting with Trump. The SEC also closed an investigation into the exchange shortly before the deal was announced, raising conflict-of-interest concerns. Officially, the termination was attributed to an unfavorable market environment. CRO's price has fallen roughly 70% since the announcement, and the broader market for publicly-traded digital asset treasuries has cooled significantly, with Bitcoin nearly halving from its late-2025 peak. The only completed transaction from the 2025 agreements remains intact: Trump Media's ~$105 million CRO purchase and Crypto.com's $50 million purchase of DJT stock. The termination aligns with DJT's strategic pivot away from crypto; the company is now pursuing a multi-billion dollar all-stock merger with nuclear fusion firm TAE Technologies, shifting its focus to clean energy.

marsbitHace 24 min(s)

The $6.4 Billion CRO Accumulation Plan of Trump Media Group Falls Apart

marsbitHace 24 min(s)

Tiger Research: The $43 Million Gray Area of Asian Prediction Markets

Tiger Research: Asia's $43 Million Grey Zone in Prediction Markets Western jurisdictions have created regulatory pathways for prediction markets through derivatives law (like the U.S. CFTC framework) or flexible gambling licenses (like the UK's "betting intermediary" category). In contrast, Asia lacks a comparable regulatory architecture. The absence of a general gambling license framework adaptable to private operators, coupled with closed financial product definitions (e.g., positive lists of assets in Korea and Japan), leaves prediction markets in a regulatory grey area. This lack of a clear classification—whether as gambling, financial derivatives, or a novel third category—has not stopped market activity. Significant liquidity, evidenced by over $52 million tied to a single South Korean election, flows to offshore platforms. However, this results in forgone tax revenue (estimated at $4-43 million annually per major Asian market), no consumer protection, and no oversight for market integrity. The core issue is not cultural opposition to gambling, which exists legally in many Asian markets, but a missing institutional design. Without a deliberate regulatory pathway, authorities are left with suboptimal options: expanding criminal sanctions or blocking access, which fail to address the underlying economic activity or achieve key policy goals. Establishing a regulatory foundation requires initiating a formal public discourse to first define prediction markets' legal status and societal value, a foundational step that has yet to occur in most Asian jurisdictions.

marsbitHace 34 min(s)

Tiger Research: The $43 Million Gray Area of Asian Prediction Markets

marsbitHace 34 min(s)

Trading

Spot
活动图片