GSR Market Director: Nearly 70% of DAO Treasuries Are Betting on Their Own Tokens; When the Bull Market Ends, It's a Triple Blow

marsbitPublicado a 2026-08-10Actualizado a 2026-08-10

Resumen

A GSR market executive highlights a critical vulnerability in DAO treasury management: nearly 70% of DAO treasury assets remain concentrated in their own native tokens. This creates a structurally pro-cyclical risk where, during a market downturn, protocols face a triple threat: plummeting treasury value, sharp declines in protocol revenue, and collapsing on-chain activity simultaneously. The article observes that projects typically seek downside protection too late, when volatility and option costs are already high. It advocates for proactive treasury structuring, separating operational reserves (in stable assets) from longer-term holdings and employing hedging strategies like zero-cost collars to lock in a value floor without selling tokens. This approach, establishing risk management policies before markets weaken, is presented as key to preserving operational runway and continuing development through bear cycles. GSR positions itself as a provider of OTC execution, structured derivatives, and treasury risk management solutions for foundations and DAOs.

Author: GSR (Spencer Hallarn)

Compiled by: Deep Tide TechFlow

Deep Tide Guide: The fatal flaw in DAO treasury management is being exposed—most assets are concentrated in native tokens. Once the market turns, the protocol will face a triple blow of plummeting token prices, sharply reduced revenue, and collapsing on-chain activity. Spencer Hallarn, Global Head of Markets at GSR, breaks down the survival rules after the bull market recedes, which is extremely important for everyone holding DAO tokens or participating in protocol governance.

Nearly 70% of DAO treasury assets remain concentrated in native tokens, structurally exposing protocols to the simultaneous decline of treasury value, revenue, and on-chain activity.

Key Takeaways

  • The industry remains highly concentrated. Nearly 70% of DAO treasury assets are held in native tokens, leaving many projects facing a single source of risk during downturns.
  • Crypto treasuries are structurally pro-cyclical. Because most projects keep the majority of their reserves in their own tokens, their treasury value, protocol revenue, and market activity tend to decline simultaneously.
  • Projects always hedge too late. Our OTC desk observes a surge in demand for downside protection after price drops, at which point option premiums have already risen, and any floor price set by projects is far below the token's starting point.
  • Protection does not require selling. Collar strategies pay for downside protection by giving up some upside potential rather than consuming stablecoins, allowing projects to maintain both their positions and operational reserves.
  • Treasury structure is more important than timing. Separating operational reserves from long-term holdings and establishing risk management policies before market conditions deteriorate can extend the operational runway.
  • GSR is an active participant in the crypto treasury and risk management market. Our activities include providing OTC execution, block trades, and structured derivatives—including collar strategies and other hedging structures—for foundations, protocols, and other market participants.

At GSR, we see the same story repeating every market cycle.

Crypto treasuries are structurally pro-cyclical because most DAO treasuries remain highly concentrated in their own tokens. Overall, over 70% of treasury assets are held in the project's own tokens, with relatively low allocations to stable assets or diversified reserves.

We see the consequences of this configuration in every downturn.

When the cycle reverses and token prices fall, the treasury originally intended to fund the roadmap suddenly becomes the project's biggest source of risk.

Given the current environment, we are having more of these conversations with clients than ever. Clients are not only suddenly asking when the market will recover but also whether the project has enough operational runway to continue building until the market does.

When Prices Fall, Activity Shrinks

The second challenge is structural.

As treasury value declines, protocol activity weakens, fee generation slows, and liquidity deteriorates simultaneously. The treasury becomes least valuable precisely when it is needed most.

We see this across cycles. Teams think they have a treasury that can sustain them through difficult markets, but both sides of the balance sheet are exposed to the same underlying risks.

Costs do not fall with token prices. Salaries, audits, infrastructure, and grants are denominated in dollars, so projects financing through token sales must sell more tokens to raise the same amount. Selling more supply in a weak market further depresses the price, increasing the number of tokens needed next quarter. The treasury burns down faster than a simple drawdown suggests.

This is exactly the first question we ask every client: If the market falls for another 12 months, can your treasury still fund the roadmap?

Protection is Cheapest Before It's Needed

This is a clear pattern we observe on our OTC desk.

In bull markets, very few projects want to hedge because paying option premiums feels like sacrificing upside. Then the market sells off, and the conversation changes almost overnight. Suddenly everyone wants protection.

Unfortunately, that is also when protection is most expensive.

As shown in the chart above, implied volatility typically rises after market declines, driving up the cost of downside protection precisely when demand is highest. Financially, this is the equivalent of buying insurance when the storm is already overhead.

We've seen this play out repeatedly. Every client wishes they had hedged when volatility was low. But none can go back in time to do it.

Hedging should be seen as an ongoing treasury policy, not a last-minute panic call. You don't need to predict where the price will go next, only ensure that known liabilities can be funded regardless of market moves.

There is also more than one way to pay for protection. Because crypto asset volatility is typically more expensive than traditional assets, the structure we execute most often is the collar. A project sells a call option above the current price and uses the premium received to buy a put option below the current price. Ultimately, this sets a defined range for the project's tokens. Value is protected below the put strike price in exchange for giving up gains above the call strike price. If structured properly, the two legs can offset each other, allowing the trade to be executed at zero cost. This makes collars the hedging tool of choice for many projects, as outright put purchases consume the very reserves the hedge aims to protect.

A collar is not a sale because the project retains exposure within its chosen range. It trades away gains above the call strike for a known floor price. When dollar-denominated budgets are set a year in advance, collars can turn a volatile asset into a range the finance team can plan around.

None of this diminishes the case for acting early. A collar is a tool that provides protection starting from the day the token is priced. A project setting a floor when the token is $10 protects most of the value. A project waiting until the token falls to $4 ends up with a floor near $4. The structure is available in both cases, but it cannot recover what has already been lost.

Treasury Structure Determines Operational Runway

Projects that successfully navigate multiple cycles have treasuries with separate compartments, each with a clear purpose.

Operational reserves are held in cash or stable assets to cover salaries and operating expenses. Longer-term crypto holdings remain invested but are hedged where appropriate. Strategic positions stay intact without threatening the organization's survival.

The chart above illustrates the difference. A treasury held entirely in native tokens could lose years of operational runway in one significant drawdown. Separating reserves and protecting long-term holdings preserves much more operational runway, even without assuming any market recovery.

Survive first, then grow.

How GSR Can Help

This is exactly the area where we dedicate our efforts.

Every treasury is different. Liquidity, governance structure, vesting schedules, operational budgets, jurisdictional restrictions, and token concentration all influence how a treasury is built and the risks and trade-offs involved.

GSR works with foundations, DAOs, and protocols to provide OTC execution, collars and other custom derivatives, structured hedging solutions, and block trades. These transactions can be used to manage treasury concentration, market risk, and liquidity, tailored to the specific circumstances of the relevant treasury.

GSR's activity in these markets includes executing and structuring treasury transactions across different market conditions.

Our industry remains cyclical. The projects that ultimately stand out will be those that never stop building because their treasuries were built from the outset to withstand the valleys.

This material is provided by GSR ("the Company") for informational purposes only. It does not constitute advice or a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any investment mentioned. Investors should form their own views regarding any proposed investment.

This material is intended only for sophisticated institutional investors and does not constitute an offer or commitment, an invitation to offer or commitment, or any advice or recommendation to enter into or conclude any transaction (whether or not on the terms indicated), or to provide any investment services in any state or country where such an offer, invitation, or service would be unlawful. In providing this material, the Company is not acting as and does not purport to be an advisor or fiduciary.

This material is not independent research and has not been prepared in accordance with any legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research issued by any regulator, including the FCA, FINRA, or CFTC.

This material is not independent of the Company's own interests, which may conflict with the interests of any of the Company's counterparties. The Company may trade for its own account in the investments discussed in this material, may engage in transactions contrary to the views expressed herein, and may hold positions in other related instruments. The Company is not subject to any restrictions on dealing ahead of disseminating this material.

The information contained herein is based on sources believed to be reliable, but its accuracy or completeness is not guaranteed. Any opinions or estimates expressed in this material reflect the judgment of the authors as of the date of publication and are subject to change without notice. The Company does not intend to update this information.

Trading and investing in digital assets involve significant risks, including price volatility and illiquidity, and may not be suitable for all investors. The Company is not responsible for any direct or indirect losses resulting from the use of this material. Copyright in this material belongs to GSR. This material or any copy thereof may not be accessed, reproduced, or redistributed directly or indirectly without the prior written consent of GSR.

For relevant regulatory legal notices regarding the United States, the United Kingdom, and Singapore, please see here.

Criptos en tendencia

Preguntas relacionadas

QWhat is the main structural risk identified in the article regarding DAO treasuries?

AThe article identifies a structural risk where nearly 70% of DAO treasury assets are concentrated in their native tokens. This creates a pro-cyclical vulnerability where treasury value, protocol revenue, and on-chain activity are all exposed to decline simultaneously during a market downturn, threatening a project's operational runway.

QAccording to the article, what is a major issue with how projects approach hedging their treasury risks?

AProjects typically hedge too late. The article notes that demand for downside protection surges only *after* a price decline, when option premiums (volatility) are higher and any floor price set is far below the token's starting point, making the protection less effective and more expensive.

QWhat is the 'collar strategy' recommended for treasury management, and what is its key advantage?

AA collar strategy involves selling a call option above the current price and using the premium to buy a put option below it. This establishes a price range for the token. Its key advantage is that it provides a known floor price (downside protection) without spending stablecoin reserves, as the cost is funded by giving up potential gains above the call strike price. It can often be structured at zero cost.

QHow does the article suggest successful projects structure their treasuries to survive market cycles?

ASuccessful projects structure their treasuries into separate parts with distinct purposes: an operational reserve held in cash/stable assets to cover expenses, and longer-term crypto holdings that remain invested but are hedged where necessary. This separation ensures the organization's survival isn't threatened by token price volatility, preserving operational runway during downturns.

QWhat is the 'triple impact' or 'triple whammy' that DAOs face when the bull market ends, as described in the article?

AThe 'triple impact' refers to the simultaneous negative effects on a DAO when the market turns: 1) A sharp drop in the value of its treasury (heavily concentrated in its native token), 2) A decline in protocol revenue as on-chain activity weakens, and 3) A collapse in overall on-chain engagement and liquidity. These three factors converge to severely strain a project's finances and operational sustainability.

Lecturas Relacionadas

Does Every Great Financial Infrastructure Begin with a Speculative Frenzy?

The article "Does Every Great Financial Infrastructure Begin with a Speculative Frenzy?" explores the dual role of speculation in the development of financial markets, drawing parallels between historical examples and the current crypto industry. The author argues that while speculation is often dismissed as mere gambling, it frequently serves as a crucial precursor and foundation for building sustainable financial infrastructure. This is illustrated by historical cases like the 19th-century Chicago grain market, where speculators provided the necessary liquidity for the nascent futures market to function, eventually establishing a global price discovery system for wheat. Keynes's nuanced view is cited, highlighting that speculation becomes dangerous only when it detaches from underlying value; when anchored to real assets, it can play a constructive role. This pattern is now evident in crypto. Platforms like Hyperliquid, initially built for leveraged crypto speculation, have successfully expanded their model to perpetual contracts for real-world assets like equities and commodities. Similarly, Robinhood Chain, designed for tokenized stock trading, has leveraged a surge in Meme coin activity (exemplified by the FRONG token) to attract initial users and liquidity, which could later support its core securities trading vision. The piece contrasts this with purely speculative phenomena, like many short-lived Meme coins, which often fail to create lasting value. The central thesis is that speculation provides the initial capital, liquidity, and user attention. Whether this evolves into enduring infrastructure depends on the platform's ability to channel that energy towards valuable underlying assets. The trajectory of crypto platforms suggests that, much like in traditional finance, speculative frenzies can indeed lay the groundwork for significant financial innovation.

marsbitHace 8 min(s)

Does Every Great Financial Infrastructure Begin with a Speculative Frenzy?

marsbitHace 8 min(s)

Trading

Spot

Artículos destacados

Cómo comprar DAO

¡Bienvenido a HTX.com! Hemos hecho que comprar DAO Maker (DAO) sea simple y conveniente. Sigue nuestra guía paso a paso para iniciar tu viaje de criptos.Paso 1: crea tu cuenta HTXUtiliza tu correo electrónico o número de teléfono para registrarte y obtener una cuenta gratuita en HTX. Experimenta un proceso de registro sin complicaciones y desbloquea todas las funciones.Obtener mi cuentaPaso 2: ve a Comprar cripto y elige tu método de pagoTarjeta de crédito/débito: usa tu Visa o Mastercard para comprar DAO Maker (DAO) al instante.Saldo: utiliza fondos del saldo de tu cuenta HTX para tradear sin problemas.Terceros: hemos agregado métodos de pago populares como Google Pay y Apple Pay para mejorar la comodidad.P2P: tradear directamente con otros usuarios en HTX.Over-the-Counter (OTC): ofrecemos servicios personalizados y tipos de cambio competitivos para los traders.Paso 3: guarda tu DAO Maker (DAO)Después de comprar tu DAO Maker (DAO), guárdalo en tu cuenta HTX. Alternativamente, puedes enviarlo a otro lugar mediante transferencia blockchain o utilizarlo para tradear otras criptomonedas.Paso 4: tradear DAO Maker (DAO)Tradear fácilmente con DAO Maker (DAO) en HTX's mercado spot. Simplemente accede a tu cuenta, selecciona tu par de trading, ejecuta tus trades y monitorea en tiempo real. Ofrecemos una experiencia fácil de usar tanto para principiantes como para traders experimentados.

306 Vistas totalesPublicado en 2024.12.11Actualizado en 2026.06.02

Cómo comprar DAO

Discusiones

Bienvenido a la comunidad de HTX. Aquí puedes mantenerte informado sobre los últimos desarrollos de la plataforma y acceder a análisis profesionales del mercado. A continuación se presentan las opiniones de los usuarios sobre el precio de DAO (DAO).

活动图片