The Four-Year Cycle Concludes, Crypto Market Embarks on a Decade-Long Protracted War

marsbitPublicado a 2025-12-24Actualizado a 2025-12-24

Resumen

In a recent article, Bitwise CIO Matt Hougan addresses the question of whether Bitcoin's historical four-year cycle—characterized by three years of gains followed by a crash in the fourth—remains relevant. He argues that the cycle, driven by factors like Bitcoin halvings, interest rate spikes, and post-bubble crashes, is losing significance due to changing conditions. The 2026 halving may have reduced impact, interest rates are likely to decrease, and the market hasn’t seen the extreme euphoria of previous cycles. Instead, Hougan proposes a "decade-long grinding advance" as the new framework, where sustained positive forces—such as institutional adoption, regulatory clarity, and real-world applications like stablecoins—gradually outweigh intermittent negative shocks like macroeconomic events or leverage-induced selloffs. This shift suggests more moderate long-term returns, lower volatility, and periodic 20-40% corrections, marking a maturation of the crypto market since the approval of Bitcoin ETFs in early 2024. Investors should expect a prolonged tug-of-war between these forces, requiring patience and a focus on fundamentals despite short-term downturns.

Author: Matt Hougan, Chief Investment Officer of Bitwise

Compiled by: Luffy, Foresight News

Over the past few weeks, the question I've been asked most frequently in meetings with institutional investors is: Is the four-year cycle of Bitcoin still relevant?

The so-called four-year cycle refers to the historical pattern in Bitcoin's price movement: 'three years of gains, followed by a crash in the fourth year.'

This question is crucial because, according to the logic of the four-year cycle, next year would be a difficult one for Bitcoin and the entire cryptocurrency market.

Although I cannot accurately predict cryptocurrency prices next year, I believe that blindly adhering to the idea that the four-year cycle will mechanically repeat is unwise. After all, the four-year cycle is not an immutable law carved in stone by the god of cryptocurrency; its formation actually stems from three specific driving factors:

Bitcoin Halving Events: The mining reward on the Bitcoin blockchain halves approximately every four years.
Interest Rate Fluctuations: The two interest rate surges in 2018 and 2022 both contributed to cryptocurrency market corrections.
Boom-and-Bust Market Cycles: The crash years for cryptocurrency (2014, 2018, 2022) invariably followed years of strong gains. For example, Bitcoin rose 5530% in 2013, 1349% in 2017, and 57% in 2021. During periods of market euphoria, fraud and speculative bubbles proliferate. The bursting of these bubbles, such as the regulatory crackdown on ICOs in 2018 and the collapse of FTX in 2022, directly triggered the market crashes in those years.

Today, these three driving factors have either significantly diminished in influence or are trending in the opposite direction compared to previous cycles. The impact of the Bitcoin halving is not as strong as it was four years ago; interest rates in 2026 are more likely to fall than rise; and the cryptocurrency market in 2025 has not experienced the kind of狂热暴涨 (frenzied surge) seen in previous cycles.

Meanwhile, more decisive forces, particularly the large-scale entry of institutional investors and the gradual improvement of regulatory policies, are gathering momentum for 2026. In our latest "2026 Market Outlook" report, we predicted that Bitcoin will reach a new all-time high next year. Currently, I still believe this is the most likely outcome.

What Will Replace the Four-Year Cycle?

If the four-year cycle is indeed over, a logical question follows: What new framework should we establish for thinking about the cryptocurrency market in 2026 and beyond?

The four-year cycle once provided clear guidance for investors. Knowing whether the market was in a recovery phase, a bull market, or a crypto winter helped investors hold on during bear markets and remain rational during bull markets.

So, what framework can replace it now?

The answer is: A Decade-Long Protracted War.

I know this phrase sounds far less catchy than 'four-year cycle.' But hear me out, because I firmly believe this is the essence of the current market.

By 'protracted war,' I mean the long-term struggle between two forces: one is a strong, persistent, and gradual positive driving force; the other is an intermittent, fierce but short-lived negative shock force.

The positive driving forces currently gaining momentum include: accelerated adoption by institutional investors, continuous improvement of regulatory frameworks, concerns about fiat currency devaluation, and the implementation of practical use cases like stablecoins and asset tokenization.

The goal of these trends is to disrupt deeply entrenched traditional systems such as capital markets, global payment systems, and international monetary regimes. Their full realization will inevitably take over a decade. Early signs of this process are already visible: billions of dollars flowing into crypto ETFs, cryptocurrency-related bills steadily advancing in Congress, rapid expansion of the stablecoin and tokenization markets, and so on.

But progress will inevitably meet resistance. Potential negative shock forces include: macroeconomic shocks, waves of leveraged position liquidations, and恶性事件 (malicious events) such as hacks, scams, and rug pulls. The impact cycle of such negative shocks typically lasts weeks, months, or quarters.

Overall, the long-term influence of the positive driving forces far exceeds that of the negative shock forces, but the negative shocks erupt rapidly and can suppress the positive forces in the short term. The market crash on October 10, 2025, is a classic case: a macro shock triggered large-scale liquidations of cryptocurrency leveraged positions, leading directly to a cliff-like drop in the market.

It is precisely this protracted war dynamic that has caused the severe divergence in the current cryptocurrency market: retail investors are in deep despair, while many institutional investors are full of bullish confidence. The root cause lies in the completely different time horizons they focus on. Retail investors are focused on the aftermath of the October liquidation event; institutions are looking ahead to the prospect of stablecoin assets surpassing $3 trillion by 2030.

Both views have their validity, just based on different time scales.

Implications of the Protracted War for Investors

For the past few months, I have been using the 'protracted war' framework to analyze the market, and it has proven extremely valuable. The protracted war格局 (situation) suggests the market will exhibit the following characteristics:

Substantial but not outrageously夸张离谱 (outlandish) returns over the long term
Overall decreased volatility
Periodic corrections of 20%—40%

This means that investors must take every market correction seriously, as they could last for a considerable time. But as long as the fundamentals remain strong, one can be confident that prices will eventually rebound.

Looking back, I believe the cryptocurrency market officially entered the protracted war phase in January 2024 with the approval of the Bitcoin spot ETFs. This milestone event unleashed a wave of institutional investment, a trend I believe will last a full decade. The facts bear this out: since the ETFs launched, the price of Bitcoin has risen 93% cumulatively, while also experiencing three deep corrections of over 20%.

I believe the market will maintain these return characteristics for a long time to come. The protracted war might not be as thrilling as the previous boom-and-bust cycles, but it signifies a deeper transformation正在迎来 (is ushering in) for the cryptocurrency industry. When an asset class matures, the era of the protracted war arrives.

Preguntas relacionadas

QWhat are the three specific drivers that historically formed Bitcoin's four-year cycle according to the article?

AThe three drivers are: Bitcoin halving events, interest rate fluctuations, and boom-bust market cycles (including speculative bubbles and subsequent crashes like ICO crackdowns or exchange collapses).

QWhy does the author believe the four-year cycle is no longer reliable for predicting crypto market behavior?

ABecause the three historical drivers have significantly weakened or reversed: halving impact has diminished, interest rates are likely to decrease in 2026, and the 2025 market lacks the extreme euphoria seen in previous cycles.

QWhat new framework does the author propose to replace the four-year cycle for understanding crypto market dynamics?

AThe author proposes a 'decade-long persistent war' framework, describing a long-term tug-of-war between sustained positive forces (e.g., institutional adoption, regulation) and intermittent negative shocks (e.g., macro events, leverage unwinding).

QHow does the 'persistent war' framework explain the current divergence between retail and institutional investor sentiment?

ARetail investors focus on short-term negative shocks (e.g., recent market crashes), while institutions focus on long-term positive trends (e.g., stablecoin growth to $3 trillion by 2030), leading to contrasting perspectives based on different time horizons.

QWhat market characteristics does the author associate with the 'persistent war' phase starting from January 2024?

AThe phase features solid long-term returns (but not extreme), lower overall volatility, and periodic 20-40% drawdowns, requiring investors to take corrections seriously while maintaining confidence in eventual recoveries if fundamentals remain strong.

Lecturas Relacionadas

Jensen Huang 'Saves' South Korean Stock Market: Locks In SK Hynix Memory, Chip Shortage to Continue

On June 5th, South Korea's stock market experienced a sharp decline, with major chipmakers like Samsung and SK Hynix dropping nearly 10%. Amidst the turmoil, NVIDIA CEO Jensen Huang's visit to Seoul played a dramatic role in boosting market sentiment. Following a dinner meeting with SK Group Chairman Chey Tae-won and SK Hynix CEO Kwak Noh-Jung, Huang confirmed that NVIDIA's new Vera CPU will utilize SK Hynix DRAM. The companies announced a multi-year technical partnership to co-develop next-generation memory for NVIDIA's AI infrastructure, covering products from data centers to personal AI and robotics. This collaboration extends beyond memory supply. SK Hynix is integrating NVIDIA's AI and Omniverse platform into its own semiconductor design and manufacturing processes, including computational lithography and creating digital twins of its fabrication plants for autonomous operation. While strengthening ties with SK Hynix, NVIDIA is diversifying its supply chain for the upcoming HBM4 memory, with Samsung, SK Hynix, and Micron all certified as suppliers for its Vera Rubin platform. Despite this, Huang warned that the global chip shortage, driven by relentless demand from AI factory construction, is expected to persist for several years across the entire supply chain. His visit underscores NVIDIA's systematic effort to deepen integration with South Korea's broader tech industry.

marsbitHace 14 min(s)

Jensen Huang 'Saves' South Korean Stock Market: Locks In SK Hynix Memory, Chip Shortage to Continue

marsbitHace 14 min(s)

Nasdaq Plunges 4.2% in a Single Day: Does "Black Friday" Burst the U.S. Stock Market Bubble?

The Nasdaq plunged 4.18% on June 5, 2026, its worst single-day drop in over a year, as a much stronger-than-expected US jobs report triggered fears of economic overheating and delayed Federal Reserve interest rate cuts. The selloff, centered on high-valuation tech and AI stocks like Nvidia and Broadcom, spread across major indices. The article examines whether this signals a market top. The strong May non-farm payrolls data, nearly double expectations, pushed bond yields higher, directly hurting rate-sensitive tech stocks. This exposed vulnerabilities in the crowded AI trade, where valuations had soared on narratives of infinite growth, despite emerging signs of slowing order momentum and corporate AI monetization challenges. Prior to the drop, market indicators flashed warning signs: historically high valuations (e.g., Shiller CAPE ratio near 39.5), extreme bullish sentiment, and high levels of leverage. Technical charts showed key support levels being breached. Wall Street is divided on the outlook. Bears, citing risks of "stagflation" and AI bubble comparisons to the dot-com era, warn of a potential significant correction. Bulls view the drop as a healthy correction within a bull market, underpinned by a strong economy and expected corporate earnings growth of around 7% in 2026. The immediate future hinges on upcoming key events: the May CPI inflation data and the mid-June FOMC meeting. Their outcomes will critically shape market expectations for the Fed's rate path. The article concludes that conditions for a major market top are aligning, marking a fragile transition from narrative-driven gains to a phase demanding validation from macroeconomic data and corporate fundamentals. Caution is advised.

marsbitHace 18 min(s)

Nasdaq Plunges 4.2% in a Single Day: Does "Black Friday" Burst the U.S. Stock Market Bubble?

marsbitHace 18 min(s)

Nasdaq Plunges 4.2% in a Single Day, Did 'Black Friday' Pop the U.S. Stock Bubble?

The Nasdaq Composite plummeted 4.18% on June 5, its biggest single-day drop since April 2025, triggering widespread debate over whether the U.S. stock market has peaked. The sell-off was sparked by a stronger-than-expected U.S. non-farm payrolls report, which fueled fears of economic overheating and pushed back market expectations for Federal Reserve rate cuts, leading to a sharp rise in Treasury yields. The AI sector, the primary driver of the recent bull market, suffered severe losses, with the Philadelphia Semiconductor Index crashing over 10%. Stocks like Nvidia, Broadcom, and Micron led the decline. Concerns are mounting about the sustainability of AI capital expenditures and high valuations, with signs of order cuts for next-generation chips emerging. Analyses point to several warning signs: historically high market valuations (e.g., elevated Shiller CAPE ratio, Buffett Indicator), extreme bullish sentiment indicators, and significant insider selling. The sell-off also caused a key technical breakdown, with the S&P 500 breaking below its short-term moving average and testing its 200-day moving average. Wall Street is divided on the outlook. Bears warn this could be the start of a bubble deflation or a "stagflation" scenario, while bulls view it as a healthy, overdue correction within a bull market driven by solid corporate earnings growth. A more moderate view suggests the easy liquidity-driven rally is over, and markets are entering a phase of fundamental stock-picking with potential for consolidation. The immediate future hinges on key upcoming events: the May CPI report and the mid-June FOMC meeting. Their outcomes will be critical in determining whether this is a temporary pullback or the beginning of a more significant trend reversal. The consensus is that the era of one-directional market gains may be ending, requiring increased investor caution.

Odaily星球日报Hace 23 min(s)

Nasdaq Plunges 4.2% in a Single Day, Did 'Black Friday' Pop the U.S. Stock Bubble?

Odaily星球日报Hace 23 min(s)

The First Case on AI Agents: What Was Adjudicated?

"The First 'Agent' Ruling: What Was Decided?" On April 30, the Guangzhou Internet Court issued a ruling—China's first behavior preservation order in the intelligent agent (AI agent) field. The defendant, an open-source AI agent software, was ordered to stop downloads, cease actions that bypassed a platform's technical protection measures, and delete related tutorials and data. The core issue: the software used the operating system's "accessibility service" permissions to automate user interactions within other apps without those platforms' authorization. This mirrors a recent US case where Amazon sued Perplexity for similar reasons—bypassing Amazon's API to directly scrape and interact with its pages—and won a preliminary injunction. Both rulings establish a crucial legal boundary for the AI agent era: agents cannot operate unchecked. The article argues the fundamental legal principle emerging is one of **dual authorization**. An AI agent requires both **user consent** AND **platform consent** to operate legitimately within that platform's ecosystem. Bypassing platform rules through system-level permissions, even with user permission, undermines platform responsibilities for content moderation, data security, and user privacy, creating liability issues. The piece uses the evolution of "Doubao Phone" (an AI-integrated smartphone) as a case study. Its initial, aggressive version that bypassed platform controls faced roadblocks. Its upcoming 2.0 version is reportedly pivoting to negotiate API access and authorization deals with major platforms (like Alibaba's ecosystem), seen as a strategic adaptation to the new regulatory reality. A global trend is identified: the era of unregulated, "wild west" growth for AI agents is ending, replaced by a **compliance race**. This raises barriers to entry, as securing platform authorizations becomes a new cost. Open-source status is also not a legal shield if the code facilitates bypassing technical protections. In conclusion, these first rulings target not the largest, but the most **aggressive and representative** cases. By setting precedent with them, regulators are efficiently steering the entire industry towards a new, more regulated operating paradigm defined by dual authorization and platform cooperation.

marsbitHace 28 min(s)

The First Case on AI Agents: What Was Adjudicated?

marsbitHace 28 min(s)

Fired by Google Over a 14-Page Paper, Over 4,000 Rallied for Her. 6 Years Later: She Almost Predicted the Entire AI Era Back Then.

In late 2020, Google AI researcher Timnit Gebru was effectively dismissed following a conflict over a 14-page, unpublished research paper she co-authored titled "On the Dangers of Stochastic Parrots." The paper, which has since been cited over 14,000 times, raised critical early warnings about the risks of large language models (LLMs). It argued that these models, trained on vast, biased internet data, are essentially "stochastic parrots" that mimic language without true understanding, potentially amplifying societal biases, generating plausible but false information (later termed "AI hallucination"), consuming massive energy, and obscuring their training data contents. Gebru's stance led to a clash with Google management, who requested the paper's withdrawal. Her subsequent internal criticism of the company's diversity efforts and handling of the matter culminated in her termination, which sparked protests from over 4,000 Google employees and researchers. Six years later, the paper's predictions have proven remarkably prescient. Issues like AI hallucination, embedded bias (evident in resume screening and healthcare algorithms), soaring energy consumption from AI data centers, unvetted training data containing harmful content, and the risk of "model collapse" from AI-generated internet content have become central industry challenges. The incident also highlighted concerns about AI development being driven primarily by commercial competition within a handful of powerful tech companies, often at the expense of ethical considerations. After leaving Google, Gebru founded the Distributed AI Research Institute (DAIR) to explore these issues independently. The controversy underscores how her early, critical insights into the fundamental limitations and societal impacts of LLMs anticipated many of the most pressing dilemmas in today's AI era.

marsbitHace 29 min(s)

Fired by Google Over a 14-Page Paper, Over 4,000 Rallied for Her. 6 Years Later: She Almost Predicted the Entire AI Era Back Then.

marsbitHace 29 min(s)

Trading

Spot

Futuros

Artículos destacados

Cómo comprar BILL

¡Bienvenido a HTX.com! Hemos hecho que comprar Billions Network (BILL) sea simple y conveniente. Sigue nuestra guía paso a paso para iniciar tu viaje de criptos.Paso 1: crea tu cuenta HTXUtiliza tu correo electrónico o número de teléfono para registrarte y obtener una cuenta gratuita en HTX. Experimenta un proceso de registro sin complicaciones y desbloquea todas las funciones.Obtener mi cuentaPaso 2: ve a Comprar cripto y elige tu método de pagoTarjeta de crédito/débito: usa tu Visa o Mastercard para comprar Billions Network (BILL) al instante.Saldo: utiliza fondos del saldo de tu cuenta HTX para tradear sin problemas.Terceros: hemos agregado métodos de pago populares como Google Pay y Apple Pay para mejorar la comodidad.P2P: tradear directamente con otros usuarios en HTX.Over-the-Counter (OTC): ofrecemos servicios personalizados y tipos de cambio competitivos para los traders.Paso 3: guarda tu Billions Network (BILL)Después de comprar tu Billions Network (BILL), guárdalo en tu cuenta HTX. Alternativamente, puedes enviarlo a otro lugar mediante transferencia blockchain o utilizarlo para tradear otras criptomonedas.Paso 4: tradear Billions Network (BILL)Tradear fácilmente con Billions Network (BILL) en HTX's mercado spot. Simplemente accede a tu cuenta, selecciona tu par de trading, ejecuta tus trades y monitorea en tiempo real. Ofrecemos una experiencia fácil de usar tanto para principiantes como para traders experimentados.

236 Vistas totalesPublicado en 2026.05.07Actualizado en 2026.06.02

Qué es ATWO

I. Introducción al ProyectoArena Two es una plataforma interactiva descentralizada que permite a los fanáticos jugar un papel activo y tokenizado en los resultados de eventos en tiempo real. A diferencia de los modelos de transmisión tradicionales que reducen a los fanáticos a espectadores pasivos, Arena Two aprovecha la tecnología blockchain para permitir que los fanáticos voten directamente en tiempo real e influyan en los resultados en el campo.II. Información del TokenNombre del token: ATWO (Arena Two)III. Enlaces RelacionadosSitio web: https://arenatwo.com/Exploradores: https://basescan.org/token/0x499D35eBE6cEe9B2Ac35Fd003fcBbeeB9CFc7B32Twitter: https://x.com/arenatwoXNota: La introducción del proyecto proviene de los materiales publicados o proporcionados por el equipo oficial del proyecto, que es solo para referencia y no constituye asesoramiento de inversión. HTX no se hace responsable de ninguna pérdida directa o indirecta resultante.

147 Vistas totalesPublicado en 2026.05.18Actualizado en 2026.06.02

Cómo comprar ATWO

¡Bienvenido a HTX.com! Hemos hecho que comprar Arena Two (ATWO) sea simple y conveniente. Sigue nuestra guía paso a paso para iniciar tu viaje de criptos.Paso 1: crea tu cuenta HTXUtiliza tu correo electrónico o número de teléfono para registrarte y obtener una cuenta gratuita en HTX. Experimenta un proceso de registro sin complicaciones y desbloquea todas las funciones.Obtener mi cuentaPaso 2: ve a Comprar cripto y elige tu método de pagoTarjeta de crédito/débito: usa tu Visa o Mastercard para comprar Arena Two (ATWO) al instante.Saldo: utiliza fondos del saldo de tu cuenta HTX para tradear sin problemas.Terceros: hemos agregado métodos de pago populares como Google Pay y Apple Pay para mejorar la comodidad.P2P: tradear directamente con otros usuarios en HTX.Over-the-Counter (OTC): ofrecemos servicios personalizados y tipos de cambio competitivos para los traders.Paso 3: guarda tu Arena Two (ATWO)Después de comprar tu Arena Two (ATWO), guárdalo en tu cuenta HTX. Alternativamente, puedes enviarlo a otro lugar mediante transferencia blockchain o utilizarlo para tradear otras criptomonedas.Paso 4: tradear Arena Two (ATWO)Tradear fácilmente con Arena Two (ATWO) en HTX's mercado spot. Simplemente accede a tu cuenta, selecciona tu par de trading, ejecuta tus trades y monitorea en tiempo real. Ofrecemos una experiencia fácil de usar tanto para principiantes como para traders experimentados.

188 Vistas totalesPublicado en 2026.05.18Actualizado en 2026.06.02

Discusiones

Bienvenido a la comunidad de HTX. Aquí puedes mantenerte informado sobre los últimos desarrollos de la plataforma y acceder a análisis profesionales del mercado. A continuación se presentan las opiniones de los usuarios sobre el precio de A (A).