Tether Blocked $182 Million in USDT on Five Wallets. What Happened

RBK-cryptoPublicado a 2026-01-12Actualizado a 2026-01-12

Resumen

Tether, the issuer of the USDT stablecoin, has frozen approximately $182 million across five wallets on the Tron blockchain. The action, which took place on January 11th, was executed in response to an official request from law enforcement agencies as part of an ongoing, months-long investigation. This is one of the largest single freezes on the Tron network in recent months, a popular blockchain for USDT transfers. The company emphasized its established practice of cooperating with law enforcement by freezing addresses linked to illegal activities or sanctions violations. Tether reports it has now frozen over $3 billion in USDT in collaboration with 310 agencies across 62 countries, voluntarily freezing a total of 3,440 wallets. This includes cooperation with U.S. authorities on 2,007 cases and blocking 470 addresses to assist law enforcement in Israel and Ukraine. The article also references a previous freeze of 2.5 billion rubles in USDT from the Russian crypto exchange Garantex in March 2025.

Tether has frozen approximately $182 million in its issued stablecoin USDT. The freeze, conducted on January 11, affected five addresses on the Tron blockchain, which held between $12 million and $50 million, according to Whale Alert.

"Tether froze the assets in connection with an ongoing investigation following an official request from law enforcement agencies," a Tether representative told The Block. He clarified that the investigation has been ongoing for several months. No further details were disclosed by the company.

The freeze of over $180 million is one of the largest single freezes of funds in the Tron network that has become known in recent months, the publication notes. Tron is one of the most popular blockchains for transferring funds in USDT. According to the issuer's data as of January 12, the total market capitalization of USDT is $186 billion, of which $82.5 billion is issued on the Tron network.

Tether emphasized that the company "has a long-standing practice of supporting legitimate investigations by freezing addresses associated with illegal activity or sanctions violations, in response to valid requests." Back in late 2023, Tether decided to block tokens on crypto addresses listed on the sanctions list of the U.S. Department of the Treasury's Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC).

According to information on Tether's website, the company has blocked over $3 billion in USDT as part of cooperation with 310 agencies from 62 countries. In total, Tether has voluntarily frozen 3,440 wallets, of which 2,007 were cases of cooperation with U.S. law enforcement agencies. 470 addresses with 95 million USDT were blocked by Tether "to assist law enforcement agencies in Israel and Ukraine," the company highlights.

2.5 billion rubles in USDT tokens were frozen by Tether from the Russian crypto exchange Garantex in March 2025. The freeze was conducted as part of a special operation by the U.S. Secret Service and law enforcement agencies from a number of European Union countries.

What to expect from the crypto market. How the Trump-Fed conflict will affect prices

Anonymous cryptocurrency Monero reached a new all-time high. Reasons for the growth

In Buryatia, a 'mining truck' stole electricity worth 3 million rubles.

Preguntas relacionadas

QHow much USDT did Tether freeze on January 11th and on how many wallets?

ATether froze approximately $182 million in USDT across five wallets on the Tron blockchain on January 11th.

QWhat was the official reason given by Tether for freezing these assets?

ATether froze the assets in connection with an ongoing investigation following an official request from law enforcement agencies.

QWhat is the total market capitalization of USDT and how much of it is issued on the Tron network?

AThe total market capitalization of USDT is $186 billion, with $82.5 billion of it issued on the Tron network.

QHow many wallets has Tether frozen in total and how many were at the request of U.S. law enforcement?

ATether has voluntarily frozen a total of 3,440 wallets, with 2,007 of those cases being in cooperation with U.S. law enforcement.

QWhich sanctioned list did Tether agree to comply with at the end of 2023?

AAt the end of 2023, Tether decided to block tokens on crypto addresses from the sanctions list of the U.S. Treasury Department's Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC).

Lecturas Relacionadas

Can a Hair Dryer Earn $34,000? Deciphering the Reflexivity Paradox in Prediction Markets

An individual manipulated a weather sensor at Paris Charles de Gaulle Airport with a portable heat source, causing a Polymarket weather market to settle at 22°C and earning $34,000. This incident highlights a fundamental issue in prediction markets: when a market aims to reflect reality, it also incentivizes participants to influence that reality. Prediction markets operate on two layers: platform rules (what outcome counts as a win) and data sources (what actually happened). While most focus on rules, the real vulnerability lies in the data source. If reality is recorded through a specific source, influencing that source directly affects market settlement. The article categorizes markets by their vulnerability: 1. **Single-point physical data sources** (e.g., weather stations): Easily manipulated through physical interference. 2. **Insider information markets** (e.g., MrBeast video details): Insiders like team members use non-public information to trade. Kalshi fined a剪辑师 $20,000 for insider trading. 3. **Actor-manipulated markets** (e.g., Andrew Tate’s tweet counts): The subject of the market can control the outcome. Evidence suggests Tate’sociated accounts coordinated to profit. 4. **Individual-action markets** (e.g., WNBA disruptions): A single person can execute an event to profit from their pre-placed bets. Kalshi and Polymarket handle these issues differently. Kalshi enforces strict KYC, publicly penalizes insider trading, and reports to regulators. Polymarket, with its anonymous wallet-based system, has historically been more permissive, arguing that insider information improves market accuracy. However, it cooperated with authorities in the "Van Dyke case," where a user traded on classified government information. The core paradox is reflexivity: prediction markets are designed to discover truth, but their financial incentives can distort reality. The more valuable a prediction becomes, the more likely participants are to influence the event itself. The market ceases to be a mirror of reality and instead shapes it.

marsbitHace 41 min(s)

Can a Hair Dryer Earn $34,000? Deciphering the Reflexivity Paradox in Prediction Markets

marsbitHace 41 min(s)

Analyst Reveals Accumulation Level For Dogecoin Before It Rallies To $2

A crypto analyst, Crypto Patel, predicts that Dogecoin (DOGE) could rally to $2, despite currently trading below $0.10. The analyst identifies a key accumulation zone between $0.07 and $0.09, where DOGE has repeatedly tested support without breaking down. Based on a bi-weekly chart using Elliott Wave theory, DOGE is in a Wave 4 consolidation phase within a descending channel. A bounce from this support is expected to trigger a Wave 5 rally, projecting a 2,767% surge toward $2. Price targets are set sequentially at $0.50, $1, and $2, with a stop-loss below $0.048. For a bullish trend reversal, DOGE must break above the $0.10 resistance level, which was recently rejected in April. Analysts emphasize that market conditions and a confirmed higher high are critical for the projected uptrend.

bitcoinistHace 1 hora(s)

Analyst Reveals Accumulation Level For Dogecoin Before It Rallies To $2

bitcoinistHace 1 hora(s)

Weekly Editor's Picks (0418-0424)

Weekly Editor's Picks (0418-0424) provides in-depth analysis on key developments across macro trends, crypto markets, and policy. Key topics include the oil market nearing a physical supply crisis due to shipping disruptions, even if the Strait of Hormuz reopens. In crypto, reports cover global consumer crypto adoption, a data-driven strategy for trading volatile altcoins, and the state of VC funding. Prediction markets like Polymarket are analyzed not as pure event-guessing games but as systems where understanding legalistic rules creates an edge. Major DeFi protocol Aave is criticized for poor crisis management amid a $300M exploit, while the controversial structure of World Liberty Financial is examined. Other highlights include policy updates like the CLARITY Act, Ethereum’s, airdrop opportunities, and weekly recaps of major incidents like the Kelp DAO hack and SpaceX's AI disclosures.

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Telegram Founder Claims French Officials Sold Crypto Data, Linked To 41 Kidnaps

Telegram founder Pavel Durov has accused French officials of selling crypto owners’ data to criminals, linking it to a sharp rise in kidnappings. France has seen 41 crypto-related kidnappings this year, part of a growing international trend known as “wrench attacks.” Durov criticized French policies requiring identity data and access to private messages, arguing that increased data flow leads to more leaks and victims. The incidents, which began in late 2024, have escalated significantly in 2026, now accounting for over half of all organized kidnappings tracked by French intelligence. In response, the government plans a broader crackdown, including a dedicated police unit, improved international coordination, and a new prevention platform for threat alerts and security guidance.

bitcoinistHace 1 hora(s)

Telegram Founder Claims French Officials Sold Crypto Data, Linked To 41 Kidnaps

bitcoinistHace 1 hora(s)

First Day Review of "Musk's WeChat" XChat: Even Worse Than Expected

Elon Musk's much-anticipated "WeChat-like" app, XChat, has officially launched after multiple delays. The initial review reveals a product that falls short of expectations, offering an experience largely similar to X Platform's (formerly Twitter) direct messages, despite being marketed as an encrypted communication tool. Key observations from the first-day test include: 1. The app's promoted "end-to-end encryption" and its claimed relation to Bitcoin's architecture were criticized by experts as a superficial attempt to capitalize on crypto buzz, with no real technical connection. 2. Musk's vision of an ad-free "secure communication system" is technically met, but only because the app is currently extremely basic, featuring only a single chat interface. 3. A promised anti-screenshot feature appears inconsistent; it works in X Platform group chats but fails within the XChat app itself, where screenshots still capture avatars. 4. The app supports 45 languages and has a 16+ age rating, indicating a broader tolerance for content compared to WeChat's 13+ rating. 5. A puzzling login process requires users to verify the email associated with their X account. 6. The touted encryption" feels minimal in practice, with its presence only indicated by a simple "Encrypted - Yes" label on messages. 7. Disappearing message timers for groups can be set from 5 minutes to 4 weeks, with the timer starting upon being read by a user. 8. Group invite links are shared with X Platform groups. 9. Group size limits are planned to be increased, aiming for 1000 members, a move that has drawn user criticism. 10. The app offers 8 different colored icons, and its chat bubbles are notably similar to WeChat's. Message deletion options mimic Telegram's. Crucially, many pre-announced features like importing X contacts, integrating Grok AI, X Money payments, and Cashtags are not yet available. The initial release is seen as a bare-bones and underwhelming first step.

Odaily星球日报Hace 1 hora(s)

First Day Review of "Musk's WeChat" XChat: Even Worse Than Expected

Odaily星球日报Hace 1 hora(s)

Trading

Spot

Futuros