‘Tax headache eased?’ IRS extends crypto relief to end of 2026

ambcryptoPublicado a 2026-03-19Actualizado a 2026-03-19

Resumen

The U.S. IRS has extended temporary tax relief for cryptocurrency investors until the end of 2026, allowing them to use alternative methods to calculate capital gains instead of relying solely on broker-submitted reports. This is the second such extension and aims to reduce tax burdens for investors. Previously, the mandatory FIFO (first-in, first-out) method often resulted in higher taxes by requiring the sale of older, more appreciated coins first. The alternative methods enable investors to potentially report more recent, lower-gain or loss-making sales. The relief also addresses operational challenges for crypto exchanges, which faced significant compliance burdens under the stricter reporting rules. The IRS is gradually phasing in reporting requirements and has proposed making electronic submission the default for tax documents.

The U.S. tax season is here, and there is some sigh of relief for crypto holders using centralized exchanges.

In its latest guidance, the U.S. Internal Revenue Service (IRS) gave crypto holders a free pass to use alternative methods to identify crypto sales for tax purposes instead of relying on their broker-submitted reports.

This is the second time the watchdog has extended the relief, and it could again help lower the tax bill for crypto investors. Initially, the agency mandated crypto exchanges to adopt the FIFO (first-in, first-out) method to track investors’ buy and sell prices for each coin.

For users, this meant that the oldest coins, which were acquired cheaply and have since appreciated significantly, should be reported first. This would result in a higher tax bill due to a higher capital gains tax.

With alternative reporting methods, however, you could include the most recently acquired coins that haven’t rallied much or are in the red.

Source: IRS

U.S. crypto tax compliance burden

According to Shehan Chandrasekera, head of tax at Coin Tracker, the IRS guidance will offer incredible relief to investors, albeit with a few friction points.

He said,

The IRS just quietly saved crypto investors from a massive tax headache by issuing Notice 2026-20.

The temporary relief will be extended up to the end of 2026. But the move isn’t out of just goodwill from the taxman.

Its strict crypto reporting regime has a compliance burden on operators. Notably, crypto exchanges must report the cost basis for each coin bought by each investor to the IRS, along with other data.

At the same time, a duplicate of the report should be given to the customer or physically mailed if the customer hasn’t opted for digital copies. Most brokers have complained that this would be a massive operational burden.

To alleviate this, the agency opted for phased-in reports, starting with only gross proceeds or total crypto sales in reports submitted in 2025. For crypto assets bought in 2026, cost basis data was included in the submitted reports (Form 1099-DA).

Earlier this month, the IRS proposed scrapping physical copies sent to customers and making ‘electronic submission’ the default for tax reports.


Final Summary

  • The IRS will allow crypto investors to use their reporting methods for crypto taxes until the end of the year, rather than relying on the strict broker-submitted reports.
  • The move comes as the agency grapples with ways of lowering tax compliance burdens for crypto investors and brokers.

Preguntas relacionadas

QWhat relief has the IRS extended to crypto holders until the end of 2026?

AThe IRS has extended temporary relief allowing crypto holders to use alternative methods to identify crypto sales for tax purposes instead of relying strictly on broker-submitted reports.

QWhy was the FIFO method problematic for crypto investors?

AThe FIFO method required reporting the oldest coins first, which were often acquired cheaply and had appreciated significantly, resulting in higher capital gains taxes.

QWhat is the IRS's motivation for extending this relief, according to the article?

AThe move isn't just out of goodwill; the strict crypto reporting regime places a significant compliance burden on both operators (exchanges) and investors, and the IRS is grappling with ways to reduce these burdens.

QWhat change did the IRS propose earlier this month regarding tax report delivery?

AThe IRS proposed scrapping physical copies of tax reports sent to customers and making 'electronic submission' the default method.

QWhat did Shehan Chandrasekera say about IRS Notice 2026-20?

AShehan Chandrasekera stated that 'The IRS just quietly saved crypto investors from a massive tax headache by issuing Notice 2026-20.'

Lecturas Relacionadas

What's the Connection Between Pinduoduo's Huang Zheng and Blockchain?

This text explores the unexpected connection between Pinduoduo founder Colin Huang and blockchain, as suggested in his article *Turning Capitalism Upside Down*. Huang argues Pinduoduo's core business is about managing "uncertainty." He posits that wealth flows to the rich because they absorb life's uncertainties (e.g., illness, job loss) that devastate the poor, who pay a premium for certainty through insurance or stable prices. Pinduoduo's model attempts a "reverse insurance": by aggregating consumer demand via group-buying and flash sales, it creates a large, predictable order for manufacturers. This certainty allows factories to remove risk premiums, passing savings back as lower prices, thus partially reversing the wealth flow. The key obstacle, Huang notes, is that an individual's buying intent is an unreliable promise. He then asks if blockchain is the natural solution for this "reverse insurance." The text elaborates that blockchain, through smart contracts with binding deposits, could transform casual intent into a costly-to-break, enforceable commitment. This replaces interpersonal trust with coded rules, making promises credible, pricable, and resistant to fraud. Finally, the author draws a parallel to Bitcoin, framing two paths to creating certainty: the "Pinduoduo path" of aggregating decentralized will into scale, and the "Bitcoin path" of locking rules into immutable code. Both sacrifice something—personal freedom or system flexibility—to manufacture trust and predictability.

链捕手Hace 6 min(s)

What's the Connection Between Pinduoduo's Huang Zheng and Blockchain?

链捕手Hace 6 min(s)

The Storage Magnate Who Conquered a Trillion-Dollar Kingdom, Yet Ultimately Could Not Become the Richest

**Summary:** "The Memory Magnate Who Built a Trillion-Dollar Empire, Yet Never Became the Richest" explores the journey of Zhu Yiming, founder of GigaDevice (603986) and co-founder of the soon-to-IPO ChangXin Memory Technologies (CXMT). The article positions GigaDevice, a fabless chip designer now valued at ~¥340 billion, as a prequel to the massive IDM (Integrated Device Manufacturer) venture, CXMT. Starting in 2005 with minimal capital, Zhu strategically "picked up the pieces" by focusing on niche markets like NOR Flash and microcontrollers (MCUs), areas major players were exiting. This allowed GigaDevice to grow into a diversified semiconductor company, maintaining robust profitability even during industry downturns by controlling costs. However, the piece argues that in the highly cyclical and capital-intensive memory chip industry, the fabless model has limits. True resilience and scale require the ability for "counter-cyclical expansion" – investing heavily during downturns – a tactic only possible for IDMs like Samsung or SK Hynix. This insight led Zhu to partner with the Hefei city government in 2016 to establish CXMT, an IDM focused on DRAM. Zhu's symbolic moves, like forfeiting salary and diluting his equity, were crucial in securing the massive state and bank funding needed. CXMT's equipment base is now valued even higher than that of BYD's vast auto manufacturing empire. Despite the potential for CXMT to reach a market cap of ¥1-2 trillion upon its IPO, Zhu's indirect stake in both companies is estimated below 3%, placing his personal wealth far below that of China's top billionaires. The article concludes that his strategic vision built a trillion-yuan memory landscape, but the capital structure necessary to achieve it precluded a personal fortune of similar scale.

marsbitHace 13 min(s)

The Storage Magnate Who Conquered a Trillion-Dollar Kingdom, Yet Ultimately Could Not Become the Richest

marsbitHace 13 min(s)

XRP Ledger Daily Fees Drop Below $400 As Network Activity Question Returns

The XRP Ledger is drawing attention as daily network fees have fallen below $400. While low fees align with XRPL's design for affordable transactions and are often seen as a strength, the metric can also serve as an indicator of network demand and paid transaction volume. This data point of around $3,100 in weekly fee burn highlights the stark contrast with higher-fee chains like Ethereum and Bitcoin. The development fuels an ongoing debate. Proponents view low fees as a sign of efficiency and accessibility, while critics may question if the network is generating sufficient high-value activity relative to its market cap and payments-focused narrative. The article cautions against overstating the finding, noting a single low-fee day does not signify network failure. It instead adds context to discussions about XRPL's usage, especially alongside Ripple's broader initiatives in stablecoins (RLUSD), AI payments, and enterprise infrastructure. The report recommends monitoring for a fee rebound, checking transaction counts for a fuller picture, and confirming the trend via native explorers like Bithomp. It frames the story within a larger market shift where on-chain data, protocol updates, and infrastructure developments are becoming crucial alongside price action. The editorial stance is to present the verified data, explain its significance for assessing network activity, and avoid hype, positioning it as part of the daily crypto conversation.

bitcoinistHace 4 hora(s)

XRP Ledger Daily Fees Drop Below $400 As Network Activity Question Returns

bitcoinistHace 4 hora(s)

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片