TAO, NEAR, and Other AI Cryptocurrencies Record Heavy Losses

TheNewsCryptoPublicado a 2026-03-19Actualizado a 2026-03-19

Resumen

TAO and NEAR, along with other major AI cryptocurrencies, have recorded significant losses in the past 24 hours. TAO dropped nearly 10.12% to $247.80, while NEAR declined by 5.53%. Other AI tokens like ICP and RENDER also fell by 4.16% and 7.02%, respectively. Despite these daily losses, some, including TAO and RENDER, still show weekly gains. Both TAO and NEAR are forecasted to decline further in the next three months. The broader market downturn coincides with reports that Iran is considering imposing transit fees on ships passing through the Strait of Hormuz, raising concerns about rising shipping costs and their potential economic impact.

TAO and NEAR have lost significant values in the last 24 hours. Their decline aligns with the general downtrend across the crypto market. However, many more AI cryptocurrencies have also shed their respective values. This comes at a time when Iran is considering imposing transit fees via the Strait of Hormuz – triggering high price concerns.

TAO and NEAR

TAO has lost almost 10.12%, going down to $247.80 when the article is being drafted. Even the hourly loss comes to 1.24% for a significant level. However, the Bittensor token has added 16.28% in gains over the last 7 days. It remains in the top position with a market cap of more than $2.67 billion.

Sailing on the same ship is the NEAR Protocol token, NEAR. It is down by 5.53% over a day and 0.10% over an hour. The AI crypto seems to have held its ground strongly compared to TAO at the moment. It still lags when talking about the weekly gain because the addition is only 2.05%.

Interestingly, TAO and NEAR are forecasted to decline in the next 3 months as well. The former could plunge by 23.08% to around $191.08. The latter could plummet by approximately 11.99% to $1.19 from $1.35.

Other AI Cryptocurrencies

Other top AI cryptocurrencies that are down are ICP and RENDER. They have lost 4.16% and 7.02%, respectively, in a single day. Their values now translate to $2.52 and $1.65, applicable in the same order. ICP stands out among the top 4 AI tokens, as it has recorded a weekly loss of 2.85%. RENDER, like TAO and NEAR, has recorded a gain of 3.09%.

FIL, the Filecoin token, also stands out with an hourly gain of 0.05%. Its weekly gain is decent at 5.34%, and loss over the last 24 hours stands at 3.95%.

Transit Fees by Iran

Iran is reportedly considering the imposition of transit fees for ships that pass through the Strait of Hormuz. If imposed, every passage will have to pay tolls and taxes to Iran, which could add to the total shipping cost.

This seems to be applicable to states that have sanctioned it. An official confirmation or update regarding the matter is awaited. The report, anyway, remains a concern, given that Crude Oil price and Brent have already reached $97.41 and $113.71, respectively.

Highlighted Crypto News Today:

US Court Dismisses Coinbase User’s IRS Summons Challenge

TagsAI CRYPTOFILICPNEARRENDERTAO

Preguntas relacionadas

QWhat are the percentage losses for TAO and NEAR in the last 24 hours?

ATAO has lost almost 10.12% and NEAR is down by 5.53% in the last 24 hours.

QWhat is the forecasted price decline for TAO and NEAR over the next 3 months?

ATAO is forecasted to plunge by 23.08% to around $191.08, and NEAR could plummet by approximately 11.99% to $1.19.

QWhich other top AI cryptocurrencies, besides TAO and NEAR, have recorded losses?

AOther top AI cryptocurrencies that are down are ICP, which lost 4.16%, and RENDER, which lost 7.02% in a single day.

QWhat global event is mentioned as a potential factor contributing to market concerns?

AIran is reportedly considering imposing transit fees for ships passing through the Strait of Hormuz, which could increase shipping costs and is a market concern.

QWhich AI token mentioned in the article has recorded a weekly loss?

AICP stands out among the top AI tokens as it has recorded a weekly loss of 2.85%.

Lecturas Relacionadas

The Recursive AI Anthropic Warned About: Tian Yuandong's New Company Has Just Taken the "First Step"

Anthropic recently highlighted the rapid progress toward "recursive self-improvement," where AI systems autonomously design and train their successors. In response, Recursive Superintelligence, a new company co-founded by former Meta researcher Tian Yuan Dong, has publicly demonstrated its first step toward automating AI research. The company released a system designed to autonomously execute the full AI research cycle: generating ideas, implementing code, running experiments, and learning from results. It validated this approach by achieving state-of-the-art results on three diverse benchmarks: 1. **NanoChat Autoresearch:** Optimizing a small language model's validation loss under a fixed 5-minute GPU budget, improving upon the community's best result. 2. **NanoGPT Speedrun:** Reducing the time to train a GPT model to a specific loss on 8 H100 GPUs from 79.7 seconds to 77.5 seconds, beating a highly optimized, human-driven community effort. 3. **SOL-ExecBench:** Improving the overall score on NVIDIA's suite of 235 GPU kernel optimization tasks by 18%, closing the gap to the hardware limit. The system discovered novel optimizations in this highly specialized domain without direct human expertise. Recursive's system operates as a general framework, capable of parallel exploration and cross-task knowledge transfer while incorporating safeguards against reward hacking. The company, backed by $650M in funding and a star-studded team including Richard Socher and Alexey Dosovitskiy, aims to create AI that recursively enhances its own research capabilities. This development represents an early but concrete move toward a new paradigm where AI accelerates its own advancement. It occurs alongside Anthropic's warnings about the need for industry coordination and potential pauses when recursive self-improvement thresholds are reached, highlighting the dual trajectory of rapid technical progress and growing calls for careful stewardship.

marsbitHace 5 min(s)

The Recursive AI Anthropic Warned About: Tian Yuandong's New Company Has Just Taken the "First Step"

marsbitHace 5 min(s)

The Gold Buy-on-the-Dip Guide: Watch Interest Rates, Not Just War

"Gold Buying Guide: Focus on Interest Rates, Not Just War" Four months ago, gold buyers likely didn't anticipate buying at a peak that even a war couldn't sustain. After hitting a record high of $5,596 on January 29, gold entered a bear market just 91 days later, its fastest decline since 2008. A key trigger was the Fed's hawkish shift, highlighting that monetary policy, not geopolitics, is the primary driver. The article argues that the traditional "buy gold in turmoil" script has changed. While the US-Iran conflict initially boosted prices, the sustained rally in oil prices heightened inflation fears, forcing central banks to maintain or consider tighter policy. Since gold yields no interest, higher rates increase its opportunity cost, eroding its appeal. This dynamic was evident when gold fell sharply on May 18 despite positive peace talks, as lower oil prices eased inflation and thus rate hike pressures. The recent sell-off is also part of a broader market deleveraging. Correlations between gold, Nasdaq, and Bitcoin spiked as leveraged investors sold liquid assets to cover losses, creating a synchronized downturn. Historically, gold bottoms align with policy shifts, not conflict resolutions. The 2008 and 2022 bear markets ended with shifts to extreme easing and peak inflation expectations, respectively. For potential buyers, the author suggests monitoring three signals: 1) Peak interest rate hike expectations, 2) Reopening of the Strait of Hormuz (to ease oil/inflation pressure), and 3) A return to net inflows for Gold ETFs, indicating the end of forced selling. While predicting the exact bottom is impossible, the author's personal strategy involves scaling into a position across price levels like $4000, $3700, and $3500, committing no more than 30% of the intended total allocation initially, and adding the remainder only if key signals emerge. The core conclusion: In turbulent times, watching interest rates is more crucial than watching wars.

marsbitHace 11 min(s)

The Gold Buy-on-the-Dip Guide: Watch Interest Rates, Not Just War

marsbitHace 11 min(s)

Recent On-Chain Review: No Clear Narrative Under U.S. Stock Market Pressure, Just Hype

This article analyzes the current state of the Solana meme coin and community token ecosystem, highlighting a market caught between two dominant forces: attention-based PvP and a gradual return to community-centric projects. The first part explores the "Attention PvP" dynamic, where success is driven by celebrity endorsements, viral events, and speed. Examples include $JOTCHUA, which surged after its meme creator's social media activity, and $WORLDCUP, which outperformed a similar Base chain project ($PITCH) largely due to influencer support. The recent "pump.fun GO" feature, allowing bounty tasks for token promotion, is critiqued for fostering sensationalist and often negative stunts—like people getting token tickers tattooed on their bodies for rewards—reminiscent of old internet shock content. In contrast, the article points to a resurgence of organic, community-driven tokens that survive market volatility through strong holder bases and shared ideology, not just hype. Influencer Ansem is cited, arguing that durable meme coins rely on communities willing to endure losses and promote their core message daily. Examples given are older tokens like $neet (anti-work ethos), $troll, $buttcoin, and $triplet, which have maintained relative price stability. A prime example of this community-build model is the new project $KINS, the token for the browser-based MMORPG Kintara. Its success stems not from advanced graphics but from consistently delivering updates, fostering player trust, and creating genuine engagement (e.g., in-game economies, events, property auctions). It has attracted a growing player base and even notable KOLs as participants, demonstrating that sustainable growth can come from building trust rather than orchestrating pumps. The article concludes by questioning whether the market is ultimately a game of mutual trust or mutual deception, expressing hope that such reflection might lead to a healthier ecosystem.

marsbitHace 11 min(s)

Recent On-Chain Review: No Clear Narrative Under U.S. Stock Market Pressure, Just Hype

marsbitHace 11 min(s)

On-Chain Scene on Opening Day: $20 Billion Already Staked, How Do On-Chain Contracts Know Who Wins?

On the opening day of the 2026 World Cup, over $2 billion had already been wagered on just the "tournament winner" contracts on platforms like Polymarket and Kalshi. This article explores how these blockchain-based prediction markets actually function once the games begin. It breaks down the massive volume and explains how single-game and tournament-long contracts are priced, with values moving between 1-99 cents to reflect implied probabilities. A key mechanism highlighted is "elimination zeroing," where a team's "champion yes" contract immediately settles to zero once they are mathematically eliminated. The core technical question answered is: how does a smart contract "know" who won a real-world match? The answer lies in oracles. The article details two primary paradigms: UMA's "optimistic oracle" (used by most of Polymarket), which allows a challenge period after a proposed result, and Chainlink's multi-source data aggregation (used by FIFA partners like ADI Predictstreet), which automates settlement with minimal dispute windows. Finally, the article injects a note of caution, citing research estimating that a significant portion of historical trading volume on these platforms might be "wash trading" to inflate numbers. It concludes by contrasting the legal status of these "event contracts" under CFTC rules in the U.S. versus traditional, state-regulated sports betting. As the tournament progresses, the real-time operation of this multi-billion dollar machine—its settlements, eliminations, and underlying mechanisms—becomes a story as compelling as the football itself.

marsbitHace 26 min(s)

On-Chain Scene on Opening Day: $20 Billion Already Staked, How Do On-Chain Contracts Know Who Wins?

marsbitHace 26 min(s)

Trading

Spot
Futuros

Artículos destacados

Cómo comprar AL

¡Bienvenido a HTX.com! Hemos hecho que comprar Archloot (AL) sea simple y conveniente. Sigue nuestra guía paso a paso para iniciar tu viaje de criptos.Paso 1: crea tu cuenta HTXUtiliza tu correo electrónico o número de teléfono para registrarte y obtener una cuenta gratuita en HTX. Experimenta un proceso de registro sin complicaciones y desbloquea todas las funciones.Obtener mi cuentaPaso 2: ve a Comprar cripto y elige tu método de pagoTarjeta de crédito/débito: usa tu Visa o Mastercard para comprar Archloot (AL) al instante.Saldo: utiliza fondos del saldo de tu cuenta HTX para tradear sin problemas.Terceros: hemos agregado métodos de pago populares como Google Pay y Apple Pay para mejorar la comodidad.P2P: tradear directamente con otros usuarios en HTX.Over-the-Counter (OTC): ofrecemos servicios personalizados y tipos de cambio competitivos para los traders.Paso 3: guarda tu Archloot (AL)Después de comprar tu Archloot (AL), guárdalo en tu cuenta HTX. Alternativamente, puedes enviarlo a otro lugar mediante transferencia blockchain o utilizarlo para tradear otras criptomonedas.Paso 4: tradear Archloot (AL)Tradear fácilmente con Archloot (AL) en HTX's mercado spot. Simplemente accede a tu cuenta, selecciona tu par de trading, ejecuta tus trades y monitorea en tiempo real. Ofrecemos una experiencia fácil de usar tanto para principiantes como para traders experimentados.

238 Vistas totalesPublicado en 2024.12.11Actualizado en 2026.06.02

Cómo comprar AL

Discusiones

Bienvenido a la comunidad de HTX. Aquí puedes mantenerte informado sobre los últimos desarrollos de la plataforma y acceder a análisis profesionales del mercado. A continuación se presentan las opiniones de los usuarios sobre el precio de AL (AL).

活动图片