TAO hits $300-zone again, but when should traders expect next decisive move?

ambcryptoPublicado a 2026-03-21Actualizado a 2026-03-21

Resumen

Bittensor (TAO) revisited the $300 resistance level after a sharp 28% rebound from a low of $242.7, though it struggled to close decisively above the key January swing high of $302.4. While the short-term structure appears bullish on lower timeframes, the RSI suggests overbought conditions and the On-Balance Volume (OBV) shows a bearish divergence, indicating weakening buying pressure. Market momentum in the AI sector has slowed, and Bitcoin’s price action around $70K is likely to influence TAO’s next move. Traders are advised to wait for clearer signals before entering positions, as neither bulls nor sellers currently hold a decisive advantage.

Bittensor [TAO] continued its stellar performance on Thursday and Friday, 19-20 March. In those two days, it registered a 28% move from the low at $242.7 to the high at $310.6.

The AI sector was an outstanding performer during the previous week. However, the sector was unable to maintain its upward momentum this week. At the same time, TAO token’s prices challenged the 1-day timeframe’s swing high at $302.4, made in January.

The bulls were unable to overcome this resistance, but their fight to drive prices higher on Thursday and Friday showed intent. It also marked a lower timeframe bullish continuation.

The long-term holder conviction in Bitcoin [BTC] was growing too as the leading crypto held on to the psychological $70k-level. This could aid TAO buyers in the short-term. Will it also allow the longer-term bear structure to be overcome?

Pitched battle at TAO’s January swing high

The relative strength of the AI sector has slowed down. As the biggest AI crypto asset, TAO’s momentum has an impact on the sector. The altcoin ran into a long-term resistance level at $302. The subsequent dip to $242 was quickly bought up.

At the time of writing, the RSI was in the overbought territory and indicated an overextended market. Moreover, the price has been unable to close a daily trading session above $302 to signify a swing structure shift.

Interestingly, the daily trading volume has been rising over the past week. This represented an intense battle between bulls and bears at the $300-area. It is unclear who the winner will be, but Bitcoin’s next move will have a big influence on the outcome.

Bullish short-term structure was weakened by volume divergence

On the 4-hour chart, the structure seemed bullish. The move beyond $300.7 (white) represented a bullish structure break after the retracement to $242.7. At the time of writing, the price had found support at the moving averages, and the RSI was also above the neutral 50-level.

And yet, the OBV made a lower high over the past few days, even as the price pushed higher. This bearish divergence indicated a lack of buying pressure as TAO attempted to breach the $300-resistance.

Traders need to wait and watch Bitcoin’s moves over the weekend to understand where Bittensor token’s prices can go next. Neither buyers nor sellers have a clear advantage right now.

Final Summary

Bittensor challenged the $300-psychological level yet again after a brief retracement to $242.
Traders should not rush to enter positions, and patience for a day or two can yield more clarity.

Lecturas Relacionadas

iQiyi Is Too Impatient

The article "iQiyi Is Too Impatient" discusses the controversy surrounding the Chinese streaming platform IQiyi's recent announcement of an "AI Actor Library" during its 2026 World Conference. IQiyi claimed over 100 actors, including well-known names like Zhang Ruoyun and Yu Hewei, had joined the initiative. CEO Gong Yu suggested AI could enable actors to "star in 14 dramas a year instead of 4" and that "live-action filming might become a world cultural heritage." The announcement quickly sparked backlash. Multiple actors named in the list issued urgent statements denying they had signed any AI-related authorization agreements. This forced IQiyi to clarify that inclusion in the library only indicated a willingness to *consider* AI projects, with separate negotiations required for any specific role. The incident, which trended on social media with hashtags like "IQiyi is crazy," is presented as a sign of the company's growing desperation. Facing intense competition from short-video platforms like Douyin and Kuaishou, as well as Bilibili and Xiaohongshu, IQiyi's financial performance has weakened, with revenues declining for two consecutive years. The author argues that IQiyi is "too impatient" to tell a compelling AI story to reassure the market, especially as it pursues a listing on the Hong Kong stock exchange. The piece concludes by outlining three key "AI questions" IQiyi must answer: defining its role as a tool provider versus a content creator, balancing the "coldness" of AI with the human element audiences desire, and properly managing the interests of platforms, actors, and viewers. The core dilemma is that while AI can reduce costs and increase efficiency, it risks creating homogenized, formulaic content and devaluing human performers.

marsbitHace 48 min(s)

Jensen Huang Publicly Challenges Google and Amazon, Is the Chip Business Entirely Sustained by Anthropic?

In a candid interview, Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang challenged competitors like Google and Amazon, admitted past strategic errors, and criticized U.S. export controls on AI chips. He framed Nvidia’s role as turning “electricity in, tokens out,” emphasizing the complexity and value of AI inference. Huang dismissed rival custom chips like Google’s TPU and Amazon’s Trainium as inflexible and niche, claiming their growth relies heavily on clients like Anthropic. He also acknowledged missing early investment opportunities in OpenAI and Anthropic. On China, Huang warned that export restrictions risk pushing the country toward self-sufficiency and could cost U.S. leadership in AI. Finally, he explained Nvidia’s acquisition of Groq as a move to serve premium, low-latency token markets. Throughout, Huang emphasized ecosystem trust and Nvidia’s central role in global AI infrastructure.

marsbitHace 54 min(s)

Jensen Huang Publicly Challenges Google and Amazon, Is the Chip Business Entirely Sustained by Anthropic?

marsbitHace 54 min(s)

ARK's SpaceX IPO Investment Guide: $1.75 Trillion Valuation, 95x Price-to-Sales Ratio, Where Is the Money Going?

ARK Invest, a major investor in SpaceX, provides an analysis following SpaceX's confidential IPO filing on April 1, 2026, targeting a $1.75 trillion valuation and up to $75 billion in funding for a Nasdaq listing around June 2026. This would be the largest IPO in history. The valuation implies a price-to-sales ratio of ~95x based on ~$18.5B in projected 2025 revenue. ARK argues this reflects future potential, not current reality. Key drivers include Starlink, with over 10M users and $20B+ in 2026 revenue, launch services which have reduced costs by ~95% since 2008, and the strategic merger with xAI in February 2026, enabling vertically integrated AI and orbital computing. ARK’s investment thesis is based on SpaceX's proven execution of ambitious goals, like reusable rockets and global satellite internet. The firm notes that significant value creation often occurs pre-IPO, and its Venture Fund offers exposure to SpaceX’s earlier private stages. Post-IPO, the fund will manage the position per standard lock-up and rebalancing processes, maintaining flexibility to reinvest in other private innovations. The analysis is based on public estimates and ARK research; the S-1 filing is not yet public. This is not investment advice.

marsbitHace 55 min(s)

ARK's SpaceX IPO Investment Guide: $1.75 Trillion Valuation, 95x Price-to-Sales Ratio, Where Is the Money Going?

marsbitHace 55 min(s)

Stablecoin Hype Overblown? Moody’s Says Banks Aren’t In Danger

The article discusses the legislative stalemate in the US over the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act of 2025 (CLARITY Act), which aims to regulate crypto assets. A key point of contention is whether stablecoins should be allowed to pay interest, with crypto companies opposing a ban and banks supporting it. Moody's analyst Abhi Srivastava states that, for now, stablecoins do not pose a significant threat to traditional banks due to existing efficient payment systems and the current prohibition on yield-bearing stablecoins. This limits their appeal for pulling deposits from banks at scale. However, with the stablecoin market cap exceeding $300 billion and growth in tokenized assets, banks could face future pressure from deposit outflows. The crypto industry warns that failure to pass the bill could lead to stricter regulatory crackdowns. Negotiations continue with little progress, despite both sides desiring a resolution.

bitcoinistHace 1 hora(s)

Stablecoin Hype Overblown? Moody’s Says Banks Aren’t In Danger

bitcoinistHace 1 hora(s)

Not a Price Hike, but a Supply Cut? Oil Prices Have Crossed the Tipping Point

The global oil market has passed a critical point, shifting the focus from price increases to potential physical supply shortages. The core issue is a time mismatch: even if the Strait of Hormuz reopens, shipping disruptions have already caused significant delays, which will continue to deplete onshore crude inventories for weeks. Refinery behavior acts as an amplifier. Reduced runs in Asia and Europe don’t reflect weaker demand but instead shrink product inventories, raising fuel prices and refining margins, which in turn encourages higher runs—creating a self-reinforcing cycle. If the Strait remains closed beyond April, traditional pricing models may fail. The market could face an unprecedented physical shortfall of 11-13 million barrels per day—roughly four times historical disruption levels. In such a scenario, price becomes an inadequate balancing tool. The only way to rebalance the market would be policy-driven demand destruction, similar to COVID-era lockdowns. Current prices around $95/barrel are insufficient to balance the market. Key signals to watch include inventory levels, policy announcements, and the pace of involuntary demand contraction. Geopolitically, the situation appears likely to worsen before improving, with little room for compromise between the US and Iran.

marsbitHace 3 hora(s)

Not a Price Hike, but a Supply Cut? Oil Prices Have Crossed the Tipping Point

marsbitHace 3 hora(s)

Trading

Spot

Futuros

Artículos destacados

Cómo comprar MOVE

¡Bienvenido a HTX.com! Hemos hecho que comprar Movement (MOVE) sea simple y conveniente. Sigue nuestra guía paso a paso para iniciar tu viaje de criptos.Paso 1: crea tu cuenta HTXUtiliza tu correo electrónico o número de teléfono para registrarte y obtener una cuenta gratuita en HTX. Experimenta un proceso de registro sin complicaciones y desbloquea todas las funciones.Obtener mi cuentaPaso 2: ve a Comprar cripto y elige tu método de pagoTarjeta de crédito/débito: usa tu Visa o Mastercard para comprar Movement (MOVE) al instante.Saldo: utiliza fondos del saldo de tu cuenta HTX para tradear sin problemas.Terceros: hemos agregado métodos de pago populares como Google Pay y Apple Pay para mejorar la comodidad.P2P: tradear directamente con otros usuarios en HTX.Over-the-Counter (OTC): ofrecemos servicios personalizados y tipos de cambio competitivos para los traders.Paso 3: guarda tu Movement (MOVE)Después de comprar tu Movement (MOVE), guárdalo en tu cuenta HTX. Alternativamente, puedes enviarlo a otro lugar mediante transferencia blockchain o utilizarlo para tradear otras criptomonedas.Paso 4: tradear Movement (MOVE)Tradear fácilmente con Movement (MOVE) en HTX's mercado spot. Simplemente accede a tu cuenta, selecciona tu par de trading, ejecuta tus trades y monitorea en tiempo real. Ofrecemos una experiencia fácil de usar tanto para principiantes como para traders experimentados.

221 Vistas totalesPublicado en 2024.12.13Actualizado en 2025.03.21

Discusiones

Bienvenido a la comunidad de HTX. Aquí puedes mantenerte informado sobre los últimos desarrollos de la plataforma y acceder a análisis profesionales del mercado. A continuación se presentan las opiniones de los usuarios sobre el precio de MOVE (MOVE).