Artículos Relacionados con Shareholder Rights

El Centro de Noticias de HTX ofrece los artículos más recientes y un análisis profundo sobre "Shareholder Rights", cubriendo tendencias del mercado, actualizaciones de proyectos, desarrollos tecnológicos y políticas regulatorias en la industria de cripto.

How to Define "Real U.S. Stocks": Differences Between On-Chain Tokens, Price Contracts, and Direct Broker Connections

**Title:** Defining "Real US Stocks": Differences Among On-Chain Tokens, Price Contracts, and Broker-Direct Access **Summary:** In 2026, using stablecoins to purchase US stocks is mainstream, but products marketed as "buying US stocks with USDT" offer fundamentally different assets. This article analyzes three primary models. **1. Tokenized Stocks:** These are on-chain tokens representing economic exposure to underlying stocks, held by an issuer or custodian. They offer benefits like 24/7 trading and DeFi composability (e.g., use as loan collateral). However, users lack direct legal shareholder status; dividends may not be paid in cash, and voting rights are typically non-binding advisory expressions. Examples include platforms like Ondo Finance. **2. Stock Futures / Equity Perpetuals:** These are derivative contracts tracking a stock's price, allowing leveraged long/short positions 24/7, similar to crypto perpetuals. They offer high efficiency and flexibility but involve funding fees, which can be a significant long-term cost, especially during strong trends. Crucially, they confer no ownership rights (dividends, voting) to the holder. **3. Broker-Direct Model:** This model provides access to real securities via licensed broker-dealers. Stocks/ETFs are bought and held within the US clearing and custodial system (e.g., DTCC), making it the only path to genuine stock ownership. Users receive cash dividends and formal proxy voting rights (where applicable). It supports thousands of stocks and ETFs, far exceeding the coverage of the other two models. Key advantages include no funding fees, a clean cost structure for long-term holds, and the potential to transfer holdings to other brokers. Some platforms facilitate stablecoin (USDT/USDC) deposits, reducing reliance on traditional banking. A critical distinction exists *within* the broker-direct model: the underlying brokerage architecture (e.g., Fully Disclosed IB, Omnibus IB, Self-Clearing) determines how client assets are held, protected, and how safeguards like SIPC insurance are conveyed. Users should verify the specific clearing structure and regulatory compliance of any platform. In conclusion, "buying US stocks with USDT" can mean holding an on-chain economic proxy (Tokenized Stocks), trading a price derivative (Stock Futures), or owning the actual security (Broker-Direct). For users seeking full ownership rights and long-term investment, the broker-direct model is the definitive choice, though its implementation details require careful scrutiny.

marsbit06/01 04:32

How to Define "Real U.S. Stocks": Differences Between On-Chain Tokens, Price Contracts, and Direct Broker Connections

marsbit06/01 04:32

The Era of On-Chain Voting Is Here: Do Your Stocks Truly 'Belong' to You?

The era of on-chain shareholder voting is approaching, as Galaxy Digital (GLXY) pioneers the first-ever on-chain voting for a public company, scheduled for its 2026 annual meeting. This initiative, developed in partnership with fintech firm Broadridge on the Avalanche blockchain, aims to transform tokenized stocks from mere "digital IOUs" into full-fledged equity with complete voting and dividend rights. The move addresses a critical flaw in traditional finance exposed during the 2021 GameStop saga: the disconnect between nominal ownership and actual shareholder rights due to multi-layered intermediation. Broadridge’s solution enables direct, transparent, and immutable voting via digital wallets, eliminating inefficiencies and opacity in the current proxy system. Key features include multi-chain auditability, a streamlined voting interface, and real-time transparency, which could empower retail and institutional investors alike. While this innovation promises greater shareholder engagement and governance transparency, the IMF warns of potential risks, such as accelerated crisis propagation due to blockchain’s settlement speed. Widespread adoption still faces hurdles, including regulatory uncertainty, resistance from traditional financial intermediaries, and technical barriers for users. However, with major players like Nasdaq and Blackrock advancing tokenization efforts, on-chain voting could mark a significant step toward authentic ownership and shareholder-centric capitalism.

marsbit04/10 14:11

The Era of On-Chain Voting Is Here: Do Your Stocks Truly 'Belong' to You?

marsbit04/10 14:11

活动图片