Artículos Relacionados con Nodes

El Centro de Noticias de HTX ofrece los artículos más recientes y un análisis profundo sobre "Nodes", cubriendo tendencias del mercado, actualizaciones de proyectos, desarrollos tecnológicos y políticas regulatorias en la industria de cripto.

Why do people like Luke still want to fork Bitcoin despite having no support? BIP-100 has already been declared a failure!

On August 8th, the Bitcoin network experienced a contentious fork triggered by BIP-110, despite the proposal having only 2.53% miner signaling support in the prior period. Led primarily by developer Luke Dashjr and based on his Bitcoin Knots implementation (not merged into Bitcoin Core), this User-Activated Soft Fork (UASF) aimed to impose strict new limits on non-financial data (like Ordinals inscriptions) within blocks to reduce long-term node costs. The fork activated at block height 961632, with BIP-110 nodes rejecting blocks without the required signaling. This created two chains: the dominant original chain continuing normally, and a low-hashrate BIP-110 chain which quickly fell behind. The core conflict is between those viewing block space as a fee market open to all data and those prioritizing Bitcoin as a monetary network, seeking to ban what they see as blockchain "spam." BIP-110's strategy relied on economic nodes (exchanges, wallets) adopting the new rules first, hoping to force miners to follow. However, this has not materialized. The BIP-110 chain now faces severe challenges: extremely slow block times potentially stretching over 1.9 years before its rules would even activate, a lack of broad economic support, and no automatic replay protection. For most users, Bitcoin's main chain operates unchanged. The immediate technical impact is limited to services running BIP-110 software, which now see a different blockchain. The event highlights ongoing ideological disputes within Bitcoin but, given its minimal support, is unlikely to alter the main network's trajectory.

marsbit08/11 03:26

Why do people like Luke still want to fork Bitcoin despite having no support? BIP-100 has already been declared a failure!

marsbit08/11 03:26

BIP-110 Bitcoin branch stalls after two blocks as gap widens

Bitcoin's BIP-110-enforcing blockchain branch has stalled after producing only two blocks, reaching block 961,633. Meanwhile, the main (non-enforcing) chain has progressed to block 961,721, creating an 88-block gap. The divergence began when BIP-110 entered a mandatory signaling phase at block 961,632. This rule requires nodes to reject blocks that do not signal support via a specific version bit. However, only 2.53% of blocks in the preceding period signaled support, leaving the enforcing branch with minimal hash power. Its progress is further hampered because it must mine through a full difficulty adjustment period before its mining difficulty can be reduced. The proposal has drawn criticism from figures like Michael Saylor and Adam Back, who argue it threatens Bitcoin's neutral consensus and credibility.

cointelegraph08/09 11:10

BIP-110 Bitcoin branch stalls after two blocks as gap widens

cointelegraph08/09 11:10

BIP-110 Supporters Prepare to Switch to PoW if Miners Reject 'Soft Fork' Plan

BIP-110 supporters are preparing a backup plan involving a potential proof-of-work (PoW) algorithm change if miners refuse to cooperate with the proposed "soft fork." The code, ported to the modern Bitcoin Knots codebase, is described as a contingency "nuclear option" rather than an immediate plan. BIP-110 itself aims to temporarily limit non-financial data (like Ordinals and Runes) in Bitcoin transactions through a "Reduced Data Temporary Softfork." With the mandatory signaling window approaching, miner support for BIP-110 remains low (around 2.59%). If miners do not signal support, enforcing nodes could split into a separate chain. The prepared PoW change code would make current ASIC mining hardware obsolete on any new chain, providing an exit path from existing miner hash power. The change includes mechanisms to help a new chain with low initial hash rate start producing blocks. The situation is causing broader ecosystem preparations. Lightning Network operators like Start9 are advising users to close channels preemptively to avoid post-fork complexities. Major mining pools and exchanges have been largely silent, while smaller operators show some support. The debate echoes past governance battles, centering on whether economic nodes or miners ultimately set Bitcoin's rules. The immediate focus is on whether miner signaling behavior changes during the imminent mandatory period.

cryptonews.ru08/07 23:42

BIP-110 Supporters Prepare to Switch to PoW if Miners Reject 'Soft Fork' Plan

cryptonews.ru08/07 23:42

Sailor from Strategy Calls on BIP-110 Supporters to 'Wait' Until the Fork

In a recent post, Sailor from Strategy has called on supporters of BIP-110 to "wait" and ultimately abandon the proposal ahead of a potential network fork. The proposal, which aims to limit the amount of non-transactional data (like Ordinals inscriptions) that can be attached to Bitcoin transactions, has garnered only minimal support. As of block 961,022, it had just 38 signaling blocks (2.70%), far below the 55% threshold required for voluntary activation. Sailor argues that reaching the 55% threshold is now impossible and warns of a chain split. Around block 961,632 (estimated early August), nodes enforcing BIP-110 will begin rejecting blocks that do not signal support. If major mining pools like Foundry and AntPool do not switch sides, the main Bitcoin chain will continue unaffected, while BIP-110 nodes risk forking off into an irrelevant chain. Proponents, including Bitcoin Knots developers and the Ocean mining pool, argue the limits would reduce node strain and fees, but critics like Sailor contend they would set a dangerous precedent by allowing the network to judge transaction intent. He urges backers to stand down now to avoid a disruptive split.

cryptonews.ru08/05 08:45

Sailor from Strategy Calls on BIP-110 Supporters to 'Wait' Until the Fork

cryptonews.ru08/05 08:45

XRP Ledger Launches Global Network of Public Nodes

The XRP Ledger Foundation has partnered with Ankr to launch a global network of public nodes for the XRP Ledger (XRPL). This new infrastructure aims to simplify developer and user interaction by eliminating the need to run personal nodes and expanding the network's reach. The globally distributed nodes, located from New York to Singapore, provide public JSON-RPC endpoints for both the mainnet and testnet, along with real-time network monitoring. This deployment occurs just ahead of the planned mainnet upgrade to version 3.3.0, pending validator approval. That upcoming release includes five proposed amendments designed to enhance asset tokenization with features like confidential multi-purpose tokens (via zero-knowledge proofs), batch processing for atomic settlements, delegated permissions, sponsored fees, and dynamic token properties.

cryptonews.ru08/03 23:21

XRP Ledger Launches Global Network of Public Nodes

cryptonews.ru08/03 23:21

Who Decides the Rules of Bitcoin? BIP-110 Ignites Governance Debate

Bitcoin's governance is once again at the center of a heated debate, this time ignited by BIP-110, the "Reduced Data Temporary Softfork." This proposal aims to curb non-monetary data (like inscriptions and Runes) by introducing seven new consensus-layer restrictions over a year, such as limiting new output scripts to 34 bytes and restoring the OP_RETURN cap to 83 bytes. The controversy stems from BIP-110's fundamental shift: it moves the battle against "spam" from node relay and miner policies to the consensus layer, rendering currently valid transactions invalid. Supporters, arguing that default policy governance has failed (highlighted by Bitcoin Core v30's relaxation of OP_RETURN limits), see this as necessary to protect node resources and Bitcoin's monetary focus. Opponents, led by figures like Michael Saylor and Adam Back, warn it dangerously centralizes governance. Saylor listed 110 reasons against it, criticizing its low 55% miner activation threshold and potential for chain splits. Back emphasized Bitcoin's "permissionless" ethos, arguing no single group should impose value judgments via consensus rules. Further complicating matters, technical critiques suggest BIP-110 may be technically circumventable, and a "BlockSlop" vulnerability in its upgrade path poses a consensus risk. The debate has drawn in diverse stakeholders: miners (with pools like Ocean signaling support and Foundry polling clients), node operators (like Bitcoin Knots), and new players like corporate treasury holder MicroStrategy (Saylor), whose market influence adds a novel dimension. Ultimately, BIP-110 acts as a governance stress test, exposing the unresolved question: who decides Bitcoin's rules? It pits the authority of miners, node operators, developers, and capital holders against each other, with each side claiming to defend Bitcoin's core principles of neutrality and security.

marsbit07/21 06:41

Who Decides the Rules of Bitcoin? BIP-110 Ignites Governance Debate

marsbit07/21 06:41

Who Decides Bitcoin's Rules? BIP-110 Ignites Governance Debate

Title: Who Decides Bitcoin's Rules? BIP-110 Ignites Governance Debate A new technical proposal, BIP-110 (Reduced Data Temporary Softfork), has sparked a fundamental governance debate within the Bitcoin community. It aims to impose new consensus rules for one year to limit non-financial data (like inscriptions and Runes) on-chain, moving beyond simple node and miner policy filters to invalidate currently valid transactions. Supporters argue that default policies have failed due to workarounds, necessitating consensus-layer changes to protect Bitcoin's core monetary function from data spam. Critics, including Michael Saylor and Adam Back, contend this dangerously centralizes judgment, undermines permissionlessness, and sets a risky governance precedent. They advocate for market-based solutions like fees or Layer 2s instead. The debate exposes deeper tensions: miners are divided on activation; node operators assert their sovereignty; Bitcoin Core developers influence defaults without direct accountability; and large corporate holders like MicroStrategy now wield narrative influence. Technically, BIP-110 may not fully block data and carries a disclosed consensus bug risk. Ultimately, BIP-110 acts as a stress test, forcing the community to confront the unresolved question: who legitimately decides what Bitcoin is and how it evolves, amidst competing claims from miners, nodes, developers, and capital holders.

链捕手07/21 06:30

Who Decides Bitcoin's Rules? BIP-110 Ignites Governance Debate

链捕手07/21 06:30

Less than 1% Support, Yet BIP-110 Forcibly Pushes Bitcoin Towards a Soft Fork?

The controversial Bitcoin Improvement Proposal (BIP-110), which seeks to limit non-financial data like Ordinals and NFTs in Bitcoin transactions, is approaching a critical "forced activation" window in early August. Despite having extremely low support—less than 1% from miners and about 15% from nodes, far below its 55% activation threshold—the proposal’s rules will be enforced by supporting nodes, potentially creating a chain split. Proponents, led by developer Luke Dashjr and his Ocean pool, argue it’s necessary to curb “spam” and refocus Bitcoin on its monetary role. However, major opponents like Adam Back, Jameson Lopp, and Michael Saylor contend that BIP-110 fails to solve core issues, risks stifling innovation, compromises Bitcoin's censorship-resistant nature, and could fragment the network. Analysts suggest the minority BIP-110 chain will likely fail to become the longest chain due to lack of hash power, potentially leading to its abandonment or a permanent, separate fork with limited economic viability.

marsbit07/18 12:12

Less than 1% Support, Yet BIP-110 Forcibly Pushes Bitcoin Towards a Soft Fork?

marsbit07/18 12:12

Support Rate Less Than 1%, BIP-110 Still Pushes Bitcoin Towards a Soft Fork?

Title: BIP-110 Pushes Bitcoin Towards a Soft Fork Despite Less Than 1% Approval With its August mandatory activation window approaching, the controversial BIP-110 proposal is back in the spotlight. Proposed in December 2025 by Dathon Ohm and supported by Bitcoin Core developer Luke Dashjr, BIP-110 aims to impose a one-year limit on arbitrary/non-monetary data in Bitcoin transactions, primarily targeting large data storage like Ordinals and Bitcoin NFTs, to reduce network "spam" and refocus Bitcoin on its monetary function. However, the proposal faces overwhelming opposition. To activate, BIP-110 requires a 55% threshold, yet current miner support is below 1%. Of the 102,674 network nodes, only 14.64% (15,035) signal readiness to enforce it. Despite this lack of consensus, BIP-110 has a contentious "mandatory window" mechanism: if the threshold isn't met by block height 961,632, supporting nodes will begin rejecting non-compliant blocks from height 961,632 to 963,647, attempting to force activation by block 965,664. This could lead to a chain split in early August between a minority chain enforcing BIP-110 and the main chain. Proponents, led by Luke Dashjr (founder of Ocean mining pool), argue that inscriptions constitute an "attack" on Bitcoin, congesting block space and raising transaction fees, thereby undermining Bitcoin's primary use as money. They view BIP-110 not as a change but as a reversal of a harmful change. Opponents, including figures like Adam Back, Jameson Lopp, and Michael Saylor, contend that BIP-110 fails to solve the spam problem while creating new risks. They warn it could stifle future innovation (e.g., impacting BitVM), introduce transaction censorship—eroding Bitcoin's neutrality—and potentially cause a damaging chain split that fragments developer resources, hash power, and monetary consensus. They argue market-based fee pressure and block size limits already manage congestion effectively. Potential outcomes post-activation include: 1) The BIP-110 chain stalling due to insufficient hash power; 2) The BIP-110 chain becoming the longest chain if it gains majority miner support (though currently, Ocean holds only 2.6% of hash power vs. opponents like F2Pool at 13.6%); or 3) A persistent minority chain that remains economically unviable, potentially leading to a permanent fork. Most analysts and prediction markets deem BIP-110's success unlikely, with one market giving only a 10% probability that it will become the accepted longest chain by September 2026.

marsbit07/17 10:27

Support Rate Less Than 1%, BIP-110 Still Pushes Bitcoin Towards a Soft Fork?

marsbit07/17 10:27

Ethereum uses less power than British Museum – Here’s what changed

Ethereum's transition from Proof-of-Work (PoW) to Proof-of-Stake (PoS) in "The Merge" has drastically reduced its energy consumption. The network now uses approximately 7.87 GWh of electricity annually, less than half the British Museum's usage, marking a reduction of over 99.9% from pre-Merge levels. This has also cut its carbon footprint by 99.98% to an estimated 2.37 kilotonnes of CO2 equivalent per year, comparable to the emissions of about 900 UK households. The Cambridge Centre for Alternative Finance (CCAF) reports that Ethereum's infrastructure remains decentralized, though geographically concentrated, with 62% of nodes hosted in the US, Germany, Finland, and France. About 56.4% of its electricity comes from sustainable sources, primarily nuclear and renewables, exceeding the global average. Future developments like stateless verification may further reduce energy needs. Meanwhile, Ethereum's development enters a new phase with "Lean Ethereum," a multi-year overhaul plan for the network's evolution. At the time of reporting, ETH's price saw a slight increase, trading near $1,800.

ambcrypto07/11 16:02

Ethereum uses less power than British Museum – Here’s what changed

ambcrypto07/11 16:02

活动图片

Bitcoinright-arrow

Project Updatesright-arrow