South Korea Delays Digital Asset Basic Law to 2026

TheNewsCryptoPublicado a 2025-12-31Actualizado a 2025-12-31

Resumen

South Korea has postponed the implementation of its Digital Asset Basic Law to 2026 due to regulatory disagreements, primarily between the Financial Services Commission and the Bank of Korea, over stablecoin oversight. The legislation, intended to establish a foundational crypto regulatory framework, aims to enhance investor protection through stricter rules, including no-fault liability for operators and reserve requirements for stablecoin issuers. However, disputes over enforcement authority and reserve management have stalled progress, creating uncertainty for crypto firms. The ruling party has proposed consolidating various proposals into a revised bill, with a focus on developing a Korean won-backed stablecoin to counter dollar-dominated stablecoins.

South Korea has delayed its Digital Asset Basic Law till 2026, as regulators are still divided over stablecoin oversight authority, as revealed by legislative sources. The policymakers have halted the crypto legislation as the Financial Services Commission and the Bank of Korea carry on clashing over control of stablecoin reserves and enforcement responsibilities, making regulatory uncertainty in one of Asia’s biggest crypto markets.

The Digital Asset Basic Law is made in a way to be the foundation of South Korea’s cryptocurrency regulatory framework. The legislation is focused on strengthening investor protection by putting robust and strict legal regulations on digital asset operators as per the draft bill.

The prominent offer includes the introduction of no-fault liability, making operators responsible for user losses even without determined negligence. The draft also needs stablecoin issuers to keep reserves surpassing 100% of circulating supply kept at banks or dignified institutions and different from the issuer’s balance sheet to restrict contagion risks.

Stablecoin oversight came as the major point of contention between regulators. At the same time, the authorities widely agree on the requirement of stronger supervision; they haven’t reached consensus on the basis of responsibilities for preserved rule enforcement and licensing authority.

The Non-Agreement

The non-agreement has entangled decisions over enforcement powers with the treatment of reserve assets, pushing authorities to delay the bill instead of advancing legislation having unresolved structural issues.

The delay further creates an uncertainty for crypto firms of South Korea, together with exchanges, payment providers and stablecoin issuers. If the regulatory framework is not complete, then it may affect the product launches, investment decisions, and operational planning, as said by industry observers.

The ruling party has planned to consolidate various policymaker proposals into a revised digital asset bill. The president of the Democratic Party, Lee Jae Myung, has recognised that a Korean won-supported stablecoin is a national priority, declaring it could be against the dominance of US dollar-linked stablecoins in global crypto markets, as per the statements from the presidential office.

Highlighted Crypto News Today:

Bitcoin Slides Below $90K as Spot BTC ETFs Record $780M in Outflows

Preguntas relacionadas

QWhy has South Korea delayed the implementation of its Digital Asset Basic Law until 2026?

ASouth Korea has delayed the Digital Asset Basic Law to 2026 because regulators, specifically the Financial Services Commission and the Bank of Korea, are divided over stablecoin oversight authority, including control of stablecoin reserves and enforcement responsibilities.

QWhat is the primary purpose of the Digital Asset Basic Law according to the draft bill?

AThe primary purpose of the Digital Asset Basic Law is to serve as the foundation of South Korea's cryptocurrency regulatory framework, with a focus on strengthening investor protection by imposing robust and strict legal regulations on digital asset operators.

QWhat are two key provisions included in the draft of the Digital Asset Basic Law?

ATwo key provisions are: 1) The introduction of no-fault liability, making operators responsible for user losses even without determined negligence. 2) A requirement for stablecoin issuers to keep reserves exceeding 100% of the circulating supply, held at banks or dignified institutions and kept separate from the issuer's balance sheet.

QHow does the regulatory delay impact crypto firms in South Korea?

AThe delay creates uncertainty for crypto firms, including exchanges, payment providers, and stablecoin issuers. It may affect their product launches, investment decisions, and operational planning until a complete regulatory framework is established.

QWhat national priority regarding stablecoins was recognized by the president of the Democratic Party, Lee Jae Myung?

ALee Jae Myung recognized the creation of a Korean won-supported stablecoin as a national priority, stating it could counter the dominance of US dollar-linked stablecoins in global crypto markets.

Lecturas Relacionadas

Bitcoin ETFs Rout Extends To June With $1.72 Billion Net Outflows In First Week

U.S. Bitcoin spot ETFs extended their downturn into early June, recording net outflows of approximately $1.72 billion from June 1-5 following a poor May. This trend reflects sustained bearish sentiment, with only one day of positive net inflows in the past 15 trading sessions. BlackRock's IBIT led the withdrawals with $1.34 billion in outflows, while most other major funds also saw redemptions. Total ETF net assets fell over 20% to $75.12 billion. In parallel, Ethereum spot ETFs saw net outflows of $168 million, indicating investor caution amid macroeconomic uncertainty. Bitcoin's price hovered around $61,592 at press time.

bitcoinistHace 2 hora(s)

Bitcoin ETFs Rout Extends To June With $1.72 Billion Net Outflows In First Week

bitcoinistHace 2 hora(s)

Zcash Suffers Historic Collapse As Billions Vanish From Market Value

Zcash, a privacy-focused cryptocurrency, suffered a historic collapse in price, losing over 50% of its value in 24 hours and erasing billions from its market cap. The dramatic sell-off was triggered by the disclosure of a major vulnerability in the Zcash Orchard privacy pool that had remained undetected since May 2022. A security researcher, using AI, developed a proof-of-concept to generate counterfeit ZEC. While the bug was patched by June 2, Zcash's privacy design makes it impossible to verify if any fake coins were minted before the fix, fueling market panic and uncertainty. This event highlights the trade-off between privacy and transparency. In response, Shielded Labs is exploring a network upgrade to allow supply verification. Despite the crisis, proponents argue that the discovery by world-class security researchers demonstrates the network's commitment to proactive hardening and resilience.

bitcoinistHace 6 hora(s)

Zcash Suffers Historic Collapse As Billions Vanish From Market Value

bitcoinistHace 6 hora(s)

Has the 'Digital Gold' Narrative for BTC Failed?

**Title: Has the "Digital Gold" Narrative for Bitcoin Failed?** The article argues that Bitcoin's "digital gold" narrative remains valid despite a recent sharp price decline (from a peak near $126k in Oct 2025 to briefly under $61k in Feb 2026). It presents a long-term investment framework based on three core points: **1. Viewing Bitcoin as an Asset:** Bitcoin is presented as a superior potential store of value compared to gold. Key arguments are its absolute scarcity (21 million cap), superior portability, and transparent auditability via its public ledger. While acknowledging its current use in early, volatile stages (~3-4% global adoption), the author draws parallels to the early, disruptive phases of the internet and e-commerce. **2. Understanding the Recent Downturn:** The current ~50% correction is framed as a predictable, consensus-driven cycle following its post-halving peak (the 2024 halving preceded the Oct 2025 high). A crucial factor is a historic "changing of hands": the influx of new institutional buyers via ETFs allowed early, low-cost holders (miners, OG believers) to take profits. The author notes that while severe, Bitcoin's historical drawdowns (e.g., 93% in 2011, 77% in 2021-22) have been progressively smaller, suggesting maturing holder structure and decreasing volatility over time. **3. The Long-Term Perspective:** The long-term thesis hinges on Bitcoin capturing a portion of gold's market value. With Bitcoin's market cap at ~$1.4 trillion (at $70k) versus gold's ~$20 trillion, significant upside potential exists if the "digital gold" narrative is partially realized. However, the author strongly cautions that short-term risks remain, the bottom is unpredictable, and high volatility is inherent. The real risk is not Bitcoin failing but poor personal position management (over-leverage, wrong capital) and a lack of deep understanding, which can force investors out during severe downturns. The conclusion uses Amazon's 95% crash post-2000 dot-com bubble and subsequent 42x recovery as an analogy. The ultimate question is not if Bitcoin's price will rise, but if an investor's strategy and conviction can withstand the volatility to see the long-term play out. The recent divergence (gold up, Bitcoin down) is posed not as a narrative failure, but as potential evidence of this ongoing, painful transition from a speculative asset to a mainstream allocation.

marsbitHace 7 hora(s)

Has the 'Digital Gold' Narrative for BTC Failed?

marsbitHace 7 hora(s)

Has BTC's 'Digital Gold' Narrative Failed?

The article discusses Bitcoin's "digital gold" narrative, its recent price drop, and long-term outlook through the perspective of "Jason". It argues the narrative is not a failure but that Bitcoin represents a superior, new asset class due to its fixed supply (21 million), portability, and auditability. The piece compares its current ~3-4% global adoption rate to early internet/e-commerce, suggesting significant growth potential. Regarding the 2025-2026 price decline (from ~$126k to briefly under $61k), the author views it as a predictable, consensus-driven sell-off within Bitcoin's ~4-year cycle post-halving, exacerbated by a major "handover" from early, low-cost holders to new institutional buyers via ETFs. A key observation is that historical peak-to-trough drawdowns have lessened over time (e.g., 93% in 2011 to ~50% in 2026), indicating maturing volatility as holder structure changes. For the long term, the author uses a simple framework: Bitcoin's total market cap (~$1.4T at $70k) is only about 7% of gold's (~$20T). Even capturing 30-50% of gold's value would imply substantial upside. However, the article strongly cautions against viewing this as investment advice, emphasizing extreme volatility and the critical importance of risk management, position sizing, and deep fundamental understanding to survive severe drawdowns. It concludes by drawing a parallel to Amazon's 95% crash in 2000 and subsequent 42x recovery, stressing that the key is surviving market cycles to realize long-term potential.

链捕手Hace 7 hora(s)

Has BTC's 'Digital Gold' Narrative Failed?

链捕手Hace 7 hora(s)

From Code to Cognition: A Ten-Thousand-Word Guide to the Evolution of the Robot Brain

"From Code to Cognition: The Evolution of Robot Brains" The journey of robotic intelligence has shifted dramatically from manually coded systems to AI-driven brains. For decades, robots relied on layered software stacks—perception, state estimation, planning, control—each handcrafted. While predictable, they lacked adaptability. The 2010s saw deep learning revolutionize perception (e.g., object detection) and control (via reinforcement learning), but learned skills remained narrow. The arrival of Large Language Models (LLMs) marked a turning point. LLMs acted as high-level planners, interpreting natural language instructions and generating sequences of actions for traditional robotic systems to execute. However, true integration came with Visual-Language-Action (VLA) models, which fused vision, language, and motion prediction into a single network. Pioneered by models like RT-2 and open-source projects like OpenVLA, VLAs enable robots to reason and act directly from visual input and commands. The most advanced humanoid robots now employ a "dual-brain" architecture: a slow-thinking, large VLA (System 2) for reasoning and planning, and a fast-reacting, small network (System 1) for high-frequency motion control, sometimes with an even lower-level System 0 for balance. This split balances cognition with the physics of real-time movement. Computation is split between onboard hardware (e.g., NVIDIA Jetson) for safety-critical control loops and cloud/edge servers for non-critical tasks like learning and interfaces. A crucial driver is the open-source ecosystem—models like GR00T and OpenVLA allow startups to build upon pre-trained brains and fine-tune them with their own data, accelerating development. Despite progress, current systems struggle with recovery from errors, sample inefficiency, and long-horizon tasks. This has spurred the rise of **World Models**—neural networks that predict the consequences of actions. By simulating possible futures before acting (like NVIDIA Cosmos or Meta V-JEPA), robots can plan, recover, and generalize better. This represents the next frontier: shifting intelligence from learned reactions to an internal model of physics and cause-and-effect. The field is rapidly evolving. While not yet at its "ChatGPT moment," the convergence of cheaper hardware, scalable simulation, and world models points toward robots that are increasingly capable, adaptive, and useful. The question is shifting from "what can robots do?" to "what *should* they do?"

marsbitHace 8 hora(s)

From Code to Cognition: A Ten-Thousand-Word Guide to the Evolution of the Robot Brain

marsbitHace 8 hora(s)

Trading

Spot

Futuros