Short Positions Have Been Squeezed Out: Will the Next Leg of the U.S. Stock AI Rally Continue in Seoul?

marsbitPublicado a 2026-05-12Actualizado a 2026-05-12

Resumen

"Short Squeeze Exhausted: Will the Next Leg of the AI Rally Continue in Seoul?" A Nomura report suggests the US AI stock rally, which saw the S&P 500 rise ~16.6% in 28 days largely driven by 10 key stocks, may be pausing. The fuel from short covering, CTA fund positioning, and volatility-control strategies is nearing its limit. For the rally to continue, new momentum from retail and sentiment-driven FOMO (Fear Of Missing Out) is needed. South Korea's market provided a potential answer on the very day the report was published. The KOSPI index surged 4.32%, triggering a buy-side circuit breaker, led by massive gains in chip giants SK Hynix (+11.98%) and Samsung. This surge is characterized by retail "hynix FOMO" and overseas funds precisely buying into AI themes via chip-focused ETFs, shifting from broad Korean market ETFs. The Korean rally is a high-beta extension of the US AI capital expenditure story, as major cloud providers plan massive infrastructure spending, directly benefiting memory chip leaders. However, this linkage also implies vulnerability. The sustainability of this next leg depends on whether US tech stocks correct, the trajectory of US inflation (with upcoming CPI data key), and geopolitical tensions around the Strait of Hormuz. Seoul has emerged as the new epicenter of the AI trade, but its fate remains tied to these broader macro and market dynamics.

Author: Claude, Deep Tide TechFlow

Deep Tide Introduction: A key judgment in Nomura's May 11th research report stated: "At least for U.S. stocks, the AI rally may be taking a breather." On the very same day, the KOSPI surged 4.32% in a single day to 7822.24 points, triggering a buy-side sidecar during the session. SK Hynix soared 11.98%, with its market cap surpassing Eli Lilly for the first time, becoming the 14th largest globally. The report's call that "the next leg depends on Korean FOMO" occurred almost simultaneously with the Korean stock surge. The driving force behind the U.S. stock AI trade is shifting from a "short squeeze" to "retail FOMO."

The U.S. stock AI rally is not over. The S&P 500 accumulated gains of about 16.6% over 28 trading days. However, the source of the funds lifting the index and the remaining fuel for the rally are undergoing subtle changes. Nomura's assessment is that the phase driven by short covering and institutional positioning is nearing its end. For the AI trade to continue, a new wave of capital must take the baton. The Korean market provided a sample case on the very day the report was released, with the KOSPI crossing the 7000, 7400, and 7800 levels within a week, retail investors falling into "hynix FOMO," and foreign capital concentrating on chip stocks via DRAM ETFs. The narrative is shifting from the Nasdaq to the KOSPI.

U.S. Stocks Appear Normal, But the Anomalous "Spot Up/Volatility Also Up" Combo is Flashing

The surface readings of the U.S. stock AI trade remain strong. Saxo's options briefing on May 11th showed the VIX closing at 17.19, up 0.64% for the day. This level is below its historical average, but the VIX rising while the index hits record highs is itself an anomalous signal. The CBOE SKEW Index rose to 138.21 (+1.54%), the VVIX (measuring VIX volatility) rose to 96.78 (+3.39%). The simultaneous rise of these three indicators suggests institutional investors have not abandoned hedging even as the index hits new highs.

Nomura's May 11th report described this combination as an "anomalous state" for U.S. tech stocks. The report noted the Nasdaq exhibited a pattern of "spot prices rising, but volatility also rising," with the VIX continuing its decline while the VXN (Nasdaq volatility) rebounded noticeably. The option skew for U.S. tech stocks (the difference between the implied volatility of 1-month 25-delta puts and 25-delta calls) has rapidly fallen to near historical lows, back to levels around October 2025. A declining skew means the premium for put protection relative to calls has been compressed, indicating more crowded pricing for tech stock upside.

More concerning is the structure of this rally. According to a return attribution chart from Nomura's Vol team cited by TECHi, of the S&P 500's roughly 16% gain since March 30th, 10 stocks contributed 69%: Alphabet, Nvidia, Amazon, Broadcom, Intel, Micron, Apple, AMD, Microsoft, SanDisk. The remaining 490 constituents contributed only 31%. Goldman Sachs' U.S. equity strategy chief Ben Snider also pointed out that current market breadth has fallen to one of the narrowest levels since the dot-com bubble era. Goldman lists "AI Megaprojects" and "Iran Conflict" as the two clearest stock market risks for the coming weeks.

The Shorts Have Been Squeezed Out, Who Will Push the Next Leg?

The real killer judgment in Nomura's report isn't the "anomalous combo" itself, but its dissection of fund flows: Quant funds' equity exposure has recovered to near neutral, and the process of forced buying and short covering is largely complete. CTA (Commodity Trading Advisor) funds have largely returned to full long positions, and the marginal incremental demand from volatility control strategies is also waning.

In other words, the three main buying forces that drove AI stocks higher in recent weeks—shorts being squeezed, CTAs adding positions, and declining volatility prompting vol-control funds to add leverage—are all nearing their limits. If AI stocks are to continue rising, they can no longer primarily rely on the "short squeeze" buying force.

It's important to note that Nomura's estimates of quant fund, CTA, and macro fund positioning are based on model calculations, not actual measured holdings. This makes them better suited as a temperature gauge for marginal changes rather than a precise positioning table. Even so, the direction is clear: Programmatic buying from the institutional side is nearing its limits, and subsequent upward momentum must rely more on retail and sentiment-driven capital.

Goldman's trading desk largely agrees with Nomura's assessment. Goldman's One-Delta trading desk head Rich Privorotsky recently described the current pace as "semi-irrational chasing," drawing a comparison to 1999, when overflowing telecom equipment orders provided a "physical bottleneck narrative," similar to the current logic of AI compute scarcity. Goldman's volatility trading desk characterized recent dynamics as "spot up, volatility up," which limits the space for systematic strategies to add further positions.

This assessment means the U.S. stock AI trade isn't breaking, but the script of "pushing higher by squeezing shorts" is nearing its end.

Korean Stocks Provide the Answer: On the Day of Nomura's Report, KOSPI Surges 4.32%, Triggering Buy-Side Sidecar

Another judgment in Nomura's report was: For the AI trade to have another leg, the true signal for continuation would be to watch for a resurgence of FOMO in Korea.

The Korean market responded with an extreme outburst on the very day the report was released. The KOSPI closed at 7822.24 points, up 4.32% for the day, touching 7899.32 points during the session, which triggered a buy-side sidecar. SK Hynix surged 11.98% to 1.888 million KRW, with its market cap surpassing Eli Lilly for the first time to become the 14th largest globally. Samsung Electronics rose 6.33% to 285,500 KRW. The combined market cap of the two companies exceeded 3,000 trillion KRW, accounting for nearly half of the KOSPI's total market cap. The combined market cap of the Korean stock market (KOSPI and KOSDAQ) exceeded 7,000 trillion KRW for the first time, just 8 trading days after breaking 6,000 trillion KRW on October 27th.

During the May 12th session, the KOSPI further broke above 3900 points (the 7900-point level), setting another new all-time high. However, data from the same day revealed the other side of FOMO: Of the 948 stocks on the KOSPI, only 186 rose while 696 fell; approximately 30% of the index constituents have fallen year-to-date. Gains were entirely concentrated in the two semiconductor heavyweights, Samsung and SK Hynix.

A retail FOMO has already spawned new market vocabulary. Korean financial media uses "hynix FOMO" to describe the psychological divide among retail investors: on one side, the regret of missing out ("I should have bought at 800,000 KRW"), and on the other, the anxiety of "should I jump in now?" and "a correction is coming soon." Retail communities are flooded with discussions about "Samjeon-nix" (a portmanteau of Samsung + Hynix). This is a typical retail-driven chasing pattern, highly consistent with the "FOMO signal" Nomura defined.

The flow of foreign capital is even more telling. According to a Seoul Economic Daily report on May 10th, the iShares MSCI Korea ETF (EWY) saw net outflows of $1.0145 billion between May 1st and 7th, a signal of passive fund withdrawal from the Korean market. However, during the same period, the Roundhill Active DRAM ETF saw net inflows of $1.9538 billion. This ETF has a 25.94% weighting in SK Hynix and 21.62% in Samsung Electronics, totaling about 48%. Foreign capital isn't selling Korea, they are selling broad-based ETFs and buying chips, a precise overweighting of the AI theme.

One detail warrants caution. Nomura's May 11th report pointed out that the KOSPI 200 also showed "spot up, volatility up," but the call skew didn't rise alongside it. This doesn't look like volatility expansion driven by call-buying chase demand. In other words, as of the report's release, the Korean market had not yet entered a typical "fear of missing out, scrambling for calls" state. Whether this signal reverses quickly after the KOSPI's surge that day will be key to judging the sustainability of the FOMO.

Korean Stocks are an Extension of the U.S. AI Capex Chain; How Long the Next Leg Lasts Depends on the "Pyramid's Apex"

The Korean FOMO is not an isolated event; it's essentially a high-beta extension of the U.S. stock AI capital expenditure story.

Data directly anchors this transmission chain. According to Bridgewater estimates, Alphabet, Amazon, Meta, and Microsoft are projected to collectively invest around $650 billion in AI-related infrastructure in 2026. Goldman Sachs cites data showing that the consensus estimate for the largest cloud infrastructure companies' 2026 capex jumped by $130 billion last quarter to $670 billion, equivalent to over 90% of these companies' projected operating cash flow. Microsoft's Q3 capex reached $31.9 billion, Alphabet's Q1 property and equipment purchases were $35.7 billion, and Meta raised its 2026 capex guidance to a range of $125-145 billion.

This money flows into data centers, GPUs, memory, networking, power systems, and cloud capacity. SK Hynix and Samsung sit at the core of this money flow, with HBM4 memory and high-bandwidth memory being snapped up by hyperscale cloud providers. According to a Reuters report, SK Hynix recently received "unprecedented" order proposals from major tech companies, with some customers proactively offering to help finance new production lines and ASML lithography machines. Chip capacity is essentially sold out. This is why the KOSPI's single-day 4.32% surge is narratively coherent—Korean stocks are essentially the "second derivative" of the U.S. AI story.

But this linkage also implies vulnerability. If U.S. tech stocks experience a full-scale reversal, Korean stocks would be the most direct high-beta asset to bear the selling pressure. Another risk path mentioned by Nomura is a resurgence of inflation forcing global central banks to be more hawkish. This week's (May 12th) U.S. CPI is a key event, yet the premium in options markets for this event remains low; the market hasn't paid a high insurance premium for this risk yet.

There's one more variable in the macro backdrop: The Strait of Hormuz. WTI crude closed at $100.09 on May 8th (+4.89%), Brent crude at $105.66 (+4.31%). Conflict near the Strait of Hormuz continues to escalate. Nomura's judgment is: As long as the Strait remains obstructed and the U.S. and Iran remain divided on ceasefire terms, the AI-dominated market environment may last longer than expected. Energy price shocks will lift inflation expectations but could also make the market even more reluctant to leave "the AI story that's making money."

Layering these clues together: The phase of the U.S. stock AI rally driven by "squeezing shorts" is nearing its end. Korean FOMO has been ignited, with retail and foreign chip ETFs adding positions in sync, but the option skew hasn't caught up yet. How long the next leg lasts depends on whether U.S. tech stocks correct, whether U.S. CPI signals accelerating inflation, and whether the Strait of Hormuz ultimately cools down. Nomura's report's judgment framework is being validated one by one by market action. Seoul is becoming the latest epicenter of this AI trade.

Preguntas relacionadas

QAccording to Nomura's report, what are the three main forces behind the recent AI stock rally in the US market, and why is their influence now considered to be nearing its limit?

AThe three main forces identified are: 1) Short covering (shorts being squeezed), 2) CTA (Commodity Trading Advisors) funds adding long positions, and 3) Volatility-control strategies increasing leverage as volatility receded. Their influence is nearing its limit because quantitative fund equity exposure is back near neutral, CTAs are mostly back to full long positions, and the 'spot up, VIX up' dynamic has limited the room for further systematic buying from these strategies.

QWhy does the article suggest South Korea's stock market (KOSPI) has become a focal point for the next phase of the AI trade, and what evidence supports this?

AThe article suggests South Korea is the next focal point because its market exhibited classic FOMO (Fear Of Missing Out) behavior driven by retail investors, precisely as predicted by Nomura's report. Evidence includes: KOSPI's 4.32% single-day surge triggering a buy-side circuit breaker; SK Hynix rising nearly 12% and Samsung Electronics rising over 6%; massive inflows into the Roundhill Active DRAM ETF concentrated on chip stocks; and the emergence of 'hynix FOMO' sentiment among Korean retail investors.

QWhat does the 'spot up, volatility up' dynamic observed in US indices like the Nasdaq indicate, and why is it considered an 'abnormal signal'?

AThe 'spot up, volatility up' dynamic means that while stock indices are hitting record highs, the CBOE Volatility Index (VIX) and Nasdaq Volatility Index (VXN) are also rising. This is considered an abnormal or contrary signal because typically, when markets rally to new highs, investor fear subsides, leading to lower volatility (VIX down). The concurrent rise suggests institutional investors are still hedging against potential downside even as prices climb, indicating underlying caution and crowded positioning.

QHow is the Korean stock market's AI rally fundamentally linked to the AI capital expenditure story in the US?

AThe Korean stock market's AI rally is a high-beta extension of the US AI capital expenditure story. Massive AI infrastructure spending by US tech giants like Alphabet, Amazon, Meta, and Microsoft (estimated at hundreds of billions annually) flows directly into data center components, including high-bandwidth memory (HBM) and DRAM chips. South Korean firms SK Hynix and Samsung Electronics are dominant suppliers in this critical segment. Therefore, the surge in their stock prices reflects the intense demand and 'scarcity narrative' downstream from US tech capital spending.

QAccording to the article, what are the key risks that could determine how long the current phase of the AI trade, centered on Korea, can last?

AThe key risks are: 1) A significant correction or reversal in US tech stocks, which would directly pressure high-beta Korean chip stocks. 2) US CPI data showing accelerating inflation, which could force central banks into more hawkish policies and disrupt the low-rate environment favorable for growth stocks. 3) Escalation of conflict around the Strait of Hormuz, which could spike oil prices, increase inflation fears, and create broader market instability.

Lecturas Relacionadas

What Happens to Ethereum Developer Tools After the Grants Run Out?

On February 27th, the Ethereum Foundation (EF) announced Project Odin, a structured sustainability support program designed for a select group of strategic, previously grant-funded teams. Unlike a standard grant, Odin offers a long-term advisory mechanism focused on helping these teams establish credible, sustainable paths within a two-year framework, thereby reducing long-term dependence on single funding sources. The program addresses a critical post-grant challenge: how essential public goods, especially major developer tools, can achieve financial sustainability beyond initial funding. While grants from EF and programs like Gitcoin or RetroPGF remain vital for startups and research, they often fall short for mature, widely-used infrastructure. Tools like compilers, languages, and network stacks are deeply embedded but struggle with monetization, trapped between being too foundational to lose and too public to generate natural revenue. Project Odin provides teams with a dedicated Strategic Advisor to guide them through a three-phase process: 1) analyzing current funding and realistic options, 2) validating potential paths with stakeholders, and 3) executing plans, which may include crafting support contracts, service agreements, or other recurring revenue models. The first pilot participant is Vyper, a critical smart contract language for the EVM, highlighting the need for sustainable models for core infrastructure. The initiative reframes the public goods conversation from "who should be funded" to "how do already-proven teams avoid perpetual funding crises?" It encourages ecosystem participants—protocols and projects that depend on these tools—to view sustainable support not just as charity, but as essential risk management for their own operational supply chains.

marsbitJusto ahora

What Happens to Ethereum Developer Tools After the Grants Run Out?

marsbitJusto ahora

MARA Reports Q1 Revenue Below Expectations, Net Loss of $1.3 Billion, Stock Plunges After Hours

Bitcoin mining firm MARA Holdings reported disappointing Q1 2024 results, causing its stock to erase all daily gains and fall 3.44% in after-hours trading. Revenue dropped 18% year-over-year to $174.6 million, missing Wall Street estimates of $192.7 million. The company posted a net loss of $1.3 billion, a significant increase from a $533.4 million loss a year ago, primarily driven by unrealized losses on its holdings of 38,689 Bitcoin, which depreciated in value during the quarter. MARA also sold over 15,100 BTC in late March to repurchase debt at a discount. The broader mining environment remains challenging due to a 35% decline in Bitcoin's price from its all-time high and a nearly 30% increase in mining difficulty over the past year. MARA's market cap ranking among U.S. miners has slipped to seventh. Critically, the company announced a strategic pivot away from Bitcoin mining expansion. It stated it has no plans to purchase new mining equipment and is fully transitioning toward AI data centers. Its strategy involves retrofitting existing mining sites for AI and high-performance computing (HPC) and leveraging its recent $1.5 billion acquisition of Long Ridge Energy & Power, a gas-fired power plant and data center. This infrastructure could eventually support 600 MW of AI compute capacity, allowing MARA to redeploy up to 90% of its non-custodial mining power for AI and IT workloads.

marsbitHace 1 min(s)

MARA Reports Q1 Revenue Below Expectations, Net Loss of $1.3 Billion, Stock Plunges After Hours

marsbitHace 1 min(s)

The AI Investment Landscape Is Being Reshaped: Beyond the 'Magnificent Seven', What Opportunities Lie in the Semiconductor Supply Chain?

AI Investment Map is Reshaping: Opportunities Beyond the 'Magnificent Seven' Since ChatGPT ignited the AI wave, investment initially focused on the "Magnificent Seven" tech giants dominating cloud infrastructure. However, the rise of DeepSeek and debates on AI capital expenditure effectiveness are shifting this dynamic. Investors now recognize opportunities deeper in the supply chain—the companies providing the essential "picks and shovels." Early concerns about an AI investment "arms race" and potential low returns were partly alleviated by strong Q1 earnings from cloud providers, validating robust compute demand. This has highlighted a more certain investment thesis: regardless of which AI applications ultimately win, massive capital expenditure will first fuel demand for semiconductors and related components. This "pick-and-shovel" logic has driven semiconductor ETFs to record highs. Key beneficiaries include: * **Memory Chipmakers (e.g., SK Hynix, Samsung, Micron)**: High Bandwidth Memory (HBM) is a critical bottleneck for AI training. * **Photonics Companies**: Crucial for high-speed data transfer within AI data centers. * **The Broader "AI-11" Semiconductor Ecosystem**: This encompasses foundries & lithography (TSMC, ASML), logic & custom chips (AMD, Broadcom, Intel, Marvell), and enterprise storage (SanDisk, Western Digital). Every dollar of AI infrastructure spending flows through this chain. While the "Magnificent Seven" remain dominant in market size, their earnings growth premium over the rest of the S&P 500 ("S&P 493") is narrowing. Market attention and marginal investment are shifting towards the expanding semiconductor supply chain. The investment narrative is evolving from "betting on the ultimate AI winner" to "investing in the certainty of the infrastructure build-out." Understanding this shift from the demand side to the supply side is key to identifying future AI investment opportunities.

marsbitHace 30 min(s)

The AI Investment Landscape Is Being Reshaped: Beyond the 'Magnificent Seven', What Opportunities Lie in the Semiconductor Supply Chain?

marsbitHace 30 min(s)

600 People, $66 Billion: The First Major Cash-Out in the Era of Large Models

The first systematic "big cash-out" of the AI era occurred in October 2025, when over 600 current and former OpenAI employees sold a total of $6.6 billion in shares via a secondary market. Approximately 75 individuals maxed out a $30 million per-person sale limit, while around 525 others cashed out an average of $8.3 million each. This event, exceeding the scale of any 2024 US IPO, functioned as a "shadow IPO." It marked a radical departure from the traditional Silicon Valley path of waiting for a public listing, instead allowing employees to convert equity to cash after just two years of tenure—a direct retention tool in a fiercely competitive talent market where rivals like Meta have offered packages worth hundreds of millions. This massive liquidity event presents a dual-edged sword for OpenAI. While it helps retain talent, it also risks triggering a brain drain as newly wealthy employees may depart. Furthermore, it creates a dilemma for those who sold: they forfeited potential future gains as the company's valuation soared from $400 billion to $852 billion within months. In stark contrast, employees at rival Anthropic demonstrated greater reluctance to sell during their own secondary offering. The financial narratives of the two labs also diverge sharply. OpenAI, while achieving over $20 billion in annualized revenue by 2025, faces massive projected losses (up to $14 billion in 2026), a long path to cash flow positivity, and significant revenue-sharing payments to Microsoft. Anthropic reports rapid revenue growth, improving gross margins, and a faster path to profitability. OpenAI's trajectory is thus balanced precariously between skyrocketing valuation based on funding narratives and the pressures of sustained financial losses post-cash-out. The event underscores that the AI race has evolved into a capital and human experiment, where immense wealth crystallizes the complex calculations of greed, fear, and ambition within the industry.

marsbitHace 49 min(s)

600 People, $66 Billion: The First Major Cash-Out in the Era of Large Models

marsbitHace 49 min(s)

Trading

Spot
Futuros

Artículos destacados

Cómo comprar NOM

¡Bienvenido a HTX.com! Hemos hecho que comprar Nomina (NOM) sea simple y conveniente. Sigue nuestra guía paso a paso para iniciar tu viaje de criptos.Paso 1: crea tu cuenta HTXUtiliza tu correo electrónico o número de teléfono para registrarte y obtener una cuenta gratuita en HTX. Experimenta un proceso de registro sin complicaciones y desbloquea todas las funciones.Obtener mi cuentaPaso 2: ve a Comprar cripto y elige tu método de pagoTarjeta de crédito/débito: usa tu Visa o Mastercard para comprar Nomina (NOM) al instante.Saldo: utiliza fondos del saldo de tu cuenta HTX para tradear sin problemas.Terceros: hemos agregado métodos de pago populares como Google Pay y Apple Pay para mejorar la comodidad.P2P: tradear directamente con otros usuarios en HTX.Over-the-Counter (OTC): ofrecemos servicios personalizados y tipos de cambio competitivos para los traders.Paso 3: guarda tu Nomina (NOM)Después de comprar tu Nomina (NOM), guárdalo en tu cuenta HTX. Alternativamente, puedes enviarlo a otro lugar mediante transferencia blockchain o utilizarlo para tradear otras criptomonedas.Paso 4: tradear Nomina (NOM)Tradear fácilmente con Nomina (NOM) en HTX's mercado spot. Simplemente accede a tu cuenta, selecciona tu par de trading, ejecuta tus trades y monitorea en tiempo real. Ofrecemos una experiencia fácil de usar tanto para principiantes como para traders experimentados.

197 Vistas totalesPublicado en 2025.09.30Actualizado en 2025.09.30

Cómo comprar NOM

Discusiones

Bienvenido a la comunidad de HTX. Aquí puedes mantenerte informado sobre los últimos desarrollos de la plataforma y acceder a análisis profesionales del mercado. A continuación se presentan las opiniones de los usuarios sobre el precio de NOM (NOM).

活动图片