SEC Promotes Tokenized Stocks, Is the Traditional Finance Industry Starting to Worry?

marsbitPublicado a 2026-05-22Actualizado a 2026-05-22

Resumen

The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) is preparing to formally release an "innovation exemption" framework this week. This framework would allow third parties to tokenize U.S. stocks like Apple and Tesla without approval from the listed companies. The move, rooted in a deregulatory vision proposed by pro-crypto commissioners earlier this year, could accelerate the migration of traditional stock markets to blockchain. This development poses a structural threat of "fragmentation" to traditional finance. Core concerns are liquidity fragmentation—where trading volume disperses across multiple blockchains and platforms, leading to price disparities and reduced market efficiency—and revenue fragmentation—where trading fees and intermediary income shift away from domestic exchanges to overseas or competing platforms. The report compares the traditional stock market to a monopolistic "supermarket." Tokenization enables countless "street stalls" to operate outside this system, threatening the exchange's dominance, diluting liquidity for large orders, and slicing into revenue streams. Evidence of this capital fragmentation is already emerging. On the same day the SEC signaled the framework, decentralized platform Hyperliquid saw its RWA (real-world asset) open interest hit a record $2.6 billion, driven by demand for 24/7 on-chain trading of traditional assets. Traditional institutions face a dilemma: either collaborate to build tokenization infrastructure proactively or...

Author: Tiger Research

Compiled by: AididiaoJP, Foresight News

The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) is preparing to formally announce an "innovation exemption" framework this week, which will allow third parties to tokenize U.S. stocks like Apple and Tesla without approval from the listed companies. This move could accelerate the migration of traditional stock markets to blockchain, while also raising deep concerns among exchanges about liquidity fragmentation and revenue loss.

According to a Bloomberg report on May 18, this framework originates from the deregulation vision proposed by pro-crypto commissioners Paul Atkins and Hester Peirce in February. Coinbase and the Blockchain Association had previously submitted formal letters of support, strongly advocating for granting third parties the right to tokenize. However, the guidance issued by Peirce on May 22 is narrower in scope than market expectations, applying only to on-chain stock instruments that fully retain shareholder rights and explicitly excluding synthetic stock tokens that do not carry voting or dividend rights.

Two Core Threats: Liquidity Fragmentation and Revenue Fragmentation

The core impact of tokenized stocks lies in "fragmentation." While the crypto industry often discusses liquidity aggregation, the traditional finance world views it as a structural threat.

Liquidity Fragmentation: When the same stock is tokenized on different blockchains and decentralized platforms, the trading volume and order flow originally concentrated on the NYSE or Nasdaq will disperse across multiple venues. This will lead to price disparities between platforms, increased slippage for large orders, and reduced overall market efficiency.
Revenue Fragmentation: With the dispersion of trading venues, transaction fees and intermediary revenues that originally belonged to domestic exchanges will flow to overseas or competing platforms, directly impacting national financial competitiveness.

A Tiger Research report uses South Korea as an example: The SK Hynix 2x Leveraged ETF launched by Hong Kong asset manager CSOP has grown into the world's largest single-stock leveraged ETF, with assets exceeding 110 billion won (approximately $80 billion). If South Korea could have taken the lead in launching similar products through regulatory sandboxes, these management fees and financial revenues could have stayed within the country.

The End of Traditional Exchanges' "Supermarket" Monopoly

The report uses a vivid metaphor to describe this change: the traditional stock market is like a dominant supermarket where all buyers and sellers are concentrated, and the exchange monopolizes transactions and collects fees. Tokenized stocks are akin to allowing anyone to set up thousands of street stalls without permission, conducting trades directly outside the supermarket.

This dispersion will lead to buyer loss, thinner inventory at each stall, difficulty in executing large trades, and the slicing up of revenue sources. If domestic exchanges hesitate due to regulatory constraints, competing platforms in other jurisdictions will rush to seize global capital flows and intermediary revenues.

Capital Fragmentation Is Already Happening

On the same day the SEC signaled the framework (May 18), the open interest for RWAs (Real World Assets) on the decentralized platform Hyperliquid surpassed $2.6 billion, reaching a record high. Driven by the demand for 24/7 on-chain trading of traditional assets, RWA trading volume on perpetual DEXs is expected to surge further.

Traditional financial institutions and regulators face a dilemma: one option is to proactively build tokenization infrastructure through cooperation, like the NYSE; the other is to lobby regulators to block innovation to protect existing revenues. Regulators are also conflicted—they must control the pace of innovation while preventing domestic revenue from being siphoned off by overseas platforms.

Even if the framework is formally announced, potential conflicts are just beginning. Future focal points will include:

A second "clarity war" surrounding shareholder rights;
How to bring platforms like Hyperliquid, which have grown in regulatory gray areas, into the regulatory system. If deemed unlicensed exchanges, this could trigger a new wave of liquidity and uncertainty shocks.

In the era of digital assets, if financial institutions and jurisdictions do not act quickly, they will permanently lose their long-monopolized fee rights and financial leadership, and capital will continue to disperse in all directions.

Preguntas relacionadas

QWhat is the SEC's upcoming 'innovation exemption' framework expected to allow, according to the article?

AThe SEC's upcoming 'innovation exemption' framework is expected to allow third parties to tokenize stocks like Apple and Tesla on the blockchain without requiring approval from the companies themselves, provided the tokenized instruments fully retain shareholder rights such as voting and dividends.

QWhat are the two main 'fragmentation' threats that tokenized stocks pose to traditional finance, as outlined in the Tiger Research report?

AThe two main 'fragmentation' threats are liquidity fragmentation and revenue fragmentation. Liquidity fragmentation means trading volume spreads across multiple blockchain platforms, causing price discrepancies and higher slippage. Revenue fragmentation refers to the diversion of trading fees and intermediary income away from national exchanges to competing or foreign platforms.

QWhat example does the article use to illustrate the financial loss a country can suffer by not moving quickly with tokenized products?

AThe article uses the example of South Korea. A Hong Kong-based asset manager's leveraged ETF on SK Hynix has grown into the world's largest single-stock leveraged ETF. The report suggests that if South Korea had acted faster through a regulatory sandbox, the management fees and financial revenue from such a product could have remained within the country.

QWhat platform's RWA (Real World Asset) open interest hit a record high on the same day the SEC signaled its new framework?

AOn the same day (May 18), the decentralized platform Hyperliquid saw its RWA open interest surge to a record high, exceeding $2.6 billion.

QWhat are the two strategic options traditional financial institutions and regulators face in response to tokenization, as mentioned in the article?

AThe two strategic options are: 1) To proactively build tokenization infrastructure through partnerships, similar to what the NYSE is doing. 2) To lobby regulators to block innovation in order to protect existing revenue streams.

Lecturas Relacionadas

The Value Distribution of Stablecoins

**Summary: The Value Distribution of Stablecoins** The article argues that stablecoins are evolving from mere trading tools into broader channels for dollar access. It divides the stablecoin ecosystem into four layers to analyze how value is distributed: 1. **Issuance Layer:** Mints stablecoins, holds reserve assets, and captures the spread between reserve yield and user costs (e.g., Tether, Circle). This layer currently earns the largest profit margin. 2. **Infrastructure Layer:** Connects stablecoins to the traditional financial system, handling fiat on/off-ramps, banking integration, compliance (KYC/AML), and asset management (e.g., Bridge, BVNK). This is the "unglamorous" but critical work, building the essential bridges between crypto and real-world finance. 3. **Acquiring/Distribution Layer:** Integrates stablecoins into merchant systems, manages payment flows, and provides enterprise financial software (e.g., Stripe, Coinbase). They act as the access point for businesses. 4. **Application Layer:** The end-users and businesses that ultimately use stablecoins for payments, settlements, or as a store of value. They benefit from convenience but have little pricing power. The core thesis is that while the issuance layer currently dominates profits, the often-overlooked **infrastructure layer holds significant long-term potential**. The real challenge and barrier to mass adoption is not the on-chain transfer of stablecoins (which is simple), but the complex "last mile" integration into existing business workflows, banking systems, and regulatory frameworks across different countries. Companies in this layer are currently in a "land grab" phase, investing heavily to build networks, secure bank partnerships, and establish compliance pathways. While their position is currently pressured by the profitable issuers above and distribution platforms below, the article suggests that if stablecoins become a default financial rail for businesses, the infrastructure providers who have done the hard work of integration will ultimately gain strong pricing power and become entrenched, essential players.

marsbitHace 4 hora(s)

The Value Distribution of Stablecoins

The Value Distribution of Stablecoins The article argues that stablecoins are evolving from a mere trading tool into a broad "dollar channel." It analyzes the industry's value chain through four layers: 1. **Issuance Layer (e.g., Tether, Circle):** The top layer that mints stablecoins, holds reserve assets, and captures the thickest interest rate spread. 2. **Infrastructure Layer (e.g., Bridge, BVNK):** Connects stablecoins to the traditional financial system, handling critical but complex "dirty work" like fiat on/off-ramps, banking integration, compliance (KYC/AML), and cross-border settlement. 3. **Acquiring/Distribution Layer (e.g., Stripe, Coinbase):** Embeds stablecoins into merchant systems, manages payment flows, and integrates with enterprise software. 4. **Application Layer:** End-users and businesses that ultimately use stablecoins for payments, settlement, or storing value. The author posits that while the issuance layer currently captures the most profit, the most overlooked and potentially critical layer is infrastructure. The core challenge for stablecoin adoption isn't the on-chain transfer (which is simple), but bridging the gap between blockchain and the real-world financial system. This involves solving practical problems for businesses: fiat conversion, reconciliation, tax handling, and user onboarding. Infrastructure companies are currently in a difficult "land-grab" phase—building networks, securing banking relationships, and achieving compliance country-by-country. They face pressure from both the profitable issuance layer above and distribution platforms below. However, the author suggests this layer is building a crucial moat. Once stablecoins become a default business rail, the infrastructure players who have done the hard work of integration may gain significant, durable value and pricing power.

链捕手Hace 4 hora(s)

Why Is Nvidia Borrowing $20 Billion When It's Not Short of Cash?

Nvidia's recent announcement to issue at least $20 billion in senior notes, despite holding a strong cash position with over $48.6 billion in free cash flow last quarter, is not a sign of financial need. Instead, it represents a strategic move to leverage its high credit rating (recently upgraded to AA by S&P) to secure low-cost, long-term debt. This capital will support long-term AI infrastructure investments, data centers, R&D, supply chain prepayments, and strategic investments, while allowing the company to continue aggressive shareholder returns through stock buybacks and dividends. The decision reflects a mature capital management strategy: using debt to finance long-term growth assets is more efficient and less dilutive to shareholders than equity financing. It signals that Nvidia, like other tech giants (Alphabet, Meta, Amazon), is entering a new phase of heavy AI capital expenditure, shifting from a pure growth story to a story about capital allocation, credit strength, and long-term ecosystem positioning. The key question for investors is whether Nvidia can maintain its high cash flow generation and ensure that returns from these AI investments justify the cost of capital over the long term. The bond issuance amplifies its expansion capabilities but also ties its valuation more closely to the broader AI investment cycle's sustainability and profitability.

marsbitHace 4 hora(s)

Why Is Nvidia Borrowing $20 Billion When It's Not Short of Cash?

marsbitHace 4 hora(s)

Liberland Fires Tech Secretary After Alleged Blockchain And Website Takeover Attempt

Liberland's congress has voted to remove Technology Secretary Dorian Stern Vukotić, following a resolution accusing him of attempting to hijack the Liberland.org domain, removing administrative multisig protections, blocking the president from voting, and launching unauthorized tokens. The incident serves as a case study in blockchain governance, highlighting risks that go beyond smart contracts to include control over domains, admin keys, and off-chain authority. For the crypto industry, it underscores the need to scrutinize decentralization claims against operational realities, where a small group can still compromise governance. The story reflects a broader market shift where infrastructure security and governance are becoming as critical as price action. Editorial framing should treat the development as a verified information signal about governance risks, avoiding overstatement of Liberland's legal status and leaving room for follow-up evidence.

bitcoinistHace 5 hora(s)

Liberland Fires Tech Secretary After Alleged Blockchain And Website Takeover Attempt

bitcoinistHace 5 hora(s)

How to Do Research Well: Deliberately Practice the Real Skills That Matter

No one truly teaches you how to do research. You're often given a desk, a pre-selected problem, and vague instructions to "create something new." Consequently, many people reverse-engineer the job based on visible outputs—papers, posts, announcements—learning only how to *appear* like a researcher rather than how to *become* one. True research capability is built from stacking small, trainable skills, nearly all of which can be developed through deliberate practice. **Pick Your Own Problem:** Most researchers absorb problems from advisors or trends, lacking the underlying reasoning. Choosing a problem you genuinely care about, as John Schulman advises, leads to original work. Develop "taste" like a muscle: predict experiment outcomes, guess paper results from methods, and track which findings remain important over time. **Upgrade Your Inputs:** Relying on shared reading lists (arXiv hot lists, filtered group chats) leads to unoriginal conclusions. Undervalued old literature often holds crucial insights (e.g., MoE, LSTM, backpropagation). Richard Sutton's "The Bitter Lesson" or Claude Shannon's 1952 talk on creative thinking are more predictive than lengthy modern surveys. Breadth matters as much as depth: draw from neuroscience, mechanism design, hardware knowledge, and honest statistics. Read papers directly, especially appendices and limitations sections. **Write Everything Down:** As Paul Graham noted, writing exposes flaws in seemingly mature ideas. Writing is the cheapest defense against self-deception. Following Feynman's principle, Darwin programmatically wrote down facts contradicting his theory to combat memory bias. Maintain a detailed log of hypotheses, setups, predictions, results, and updated understandings. Reviewing past logs fosters essential humility.

marsbitHace 6 hora(s)

How to Do Research Well: Deliberately Practice the Real Skills That Matter

marsbitHace 6 hora(s)

Trading

Spot

Futuros