ProShares’ stablecoin-ready ETF posts ‘insane’ $17B trading debut

ambcryptoPublicado a 2026-02-21Actualizado a 2026-02-21

Resumen

ProShares' GENIUS Money Market ETF (IQMM) shattered records with an "insane" $17 billion in first-day trading volume, far surpassing the debut of major Bitcoin ETFs. The fund, designed to hold assets compliant with the proposed U.S. stablecoin (GENIUS Act) regulations, is intended for use as reserves by stablecoin issuers. While speculation suggested a major issuer like Circle could be behind the volume, it was clarified the initial funding came from internal ProShares funds for cash management. Separately, the stablecoin sector received a significant regulatory boost as the SEC reduced its capital "haircut" on stablecoin holdings from 100% to 2%, a move hailed by Circle's CEO as a major win that will foster greater adoption in capital markets.

A money market fund targeting issuers regulated under the U.S stablecoin law, GENIUS Act, has made a new record for debut trading volume.

The ProShares GENIUS Money Market ETF (NYSE: IQMM) saw a whopping $17 billion in trading volume.

For context, BlackRock’s iShares Bitcoin ETF (IBIT) saw $1 billion in day-one volume, while its other product, the BlackRock ESG ETF, saw $2 billion.

This was eight times the previous record, noted Bloomberg ETF analyst Eric Balchunas.

He added,

“Insane: That $17B is going to show up as flows/assets tonight. Where is $ coming from? Either way, I was wrong about this ETF.”

Is Circle behind the record debut?

Responding to Balchunas, another ETF expert, Nate Geraci, speculated,

“Would assume ProShares cut a deal with one of the major U.S.-based stablecoin issuers...Looking at assets, believe that would only leave Circle.”

But Ben Johnson, head of client solutions at Morningstar, clarified that the product was funded by other ProShares funds for easier cash management purposes.

So, why GENIUS Act-inspired? The U.S stablecoin law has several instruments that can be used as reserve assets for issued stablecoin tokens. Some of the permitted reserves include cash and cash equivalents, short-dated U.S. Treasury bills, and money market funds focused on cash management.

This makes it easier to redeem and to cater to rising demand if users cash out en masse from stablecoins into fiat without triggering a bank run or risking broader financial markets.

And that’s where the ProShares ETF falls: an MMF focused on stablecoin reserves, likely in the hope that issuers may opt for it for easier cash management, too. It’s unclear whether it will attract these potential issuers.

Why the SEC’s 2% ‘haircut’ is good for stablecoins

Meanwhile, the stablecoin sector got another win after a recent SEC guideline. The regulator said payment stablecoin will now have 2% haircut, similar to money market funds.

In the past, stablecoins had a 100% ‘haircut’, meaning holding them had no capital benefit. If you had $100 million, it would be seen as $0 for capital purposes. Now, it can be valued at $98 million.

The change means stablecoin holders can have more trading inventory, loan capacity, and overall financial activity.

For his part, Jeremy Allaire, CEO of Circle, hailed the move as positive for stablecoin adoption.

“This is a big win for USDC adoption in capital markets. Great progress.”


Final Summary

  • ProShares’ GENIUS Act-inspired ETF set a new record, hitting $17 billion in day-one trading volume.
  • Circle CEO hailed the SEC’s 2% haircut for stablecoin as a likely catalyst for USDC adoption.

Preguntas relacionadas

QWhat was the record-breaking first-day trading volume for the ProShares GENIUS Money Market ETF (IQMM)?

AThe ProShares GENIUS Money Market ETF (IQMM) saw a record-breaking $17 billion in first-day trading volume.

QAccording to Bloomberg ETF analyst Eric Balchunas, how did the IQMM's debut volume compare to the previous record?

AAccording to Eric Balchunas, the IQMM's $17 billion debut was eight times the previous record.

QWhat was the speculated reason behind the massive trading volume, as suggested by ETF expert Nate Geraci?

AETF expert Nate Geraci speculated that ProShares may have cut a deal with a major U.S.-based stablecoin issuer, likely Circle, to generate the massive volume.

QWhat is the significance of the SEC's new 2% 'haircut' rule for payment stablecoins?

AThe SEC's new 2% 'haircut' rule means stablecoins are now valued at 98% of their face value for capital purposes, a significant improvement from the previous 100% haircut which valued them at $0. This allows holders to have more trading inventory, loan capacity, and overall financial activity.

QHow does the ProShares ETF relate to the proposed GENIUS Act for stablecoins?

AThe ProShares ETF is a money market fund focused on the types of reserve assets (like cash, short-dated Treasury bills, and other money market funds) that would be permitted under the proposed GENIUS Act for stablecoin issuers to use for easier cash management and redemption.

Lecturas Relacionadas

Beyond the Stadium: The Profitable Games Surrounding the World Cup

"Beyond the Pitch: The Profit Game Around the World Cup" The FIFA World Cup transcends being a sporting spectacle, evolving into a massive global arena for speculation and profit-seeking. The 2026 tournament has amplified this dynamic, creating a multi-layered ecosystem of financial opportunism alongside the football. **Prediction markets** have surged into the mainstream. Platforms like Polymarket and Kalshi saw trading volumes for World Cup contracts soar, attracting new users with their financial trading model and high-profile, chain-based wealth stories that overshadow traditional sports betting in terms of growth and narrative. However, **traditional sportsbooks** remain the dominant force, leveraging established user habits, legal markets, and comprehensive product offerings to handle the vast majority of speculative wagers, with projections suggesting record-breaking betting volumes. Capital markets also react. **"Concept stocks"** in countries like South Korea and Japan experience volatile price swings based on team performance and anticipated fan spending on items like chicken, beer, and viewing parties, effectively becoming a stock market reflecting fan sentiment. The **ticket resale market** has become a sophisticated arena for arbitrage. Prices fluctuate wildly based on team draws and star power, with sellers sometimes listing tickets they don't yet own in a practice akin to short-selling, while FIFA's own "Right to Buy" tokens add another layer of speculative trading. **Collectibles and merchandise** offer another avenue. Panini sticker albums, with their inherent scarcity and nostalgic value, can become high-value collectibles. Limited-edition or locally themed jerseys command significant premiums on secondary markets, and even counterfeit vendors profit from fans' desire for affordable match-day identity. The **cryptocurrency** space has seen a frenzy of speculative, unauthorized World Cup-themed meme coins on chains like Solana. These tokens, often exploiting team names and player imagery, experience extreme pump-and-dump cycles, creating stories of massive gains for a few early entrants and steep losses for many others. Finally, an entire industry thrives on **providing information and tools** to other speculators. Developers create platforms like SeatSidekick to track ticket inventory and prices, while paid Telegram groups and subscriptions sell betting tips and predictions, monetizing the widespread desire for an informational edge. In essence, the World Cup has become a compressed, global laboratory for speculation. While the games determine champions on the field, a parallel, complex network of financial transactions—spanning prediction contracts, bets, stocks, tickets, collectibles, crypto, and information services—settles its own scores in the global market.

marsbitHace 23 min(s)

Beyond the Stadium: The Profitable Games Surrounding the World Cup

marsbitHace 23 min(s)

How Does Codex Use a Computer? Three Entry Points and Permission Boundaries

This article explains the three primary methods for Codex to interact with a computer, each with distinct use cases, permission boundaries, and trust levels. **1. Computer Use:** This offers the broadest access, allowing Codex to visually control and interact with the graphical user interface of authorized macOS/Windows apps, system settings, and even iOS simulators. It's ideal for tasks lacking APIs or structured tools, such as operating legacy software or multi-app workflows. However, it's the slowest method and has the widest permission scope, requiring careful supervision for sensitive actions. **2. Chrome Extension:** This grants Codex access to the user's logged-in Chrome browser state, including cookies, profiles, and open tabs. It's best for tasks requiring user identity across websites like Gmail, LinkedIn, Salesforce, or internal dashboards. Its key advantage is multi-tab control for complex workflows. While more powerful for browser-based tasks than Computer Use, it carries higher sensitivity as actions are performed under the user's identity. **3. In-App Browser:** This is a browser isolated within the Codex thread, separate from the user's personal browsing data. It excels in web development and debugging scenarios—previewing local servers, testing responsive layouts, or annotating designs directly on the page. Its isolation is a strength for development but a limitation for tasks requiring login sessions. The core principle is to choose the narrowest, safest, and most structured interface for the task. Use plugins or MCPs first, resort to visual control (Computer Use) only for GUI-dependent tasks, employ the Chrome extension for identity-reliant browser work, and prefer the In-App Browser for isolated development. **Appshots** are clarified as a fourth, complementary tool for *inputting* context—capturing a screenshot of a window to point Codex to something—rather than a method for Codex to *act*. Together, this layered approach highlights a key to AI agent productization: not granting unlimited permissions, but constraining them within clear boundaries for specific tasks while preserving user oversight.

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

How Does Codex Use a Computer? Three Entry Points and Permission Boundaries

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

The "Iron Rule" of Chip Equipment Is Being Broken

For years, the semiconductor equipment industry followed an unwritten "iron rule": suppliers offered steep discounts for new tool introductions (Design-in) and faced consistent price pressure during repeat orders, especially during market downturns. This long-standing buyer's market dynamic is now being upended. Recently, SK Hynix's primary equipment suppliers have reportedly requested a 3-4% price *increase*, a nearly unprecedented move. This shift is driven by a severe supply-demand imbalance fueled by the AI compute boom. Securing equipment has become an urgent arms race as chipmakers' expansion speed dictates their ability to fulfill massive AI chip orders. Key areas feeling the strain include: **TCB (Thermal Compression Bonding) Equipment:** Demand is exploding, driven by the simultaneous needs of HBM4 memory stacking, AI chip Chip-on-Substrate (C2S), and logic Chiplet Chip-on-Wafer (C2W) packaging. Players like Hanmi Semiconductor, Hanwha Semitech, and ASMPT are receiving major orders. While hybrid bonding is seen as the future, TCB remains the pragmatic choice for HBM4 mass production, with its lifecycle extended by relaxed specifications and ongoing technological upgrades. **Test Equipment Bottlenecks:** Ironically, AI-driven shortages are now crippling test equipment manufacturing. Critical components like FPGAs, Driver ICs, and CPUs face severe shortages and extended lead times (up to 52 weeks for FPGAs), as AI data center and server vendors prioritize supply. This creates a paradoxical cycle: AI chip shortages drive fab expansion, which requires more test equipment, whose production is delayed because its key parts are diverted to make AI chips. The industry is entering a broad, AI-powered upcycle. SEMI forecasts global semiconductor equipment sales to hit a record $156 billion by 2027, fueled by investment in advanced logic/foundry, HBM-driven DRAM, and advanced packaging (like CoWoS). Major players like TSMC, SK Hynix, and Micron are aggressively ramping capital expenditure. In conclusion, leading equipment vendors are no longer just selling tools; they are selling the critical capability to deliver AI-era capacity. Pricing power is shifting decisively to those with indispensable technology in key process nodes like advanced logic, HBM, and advanced packaging, rewriting the industry's traditional power structure.

marsbitHace 2 hora(s)

The "Iron Rule" of Chip Equipment Is Being Broken

marsbitHace 2 hora(s)

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片