Over 100 Crypto ETPs Launching Soon but Many Won’t Survive

TheNewsCryptoPublicado a 2025-12-18Actualizado a 2025-12-18

Resumen

The cryptocurrency investment landscape is set for significant transformation with over 100 new exchange-traded products (ETPs) expected to launch. However, industry analysts predict many will not survive beyond 2027 due to insufficient investor interest and low asset accumulation. Market saturation is a key concern, with 126 filings currently awaiting SEC approval. Historical data supports these sustainability worries, as 622 ETFs closed last year, with an average lifespan of 5.4 years for those shutting down in 2023. Recent regulatory changes have accelerated approvals but also enabled more speculative products, including memecoin-related ETFs. Performance varies widely; Bitcoin ETFs attracted $57.6 billion in early 2024, while newer offerings like Solana ETFs have seen slower growth. The market's ability to support hundreds of new products competing for limited investment remains uncertain.

Next‍‌‍‍‌‍‌‍‍‌ year the cryptocurrency investment environment is set to undergo a big change. Projections are showing that there will be more than 100 new exchange-traded products launched. Nevertheless, a few voices in the industry have expressed their concern that a large number of these products will be unable to continue their activity after 2027 because of a lack of investors and low asset ‍‌‍‍‌‍‌‍‍‌accumulation.

Market Saturation Threatens New Products

According‍‌‍‍‌‍‌‍‍‌ to James Seyffart of Bloomberg, a considerable amount of crypto ETP liquidations will take place towards the end of 2026 or during 2027, despite the expected wave of launches. Right now, there are over 126 filings that are waiting for a green light from the SEC, thus resulting in a heavily saturated market situation in which the issuers are simultaneously experimenting with multiple ‍‌‍‍‌‍‌‍‍‌products.

Product‍‌‍‍‌‍‌‍‍‌ sustainability concerns are backed up by historical trends, as 622 ETFs closed worldwide last year, out of which 189 closed just in America. The average lifetime of American ETFs, which are set to close in 2023, is 5.4 years, as per the research done by Morningstar. The main reasons for the failures are a lack of sufficient inflows and low assets under management, thus making it impossible to be ‍‌‍‍‌‍‌‍‍‌profitable.

The‍‌‍‍‌‍‌‍‍‌ regulatory environment underwent a significant change when the SEC put in place generic listing standards in September, thus doing away with case-by-case application reviews. With this alteration, approvals are quickened; however, it also makes it possible for more and more speculative products to be introduced to the market, among which there are ETFs related to memecoins such as Melania Trump’s ‍‌‍‍‌‍‌‍‍‌token.

Different‍‌‍‍‌‍‌‍‍‌ crypto investment vehicles have shown very different results in recent market performance. In just a few weeks after the first day of trading in January 2024, Bitcoin ETFs drew a massive amount of $57.6 billion in inflows, whereas after their launch in July 2024, Ethereum products only managed to gather $12.6 billion. The latest offerings have slower growth rates as leading Solana ETFs have been able to raise only $725 million since the end of ‍‌‍‍‌‍‌‍‍‌October.

As‍‌‍‍‌‍‌‍‍‌ a matter of fact, a number of products have given in to the market demands in this year already, among which two ARK 21Shares strategies concentrate on Bitcoin and Ethereum. The move away from Bitcoin and Ethereum towards altcoins such as Litecoin, Solana, and XRP was a moderate success; however, there are still doubts as to whether the market will be able to support hundreds of new products vying for a few investor ‍‌‍‍‌‍‌‍‍‌capitals.

Highlighted Crypto News Today:

MSCI Crypto Treasury Exclusion Could Trigger $15B Market Selloff

Criptos en tendencia

CitreaCTR

wrapped stUSDTWSTUSDT

Velodrome FinanceVELODROME

BrevisBREV

ZRX（0X）ZRX

PancakeSwapCAKE

Preguntas relacionadas

QAccording to the article, why are many new crypto ETPs expected to close after 2027?

AMany new crypto ETPs are expected to close after 2027 due to a lack of investors and low asset accumulation, making them unprofitable.

QWhat historical evidence supports the concern about product sustainability for new crypto ETPs?

AHistorical trends show that 622 ETFs closed worldwide last year, with 189 closing in America. The average lifetime of U.S. ETFs set to close in 2023 was 5.4 years, primarily due to insufficient inflows and low assets under management.

QHow did the SEC's regulatory change in September affect the approval process for crypto ETPs?

AThe SEC implemented generic listing standards, eliminating case-by-case application reviews. This sped up approvals but also allowed more speculative products, including memecoin-related ETFs, to enter the market.

QWhat were the inflow differences between Bitcoin ETFs and Ethereum ETFs after their launches in 2024?

ABitcoin ETFs attracted $57.6 billion in inflows within weeks of their January 2024 launch, while Ethereum products gathered only $12.6 billion after their July 2024 launch.

QWhich altcoins have seen moderate success in ETP offerings, and what concern remains about the market's capacity?

AAltcoins like Litecoin, Solana, and XRP have seen moderate success. However, there are doubts about whether the market can support hundreds of new products competing for limited investor capital.

Lecturas Relacionadas

7 Months After the Collapse of Huiwang, Southeast Asia's Escrow Platforms Undergo a Major Reshuffle

Following the collapse of Huione Pay—dubbed the "Alipay of Southeast Asia"—seven months ago, the region's underground financial guarantee platform sector is undergoing a significant reshuffle. This power vacuum has been swiftly filled by emerging platforms such as XinBi, Tiger/Navigator, JinBei (renamed JinBo), Dali/Tiancheng, and FullyLight. These platforms, operating largely via Telegram and offering services like escrow for illicit transactions, have absorbed the vast user base and markets left behind by Huione. While positioning themselves as "trust intermediaries," their primary clientele consists of networks involved in online scams, money laundering, illegal gambling, and even human trafficking. For instance, the Tiger/Navigator platform explicitly provides "escrow" services for kidnapping-for-ransom operations ("强押车交易"). Data underscores the immense scale: Huione alone processed over $103 billion in cryptocurrency payments and facilitated over $31 billion through its escrow market before its downfall, linking it to Cambodia's notorious Prince Group. Since its collapse, competitors have seen explosive growth. For example, the XinBi platform has accumulated over $1.6 billion in total USDT revenue, while platforms like NewPay, OkPay (under Dali), and FullyLight Wallet collectively processed over $4.8 billion in USDT in a single year. This ecosystem thrives in regions like Cambodia and Myanmar, where regulatory gaps allow these platforms to act as critical financial infrastructure for sprawling cybercrime industries, from scam compounds to online casinos. The article concludes that the moniker "Southeast Asian Alipay" is a misnomer, obscuring the platforms' fundamental role in enabling serious criminal enterprises rather than representing legitimate financial innovation.

Odaily星球日报Hace 3 min(s)

7 Months After the Collapse of Huiwang, Southeast Asia's Escrow Platforms Undergo a Major Reshuffle

Odaily星球日报Hace 3 min(s)

The Changing Landscape: What Are Crypto VCs Experiencing?

Title: The Shifting Landscape of Crypto Venture Capital The era of dedicated crypto venture capital funds is undergoing a significant transformation. Once essential for navigating the sector's complexity and high risk, these specialized funds are now facing an identity crisis as the market matures. This shift mirrors historical patterns in other specialized investment classes like cleantech and SPACs, where initial information advantages dissipate as technologies become mainstream and integrated into existing industry frameworks. The article argues that crypto is reaching a critical inflection point, transitioning from a "building phase" to an "integration phase." Major players like Stripe, BlackRock, and Visa now engage with crypto not for its novel mechanics but as a foundational financial infrastructure. Their needs—regulatory compliance, banking partnerships, distribution channels—align with traditional fintech, a domain easily understood by large, generalist funds like Sequoia and Founders Fund. This evolution creates a "barbell effect" within the VC landscape. On one end are massive, diversified platforms that can incorporate crypto as one vertical among many. On the other are small, nimble funds focused on niche, experimental projects. The middle ground—medium-sized dedicated crypto funds—is being squeezed out. Their typical fund size makes it impossible to generate sufficient returns solely from early-stage crypto bets, yet they cannot compete with giants for later-stage deals. Consequently, leading crypto-native firms like Paradigm and Framework Ventures are expanding into AI, robotics, and other sectors, driven partly by LP pressure for better returns amid a broader VC DPI crisis. Others, like Dragonfly and a16z, have narrowed their crypto focus predominantly to financial infrastructure like stablecoins, reframing the sector's core narrative. For crypto entrepreneurs, this consolidation presents challenges. While generalist funds offer larger checks and broader resources, crypto projects now compete fiercely with AI for attention and capital within these firms. Furthermore, the long-term, non-commercial foundational work that built the ecosystem—funded by dedicated crypto VCs—is less likely to attract generalist capital focused on direct returns. The conclusion is that "crypto investor" as a standalone category is becoming obsolete, akin to "internet investor." Crypto is becoming a baseline infrastructure layer. The future will see a barbell structure: large-scale growth financing handled by generalist funds, while pioneering, speculative projects are funded by small, specialized vehicles. The dedicated crypto funds of the 2017-2021 boom, which incubated core infrastructure, are giving way to this new, bifurcated reality.

Foresight NewsHace 20 min(s)

The Changing Landscape: What Are Crypto VCs Experiencing?

Foresight NewsHace 20 min(s)

As Consensus Accelerates, What Are Young Investors Betting On?

Title: As Consensus Forms Faster, What Are Young Investors Betting On? In the rapid evolution of tech investment, a new generation of young investors is navigating a landscape where AI, robotics, commercial aerospace, and quantum computing are advancing simultaneously. Traditional investment logic based on financial models is giving way to a need for deep technical understanding and the ability to act before industry consensus forms. An analysis of trends from the "WAIC FUTURE TECH" list of young investment leaders reveals key shifts in focus. The first major trend is the movement of AI from the digital screen into the physical world. Investment is shifting from large language models and chatbots towards embodied AI, robotics, AI hardware, and edge computing. While demonstrations generate excitement, the real challenge lies in achieving scalable, reliable, and cost-effective delivery in complex real-world environments like factories and logistics. Success depends not just on algorithms but on the integration of sensors, actuators, and control systems. Second, the competitive focus for large models is moving beyond raw capability toward building an "intelligence flywheel." The goal is to create self-reinforcing systems where user interaction generates data, improving the model, which in turn enhances the user experience and attracts more engagement. Companies that successfully embed AI into workflows to create these closed-loop systems can build lasting value that isn't easily erased by the next model upgrade. Third, facing a potential bottleneck in high-quality human-generated data, investors are looking at new underlying technologies. Reinforcement learning and self-play, as demonstrated by AlphaGo Zero, offer paths for AI to generate its own experience. Scientific foundation models, which aim to build general AI capabilities for fields like life sciences and materials discovery, represent a non-consensus direction that could unlock new frontiers of knowledge and data. Finally, in deep-tech areas like quantum computing, commercial aerospace, and space-based infrastructure, patient capital is essential. These fields have long, uncertain development and validation cycles involving complex engineering, supply chains, and regulations. Investment here requires a long-term view, focusing on foundational team capabilities and the eventual emergence of market demand, even if commercial returns are distant. Collectively, these trends illustrate how young investors are adapting to a new era. They are learning to make earlier, technically-informed judgments, balance hype with real-world viability, and provide the patient capital needed to build the deep-tech foundations of the future.

marsbitHace 48 min(s)

As Consensus Accelerates, What Are Young Investors Betting On?

marsbitHace 48 min(s)

Unlocking $100 Million in Liquidity? Pump.fun's New Policy Tests the 5-Minute Pump Technique

Foresight News, July 21 – Pump.fun has launched its new "BOOST" mode as the standard launch mechanism for new tokens. The core of BOOST is to address the issue of "dead liquidity." Historically, when a token migrates from its bonding curve to a liquidity pool, roughly 20% of its liquidity becomes permanently locked and unusable, a problem the platform estimates costs over $100 million annually. The new mechanism redirects this 20% of funds, which would have been locked, to instead be used for a 5-minute Time-Weighted Average Price (TWAP) buyback of the token immediately after migration. The purchased tokens are then permanently burned. For example, this means reserving 17.6 SOL for SOL pairs or about $2516 for USDC pairs at migration. This creates a short-term buying pressure and reduces the token's supply. The goal is to improve the immediate post-launch performance of memecoins, potentially increasing trader retention and transaction volume on the platform. However, critics warn this could lower the bar for token launches, encouraging low-quality projects, and that the brief 5-minute buy pressure might lead to sharper price crashes once it ends if followed by large sell-offs.

Foresight NewsHace 58 min(s)

Unlocking $100 Million in Liquidity? Pump.fun's New Policy Tests the 5-Minute Pump Technique

Foresight NewsHace 58 min(s)

What Signals Can Be Read from the Trading Data of India's Largest Asset Manager SBI's IPO?

India's largest asset manager, SBI Funds Management, successfully listed on July 21 with a nearly $10 billion IPO, attracting approximately 42 times subscription. However, the first-day closing price rose only about 6.3%, falling short of the 16% premium anticipated in the grey market. This signals robust demand for core Indian financial assets but also disciplined pricing, indicating the IPO market is selectively open for strong brands with clear growth narratives. The low reported underwriting fees, which led some global banks to reduce participation, highlight a shift in pricing power towards powerful issuers like SBI. Its strong brand, banking parent, and stable cash flows reduced reliance on traditional investment banking sales channels, with local brokers playing a larger role. This fee dynamic may not be replicable for weaker issuers. SBI's performance is seen as a key test for India's IPO pipeline, including potential future large listings like Reliance Jio and NSE. Its success with tempered gains sets a new price anchor: high-quality assets can launch, but excessive valuation premiums are constrained. The true measure of a sustained market reopening will be whether subsequent major offerings can proceed smoothly at reasonable valuations.

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Trading

Spot

Artículos destacados

Cómo comprar SOON

¡Bienvenido a HTX.com! Hemos hecho que comprar SOON (SOON) sea simple y conveniente. Sigue nuestra guía paso a paso para iniciar tu viaje de criptos.Paso 1: crea tu cuenta HTXUtiliza tu correo electrónico o número de teléfono para registrarte y obtener una cuenta gratuita en HTX. Experimenta un proceso de registro sin complicaciones y desbloquea todas las funciones.Obtener mi cuentaPaso 2: ve a Comprar cripto y elige tu método de pagoTarjeta de crédito/débito: usa tu Visa o Mastercard para comprar SOON (SOON) al instante.Saldo: utiliza fondos del saldo de tu cuenta HTX para tradear sin problemas.Terceros: hemos agregado métodos de pago populares como Google Pay y Apple Pay para mejorar la comodidad.P2P: tradear directamente con otros usuarios en HTX.Over-the-Counter (OTC): ofrecemos servicios personalizados y tipos de cambio competitivos para los traders.Paso 3: guarda tu SOON (SOON)Después de comprar tu SOON (SOON), guárdalo en tu cuenta HTX. Alternativamente, puedes enviarlo a otro lugar mediante transferencia blockchain o utilizarlo para tradear otras criptomonedas.Paso 4: tradear SOON (SOON)Tradear fácilmente con SOON (SOON) en HTX's mercado spot. Simplemente accede a tu cuenta, selecciona tu par de trading, ejecuta tus trades y monitorea en tiempo real. Ofrecemos una experiencia fácil de usar tanto para principiantes como para traders experimentados.

175 Vistas totalesPublicado en 2025.05.23Actualizado en 2026.06.02

Discusiones

Bienvenido a la comunidad de HTX. Aquí puedes mantenerte informado sobre los últimos desarrollos de la plataforma y acceder a análisis profesionales del mercado. A continuación se presentan las opiniones de los usuarios sobre el precio de SOON (SOON).