OpenAI Restarts Robotics Business After Six Years, Short-term Bets on Assistive Robots

marsbitPublicado a 2026-06-02Actualizado a 2026-06-02

Resumen

On June 1st, OpenAI CEO Sam Altman announced the company's entry into the physical robotics arena, launching a new "OpenAI Robotics" team. The strategy has short and long-term goals: developing robots to assist technical workers with infrastructure in the near term, and envisioning personal robots for everyone eventually. This marks a return to robotics for OpenAI, which had a team from 2016-2019 before disbanding it to focus on large language models like GPT, leading to ChatGPT. The revival stems from the rapid progress of an internal "Worldsim" research project, now led by Sora co-creator Aditya Ramesh, and a shift in strategy following the end of a partnership with humanoid robotics firm Figure AI in early 2025 due to technical disagreements. OpenAI's approach leverages its leading AI models and "world model" capabilities, aiming to build the "brain" first before the physical body. The move also serves to present a new growth narrative—embodied AI and expansion into the physical world—ahead of its planned 2026 IPO, potentially helping to address investor concerns over its significant ongoing losses.

On June 1, a recruitment post shared by OpenAI CEO Sam Altman on social media officially announced the company's entry into the physical robotics track. Altman stated that the company is forming a new team named "OpenAI Robotics" and is publicly recruiting full-stack hardware, operations, systems, and machine learning engineers. The goal is to "co-program and build robots that are truly useful to society."

According to Altman's explanation, OpenAI's robotics strategy has both short-term and long-term goals. In the short term, OpenAI focuses on developing robots that can assist technical workers in building future infrastructure. In the long run, the company envisions a future where every person can own a personal robot capable of fulfilling various needs.

Altman revealed that the move into robotics is based on the rapid development of an internal OpenAI research project called "Worldsim." This project evolved over the past year into OpenAI Robotics, led by the company's Research Vice President, Aditya Ramesh, a core developer of the text-to-image model DALL·E and the video generation model Sora. The project's foundation lies in the deep integration and co-design of robotics hardware research and machine learning research.

OpenAI's return to the robotics field is, in fact, a "comeback." As early as the company's founding days, robotics technology was a crucial direction in its exploration of Artificial General Intelligence (AGI). Between 2016 and 2019, OpenAI successively launched the reinforcement learning benchmark environment OpenAI Gym, the open-source robot simulation platform Roboschool, and successfully developed a dexterous robotic hand named Dactyl.

In 2019, OpenAI, using reinforcement learning and "Automatic Domain Randomization" (ADR) technology, trained an AI system that enabled a humanoid robotic hand to successfully solve a Rubik's Cube. This research proved the feasibility of the technical path of training in a simulation environment and then transferring the capabilities to a real robot. However, due to the scarcity of robotics training data and slow iteration at that time, contrasted with the vast and easily accessible text and image data on the internet, OpenAI made a strategic decision around 2020: to disband the robotics team and concentrate resources on the development of large language models represented by the GPT series. This decision ultimately led to the creation of ChatGPT.

In the following years, OpenAI ignited the global large model boom with its ChatGPT series of products, becoming the world's highest-valued AI unicorn. According to multiple media reports, OpenAI secretly submitted a draft IPO prospectus on May 22, planning to go public as early as September 2026. In its latest round of financing completed in March of this year, OpenAI's valuation reached $852 billion. Institutions like Deutsche Bank predict its listing valuation could exceed $1 trillion, with a fundraising scale potentially reaching $60 billion, potentially making it one of the largest tech IPOs in U.S. public market history.

Nevertheless, OpenAI also faces significant pressure from substantial losses. The company is projected to incur a full-year loss of approximately $14 billion in 2026, with cash burn expected to further expand. It might not achieve cash flow break-even until 2030 at the earliest. Its gross margin is only about 33%, with the high inference costs of AI models being the primary reason for eroding profits.

During the years after disbanding its in-house robotics team, OpenAI did not completely abandon the robotics track. Instead, it adopted a "multi-point investment" strategy through its venture fund, successively investing in several robotics startups, including the Norwegian humanoid robot company 1X Technologies, the American humanoid robot star company Figure AI, and Physical Intelligence.

The most notable collaboration was with Figure AI in February 2024. At that time, OpenAI not only participated in Figure AI's $675 million Series B funding round but also announced the development of a dedicated multimodal AI model for Figure's humanoid robots. Just 13 days after the partnership was announced, the Figure 01 humanoid robot equipped with the OpenAI model demonstrated fluent natural language interaction, object recognition, and autonomous operation capabilities.

However, this collaboration lasted less than a year. In February 2025, Figure AI founder Brett Adcock officially announced the termination of the partnership with OpenAI, opting to independently develop an end-to-end robot AI model. The primary reason for the breakdown was a divergence in technical approaches. Figure believed that general-purpose large models could not adapt to the hardware requirements of robots; it was essential to create a vertically integrated end-to-end model. This also prompted OpenAI, after a six-year hiatus, to choose to "revive" its robotics team, personally entering the field and upgrading robotics from an "investment" to an "internal strategic business."

Simultaneously, this is also OpenAI's move to outline a new growth narrative for the capital market ahead of its IPO. It aims to show investors a grand vision of transitioning from pure software to a software-hardware combination and expanding from the virtual world to the physical world. The company hopes to use the "embodied intelligence" story to hedge against market concerns about the sustainability of its business model and its massive losses.

OpenAI's advantage in entering the robotics field lies in its globally leading AI large model capabilities, particularly its "world model" for understanding and simulating the physical world. Its technical path may differ from many companies starting with hardware platforms, instead following a logic of "first build the brain, then grow the body." This means first enabling the AI to understand physical laws through a powerful world model, then infusing that capability into physical robots. If successful, this software- and algorithm-defined hardware approach could reshape the R&D model of the robotics industry.

This article is from "Jiemian News," author: Li Kefeng

Preguntas relacionadas

QWhy is OpenAI restarting its robotics business after six years?

AOpenAI is restarting its robotics business primarily due to the rapid development of its internal 'Worldsim' research project, which evolved into 'OpenAI Robotics'. Additionally, a strategic partnership breakdown with Figure AI over technical disagreements on AI model integration for robots prompted the company to bring robotics back as an in-house strategic business, moving beyond mere investment.

QWhat are the short-term and long-term goals for OpenAI's new robotics strategy?

AOpenAI's short-term goal is to develop robots capable of assisting technical workers in building future infrastructure. Its long-term vision is to create personal robots for everyone that can fulfill various needs.

QWhat was the outcome and significance of OpenAI's Dactyl robotic hand research in 2019?

AIn 2019, OpenAI successfully trained an AI system to solve a Rubik's Cube using a Dactyl robotic hand. This research demonstrated the feasibility of training AI in simulation and transferring that capability to a real-world robot, proving a key technical pathway.

QHow did OpenAI's collaboration with Figure AI in 2024 proceed and end?

AIn February 2024, OpenAI invested in Figure AI's funding round and developed a multimodal AI model for its humanoid robot. The integrated robot demonstrated impressive capabilities within 13 days. However, the partnership ended in February 2025 when Figure AI decided to build its own end-to-end AI model, citing that general-purpose large models couldn't adequately meet specific robot hardware requirements.

QWhat is OpenAI's potential approach to developing robots, according to the article?

AOpenAI's potential approach is described as 'building the brain first, then the body.' This means focusing first on developing a powerful 'world model' AI that understands physical laws, and then instilling that capability into physical robots. This software and algorithm-first approach could potentially reshape robotics R&D.

Lecturas Relacionadas

The Value Distribution of Stablecoins

**Summary: The Value Distribution of Stablecoins** The article argues that stablecoins are evolving from mere trading tools into broader channels for dollar access. It divides the stablecoin ecosystem into four layers to analyze how value is distributed: 1. **Issuance Layer:** Mints stablecoins, holds reserve assets, and captures the spread between reserve yield and user costs (e.g., Tether, Circle). This layer currently earns the largest profit margin. 2. **Infrastructure Layer:** Connects stablecoins to the traditional financial system, handling fiat on/off-ramps, banking integration, compliance (KYC/AML), and asset management (e.g., Bridge, BVNK). This is the "unglamorous" but critical work, building the essential bridges between crypto and real-world finance. 3. **Acquiring/Distribution Layer:** Integrates stablecoins into merchant systems, manages payment flows, and provides enterprise financial software (e.g., Stripe, Coinbase). They act as the access point for businesses. 4. **Application Layer:** The end-users and businesses that ultimately use stablecoins for payments, settlements, or as a store of value. They benefit from convenience but have little pricing power. The core thesis is that while the issuance layer currently dominates profits, the often-overlooked **infrastructure layer holds significant long-term potential**. The real challenge and barrier to mass adoption is not the on-chain transfer of stablecoins (which is simple), but the complex "last mile" integration into existing business workflows, banking systems, and regulatory frameworks across different countries. Companies in this layer are currently in a "land grab" phase, investing heavily to build networks, secure bank partnerships, and establish compliance pathways. While their position is currently pressured by the profitable issuers above and distribution platforms below, the article suggests that if stablecoins become a default financial rail for businesses, the infrastructure providers who have done the hard work of integration will ultimately gain strong pricing power and become entrenched, essential players.

marsbitHace 4 hora(s)

The Value Distribution of Stablecoins

marsbitHace 4 hora(s)

The Value Distribution of Stablecoins

The Value Distribution of Stablecoins The article argues that stablecoins are evolving from a mere trading tool into a broad "dollar channel." It analyzes the industry's value chain through four layers: 1. **Issuance Layer (e.g., Tether, Circle):** The top layer that mints stablecoins, holds reserve assets, and captures the thickest interest rate spread. 2. **Infrastructure Layer (e.g., Bridge, BVNK):** Connects stablecoins to the traditional financial system, handling critical but complex "dirty work" like fiat on/off-ramps, banking integration, compliance (KYC/AML), and cross-border settlement. 3. **Acquiring/Distribution Layer (e.g., Stripe, Coinbase):** Embeds stablecoins into merchant systems, manages payment flows, and integrates with enterprise software. 4. **Application Layer:** End-users and businesses that ultimately use stablecoins for payments, settlement, or storing value. The author posits that while the issuance layer currently captures the most profit, the most overlooked and potentially critical layer is infrastructure. The core challenge for stablecoin adoption isn't the on-chain transfer (which is simple), but bridging the gap between blockchain and the real-world financial system. This involves solving practical problems for businesses: fiat conversion, reconciliation, tax handling, and user onboarding. Infrastructure companies are currently in a difficult "land-grab" phase—building networks, securing banking relationships, and achieving compliance country-by-country. They face pressure from both the profitable issuance layer above and distribution platforms below. However, the author suggests this layer is building a crucial moat. Once stablecoins become a default business rail, the infrastructure players who have done the hard work of integration may gain significant, durable value and pricing power.

链捕手Hace 4 hora(s)

The Value Distribution of Stablecoins

链捕手Hace 4 hora(s)

How to Do Research Well: Deliberately Practice the Real Skills That Matter

No one truly teaches you how to do research. You're often given a desk, a pre-selected problem, and vague instructions to "create something new." Consequently, many people reverse-engineer the job based on visible outputs—papers, posts, announcements—learning only how to *appear* like a researcher rather than how to *become* one. True research capability is built from stacking small, trainable skills, nearly all of which can be developed through deliberate practice. **Pick Your Own Problem:** Most researchers absorb problems from advisors or trends, lacking the underlying reasoning. Choosing a problem you genuinely care about, as John Schulman advises, leads to original work. Develop "taste" like a muscle: predict experiment outcomes, guess paper results from methods, and track which findings remain important over time. **Upgrade Your Inputs:** Relying on shared reading lists (arXiv hot lists, filtered group chats) leads to unoriginal conclusions. Undervalued old literature often holds crucial insights (e.g., MoE, LSTM, backpropagation). Richard Sutton's "The Bitter Lesson" or Claude Shannon's 1952 talk on creative thinking are more predictive than lengthy modern surveys. Breadth matters as much as depth: draw from neuroscience, mechanism design, hardware knowledge, and honest statistics. Read papers directly, especially appendices and limitations sections. **Write Everything Down:** As Paul Graham noted, writing exposes flaws in seemingly mature ideas. Writing is the cheapest defense against self-deception. Following Feynman's principle, Darwin programmatically wrote down facts contradicting his theory to combat memory bias. Maintain a detailed log of hypotheses, setups, predictions, results, and updated understandings. Reviewing past logs fosters essential humility.

marsbitHace 6 hora(s)

How to Do Research Well: Deliberately Practice the Real Skills That Matter

marsbitHace 6 hora(s)

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片