MiCA strikes again? Revolut to drop USDT as Circle gains momentum

ambcryptoPublicado a 2026-07-04Actualizado a 2026-07-04

Resumen

Europe's largest fintech platform Revolut will delist Tether's USDT stablecoin, halting deposits by the end of July and removing it entirely by August 31. This move is widely attributed to compliance with the EU's new MiCA crypto regulatory framework, which aims to block non-compliant stablecoins. Tether's CEO has criticized MiCA as "dangerous," arguing its reserve requirements could destabilize European banks, and has opted not to seek approval. In contrast, Circle's USDC, which is MiCA-compliant, is gaining significant momentum. Visa data shows USDC's transfer volume doubled that of USDT in June, reaching $1.21 trillion, with a notable shift towards Euro-based stablecoins also observed. The delisting by Revolut and other EU platforms may further accelerate this trend, though USDT maintains a dominant position in overall market supply.

Europe’s largest fintech platform, Revolut, will drop Tether’s USDT by 31st of August. However, USDT deposits will be disabled from the platform by the end of this month.

The tech giant informed users that those who fail to transfer their funds by the end of August will have their USDT automatically exchanged to fiat.

The move is likely informed by regulatory pressure, according to analyst Max Karpis. He noted,

Revolut is delisting USDT on 31 Aug 2026 (regulatory/risk reasons). Not long ago, they expanded support to include zero-fee transfers and 1:1 USDT/USDC swaps. Now a reversal. Compliance hits again.

EU’s crypto regulatory framework, MiCA, is now in effect. Hence, the move is likely to block non-compliant stablecoins and tokens.

Tether CEO deems MiCA as ‘dangerous’ for stablecoins

Interestingly, Tether CEO Paolo Ardoino has been open about not seeking MiCA approval. In fact, he argued that the regulation is “bad” and “dangerous” for stablecoins.

The problem I have with MiCA is that it’s very dangerous for stablecoins. What will happen next year is that a few banks in Europe will go belly up because of MiCA’s requirement that 60% of stablecoin reserves be kept in uninsured cash deposits in European banks.

He also noted that only small banks accept crypto firms, as major ones like UBS are unwilling to accept stablecoin business. For Ardoino, this would be risky as a +20% redemption on USDT could quickly trigger a banking crisis.

He believes that MiCA is designed to position the Digital Euro to control fund flows. Hence, he opted to keep USDT safe for emerging markets that rely heavily on it.

Whether the same risk applies to Circle’s USDC or Euro stablecoin EURC is not clear. However, Circle has MiCA approval and seems to have benefited last month as the MiCA transition period came to an end.

According to Visa data, USDC saw $1.21T in transfer volume in June, doubling Tether’s USDT. This was the second highest monthly transfer volume following February’s record $1.28T amid growing adoption across most blockchains.

Source: Visa

In fact, less than a week into July, USDC’s volume was 3x that of USDT, underscoring a likely shift tied to the MiCA framework. Users across the EU or those sending money to the continent may be opting for USDC instead of USDT.

The shift was also evident across US dollar and Euro-based stablecoins. The latter grew 11x while USD-based stablecoin volumes shrank.

Source: TRM Labs

Tether’s USDT still dominates the stablecoin market in terms of supply though. It remains to be seen whether Circle will close the gap as Revolut and other EU platforms continue to delist USDT.


Final Summary

  • Revolut will delist USDT by August 31st and stop accepting deposits from the stablecoin by the end of July.
  • USDC transfer volume hit $1.21T, doubling Tether’s USDT, further underscoring MiCA’s impact on stablecoin adoption.

Preguntas relacionadas

QWhat is the key deadline and action that Revolut is taking regarding Tether's USDT stablecoin?

ARevolut will stop accepting USDT deposits by the end of July 2026 and will completely delist Tether's USDT from its platform by August 31, 2026. Users who fail to transfer their USDT funds by the end of August will have them automatically exchanged to fiat currency.

QAccording to the analyst Max Karpis, what is the primary reason behind Revolut's decision to delist USDT?

AAccording to analyst Max Karpis, Revolut's decision is primarily due to regulatory and risk reasons, specifically in response to compliance pressures, which he attributes to the EU's MiCA regulatory framework now being in effect.

QWhat are the main criticisms of the MiCA regulation expressed by Tether's CEO, Paolo Ardoino?

ATether CEO Paolo Ardoino criticizes MiCA as being 'bad' and 'dangerous' for stablecoins. He argues that its requirement for 60% of stablecoin reserves to be held as uninsured cash deposits in European banks could lead to bank failures, especially if there is a large-scale redemption event like a +20% redemption of USDT. He also believes it is designed to favor the Digital Euro and control fund flows.

QHow has Circle's USDC stablecoin reportedly been affected by the implementation of MiCA, according to the Visa data mentioned in the article?

AAccording to Visa data cited in the article, USDC's transfer volume reached $1.21 trillion in June 2026, doubling that of Tether's USDT. Furthermore, in early July, USDC's volume was three times that of USDT, indicating a significant shift in adoption likely tied to MiCA compliance.

QBeyond USDT and USDC, what broader trend in stablecoin usage was observed in the EU market as the MiCA transition period ended?

AThe article shows a broader shift towards Euro-based stablecoins. While USD-based stablecoin volumes shrank, Euro-based stablecoin volumes grew by 11 times, indicating a significant move towards euro-denominated stablecoins within the EU market following the MiCA framework's implementation.

Lecturas Relacionadas

In Conversation with Ray Dalio: We Are Currently in an AI Bubble, with 1% of My Portfolio in Bitcoin

Ray Dalio, founder of Bridgewater Associates, warns in an interview that the current AI boom shows classic bubble characteristics, which could lead to significant economic downturns as seen in past cycles like 1929 or 2000. He explains that speculative enthusiasm, fueled by debt and overvaluation, often precedes a crash when rising rates or taxation force asset sales, causing widespread losses and recession. Dalio also outlines his "Big Cycle" theory, describing an approximate 80-year pattern where widening wealth gaps, massive government deficits, and shifting geopolitical power (like China's rise) create internal conflict and global instability. He emphasizes that we are in a late-cycle, transitional phase where traditional powers like the US and UK face decline. For personal wealth protection, Dalio advises diversification beyond cash into assets like stocks, bonds, real estate, and particularly gold, which he prefers over Bitcoin. While he holds about 1% of his portfolio in Bitcoin as a non-printable hard asset, he views gold as more secure from technological or governmental threats. Regarding AI's impact, Dalio believes it will disproportionately benefit capital owners, worsening inequality by replacing both physical and cognitive labor. He suggests that human intuition and emotional intelligence, combined with AI, will be key for future workers. On taxation, Dalio argues that wealth taxes are impractical and risk triggering asset sell-offs, reducing productive investment. He points to the UK as a cautionary example of debt, low productivity, and political strife. Geopolitically, Dalio foresees a more regionalized world, with the US showing weakness in prolonged conflicts like with Iran, akin to past imperial declines. The ideal outcome, he suggests, is coexisting powerful blocs (e.g., Americas, China-Asia Pacific) without major war.

marsbitHace 3 hora(s)

In Conversation with Ray Dalio: We Are Currently in an AI Bubble, with 1% of My Portfolio in Bitcoin

marsbitHace 3 hora(s)

Daily 7.2 Trillion KRW: Foreign Capital's Record Net Buying on Friday! Wall Street Says Headwinds for Korean Stock Fund Flows Have Subsided

South Korean stock market sees a dramatic shift in fund flows. On July 31, foreign investors made a record net purchase of approximately KRW 7.2 trillion in KOSPI stocks, marking a fundamental reversal from the persistent large-scale net outflows seen in previous months. This contributed to a significant narrowing of foreign net selling in July to KRW 9.8 trillion, down sharply from KRW 48.4 trillion in June and KRW 44.5 trillion in May. Simultaneously, domestic institutional pressure eased. South Korean pension funds and asset managers turned to a net buying position in July, purchasing KRW 1.0 trillion worth of KOSPI shares, contrasting with net sales in May and June. Market volatility is expected to be dampened by new financial regulations. Effective July 31, the Financial Services Commission tightened access for retail investors to single-stock leveraged ETFs by raising the minimum cash deposit requirement. Trading volumes for these products subsequently dropped to about 50% of their monthly average. Citigroup Research maintains its year-end KOSPI target of 10,000 points. The firm cites several supportive factors: the substantial easing of headwinds from capital outflows, a robust fundamental outlook for the semiconductor sector, historically low market valuations, strong economic fundamentals, and the potential for policy support from financial authorities if needed.

marsbitHace 3 hora(s)

Daily 7.2 Trillion KRW: Foreign Capital's Record Net Buying on Friday! Wall Street Says Headwinds for Korean Stock Fund Flows Have Subsided

marsbitHace 3 hora(s)

Thanks to Dice Rolls, Bitcoin Keys Are Stored Offline, But Not Everyone Will Do It

The article discusses using dice rolls to generate secure Bitcoin wallet seeds, providing entropy independent of potentially flawed hardware random number generators. It explains that each fair dice roll offers about 2.585 bits of entropy, with around 50 rolls needed for a standard 12-word seed phrase and 99+ recommended for higher security. This method gained attention after a vulnerability was revealed in some Coldcard hardware wallets, where a faulty firmware RNG (dating back to 2021) compromised generated keys. The analysis notes that while a dice-generated main seed was safe from this specific flaw, other Coldcard functions (like creating paper wallets, backup keys, or passwords) could still be vulnerable if they used the defective RNG. The piece argues that while dice-based entropy is technically robust, the manual process is error-prone, tedious, and unrealistic for most new users, who might make mistakes in recording or inputting rolls. It concludes that while manual entropy generation should remain an option for advanced users, the long-term goal is to develop reliable, user-friendly hardware and software that securely generates randomness without requiring specialized knowledge. Coldcard users are advised to check their firmware version and replace any secondary secrets (like paper wallet keys) created with vulnerable devices, while also considering multi-signature setups with devices from different manufacturers for added security.

cryptonews.ruHace 8 hora(s)

Thanks to Dice Rolls, Bitcoin Keys Are Stored Offline, But Not Everyone Will Do It

cryptonews.ruHace 8 hora(s)

Trading

Spot
活动图片