Mantra CEO tells OM holders to withdraw from OKX over ‘inaccurate’ migration plan

cointelegraphPublicado a 2025-12-08Actualizado a 2025-12-08

Resumen

Mantra CEO John Patrick Mullin has urged users to withdraw their OM tokens from the OKX exchange, accusing the platform of posting an "inaccurate" migration plan. Mullin claims OKX provided incorrect dates and details about the upcoming token migration from an Ethereum-based ERC-20 token to a native Mantra Chain token. He stated that OKX has not communicated with Mantra since April 13, when the OM token crashed over 90%, an event Mantra attributed to aggressive exchange leverage policies. Mullin advised users to avoid relying on OKX and complete the migration independently. The official migration is set to occur after January 15, contrary to OKX’s announced December timeline.

Tensions between blockchain platform Mantra and crypto exchange OKX are rising after Mantra accused the exchange of posting incorrect information about its token migration.

In a Monday X post, Mantra CEO John Patrick Mullin urged users of centralized cryptocurrency exchange (CEX) OKX to withdraw their Mantra (OM) tokens and cut their “dependency” on the platform.

“Users should consider withdrawing their OM tokens from OKX[...]. Avoid OKX Exchange Dependency: Complete migration without relying on potentially negligent or malicious intermediaries,” said Mullin.

His warning came in response to a Friday announcement from OKX about supporting the incoming OM token migration.

Related: BitMine buys $199M in Ether as smart money traders bet on ETH decline

According to Mullin, the OKX post contained multiple inaccuracies, including false migration and implementation dates.

OKX said the migration would occur between Dec. 22 and Dec. 25. Mantra’s governance proposal, by contrast, states that the migration will only take place after the Jan. 15 deprecation of the Ethereum-based ERC-20 OM token.

Mullin also said OKX’s post referenced “arbitrary dates throughout December 2025,” while Mantra has not yet announced an official implementation date.

He claimed OKX has not communicated with Mantra since “the events” of April 13, while Mantra has “helpfully [been] communicating with all other major exchanges regarding our migration.”

*OKX’s OM Crypto Migration post. Source:* *okx.com*

During the incoming migration, the OM token will migrate from an Ethereum-native ERC-20 token to a Mantra Chain-native token.

Cointelegraph has contacted OKX for comment but had not received a response by publication time.

Related: Prediction markets emerge as speculative ‘arbitrage arena’ for crypto traders

April crash still casting a shadow

On April 13, the Mantra’s OM token price fell by over 90% from around $6.30 to below $0.50.

*OM/USD, 1-day chart. Source:* *Coingecko.com*

On April 30, Mantra published a post-mortem report that blamed the aggressive trading policies and high leverage on cryptocurrency exchanges for the token crash.

“Liquidation cascades could happen to any project in the crypto industry,” Mullin said in the post, pointing to the role of “aggressive leverage positions” on exchanges as a broader threat to investor safety.

Mullin also urged exchanges to review their leverage policies while implementing a transparency dashboard for OM tokenomics, along with announcing the burning of 150 million staked OM tokens, permanently removing them from circulation in a bid to tighten the token’s supply.

Magazine: If the crypto bull run is ending... it’s time to buy a Ferrari — Crypto Kid

Lecturas Relacionadas

What's the Connection Between Pinduoduo's Huang Zheng and Blockchain?

This text explores the unexpected connection between Pinduoduo founder Colin Huang and blockchain, as suggested in his article *Turning Capitalism Upside Down*. Huang argues Pinduoduo's core business is about managing "uncertainty." He posits that wealth flows to the rich because they absorb life's uncertainties (e.g., illness, job loss) that devastate the poor, who pay a premium for certainty through insurance or stable prices. Pinduoduo's model attempts a "reverse insurance": by aggregating consumer demand via group-buying and flash sales, it creates a large, predictable order for manufacturers. This certainty allows factories to remove risk premiums, passing savings back as lower prices, thus partially reversing the wealth flow. The key obstacle, Huang notes, is that an individual's buying intent is an unreliable promise. He then asks if blockchain is the natural solution for this "reverse insurance." The text elaborates that blockchain, through smart contracts with binding deposits, could transform casual intent into a costly-to-break, enforceable commitment. This replaces interpersonal trust with coded rules, making promises credible, pricable, and resistant to fraud. Finally, the author draws a parallel to Bitcoin, framing two paths to creating certainty: the "Pinduoduo path" of aggregating decentralized will into scale, and the "Bitcoin path" of locking rules into immutable code. Both sacrifice something—personal freedom or system flexibility—to manufacture trust and predictability.

链捕手Hace 39 min(s)

What's the Connection Between Pinduoduo's Huang Zheng and Blockchain?

链捕手Hace 39 min(s)

The Storage Magnate Who Conquered a Trillion-Dollar Kingdom, Yet Ultimately Could Not Become the Richest

**Summary:** "The Memory Magnate Who Built a Trillion-Dollar Empire, Yet Never Became the Richest" explores the journey of Zhu Yiming, founder of GigaDevice (603986) and co-founder of the soon-to-IPO ChangXin Memory Technologies (CXMT). The article positions GigaDevice, a fabless chip designer now valued at ~¥340 billion, as a prequel to the massive IDM (Integrated Device Manufacturer) venture, CXMT. Starting in 2005 with minimal capital, Zhu strategically "picked up the pieces" by focusing on niche markets like NOR Flash and microcontrollers (MCUs), areas major players were exiting. This allowed GigaDevice to grow into a diversified semiconductor company, maintaining robust profitability even during industry downturns by controlling costs. However, the piece argues that in the highly cyclical and capital-intensive memory chip industry, the fabless model has limits. True resilience and scale require the ability for "counter-cyclical expansion" – investing heavily during downturns – a tactic only possible for IDMs like Samsung or SK Hynix. This insight led Zhu to partner with the Hefei city government in 2016 to establish CXMT, an IDM focused on DRAM. Zhu's symbolic moves, like forfeiting salary and diluting his equity, were crucial in securing the massive state and bank funding needed. CXMT's equipment base is now valued even higher than that of BYD's vast auto manufacturing empire. Despite the potential for CXMT to reach a market cap of ¥1-2 trillion upon its IPO, Zhu's indirect stake in both companies is estimated below 3%, placing his personal wealth far below that of China's top billionaires. The article concludes that his strategic vision built a trillion-yuan memory landscape, but the capital structure necessary to achieve it precluded a personal fortune of similar scale.

marsbitHace 46 min(s)

The Storage Magnate Who Conquered a Trillion-Dollar Kingdom, Yet Ultimately Could Not Become the Richest

marsbitHace 46 min(s)

Token Of Power Governance Exploit Drains $1.58 Million In WETH, TRM Says

Blockchain intelligence firm TRM Labs reports a governance exploit against the Token of Power protocol, resulting in a loss of approximately $1.58 million in WETH. The attacker exploited a missing timelock in the protocol's Aragon DAO setup, allowing them to propose, vote on, and execute a malicious action within a single block. The attacker funded the operation with 662 ETH from Tornado Cash, purchased enough TOP tokens to gain majority voting power, minted 10 billion new TOP tokens, and swapped them for WETH via a Balancer pool before moving funds back through Tornado Cash. The incident underscores that governance design is a critical security risk in DeFi, where parameters like timelocks provide essential reaction time. It also highlights how mixers and liquidity pools can be utilized in exploits without being directly compromised. Observers are now watching for any movement of the stolen funds and further remediation details from involved parties. This event is part of a broader shift in crypto, emphasizing the importance of underlying infrastructure, security, and governance alongside market movements.

bitcoinistHace 3 hora(s)

Token Of Power Governance Exploit Drains $1.58 Million In WETH, TRM Says

bitcoinistHace 3 hora(s)

XRP Ledger Daily Fees Drop Below $400 As Network Activity Question Returns

The XRP Ledger is drawing attention as daily network fees have fallen below $400. While low fees align with XRPL's design for affordable transactions and are often seen as a strength, the metric can also serve as an indicator of network demand and paid transaction volume. This data point of around $3,100 in weekly fee burn highlights the stark contrast with higher-fee chains like Ethereum and Bitcoin. The development fuels an ongoing debate. Proponents view low fees as a sign of efficiency and accessibility, while critics may question if the network is generating sufficient high-value activity relative to its market cap and payments-focused narrative. The article cautions against overstating the finding, noting a single low-fee day does not signify network failure. It instead adds context to discussions about XRPL's usage, especially alongside Ripple's broader initiatives in stablecoins (RLUSD), AI payments, and enterprise infrastructure. The report recommends monitoring for a fee rebound, checking transaction counts for a fuller picture, and confirming the trend via native explorers like Bithomp. It frames the story within a larger market shift where on-chain data, protocol updates, and infrastructure developments are becoming crucial alongside price action. The editorial stance is to present the verified data, explain its significance for assessing network activity, and avoid hype, positioning it as part of the daily crypto conversation.

bitcoinistHace 5 hora(s)

XRP Ledger Daily Fees Drop Below $400 As Network Activity Question Returns

bitcoinistHace 5 hora(s)

Ripple Launches XRPL AI Starter Kit For XRP And RLUSD Agent Payments

Ripple has released the XRPL AI Starter Kit, a Phase 1 developer toolkit aimed at enabling AI agents to make payments using XRP and its stablecoin RLUSD on the XRP Ledger. The kit supports the x402 payment standard and includes a server to connect AI systems like Claude directly to XRPL documentation. This move provides XRP with a new utility narrative focused on autonomous, machine-to-machine transactions, where agents could pay for APIs and services without manual approval for each micro-payment. For the XRP community, it represents a push into tangible payment infrastructure beyond speculation. The announcement is a concrete product update within a broader crypto shift towards valuing infrastructure and utility alongside price. The next steps involve monitoring developer adoption, documentation updates, and testnet activity. The story is based on Ripple's official blog.

bitcoinistHace 7 hora(s)

Ripple Launches XRPL AI Starter Kit For XRP And RLUSD Agent Payments

bitcoinistHace 7 hora(s)

Trading

Spot

Futuros