Infinex Token Sale New Rules: $0.0099 Locked for One Year or $0.03 for Immediate Unlock, Choose One

marsbitPublicado a 2025-12-26Actualizado a 2025-12-26

Resumen

Infinex, a DeFi platform founded by Synthetix's Kain Warwick, has revised its token sale terms for its INX token. The fully diluted valuation (FDV) has been significantly reduced from $300 million to $99.99 million. The sale will offer two options: tokens can be purchased at $0.0099 each with a mandatory one-year lockup, or participants can opt for immediate unlocking at TGE for a higher price of $0.03 per token, which corresponds to the original $300 million FDV. The token sale is scheduled for January 3-6, 2026, with TGE planned for late January. The changes have sparked strong negative reactions, particularly from Patron NFT holders. They had purchased these NFTs under the previous assumption that they would receive priority allocation and earlier unlock options at a higher valuation. The new rules, which lower the unlock valuation threshold, have devalued their NFTs and undermined the initial value proposition. Despite the FDV reduction, the one-year lockup period remains a major point of community criticism, with many viewing it as overly restrictive in the current market.

Author | Asher(@Asher_ 0210)

Yesterday, Infinex founder Kain Warwick posted on X platform, stating that due to feedback indicating the pricing was too high, the valuation for the Sonar token sale conducted by Infinex on Echo has been lowered from the initially set $300 million to $99.99 million, while the lock-up period remains unchanged at one year, to better adapt to the current market environment.

Affected by the FDV reduction, the overall allocation quota for the Sonar sale has decreased, making it impossible to guarantee the priority allocation arrangements for the original Patron NFT holders. The floor price of Infinex Patrons NFT dropped nearly 10% in 24 hours, temporarily reported at 1.387 ETH.

Below, Odaily Planet Daily takes you through the Infinex project, the new token sale rules, and community sentiment.

Infinex: Full-Stack DeFi Services

Infinex is a decentralized finance platform launched by Synthetix founder Kain Warwick in April 2024. Its goal is to provide a product form close to the experience of a centralized exchange under the premise of decentralization, thereby narrowing the usability gap between CeFi and DeFi. While maintaining non-custodial assets and on-chain security, the platform focuses on optimizing the interaction process and user experience.

From a product positioning perspective, Infinex is not a single-function application, but rather closer to a full-stack DeFi service entry point. Its core capabilities include: acting as a non-custodial wallet covering multiple chains to host user assets; serving as a unified interface, aggregating and integrating various on-chain DeFi protocols and services; and simultaneously, through highly abstract interaction design, hiding complex concepts such as address management, cross-chain bridging, seed phrases, and Gas fees in the background. This allows users to complete interactions with DeFi applications without needing to understand the underlying mechanisms, making the overall user experience closer to CeFi products.

To date, Infinex has supported 15 blockchain networks including Ethereum, Solana, and Base. The integrated DeFi functions cover cross-chain trading (Swidge), perpetual contracts (Perp), liquid staking, and other yield-generating services (Earn), among others.

Infinex Token Sale New Regulations

According to the official Infinex documentation, the updated details of the Infinex token sale are as follows:

  • INX Token Sale Account Registration Date: Starting December 27th;
  • INX Token Official Sale Date: January 3rd to January 6th, 2026;
  • Infinex TGE Date: Planned for late January 2026;
  • Sale Quantity: 5% of the total token supply;
  • FDV: Valuation lowered from the initially set $300 million to $99.99 million;
  • Lock-up Situation: Locked for one year;
  • Purchase Quantity: Minimum amount is $200, maximum amount is $2500. If the token sale is oversubscribed, the chance of obtaining an allocation can be increased by sharing participation details on X. Regular users can get a 3x multiplier by sharing on X, while Patreon NFT holders can get a 10x multiplier.

Additionally, the INX tokens in this sale offer an early unlock option. If early unlock is chosen, the corresponding valuation at TGE is a $300 million FDV, with a single token price of $0.03. Thereafter, this valuation will be linearly reduced over the following year, finally settling at a $99.99 million FDV, corresponding to a single token price of $0.0099.

Community Sentiment: Negative Voices Dominate, Patron NFT Holders Particularly Dissatisfied

"A $300 million valuation allows for full unlock at TGE, so what does that make the Patron NFT I bought at an implied $500 million valuation worth?" This is the most direct question raised by many Patron NFT holders after the announcement of the new rules. According to the previous sale expectations, participants could join the token sale at a $300 million FDV. If they wished to unlock at TGE, they would need to correspond to a higher valuation threshold, approximately a $1 billion FDV. It was under this expectation that some users chose to purchase Patron NFTs at a higher implied valuation to secure more certain allocation rights and earlier liquidity.

However, after the adjustment of the new plan, the valuation threshold for early unlock was significantly reduced to a $300 million FDV, noticeably weakening the Patron mechanism which originally relied on a high valuation to exchange for unlock rights and priority. This means that the premium paid by Patron NFT holders previously for "certainty" and "early unlock" is no longer valid, and some holders have turned to a state of negative returns both on paper and in expectation.

In response to this controversy, Kain Warwick stated that the purpose of the new plan is to promote broader distribution of the token and increase overall participation and market heat before TGE. However, in the view of some Patron holders, this explanation hardly covers their core losses and fails to fully address the expectation gap suffered by early supporters due to the mechanism change, thus not completely quelling the controversy.

Furthermore, the unchanged 1-year lock-up period remains the biggest pain point in community discussions. Although the significant reduction in FDV has somewhat alleviated market criticism of the high valuation, it has not changed the strong dissatisfaction of most community members towards the "1-year lock-up period," which they believe is almost equivalent to a "death sentence in advance" in the current market environment.

Preguntas relacionadas

QWhat are the two options for purchasing INX tokens in the updated Infinex token sale?

AParticipants can choose between two options: 1) Purchase tokens at $0.0099 per token with a one-year lockup period, or 2) Purchase tokens at $0.03 per token for immediate unlocking at TGE.

QWhy did Infinex reduce the fully diluted valuation (FDV) for its Sonar token sale?

AInfinex reduced the FDV from the initially set $300 million to $99.99 million in response to community feedback that the original pricing was too high, aiming to better adapt to the current market environment.

QWhat negative impact did the FDV reduction have on Infinex Patron NFT holders?

AThe FDV reduction decreased the overall token allocation, eliminating the guaranteed priority allocation for Patron NFT holders. This caused the floor price of Infinex Patrons NFT to drop nearly 10% in 24 hours to 1.387 ETH.

QWhat is the core product vision of the Infinex platform?

AInfinex is a full-stack DeFi service platform aiming to provide a user experience close to that of a centralized exchange (CeFi) while maintaining non-custodial asset security and on-chain decentralization. It simplifies DeFi interactions by abstracting complex concepts like address management and gas fees.

QWhat was a major point of community criticism regarding the token sale terms that remained unchanged despite the FDV adjustment?

AThe one-year lockup period remained a major point of community criticism. Many members expressed strong dissatisfaction, believing that a one-year lockup is excessively long and unfavorable in the current market climate.

Lecturas Relacionadas

The Niche Consensus Among Elites: Has College Become an Expensive Waste?

**Summary:** A growing "anti-college" movement is gaining traction among elite circles in Silicon Valley, challenging the traditional value of a four-year university degree. Proponents argue that college has become an expensive, slow, and increasingly irrelevant waste of time, especially in the fast-paced tech world where opportunities pass by quickly. The movement is led by figures like billionaire Peter Thiel, who criticizes universities for high costs, ideological indoctrination, and stifling true innovation. His "Thiel Fellowship" pays young people to drop out and pursue ventures. Companies like Palantir Technologies (co-founded by Thiel) fuel this trend with programs like the "Meritocracy Fellowship," which offers high school graduates paid internships as an alternative to immediate college enrollment, promising a practical "Palantir Degree." Key drivers include: 1. **Economics:** Skyrocketing student debt versus the allure of immediate, high-paying tech jobs or startup funding. 2. **Technology:** AI and online tools lowering barriers to self-education and product development, making formal instruction seem inefficient. 3. **Culture:** A backlash against perceived "woke" ideology and DEI policies in universities, coupled with a belief that these institutions suppress meritocracy and masculine drive. The movement is notably male-dominated. Critics, like economist David Deming, warn against overgeneralizing from dropout success stories (survivorship bias). He emphasizes that genuine autodidacts are rare, corporate training is narrowly focused, and the "college wage premium" remains high for most people. University liberal arts education, he argues, builds adaptable problem-solving skills and broad perspectives. The debate highlights a deeper crisis in education. The core model of the modern university appears increasingly mismatched with the speed of the information age. The movement signals a shift in the locus of learning from institutional "education" to personal, active "learning" powered by the internet and AI. Ultimately, this may not mean the end of university, but rather a painful evolution. The future likely holds more hybrid, personalized, and lifelong learning pathways. The central question becomes: in a world changing faster than any curriculum, how do we best learn?

marsbitHace 19 min(s)

The Niche Consensus Among Elites: Has College Become an Expensive Waste?

marsbitHace 19 min(s)

From Subsidies to Token-Based Pricing to Price Cuts: Is OpenAI Sparking a Price War? Is the Inflection Point for Token Economics Nearing?

The commercialization of generative AI is facing a critical inflection point as a potential price war looms. According to The Wall Street Journal, OpenAI is considering a significant cut to its token fees to compete with rival Anthropic, signaling a shift from a growth-at-all-costs model focused on token consumption. This move comes as both companies, reportedly losing billions on compute, prepare for IPOs, and as enterprise customers face "bill shock" from switching to usage-based token billing. Reports indicate poor ROI, with one analysis finding only 18 cents of every dollar spent on AI tokens generates user-facing value. The industry's initial phases—from flat-rate subscriptions to aggressive subsidies—have given way to a reckoning with real costs. Analysts debate the future: some predict a bifurcation between premium, high-cost models for complex tasks and cheaper alternatives for routine work, while others believe overall spending will still rise as agentic AI increases tokens per task. Notably, Chinese model DeepSeek's low-cost API is gaining traction with U.S. enterprises, adding competitive pressure. The core challenge is redefining value beyond token volume ("tokenmaxxing") toward measurable productivity ("valuemaxxing"), as the entire AI value chain, from cloud providers to chipmakers, feels the ripple effects of unsustainable pricing.

marsbitHace 23 min(s)

From Subsidies to Token-Based Pricing to Price Cuts: Is OpenAI Sparking a Price War? Is the Inflection Point for Token Economics Nearing?

marsbitHace 23 min(s)

Trading

Spot
Futuros

Artículos destacados

Cómo comprar ONE

¡Bienvenido a HTX.com! Hemos hecho que comprar Harmony (ONE) sea simple y conveniente. Sigue nuestra guía paso a paso para iniciar tu viaje de criptos.Paso 1: crea tu cuenta HTXUtiliza tu correo electrónico o número de teléfono para registrarte y obtener una cuenta gratuita en HTX. Experimenta un proceso de registro sin complicaciones y desbloquea todas las funciones.Obtener mi cuentaPaso 2: ve a Comprar cripto y elige tu método de pagoTarjeta de crédito/débito: usa tu Visa o Mastercard para comprar Harmony (ONE) al instante.Saldo: utiliza fondos del saldo de tu cuenta HTX para tradear sin problemas.Terceros: hemos agregado métodos de pago populares como Google Pay y Apple Pay para mejorar la comodidad.P2P: tradear directamente con otros usuarios en HTX.Over-the-Counter (OTC): ofrecemos servicios personalizados y tipos de cambio competitivos para los traders.Paso 3: guarda tu Harmony (ONE)Después de comprar tu Harmony (ONE), guárdalo en tu cuenta HTX. Alternativamente, puedes enviarlo a otro lugar mediante transferencia blockchain o utilizarlo para tradear otras criptomonedas.Paso 4: tradear Harmony (ONE)Tradear fácilmente con Harmony (ONE) en HTX's mercado spot. Simplemente accede a tu cuenta, selecciona tu par de trading, ejecuta tus trades y monitorea en tiempo real. Ofrecemos una experiencia fácil de usar tanto para principiantes como para traders experimentados.

283 Vistas totalesPublicado en 2024.12.12Actualizado en 2026.06.02

Cómo comprar ONE

Discusiones

Bienvenido a la comunidad de HTX. Aquí puedes mantenerte informado sobre los últimos desarrollos de la plataforma y acceder a análisis profesionales del mercado. A continuación se presentan las opiniones de los usuarios sobre el precio de ONE (ONE).

活动图片