Hidden Ads No More: Under X's New Disclosure Rules, KOLs' Easy Money Model Faces Account Suspension Risks

比推Publicado a 2026-02-24Actualizado a 2026-02-24

Resumen

X, formerly known as Twitter, is set to enforce stricter advertising disclosure rules, as announced by product lead Nikita Bier. The new policy will require users to clearly label paid promotions with tags like #ad or #sponsored. This follows a public intervention by Bier, who warned an influential account promoting Kalshi without proper disclosure of its financial ties. The article highlights several high-engagement “stealth ads”—posts disguised as organic content that are actually paid promotions—from accounts like @jota_snchez and @FluentInFinance, which garnered millions of views without disclosure. These posts often promoted prediction markets like Polymarket and Kalshi by leveraging FOMO and misleading narratives. The new rules aim to increase transparency, impacting Web3 projects and influencers who rely on undisclosed soft promotions for user acquisition. KOLs may face higher risks, including post removal and account suspension, while projects could see rising marketing costs. Alternatively, advertisers may shift budgets to X’s official promoted post system, potentially increasing the platform’s ad revenue. The move is expected to reduce deceptive marketing practices and improve user awareness in the long term.

Author: Sanqing, Foresight News

Original Title: X's New Advertising Disclosure Rules to Launch, Potentially Ending the Crypto KOLs' 'Easy Money' Model

On February 21, X platform product lead Nikita Bier (@nikitabier) publicly intervened in a post suspected of undisclosed paid promotion, directly requesting the original poster to add a disclosure statement or face account suspension. User @infodexx posted a list of the "Most Valuable Startups of 2025," with prediction market Kalshi ranking second with a $11 billion valuation, accompanied by Kalshi's green brand image and founder's photo.

The post garnered over 420,000 views, nearly 2000 likes, and hundreds of reposts. While it appeared to be an objective ranking, it was flagged in the reader community notes as "this is a paid post." Furthermore, @infodexx's bio explicitly states "@Kalshi partner," yet the original post lacked any clear disclosure labels like #ad or #sponsored.

Nikita Bier replied to the post on the same day: "Please add a follow-up reply disclosing this is a paid promotion for Kalshi. Otherwise, this will result in account suspension." Later, when user @AlexFinn complained about the X platform being flooded with undisclosed ads (especially posts related to prediction markets and AI), Nikita Bier further stated: "We are launching a disclosure feature for this type of issue next week."

High-Viewership Hidden Ads Will Be Brought into the Light

Below are several examples of high-viewership "hidden ads" selected by the author. These tweets appear to be natural shares but are suspected promotions lacking any disclosure labels. They attract high views, lure degens to follow the trend, yet evade responsibility.

A Spanish-language account @jota_snchez shared a story about a "Chinese student making a fortune on Polymarket," with over 1.29 million views, 7313 likes, and 312 reposts. The content detailed strategies with images and videos, seeming like an inspirational post but actually softly promoting Polymarket's money-making potential. No #ad label, yet indirectly hyping the platform—a classic disguise of experience sharing.

User @FluentInFinance quoted a Kalshi tweet, complaining "US 1% wealthier than middle class," with 1.68 million views, 150k+ likes, and 20k+ reposts. Superficially social commentary, it actually quoted Kalshi's "JUST IN" news, guiding users to bet on related events on the platform. Not labeled #sponsored, yet amplified exposure through high engagement. This is where Web3 degens often get tricked.

@Shelpid_WI3M "exposed" a 5-minute setup framework for Polymarket Clawdbot, with 940k views, 2940 likes, 6091 bookmarks. Detailed steps + link, seeming like a "free share" but actually promoting a copytrade tool, indirectly pulling new users to Polymarket. No disclosure of any partnership—this type of "developer perspective" hidden ad is the most deceptive for technical degens.

@karbonbased publicly "refused Kalshi collaboration but continues to shill Polymarket for free," with 95k views, 764 likes. Superficially a "principled" refusal, it actually promotes Polymarket indirectly. The word "free" is most suspicious—what's truly free in Web3? No #ad, yet using moral high ground to induce followers.

@pablofindsout uploaded a video discussing the nature of Polymarket and Kalshi, with 300k views, 1657 likes. Citing expert opinions, seemingly neutral but actually amplifying platform exposure—an unlabeled sponsored隐形广告片 (stealth ad video).

These examples show that high viewership does not equal sincerity. They rely on FOMO for viral spread but avoid disclosure, costing wallets dearly. After the new rules, similar tweets will be restricted.

Impact of X's New Rules on Web3 Marketing

For Web3 project teams, this means a significant increase in marketing costs. Many prediction market projects (like Polymarket and Kalshi) rely on KOLs' soft ads to drive user FOMO entry at low cost.

Now, the new rules require any content involving payment, gifts, affiliate links, or material incentives to be prominently labeled with "#ad," "sponsored," or "paid partnership," etc. Otherwise, the tweet will be directly removed, and the account faces suspension or even permanent ban.

In the short term, growth for these platforms will slow down. KOLs will hesitate to share freely, collaboration thresholds will be raised, and budgets will be forced towards more expensive channels.

For KOLs, the most direct impact is the end of the "low-effort easy money" model. In the past, many projects heavily relied on KOLs' "soft ad" strategy: disguising promotions as neutral experience sharing, data-driven complaints, or viral memes to create FOMO and drive user participation at low cost.

Now, forced explicit disclosure means KOLs can no longer hide commercial relationships and dare not casually "share naturally." Once detected by AI or reported, the risk of tweet deletion and account suspension is extremely high.

This will also raise the collaboration threshold between projects and KOLs. As risks increase, KOLs' rates may rise. But in the long run, this is positive for the Web3 ecosystem. Increased transparency will restore user trust in promoted content, reducing rug pulls and short-term speculation.

A common alternative is shifting to X's official Promoted Post system: these ads automatically carry "Promoted" or "Ads" labels, handled uniformly by the platform for disclosure, avoiding manual labeling risks. However, this also means project teams pay directly to X, concentrating more ad revenue into the platform's hands rather than dispersing it to KOLs.

X's move also likely aims to enhance its own advertising monetization capability. By enforcing explicit disclosure and promoting official ad tools, the platform can attract more budgets into its own system, capturing the share of "hidden ads" that originally flowed to KOLs, further strengthening its position as an ad revenue source, especially in competitive fields like prediction markets and AI content.

Twitter:https://twitter.com/BitpushNewsCN

Bitpush TG Discussion Group:https://t.me/BitPushCommunity

Bitpush TG Subscription: https://t.me/bitpush

Original article link:https://www.bitpush.news/articles/7614106

Preguntas relacionadas

QWhat new policy is X platform introducing regarding paid promotions?

AX platform is introducing a new policy that requires any content involving paid promotions, giveaways, affiliate links, or material incentives to be clearly labeled with disclosures such as '#ad', 'sponsored', or 'paid partnership'. Failure to comply will result in post removal and potential account suspension or permanent ban.

QWho is Nikita Bier and what action did he take on February 21st?

ANikita Bier is the Product Lead at X platform. On February 21st, he publicly intervened on a post by user @infodexx that was suspected of being an undisclosed paid promotion. He instructed the user to add a disclosure statement or face account suspension.

QWhat are some examples of high-engagement 'stealth ads' mentioned in the article?

AExamples include a Spanish account @jota_snchez sharing a story about a Chinese student making money on Polymarket (1.29M views), @FluentInFinance criticizing wealth inequality while referencing Kalshi (1.68M views), and @Shelpid_WI3M sharing a 'setup framework' for a Polymarket tool (940k views). All lacked proper disclosure tags.

QHow will the new disclosure rules impact Web3 projects and KOLs according to the article?

AFor Web3 projects, marketing costs will rise as they can no longer rely on low-cost, undisclosed KOL soft promotions. For KOLs, their 'easy money' model of sharing undisclosed ads will end, forcing them to properly label content. This raises the cooperation threshold and may increase KOL pricing due to higher risks.

QWhat is a potential alternative for advertisers under the new rules, and what is X platform's possible motive?

AA common alternative is to use X's official Promoted Post system, which automatically labels ads as 'Promoted' or 'Ads'. The article suggests X's motive may be to increase its own advertising revenue by redirecting budgets from KOL 'stealth ads' to its official ad platform, especially in competitive areas like prediction markets and AI content.

Lecturas Relacionadas

GPT-5.6 Countdown: Abandon the Illusion of a Single API, Computational Iteration Can't Outpace a Single Page of Compliance

In mid-June, three seemingly independent industry events—the compliance-driven throttling of Fable 5, the open-sourcing of GLM-5.2, and the leaked release timeline for GPT-5.6—are pushing the global AI industry toward a watershed moment. These shifts signal a fundamental restructuring of the industry's underlying logic. First, **"usability" has substantially overtaken "advanced capabilities"** as the primary weight, pushing the global large language model (LLM) supply chain into a "dual-track" phase of controlled closed-source and local open-source coexistence. Second, **the competitive moats of closed-source giants are shifting**. Their technical focus is moving from "language intelligence" toward "spatial intelligence (world models)"—a domain heavily reliant on computing power. Third, faced with常态化 transnational compliance risks, **a "model-agnostic" decoupled design has become a survival necessity for application-layer developers to maintain business continuity.** The article details how Anthropic's Fable 5, despite its advanced engineering feats, was restricted for non-U.S. citizens within 72 hours of launch, highlighting how geopolitical compliance can instantly limit even the most advanced models. In response, the open-source camp, exemplified by Zhipu AI's MIT-licensed GLM-5.2, is gaining market share by offering stable performance improvements and significant cost advantages (up to 70% savings for enterprises), while achieving full adaptation with domestic semiconductor platforms. Meanwhile, closed-source leaders like OpenAI are pivoting. The anticipated GPT-5.6 reportedly shifts focus from language to spatial intelligence and world models, aiming to rebuild a generational gap in areas like 3D understanding, simulation, and industrial design that demand immense compute. The core conclusion is that the LLM supply chain's logic has changed. Enterprises must now evaluate infrastructure based on a composite of technical performance and policy compliance. For developers, complete reliance on a single closed-source API poses unacceptable risk. Implementing a truly model-agnostic architecture—enabling swift switches to compliant, locally deployable open-source alternatives—is no longer just good practice but a fundamental baseline for business continuity.

marsbitHace 52 min(s)

GPT-5.6 Countdown: Abandon the Illusion of a Single API, Computational Iteration Can't Outpace a Single Page of Compliance

marsbitHace 52 min(s)

Is the 'Token Subsidy War' Among AI Giants Almost Over?

The article discusses the ongoing "token subsidy war" among AI giants like OpenAI and Anthropic, questioning whether it's nearing its end. It reveals that current AI subscription prices are heavily subsidized, with some plans offering tokens at up to 70 times the actual cost to attract and retain heavy users, especially developers and enterprises. This strategy mirrors past internet-era subsidy battles, but with a key difference: AI tokens lack "lock-in" effects. Unlike ride-hailing or food delivery apps, users can easily switch between AI providers as APIs become standardized, making it difficult for companies to raise prices post-subsidy. The piece highlights a structural asymmetry in the competition. Giants like Google, with massive advertising revenue, can afford to subsidize tokens indefinitely, akin to using "tokens as a weapon." In contrast, venture-backed companies like OpenAI and Anthropic face pressure to become profitable, especially as they approach IPO. The article cites Google Ventures founder Bill Maris, who suggests Google could slash token prices by 80%, putting immense pressure on competitors. Two potential endgames are presented: the "internet service" model (subsidize, monopolize, then raise prices) and the "utility" model (tokens become a standardized, low-margin commodity like electricity). Given the low switching costs, the latter seems more likely. The competition may not have a single winner but could instead accelerate AI's evolution into a foundational, infrastructure-level technology, akin to a public utility. For now, users continue to benefit from heavily subsidized token costs.

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Is the 'Token Subsidy War' Among AI Giants Almost Over?

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Beyond the Stadium: The Profitable Games Surrounding the World Cup

"Beyond the Pitch: The Profit Game Around the World Cup" The FIFA World Cup transcends being a sporting spectacle, evolving into a massive global arena for speculation and profit-seeking. The 2026 tournament has amplified this dynamic, creating a multi-layered ecosystem of financial opportunism alongside the football. **Prediction markets** have surged into the mainstream. Platforms like Polymarket and Kalshi saw trading volumes for World Cup contracts soar, attracting new users with their financial trading model and high-profile, chain-based wealth stories that overshadow traditional sports betting in terms of growth and narrative. However, **traditional sportsbooks** remain the dominant force, leveraging established user habits, legal markets, and comprehensive product offerings to handle the vast majority of speculative wagers, with projections suggesting record-breaking betting volumes. Capital markets also react. **"Concept stocks"** in countries like South Korea and Japan experience volatile price swings based on team performance and anticipated fan spending on items like chicken, beer, and viewing parties, effectively becoming a stock market reflecting fan sentiment. The **ticket resale market** has become a sophisticated arena for arbitrage. Prices fluctuate wildly based on team draws and star power, with sellers sometimes listing tickets they don't yet own in a practice akin to short-selling, while FIFA's own "Right to Buy" tokens add another layer of speculative trading. **Collectibles and merchandise** offer another avenue. Panini sticker albums, with their inherent scarcity and nostalgic value, can become high-value collectibles. Limited-edition or locally themed jerseys command significant premiums on secondary markets, and even counterfeit vendors profit from fans' desire for affordable match-day identity. The **cryptocurrency** space has seen a frenzy of speculative, unauthorized World Cup-themed meme coins on chains like Solana. These tokens, often exploiting team names and player imagery, experience extreme pump-and-dump cycles, creating stories of massive gains for a few early entrants and steep losses for many others. Finally, an entire industry thrives on **providing information and tools** to other speculators. Developers create platforms like SeatSidekick to track ticket inventory and prices, while paid Telegram groups and subscriptions sell betting tips and predictions, monetizing the widespread desire for an informational edge. In essence, the World Cup has become a compressed, global laboratory for speculation. While the games determine champions on the field, a parallel, complex network of financial transactions—spanning prediction contracts, bets, stocks, tickets, collectibles, crypto, and information services—settles its own scores in the global market.

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Beyond the Stadium: The Profitable Games Surrounding the World Cup

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Hyperliquid ETF Claim Draws Attention As HYPE Narrative Builds On X

A social media claim has brought attention to Hyperliquid (HYPE) and the growth of its related ETF products. According to a June 20 post on X by AlphaOnChain, three Hyperliquid ETFs launched in May 2026 have collectively amassed $158 million in assets under management, led by a Bitwise fund with $88 million and a 21Shares fund with $66 million. The article notes this claim is from social media and not verified by official issuer data, advising caution. Nonetheless, the report highlights that HYPE is gaining traction as a notable altcoin narrative. Its focus on on-chain perpetual trading and exchange infrastructure places it at the intersection of DeFi and derivatives, attracting traders looking for high-conviction plays beyond Bitcoin and Ethereum. The key takeaway is that while social momentum can influence short-term markets, sustainable growth for HYPE would require confirmed demand, liquidity, and continued ecosystem development.

bitcoinistHace 3 hora(s)

Hyperliquid ETF Claim Draws Attention As HYPE Narrative Builds On X

bitcoinistHace 3 hora(s)

How Does Codex Use a Computer? Three Entry Points and Permission Boundaries

This article explains the three primary methods for Codex to interact with a computer, each with distinct use cases, permission boundaries, and trust levels. **1. Computer Use:** This offers the broadest access, allowing Codex to visually control and interact with the graphical user interface of authorized macOS/Windows apps, system settings, and even iOS simulators. It's ideal for tasks lacking APIs or structured tools, such as operating legacy software or multi-app workflows. However, it's the slowest method and has the widest permission scope, requiring careful supervision for sensitive actions. **2. Chrome Extension:** This grants Codex access to the user's logged-in Chrome browser state, including cookies, profiles, and open tabs. It's best for tasks requiring user identity across websites like Gmail, LinkedIn, Salesforce, or internal dashboards. Its key advantage is multi-tab control for complex workflows. While more powerful for browser-based tasks than Computer Use, it carries higher sensitivity as actions are performed under the user's identity. **3. In-App Browser:** This is a browser isolated within the Codex thread, separate from the user's personal browsing data. It excels in web development and debugging scenarios—previewing local servers, testing responsive layouts, or annotating designs directly on the page. Its isolation is a strength for development but a limitation for tasks requiring login sessions. The core principle is to choose the narrowest, safest, and most structured interface for the task. Use plugins or MCPs first, resort to visual control (Computer Use) only for GUI-dependent tasks, employ the Chrome extension for identity-reliant browser work, and prefer the In-App Browser for isolated development. **Appshots** are clarified as a fourth, complementary tool for *inputting* context—capturing a screenshot of a window to point Codex to something—rather than a method for Codex to *act*. Together, this layered approach highlights a key to AI agent productization: not granting unlimited permissions, but constraining them within clear boundaries for specific tasks while preserving user oversight.

marsbitHace 3 hora(s)

How Does Codex Use a Computer? Three Entry Points and Permission Boundaries

marsbitHace 3 hora(s)

Trading

Spot

Futuros