From a $41 Million Fine to Assisting Governments in Freezing Assets: How Has Tether Completed Its Role Transformation?

比推Publicado a 2026-02-09Actualizado a 2026-02-09

Resumen

Tether, the issuer of the $185 billion stablecoin USDT, has shifted from regulatory penalties to active collaboration with global law enforcement. Recently, it assisted Turkish authorities in freezing over $500 million in assets linked to an illegal gambling and money laundering operation led by Veysel Sahin. This action is part of a broader crackdown in which Turkey has frozen over $1 billion in illicit assets. Tether CEO Paolo Ardoino emphasized the company follows legal procedures when cooperating with agencies like the U.S. Department of Justice and FBI. According to Elliptic, Tether and competitor Circle have blacklisted around 5,700 wallets holding approximately $2.5 billion, with three-quarters containing USDT. Tether claims to have assisted in over 1,800 cases across 62 countries, freezing $3.4 billion tied to illegal activities. This marks a significant change from 2021, when Tether paid a $41 million fine to settle allegations of misrepresenting its reserves. The company has since re-entered the U.S. market with a compliant stablecoin, USAT, and has gained recognition for its proactive stance against crypto-related crimes, despite ongoing scrutiny over USDT’s use in illicit finance.

Author: Ryan Weeks, Todd Gillespie, Taylan Bilgic

Compilation: Luffy, Foresight News

Original Title: Assisting Turkey in Freezing $1 Billion in Assets, Tether's Compliance Approach Has Changed

On January 30, Turkish authorities announced the freezing of assets worth over $500 million under the name of Veysel Sahin, who is accused of operating an illegal gambling platform and涉嫌洗钱. The Chief Prosecutor of Istanbul revealed that an unnamed cryptocurrency company carried out the freezing operation at the request of the Turkish government.

This company is Tether Holdings SA, the issuer of the stablecoin USDT with a market capitalization of $185 billion. Recently, the company has actively assisted governments around the world in combating various cryptocurrency-related criminal activities, including money laundering, drug trafficking, and sanctions evasion.

Tether CEO Paolo Ardoino stated in a recent interview with Bloomberg News: "Law enforcement agencies approach us, provide relevant information, we verify the information, and then take action in accordance with the laws of the country in question. We follow this process when cooperating with the U.S. Department of Justice, the FBI, and other agencies."

Tether did not comment further on this case. Bloomberg was unable to reach Sahin. A Turkish official also declined to disclose the name of the company mentioned in the prosecutor's statement.

The frozen assets, amounting to 460 million euros (approximately $544 million), are part of a large-scale law enforcement operation in Turkey, where the total value of frozen涉案资产 has exceeded $1 billion. According to Turkish television NTV, a few days after the announcement of the freezing of Sahin's assets, another individual was investigated for涉嫌洗钱 and illegal gambling, and加密资产 worth $500 million under their name were also frozen. However, it is currently unclear whether this asset freeze involved tokens issued by Tether.

A Turkish official, who spoke anonymously on sensitive legal matters to Bloomberg, revealed that authorities discovered the "financial traces" of these涉嫌非法收入 by tracking fund flows and analyzing加密资产. The official also stated that similar asset freezing actions will be taken in the future against individuals involved in illegal gambling and payment systems.

For Tether, this freezing operation is just one of its increasingly frequent fund freezes, highlighting the growing efforts of this cryptocurrency giant to cooperate with global law enforcement agencies.

A report released in January by analytics firm Elliptic showed that by the end of 2025, Tether and its competitor Circle Internet Group Inc. had blacklisted approximately 5,700 wallets, involving assets of about $2.5 billion, a number that was negligible two years ago. At the time of freezing, three-quarters of these wallets held USDT.

Arda Akartuna, Head of Crypto Threat Intelligence for Asia-Pacific at Elliptic, said: "As the legitimate application of cryptocurrencies and the integration of global payments accelerate, illegal usage has also increased, prompting stablecoin issuers to intervene more actively."

Tether often publicizes its efforts to combat criminal activities, including in communications aimed at potential investors. The company is seeking financing at a valuation of up to $500 billion. According to its website, Tether has assisted law enforcement agencies in 62 countries with over 1,800 cases, freezing $3.4 billion worth of USDT related to涉嫌非法活动.

Nathan McCauley, Co-founder and CEO of Tether partner Anchorage Digital Bank, said in an interview: "They (Tether) are extremely proactive in their cooperation. Among stablecoin issuers, the company has the 'recognized best reputation' among law enforcement agencies."

Anchorage is the issuer of Tether's compliant dollar stablecoin USAT, which was launched in late January, marking Tether's return to the U.S. market.

This represents a significant shift from the tense situation between Tether and U.S. regulators a few years ago. After clashing with regulators in 2018, Tether largely withdrew from the U.S. market and paid a $41 million fine in 2021 to settle charges of misrepresenting its reserves.

However, the second Trump administration has welcomed the cryptocurrency industry. Last year, Ardoino attended, along with several other executives, the ceremony where President Trump signed the stablecoin regulatory bill.

Even so, Tether's USDT continues to face scrutiny from regulators due to its widespread use by criminals.

On January 9, the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Eastern District of Virginia announced charges against a Venezuelan citizen for using USDT to launder $1 billion. A recent report from Elliptic showed that the Central Bank of Iran purchased over $500 million worth of USDT to alleviate its currency crisis and evade U.S. sanctions.

Turkish fugitive Sahin is accused of leading an organization that laundered money for illegal online gambling platforms. According to local media reports, Sahin was sentenced to 10 years in prison in 2017, released in 2023, and sentenced to another 21 years in prison one month later. His current whereabouts are unknown, but the Turkish official news agency Anadolu Agency reported on January 30 that "the relevant authorities are advancing the legal process for his extradition back to Turkey."

Twitter:https://twitter.com/BitpushNewsCN

Bitpush TG Discussion Group:https://t.me/BitPushCommunity

Bitpush TG Subscription: https://t.me/bitpush

Original link:https://www.bitpush.news/articles/7610331

Preguntas relacionadas

QWhat was the cryptocurrency company Tether's role in the Turkish government's asset freeze operation?

ATether Holdings SA, the issuer of the USDT, assisted the Turkish government by freezing over 500 million dollars in assets belonging to Veysel Sahin, who was accused of operating an illegal gambling platform and money laundering.

QHow has Tether's relationship with U.S. regulators changed in recent years according to the article?

ATether's relationship with U.S. regulators has significantly improved. After a $41 million settlement in 2021 over allegations of misrepresenting reserves, the company has since increased cooperation with law enforcement and attended the signing ceremony of a stablecoin regulation bill under the Trump administration.

QWhat does the increase in the number of blacklisted wallets by Tether and Circle indicate?

AThe increase to about 5,700 blacklisted wallets, holding approximately $2.5 billion in assets, indicates that stablecoin issuers are becoming more proactive in intervening against the illegal use of cryptocurrencies, such as money laundering and sanctions evasion.

QWhat specific illegal activities is Tether's cooperation with global law enforcement agencies targeting?

ATether's cooperation targets a range of cryptocurrency-related crimes, including money laundering, drug trafficking, and evasion of sanctions.

QWhat new product did Tether launch in its effort to re-enter the U.S. market, and who is the issuer?

ATether launched a compliant U.S. dollar stablecoin called USAT in late January, which is issued by its partner Anchorage Digital Bank.

Lecturas Relacionadas

GPT-5.6 Countdown: Abandon the Illusion of a Single API, Computational Iteration Can't Outpace a Single Page of Compliance

In mid-June, three seemingly independent industry events—the compliance-driven throttling of Fable 5, the open-sourcing of GLM-5.2, and the leaked release timeline for GPT-5.6—are pushing the global AI industry toward a watershed moment. These shifts signal a fundamental restructuring of the industry's underlying logic. First, **"usability" has substantially overtaken "advanced capabilities"** as the primary weight, pushing the global large language model (LLM) supply chain into a "dual-track" phase of controlled closed-source and local open-source coexistence. Second, **the competitive moats of closed-source giants are shifting**. Their technical focus is moving from "language intelligence" toward "spatial intelligence (world models)"—a domain heavily reliant on computing power. Third, faced with常态化 transnational compliance risks, **a "model-agnostic" decoupled design has become a survival necessity for application-layer developers to maintain business continuity.** The article details how Anthropic's Fable 5, despite its advanced engineering feats, was restricted for non-U.S. citizens within 72 hours of launch, highlighting how geopolitical compliance can instantly limit even the most advanced models. In response, the open-source camp, exemplified by Zhipu AI's MIT-licensed GLM-5.2, is gaining market share by offering stable performance improvements and significant cost advantages (up to 70% savings for enterprises), while achieving full adaptation with domestic semiconductor platforms. Meanwhile, closed-source leaders like OpenAI are pivoting. The anticipated GPT-5.6 reportedly shifts focus from language to spatial intelligence and world models, aiming to rebuild a generational gap in areas like 3D understanding, simulation, and industrial design that demand immense compute. The core conclusion is that the LLM supply chain's logic has changed. Enterprises must now evaluate infrastructure based on a composite of technical performance and policy compliance. For developers, complete reliance on a single closed-source API poses unacceptable risk. Implementing a truly model-agnostic architecture—enabling swift switches to compliant, locally deployable open-source alternatives—is no longer just good practice but a fundamental baseline for business continuity.

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

GPT-5.6 Countdown: Abandon the Illusion of a Single API, Computational Iteration Can't Outpace a Single Page of Compliance

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Is the 'Token Subsidy War' Among AI Giants Almost Over?

The article discusses the ongoing "token subsidy war" among AI giants like OpenAI and Anthropic, questioning whether it's nearing its end. It reveals that current AI subscription prices are heavily subsidized, with some plans offering tokens at up to 70 times the actual cost to attract and retain heavy users, especially developers and enterprises. This strategy mirrors past internet-era subsidy battles, but with a key difference: AI tokens lack "lock-in" effects. Unlike ride-hailing or food delivery apps, users can easily switch between AI providers as APIs become standardized, making it difficult for companies to raise prices post-subsidy. The piece highlights a structural asymmetry in the competition. Giants like Google, with massive advertising revenue, can afford to subsidize tokens indefinitely, akin to using "tokens as a weapon." In contrast, venture-backed companies like OpenAI and Anthropic face pressure to become profitable, especially as they approach IPO. The article cites Google Ventures founder Bill Maris, who suggests Google could slash token prices by 80%, putting immense pressure on competitors. Two potential endgames are presented: the "internet service" model (subsidize, monopolize, then raise prices) and the "utility" model (tokens become a standardized, low-margin commodity like electricity). Given the low switching costs, the latter seems more likely. The competition may not have a single winner but could instead accelerate AI's evolution into a foundational, infrastructure-level technology, akin to a public utility. For now, users continue to benefit from heavily subsidized token costs.

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Is the 'Token Subsidy War' Among AI Giants Almost Over?

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Beyond the Stadium: The Profitable Games Surrounding the World Cup

"Beyond the Pitch: The Profit Game Around the World Cup" The FIFA World Cup transcends being a sporting spectacle, evolving into a massive global arena for speculation and profit-seeking. The 2026 tournament has amplified this dynamic, creating a multi-layered ecosystem of financial opportunism alongside the football. **Prediction markets** have surged into the mainstream. Platforms like Polymarket and Kalshi saw trading volumes for World Cup contracts soar, attracting new users with their financial trading model and high-profile, chain-based wealth stories that overshadow traditional sports betting in terms of growth and narrative. However, **traditional sportsbooks** remain the dominant force, leveraging established user habits, legal markets, and comprehensive product offerings to handle the vast majority of speculative wagers, with projections suggesting record-breaking betting volumes. Capital markets also react. **"Concept stocks"** in countries like South Korea and Japan experience volatile price swings based on team performance and anticipated fan spending on items like chicken, beer, and viewing parties, effectively becoming a stock market reflecting fan sentiment. The **ticket resale market** has become a sophisticated arena for arbitrage. Prices fluctuate wildly based on team draws and star power, with sellers sometimes listing tickets they don't yet own in a practice akin to short-selling, while FIFA's own "Right to Buy" tokens add another layer of speculative trading. **Collectibles and merchandise** offer another avenue. Panini sticker albums, with their inherent scarcity and nostalgic value, can become high-value collectibles. Limited-edition or locally themed jerseys command significant premiums on secondary markets, and even counterfeit vendors profit from fans' desire for affordable match-day identity. The **cryptocurrency** space has seen a frenzy of speculative, unauthorized World Cup-themed meme coins on chains like Solana. These tokens, often exploiting team names and player imagery, experience extreme pump-and-dump cycles, creating stories of massive gains for a few early entrants and steep losses for many others. Finally, an entire industry thrives on **providing information and tools** to other speculators. Developers create platforms like SeatSidekick to track ticket inventory and prices, while paid Telegram groups and subscriptions sell betting tips and predictions, monetizing the widespread desire for an informational edge. In essence, the World Cup has become a compressed, global laboratory for speculation. While the games determine champions on the field, a parallel, complex network of financial transactions—spanning prediction contracts, bets, stocks, tickets, collectibles, crypto, and information services—settles its own scores in the global market.

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Beyond the Stadium: The Profitable Games Surrounding the World Cup

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Hyperliquid ETF Claim Draws Attention As HYPE Narrative Builds On X

A social media claim has brought attention to Hyperliquid (HYPE) and the growth of its related ETF products. According to a June 20 post on X by AlphaOnChain, three Hyperliquid ETFs launched in May 2026 have collectively amassed $158 million in assets under management, led by a Bitwise fund with $88 million and a 21Shares fund with $66 million. The article notes this claim is from social media and not verified by official issuer data, advising caution. Nonetheless, the report highlights that HYPE is gaining traction as a notable altcoin narrative. Its focus on on-chain perpetual trading and exchange infrastructure places it at the intersection of DeFi and derivatives, attracting traders looking for high-conviction plays beyond Bitcoin and Ethereum. The key takeaway is that while social momentum can influence short-term markets, sustainable growth for HYPE would require confirmed demand, liquidity, and continued ecosystem development.

bitcoinistHace 3 hora(s)

Hyperliquid ETF Claim Draws Attention As HYPE Narrative Builds On X

bitcoinistHace 3 hora(s)

How Does Codex Use a Computer? Three Entry Points and Permission Boundaries

This article explains the three primary methods for Codex to interact with a computer, each with distinct use cases, permission boundaries, and trust levels. **1. Computer Use:** This offers the broadest access, allowing Codex to visually control and interact with the graphical user interface of authorized macOS/Windows apps, system settings, and even iOS simulators. It's ideal for tasks lacking APIs or structured tools, such as operating legacy software or multi-app workflows. However, it's the slowest method and has the widest permission scope, requiring careful supervision for sensitive actions. **2. Chrome Extension:** This grants Codex access to the user's logged-in Chrome browser state, including cookies, profiles, and open tabs. It's best for tasks requiring user identity across websites like Gmail, LinkedIn, Salesforce, or internal dashboards. Its key advantage is multi-tab control for complex workflows. While more powerful for browser-based tasks than Computer Use, it carries higher sensitivity as actions are performed under the user's identity. **3. In-App Browser:** This is a browser isolated within the Codex thread, separate from the user's personal browsing data. It excels in web development and debugging scenarios—previewing local servers, testing responsive layouts, or annotating designs directly on the page. Its isolation is a strength for development but a limitation for tasks requiring login sessions. The core principle is to choose the narrowest, safest, and most structured interface for the task. Use plugins or MCPs first, resort to visual control (Computer Use) only for GUI-dependent tasks, employ the Chrome extension for identity-reliant browser work, and prefer the In-App Browser for isolated development. **Appshots** are clarified as a fourth, complementary tool for *inputting* context—capturing a screenshot of a window to point Codex to something—rather than a method for Codex to *act*. Together, this layered approach highlights a key to AI agent productization: not granting unlimited permissions, but constraining them within clear boundaries for specific tasks while preserving user oversight.

marsbitHace 3 hora(s)

How Does Codex Use a Computer? Three Entry Points and Permission Boundaries

marsbitHace 3 hora(s)

Trading

Spot

Futuros