Figure Technology Confirms Customer Data Breach After Social Engineering Attack

TheNewsCryptoPublicado a 2026-02-14Actualizado a 2026-02-14

Resumen

Figure Technology, a blockchain-based lending firm, has confirmed a data breach resulting from a social engineering attack. Hackers tricked an employee into providing access, leading to the theft of approximately 2.5 GB of customer data, including names, addresses, birth dates, and phone numbers. The group ShinyHunters claimed responsibility and released the data after the company refused to pay a ransom. No financial information or passwords were confirmed to be compromised. The company has launched an investigation, notified affected customers, and is offering free credit monitoring. Cybersecurity experts emphasize that such attacks target human vulnerabilities rather than technical flaws.

Figure Technology, a publicly traded blockchain-based lender company, has confirmed that hackers gained access to customer information by tricking an employee through a social engineering scheme. As per the report from TechCrunch, attackers claimed that they had released 2.5 gigabytes of stolen data after the company refused to pay a ransom.

How did the hack happen?

One of the staff members was manipulated by an outside actor, which allowed the attacker to download the files using the employee’s legitimate account. According to the company, the suspicious activity was blocked quickly, and forensic investigations have been launched. A report from TechCrunch said that the stolen files may include full names, home addresses, dates of birth, and phone numbers. Still, there is no confirmation that the passwords or financial assets were accessed.

The cybercrime group ShinyHunters claims responsibility, and one alleged member said that the breach is part of the wider campaign targeting organizations that use the identity and login provider Okta. The group alleged that it had released about 2.5 GB of data after the company refused the ransom demands. The company says that it is now notifying affected individuals and offering free credit monitoring with strong internal security controls.

Expert’s Advice

Cybersecurity experts warn that social engineering attacks don’t break the software; instead, they trick humans, and criminals may pretend to be IT staff and send fake approval requests with some urgent messages to pressure the victims. Once the access is granted, they operate as legitimate users. Right now, investigators are still working to confirm which file has been stolen and how many people are affected. So further updates are expected once the forensic review is complete.

Highlighted Crypto News:

KuCoin Institutional Premiere 2026 Highlights Long-Term Growth and Market Resilience

TagsCrypto ScamCryptocurrency

Preguntas relacionadas

QWhat type of attack did Figure Technology experience that led to the customer data breach?

AFigure Technology experienced a social engineering attack where hackers tricked an employee to gain access to customer information.

QWhich cybercrime group claimed responsibility for the attack on Figure Technology?

AThe cybercrime group ShinyHunters claimed responsibility for the attack.

QWhat specific customer information was potentially exposed in the data breach according to the TechCrunch report?

AAccording to the TechCrunch report, the stolen files may include full names, home addresses, dates of birth, and phone numbers.

QWhat action did the attackers take after the company refused to pay the ransom?

AAfter the company refused to pay the ransom, the attackers claimed to have released about 2.5 gigabytes of stolen data.

QWhat is the company doing to assist the affected individuals following the breach?

AThe company is notifying affected individuals and offering them free credit monitoring.

Lecturas Relacionadas

In Jinjiang, Fujian, a Storage Super Unicorn Lies Quiet

In Fujian's Jinjiang, a city known for sportswear, lies a quiet semiconductor giant: Fujian Jinhua Integrated Circuit Co. (JHICC). Once a promising domestic DRAM manufacturer alongside Yangtze Memory and ChangXin Memory Technologies (CXMT), its journey was derailed in 2018 when the U.S. placed it on an Entity List and filed criminal charges for alleged trade secret theft. This halted production for years. A turning point came in February 2024 when a U.S. federal court found JHICC not guilty. However, it had lost crucial time. While CXMT soared to become a top-valued A-share company in 2024, JHICC, with an estimated valuation of 80 billion RMB, was just restarting. Its current output is primarily customized DDR4 chips, not the advanced DDR5/HBM demanded for AI, but it still benefits from the broader memory chip upcycle. JHICC's story is tied to Chen Zhengkun, a veteran engineer who left Micron to lead the venture. Founded in 2016 with state-backed funding, JHICC partnered with Taiwan's UMC to develop DRAM technology. Rapid progress was cut short by the U.S. actions, which Micron initiated, partly due to its heavy reliance on the Chinese market. Post-sanctions, Chen's team worked to rebuild the production line with reduced reliance on U.S. technology. According to its records, JHICC achieved small-scale production and revenue growth under immense pressure. It now focuses on the stable "niche" DRAM market (e.g., TVs, routers) with a monthly capacity of ~40,000 wafers, aiming for 60,000 by 2026. It holds over 1,000 patents but remains on the Entity List. For Jinjiang, investing in JHICC was a bold industrial leap. The local government provided unwavering financial and logistical support during the crisis, helping the company survive. JHICC has become the anchor for a growing local semiconductor cluster. Though its scale lags behind domestic peers, JHICC's persistence symbolizes a hard-won foothold in a global market long dominated by Samsung, SK Hynix, and Micron. Having missed one boom, it seeks a place in the new AI-driven memory supercycle.

marsbitHace 58 min(s)

In Jinjiang, Fujian, a Storage Super Unicorn Lies Quiet

marsbitHace 58 min(s)

Trading

Spot
活动图片