eToro Reports Strong Q1 Profit Growth Despite Crypto Trading Slump

TheNewsCryptoPublicado a 2026-05-13Actualizado a 2026-05-13

Resumen

eToro reported strong Q1 profit growth despite a downturn in cryptocurrency trading. Net income rose 37% year-over-year to $82 million, driven largely by a nearly 400% surge in commodities trading volume, which accounted for about 60% of trading commissions. Key metrics also showed growth: net contribution increased 19% to $258 million, adjusted EBITDA grew 35% to $109 million, and assets under management climbed 15% to $17 billion. While commodities thrived, crypto activity declined. The number of crypto trades fell 32% year-over-year in April, with the average investment per trade dropping 22%. To bolster its offerings, eToro launched an AI-powered "Agent Portfolios" feature and enhanced its AI agent, Tori, with Grok 4.2 market sentiment analysis. The company also expanded by activating its BitLicense for New York crypto trading, adding Japanese equities, and finalizing the acquisition of self-custody wallet provider Zengo. By late April, total assets under management had risen further to $18.7 billion.

With a 37% year-over-year increase in net income to $82 million, EToro was able to weather a dip in cryptocurrency activity thanks to a spike in commodities trading.

On Tuesday, the business said that its net income increased 37% year-over-year to $82 million, up from $60 million in the first quarter of 2025. Earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization, or adjusted EBITDA, increased by 35% to $109 million from $80 million the previous year, while net contribution increased by 19% to $258 million.

Nearly 400% Surge in Commodities Trading

Commodities trading, which increased volumes by almost 400% year-over-year, was the primary driver of the positive performance, accounting for around 60% of trading commissions in the quarter. The business has activated its BitLicense to commence crypto trading in New York and extended its equities offering to include Japanese companies, bringing its exchange coverage to 26.

A total of 4.02 million funded accounts increased by 12%, while assets under management increased by 15%, reaching $17 billion. As of the 31st of March, the firm’s cash and short-term investments totaled $1.3 billion.

Crypto volumes fell even as commodities trade surged. In April, with the profits, statistics indicated that there were two million trades using cryptocurrencies, a 32% year-over-year decline, and a 22% decline in the amount invested per trade, to $207.

On the product side, eToro introduced an Agent Portfolios feature driven by AI and strengthened its cooperation with xAI. Tori, their AI investing agent, now incorporates market sentiment powered by Grok 4.2.

Additionally, on April 30, the business finalized its purchase of Zengo, a supplier of self-custodial crypto wallets. CEO Yoni Assia said that this move furthers eToro’s aim of connecting conventional finance with on-chain infrastructure. April saw total money transfers reach $1.4 billion, an increase of 53% year-over-year, while assets under management continued their ascent to $18.7 billion, an increase of 19% year-over-year.

Highlighted Crypto News Today:

Bhutan’s GMC Launches Fast-Track Licensing for Global Financial Firms

Preguntas relacionadas

QWhat was the year-over-year percentage increase in eToro's Q1 net income and what was the total amount?

AeToro's net income increased by 37% year-over-year to a total of $82 million in Q1.

QWhat specific type of trading activity offset the decline in cryptocurrency trading volume at eToro?

AA nearly 400% surge in commodities trading activity offset the decline in cryptocurrency trading volume, accounting for around 60% of trading commissions for the quarter.

QHow did the number of cryptocurrency trades and the average investment per trade change in April compared to the previous year?

AIn April, the number of cryptocurrency trades declined by 32% year-over-year to two million, and the average amount invested per trade fell by 22% to $207.

QWhat two recent developments did eToro mention regarding its product offerings and AI capabilities?

AeToro introduced an AI-driven Agent Portfolios feature and enhanced its AI investing agent, Tori, by integrating market sentiment analysis powered by Grok 4.2 through its partnership with xAI.

QWhat strategic acquisition did eToro finalize at the end of April and what was its stated purpose?

AeToro finalized the acquisition of Zengo, a self-custodial crypto wallet provider, to further its goal of connecting traditional finance with on-chain infrastructure.

Lecturas Relacionadas

Hyperliquid Sued by Two Major Traditional Exchanges

Hyperliquid, a cryptocurrency derivatives platform, is facing formal complaints from two major traditional exchanges, CME (Chicago Mercantile Exchange) and ICE (Intercontinental Exchange, parent company of the New York Stock Exchange). The firms have jointly approached the U.S. Congress and the CFTC (Commodity Futures Trading Commission), urging stricter regulatory oversight of Hyperliquid's operations. The action highlights growing tensions between established traditional financial institutions and emerging crypto-native platforms in the derivatives market.

链捕手Hace 2 hora(s)

Hyperliquid Sued by Two Major Traditional Exchanges

链捕手Hace 2 hora(s)

Breaking: OpenAI Undergoes Major Reorganization, President Brockman Assumes Command

OpenAI has announced a major internal reorganization just months before its anticipated IPO. The company is merging its three flagship product lines—ChatGPT, Codex, and the API platform—into a single, unified product organization. The most significant leadership change involves co-founder and President Greg Brockman moving from a background technical role to take full, permanent control over all product strategy. This follows the indefinite medical leave of AGI Deployment CEO Fidji Simo. Additionally, ChatGPT's longtime lead, Nick Turley, has been reassigned to enterprise products, with former Instagram executive Ashley Alexander taking over consumer offerings. The consolidation, internally framed as a strategic move towards an "Agentic Future," aims to break down internal silos and create a cohesive "Super App." This planned desktop application would integrate ChatGPT's conversational abilities, Codex's coding power, and a rumored internal web browser named "Atlas" to autonomously perform complex user tasks. The reorganization occurs amid significant internal and external pressures. OpenAI has recently seen a wave of high-profile departures, including Sora co-lead Bill Peebles and other senior technical leaders, leading to concerns about a thinning executive bench. Externally, rival Anthropic recently secured funding at a staggering $900 billion valuation, surpassing OpenAI's own. Google's upcoming I/O developer conference also poses a competitive threat. Analysts suggest the dramatic restructure is a pre-IPO move to present a clearer, more focused narrative to Wall Street—streamlining operations and demonstrating decisive leadership under Brockman to counter internal turbulence and intense market competition.

marsbitHace 2 hora(s)

Breaking: OpenAI Undergoes Major Reorganization, President Brockman Assumes Command

marsbitHace 2 hora(s)

Two Survival Structures of Market Makers and Arbitrageurs

Market makers and arbitrageurs represent two distinct survival structures in high-frequency trading. Market makers primarily use limit orders (makers) to profit from the bid-ask spread, enjoying high capital efficiency (nominally 100%) but bearing inventory risk. This "inventory risk" arises from passive, fragmented, and discontinuous order fills in the limit order book (LOB). This risk, while a potential cost, can also contribute to excess profit if managed within control boundaries, allowing for mean reversion. Market makers essentially sell "time" (uncertainty over execution timing) to the market for price control and low fees. In contrast, cross-exchange arbitrageurs typically use market orders (takers) to exploit price differences or funding rates, resulting in lower nominal capital efficiency (requiring capital on both exchanges) and higher transaction costs. Their risk exposure stems from asymmetries in exchange rules (e.g., minimum order sizes), execution latency, and infrastructure risks (e.g., ADL, oracle drift). These exposures are active, exogenous gaps that primarily erode profits rather than contribute to them. Arbitrageurs essentially sell "space" (capital sunk across venues) for localized, immediate certainty. Both strategies engage in a trade-off between execution friction and residual risk. Optimal systems allow for temporary, controlled risk exposure rather than enforcing zero exposure at all costs. Their evolution converges towards hybrid models: arbitrageurs may use maker orders to reduce costs, while market makers may use taker orders or hedges for risk management. Ultimately, both use different forms of risk exposure—market makers exposing inventory, arbitrageurs immobilizing capital—to extract marginal, hard-won certainty from the market.

链捕手Hace 2 hora(s)

Two Survival Structures of Market Makers and Arbitrageurs

链捕手Hace 2 hora(s)

Bitcoin Short-Term Holder Basis Remains High Within Biggest Supply Cluster

Bitcoin's recent recovery from February lows is approaching a critical supply cluster between $84,000 and $88,000, which holds the largest concentration of Bitcoin supply on the current chart. This zone represents the cost basis for short-term holders (investors who bought within the last 155 days) and is stacked with "trapped" sellers who bought near those levels and are now at breakeven. Technical analysis suggests the rally faces significant resistance in this area. Two primary scenarios are outlined: a direct push into the $84k-$86k zone followed by a rejection and pullback to $70,000 support, or a more volatile path involving a dip before testing the supply cluster. A weekly close above $84,000 would weaken the bearish rejection case, but a decisive break above $86,900-$88,000 is needed for a stronger bullish confirmation. Bitcoin is currently trading around $80,430.

bitcoinistHace 2 hora(s)

Bitcoin Short-Term Holder Basis Remains High Within Biggest Supply Cluster

bitcoinistHace 2 hora(s)

Who Will Define the Rules of the AI Era? Anthropic Discusses the 2028 US-China AI Landscape

This article, based on Anthropic's analysis, outlines the intensifying systemic competition between the U.S./allies and China for AI leadership by 2028. It argues that access to advanced computing power ("compute") is the critical bottleneck, where the U.S. currently holds a significant advantage through chip export controls and allied innovation. However, China's AI labs remain competitive by exploiting policy loopholes—via chip smuggling, overseas data center access, and "model distillation" attacks to copy U.S. model capabilities—keeping them close to the frontier. The piece presents two contrasting scenarios for 2028. In the first, decisive U.S. action to tighten compute controls and curb distillation locks in a 12-24 month AI capability lead, cementing democratic influence over global AI norms, security, and economic infrastructure. In the second, policy inaction allows China to achieve near-parity through continued access to U.S. technology, enabling Beijing to promote its AI stack globally and integrate advanced AI into its military and governance systems, altering the strategic balance. Anthropic contends that maintaining a decisive U.S. lead is essential for shaping safe AI development and governance. The core recommendation is for U.S. policymakers to urgently close compute and model access loopholes while promoting global adoption of the U.S. AI technology stack to secure a lasting strategic advantage.

marsbitHace 4 hora(s)

Who Will Define the Rules of the AI Era? Anthropic Discusses the 2028 US-China AI Landscape

marsbitHace 4 hora(s)

Trading

Spot

Futuros