ECB eyes onchain settlements next year as lawmakers weigh digital euro privacy

cointelegraphPublicado a 2025-12-19Actualizado a 2025-12-19

Resumen

The European Central Bank (ECB) plans to enable blockchain-based settlement in central bank money by next year and is preparing to issue a digital euro, though its privacy features depend on approval from EU lawmakers. ECB executive Piero Cipollone stated that the digital euro would support both online and offline transactions, enhancing resilience and privacy. The offline version would allow device-to-device payments without third-party validation, similar to cash. The ECB aims to address fragmented retail payments and slow cross-border transactions with the digital euro, while also mitigating risks from stablecoins. However, the EU's recent push for increased surveillance and data retention contrasts with the ECB's privacy-focused design. Legislative approval is expected by 2026, with initial transactions possible in 2027 and full issuance by 2029.

The European Central Bank plans to allow blockchain-based settlement in central bank money next year and is preparing to issue a digital euro, but its privacy safeguards will ultimately depend on approval from EU lawmakers.

ECB executive board member Piero Cipollone said in a Friday statement that the institution will “make it possible to settle transactions based on [DLT] in central bank money” next year. He also said the ECB is “getting ready” to issue the digital euro and to link its system internationally for cross-border payments.

The digital euro underlying infrastructure would also be available to other institutions to settle transactions with other central bank digital currencies (CBDCs). The executive said that holding limits and a lack of interest are expected to “preserve banks’ role in “credit intermediation and monetary transmission.”

Assuming legislative approval in 2026, initial transactions with the digital euro could follow in 2027, with readiness to issue the CBDC in 2029. In Thursday statements, ECB President Christine Lagarde said the ECB’s work is over and that the digital euro design, including its privacy features, lies with EU lawmakers. Cipollone shared the ECB vision:

“The digital euro would be available both online and offline, supporting resilience and privacy.“

According to Cipollone, a CBDC is needed due to the EU’s fragmented retail payment ecosystem, slow cross-border payments. He also explained that without a CBDC, tokenization and DLT would lead to fragmentation and increased credit risk. A tokenized digital euro will also be available for the digital asset market, presumably to prevent this fragmentation.

Cipollone acknowledged that stablecoins offer a solution to slow, costly cross-border payments, but also introduce risks to currencies and financial systems. Furthermore, “if dollar-based stablecoins were to expand, [...] they could erode the international role of the euro.”

Related: Cypherpunk values are dying, but they’re 'Not Dead Yet'

A private CBDC that works offline

The ECB’s 2023 opinion is that the digital euro should not be programmable in a way that restricts what it can be spent on, while still allowing for conditional payments. The ECB also noted that “for the offline model of the digital euro, the ECB welcomes that the envisaged level of privacy and data protection would be similar to cash.” The parallels to cash do not end here:

“The offline digital euro model would ensure that not all transactions are necessarily validated by a third party, thereby meeting the data protection requirements of proportionality and necessity.“

The offline variant of the digital euro would be stored locally, allowing device-to-device payments without requiring an online ledger check. The ECB discusses using the secure element in mobile devices to store offline digital euro and considers smart cards — reminiscent of cyberpunk credit chips.

Related: Crypto urges SEC to see the good in blockchain privacy tools

EU’s surveillance push

Those recommendations are in stark contrast to the recent attacks on privacy by the EU, whose legislators must approve the CBDC blueprint. Last month, the European Commission unsuccessfully attempted to mandate private message scanning yet again.

An internal Nov. 27 EU document published earlier this month by German-language news outlet Netzpolitik appears to show that member states view sweeping data retention positively. The document discusses companies logging “who communicated with whom, when, where and how,” mentioning “location data” 11 times.

The EU’s AML Handbook, published in May, bans “crypto-asset accounts allowing anonymisation of transactions,” and “accounts using anonymity-enhancing coins from 2027. This followed the EU Innovation Hub taking issue with crypto privacy-preserving technologies in June 2024.

Related: SEC commissioner says crypto is ‘helping to nudge reassessment’ on privacy

Preguntas relacionadas

QWhat is the European Central Bank (ECB) planning to allow next year, and what is the timeline for the initial transactions and full issuance of the digital euro?

AThe ECB plans to allow blockchain-based settlement in central bank money next year. Assuming legislative approval in 2026, initial transactions with the digital euro could follow in 2027, with readiness to issue the CBDC in 2029.

QAccording to ECB executive Piero Cipollone, what are the key reasons a digital euro is needed for the EU?

ACipollone stated that a CBDC is needed due to the EU's fragmented retail payment ecosystem and slow cross-border payments. He also explained that without a CBDC, tokenization and DLT would lead to fragmentation and increased credit risk.

QHow does the ECB envision the privacy features of the offline digital euro, and how does it compare to cash?

AThe ECB stated that for the offline model, the level of privacy and data protection would be similar to cash. It would ensure that not all transactions are necessarily validated by a third party, meeting data protection requirements of proportionality and necessity. It would be stored locally, allowing device-to-device payments without an online ledger check.

QWhat potential risk does ECB executive Cipollone associate with the expansion of dollar-based stablecoins?

ACipollone acknowledged that if dollar-based stablecoins were to expand, they could erode the international role of the euro.

QHow do the ECB's recommendations for a private digital euro contrast with recent actions by the European Union?

AThe ECB's recommendations for a private CBDC that works offline are in stark contrast to recent EU attacks on privacy, such as attempts to mandate private message scanning and the AML Handbook's ban on anonymous crypto-asset accounts and anonymity-enhancing coins from 2027.

Lecturas Relacionadas

When AI Begins to Audit the World: From Claude Discovering the ZEC Vulnerability, Watching the Encryption Industry Enter the 'Recursive Security Era'

**When AI Audits the World: From Claude's Discovery of a ZEC Vulnerability, Viewing the Crypto Industry Entering a "Recursive Security Era"** This article examines a pivotal shift in the blockchain security landscape, triggered by the convergence of two events: Anthropic's research on AI's "Recursive Self-Improvement" and Claude Opus 4.8's discovery of a critical vulnerability in Zcash's code. Traditionally, crypto security has relied on human experts and automated tools for periodic audits. However, the article argues AI is transitioning from a mere tool to an active participant in understanding and analyzing complex systems. Claude's ability to identify a subtle flaw in Zcash's zero-knowledge proof system demonstrates AI's potential to dramatically lower the cost and time required for risk discovery. This goes beyond finding a single bug; it signals a change in the very mechanism of how vulnerabilities are found. The core thesis introduces the concept of "Recursive Security," drawing a parallel to Anthropic's "Recursive Self-Improvement." Just as AI can accelerate its own development through feedback loops, security systems are evolving towards a continuous cycle of analysis, risk identification, remediation, and re-analysis. Security is becoming a persistent, evolving capability integrated into a system's lifecycle, rather than a one-time pre-launch audit. This shift is particularly urgent for the crypto industry, where system complexity from Layer-2 networks, modular architectures, and ZK-proofs is growing faster than human analysis capacity. AI excels at the pattern recognition and contextual understanding needed to navigate this complexity. Importantly, the article cautions that AI augments both defenders and potential attackers, accelerating the entire threat landscape. The future competitive advantage may not lie in having zero vulnerabilities, but in having the fastest risk discovery, validation, and response capabilities. The Claude-Zcash incident is thus an early signal of an era where AI-driven, recursive security systems become essential for managing risk in an increasingly complex digital world.

marsbitHace 27 min(s)

When AI Begins to Audit the World: From Claude Discovering the ZEC Vulnerability, Watching the Encryption Industry Enter the 'Recursive Security Era'

marsbitHace 27 min(s)

From MSTR to STRC+: Where Is the Limit of the Strategy Universe?

From MSTR to STRC+: The Evolution and Limits of the Strategy Universe This article examines the transformation of Strategy (formerly MicroStrategy) from a simple "Bitcoin treasury" company into a complex financial engineering firm building a BTC-backed credit system. **Core Thesis:** Strategy's true significance lies not just in its massive BTC holdings (~844k BTC), but in its attempt to transform this static reserve into a multi-layered credit curve within traditional capital markets and, subsequently, into on-chain yield infrastructure. **The MSTR Flywheel:** The initial model was a reflexive loop: BTC price rises → MSTR stock rises → company raises capital (debt/equity) at a premium → buys more BTC → increases per-share BTC exposure → MSTR premium grows. This "amplified Bitcoin" equity (MSTR) thrives on bullish momentum but is vulnerable to tightening premiums and rising funding costs. **Building the Credit Curve:** Strategy's innovation is slicing its single BTC balance sheet into different risk/return profiles via specialized securities: * **MSTR:** High-volatility equity layer absorbing full BTC upside/downside. * **STRC:** Key product. A perpetual preferred stock designed as "short duration high yield credit," offering ~11.5% floating monthly dividends. It attracts fixed-income investors seeking yield without direct BTC exposure, funding Strategy's operations. * **STRD/STRK/STRF:** Other preferred/share classes with varying durations, conversion rights, and fixed dividends. **Risks of the STRC Model:** STRC's high yield is not risk-free. Its stability depends on: 1) Sufficient BTC asset coverage, 2) Strategy's continued ability to pay dividends, and 3) Market faith in the MSTR/STRC funding flywheel. Stress points include deep BTC price declines eroding the asset buffer, rising dividend costs if STRC trades below par, and a broken flywheel if MSTR's premium (mNAV) falls persistently. **On-Chain Expansion: STRC+:** Projects like **Saturn** and **Apyx** aim to package STRC's (and other DAT preferred stock) cash flows into on-chain stablecoin yield (e.g., sUSDat, apyUSD). They offer DeFi a new yield source distinct from trading fees or incentives—cash dividends from traditional securities. However, this introduces compounded risks: off-chain custody, issuer credit risk, BTC volatility, and protocol execution risk. **Conclusion: The Ultimate Boundary** Strategy's endgame is not infinite BTC accumulation. It is the market's long-term acceptance of a new credit system where BTC serves as collateral for tradable securities whose cash flows can power on-chain financial applications. Its "universe" expands if this BTC-native credit curve gains legitimacy, but contracts if these instruments are repriced purely as high-risk, yield-bearing credit assets without stablecoin mythology.

marsbitHace 46 min(s)

From MSTR to STRC+: Where Is the Limit of the Strategy Universe?

marsbitHace 46 min(s)

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片