Detailed Explanation of NYSE's Tokenized Securities Platform: Why It Aims for 7x24 Trading

marsbitPublicado a 2026-01-22Actualizado a 2026-01-22

Resumen

The New York Stock Exchange (NYSE), part of the ICE Group, has announced plans to develop a platform for trading tokenized securities with on-chain settlement, pending regulatory approval. The platform aims to offer a 7x24 trading experience, instant settlement, dollar-based orders, and stablecoin transfers. It will integrate NYSE’s Pillar matching engine with a blockchain-based post-trade system, supporting multi-chain settlement and custody. This move places NYSE in competition with Nasdaq, which submitted a similar proposal to the SEC in 2025. While Nasdaq’s approach is a hybrid model integrating tokenization into existing systems, NYSE’s plan is more radical—a standalone platform enabling T+0 settlement, fractional shares, and extended trading hours. Globally, tokenization of securities is advancing, with initiatives like SIX Digital Exchange in Switzerland and Deutsche Börse’s D7 in Germany. NYSE’s effort is seen as a response to growing global investor demand and competition from crypto markets. Potential impacts include lower entry barriers for retail investors through fractional ownership, improved liquidity, and reduced settlement risk. However, challenges may include increased market volatility, manipulation risks, and higher operational demands on brokers and market makers. For crypto, the news could benefit public blockchains like Ethereum and Solana if adopted for settlement, while stablecoin-based lending protocols may see increased utility. Although short-t...

On January 19, according to official news, the New York Stock Exchange, a subsidiary of the ICE Group, announced today that it is developing a platform for trading tokenized securities and on-chain settlement, and will seek regulatory approval for this.

The NYSE's new digital platform will support a tokenized trading experience, including 7x24 hour round-the-clock operation, instant settlement, order placement by dollar amount, and fund transfers based on stablecoins. Its design integrates the NYSE Pillar matching engine with a blockchain-based post-trade system, capable of supporting multi-chain settlement and custody.

Lynn Martin, President of the ICE Group, stated bluntly: "We are leading the industry towards a fully on-chain solution while maintaining the NYSE's unparalleled protection and high regulatory standards." In other words, they aim to use blockchain to improve efficiency while continuing to win the trust of Wall Street.

Currently, the plan is still in the early development stage and has not been built or fully tested. The NYSE stated that it will seek approval from regulatory bodies such as the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), and the platform is expected to launch in late 2026.

The first reaction from crypto players might be, "It's over, the正规军 (mainstream institutions) are entering the market on a large scale again. The narrative of trading U.S. stocks on-chain is about to be completely taken away, so what do we have left?" In fact, the on-chain transformation of traditional securities markets is not a trend that emerged only after the significant advancement of cryptocurrency compliance last year; it has been around for a long time. When we take a more detailed look at the past and present of the on-chain transformation of traditional securities in the U.S. and globally, we will find that this is an already unstoppable and continuously advancing trend. Anxiety is reasonable, but confidence is even more necessary.

In the U.S., the NYSE is Actually Racing Against Nasdaq

Compared to the NYSE, which has only just preliminarily announced its on-chain plan, Nasdaq submitted a formal related proposal to the SEC last year.

On September 8, 2025, Nasdaq submitted proposal SR-NASDAQ-2025-072 to the SEC, aiming to amend rules to allow the trading of tokenized securities on the Nasdaq market and integrate blockchain technology for settlement and clearing. The proposal emphasizes that blockchain can bring faster settlement, improved audit trails, and a more seamless order-to-settlement process.

If approved, this feature is expected to be available by the end of the third quarter of 2026. The proposal has entered the SEC review stage, and a revised version (Amendment No. 1) was submitted on December 29, 2025.

By comparison, the NYSE seems to have fallen behind Nasdaq, but in fact, this new plan by the NYSE is not a hasty response to Nasdaq; it is a continuation of the long-term blockchain布局 (layout/strategy) of the NYSE's parent company, ICE.

As early as 2015, ICE began exploring blockchain technology and launched the Bakkt platform (focused on crypto futures and custody) in 2018. In 2021, the platform went public on the NYSE through a SPAC merger with VPC Impact Acquisition Holdings.

Last August, ICE partnered with Chainlink to provide foreign exchange and precious metal exchange rate data on-chain through Chainlink. In October, ICE announced a strategic investment of up to $20 billion in Polymarket. There were also reports late last year that ICE was in talks to invest in MoonPay.

More notably, the on-chain reform plans for securities adopted by the NYSE and Nasdaq are different.

Nasdaq's方案 (plan) adopts a "hybrid model." Traders can choose traditional form or tokenized form (using blockchain) for settlement when entering orders. All trades are executed in the same order book, using the same CUSIP identifiers, execution rules, and priority. Clearing and settlement are handled by the DTC. Tokenization is only an optional "digital representation" form and does not change the existing structure (such as the T+1 settlement cycle).

That is to say, Nasdaq is not creating a brand-new, independent on-chain securities trading platform; instead, it is integrating tokenized securities into the existing system, emphasizing compatibility with the current system, minimizing disruption to the existing infrastructure, and avoiding creating new risks. Although there were reports at the end of last year that Nasdaq was seeking approval to allow the market to trade 5 days a week, 23 hours a day, it is still a gradual and温和的 (moderate) reform.

The NYSE's plan is clearly more激进 (radical). They aim to create a brand-new, independent on-chain securities trading platform. ICE is collaborating with banks such as Bank of New York Mellon and Citigroup to support tokenized deposits in its clearinghouse, helping clearing members transfer and manage funds outside traditional banking hours, fulfill margin obligations, and adapt to the fund needs of different jurisdictions and time zones.

This摆脱 (breaks free from) the limitation of traditional bank clearing windows that are only open on weekdays. For the NYSE, T+0, 7x24 hour round-the-clock trading, fractional share trading, and support for stablecoin funds are all must-haves. Compared to Nasdaq, this is undoubtedly a more profound transformation.

Globally, the exploration of securities tokenization and even asset tokenization has long begun and is flourishing. Examples include Switzerland's SIX Digital Exchange (SDX), Germany's Deutsche Börse D7 platform, the UK's Archax, and Singapore's DBS Bank Digital Exchange. However, a reform plan as激进 (radical) as the NYSE's can still be called "unprecedented."

The race between the NYSE and Nasdaq is by no means just to "earning a little more commission"; it is an active出击 (offensive) in the new landscape of global competition entering the traditional securities trading market. Like Nasdaq, the NYSE's securities trading platform, NYSE Arca, also submitted a proposal to extend trading hours and is awaiting formal approval, and this was back in 2024.

The London Stock Exchange (LSE) and Asian exchanges (such as Tokyo or Hong Kong) are also discussing extending trading hours.

For traditional stock exchanges, extending trading hours is not as simple as it seems on the surface—"opening for a few more hours." The exchange side has many technical modifications, such as closing prices, ex-rights, ex-dividends, etc., and also faces potential network stability challenges. At the securities broker level, upgrades are also required to follow these changes.

Historically, extending trading hours has been a trend that has never stopped伴随着 (accompanying) technological progress. Taking the U.S. as an example, in the 1920s–1940s, the daily trading time of the securities market was only about 5 hours; it increased to about 6 hours in the 1950s–1970s, and to about 6.5 hours in the 1980s–1990s, until reaching about 16 hours in the 21st century.

According to data from a Deloitte report, in June 2023, foreign investors' holdings of U.S. securities had already reached $26.86 trillion. Among the reasons for extending trading hours, there must be one point: to better包容 (accommodate) and even attract foreign investors.

NYSE executive Kevin Tyrrell stated in an interview with CNBC: "Interest in U.S. equities continues to grow among both retail and institutional investors, both in the U.S. and globally. The 22-hour/5-day (5 days a week, 22 hours a day) extended trading plan we developed is based on numerous exchanges with market participants and our own data and analysis. Given the current level of investor demand and the availability of existing market infrastructure, we believe the 22-hour/5-day extended trading plan is the right approach."

For international companies wanting to list, they want to land in the world's most liquid U.S. stock market. If one of the NYSE or Nasdaq supports round-the-clock trading, they would prefer the one that supports it, as it is more time-friendly.

Although stock exchanges are also aware of the risks that round-the-clock trading may bring and the upgrade costs to be paid, the endless cryptocurrency market that has been running for years and its attraction to global users has become their best "teacher." Whether it is extending trading hours or improving trading and settlement efficiency, embracing investors worldwide is something they must strive to do. Traditional securities are not stuck in "tradition"; they are also constantly evolving.

Impact on Traditional Markets

Support for fractional share trading will undoubtedly significantly lower the entry barrier for retail investors again. One major advantage of cryptocurrency compared to traditional stock markets is that even if Bitcoin rises to $1 million each, retail investors can still buy just $10 worth of it. But if the NYSE's vision is ultimately realized, everyone will also be able to buy $10 worth of U.S. stock giants like Nvidia, Tesla, or Apple.

7x24 hour round-the-clock trading and T+0 settlement will greatly accelerate the market pace of traditional stock markets. On the positive side, settlement risks and cross-time zone friction will be greatly reduced, and the flexibility of investment and the efficiency of price discovery will be greatly improved.

Risks also exist. More剧烈 (violent) fluctuations and more emotional trading, the possible liquidity dispersion caused by a non-stop market, and more price manipulation. Especially during the closing periods of traditional securities trading markets, the on-chain environment could potentially become a "paradise" more prone to滋生 (breeding) "恶庄 (malicious market makers)" and insider trading.

Due to changes in trading and settlement mechanisms, the strategies of traditional institutions and market makers may also enter a stage of你追我赶 (catching up with each other) upgrades, like the NYSE and Nasdaq. Faced with upgraded round-the-clock information monitoring and automated trading strategies, for retail investors, whether this progress means more opportunities or more残酷 (cruel) competition is really hard to say.

Which Cryptocurrency Projects Have Potential Benefits

Although the NYSE announcement mentioned that it "will support multi-chain settlement and custody," no further details have been revealed on whether this means public chains like Ethereum and Solana. If so, it would undoubtedly be a major利好 (positive factor) for public chain tokens.

When stablecoins on-chain can directly enter U.S. stock targets through the NYSE's channel, the probability of another altseason in the crypto circle will shrink again in the short term. The reason for saying short-term is that the demand for on-chain stablecoins to enter U.S. stocks has never had a chance to be satisfied. Once the channel is opened, it will certainly create a significant虹吸效应 (siphon effect) in the short term.

But over the years, the crypto circle has also沉淀 (precipitated/settled) a group of investors with distinct characteristics. The overall investment environment of the crypto circle is quite different from the stock market. Whether to choose stability or the dream of hundredfold or thousandfold returns, how investors will choose can still be observed over a longer term.

For crypto projects like AAVE and Compound that provide stablecoin lending, the NYSE's plan is无异于 (nothing less than) a "narrative falling from the sky." For projects like Ondo that were previously dedicated to introducing U.S. stocks on-chain, they will experience the pain of transformation.

For the crypto market, it is about to face an unprecedented challenge from the traditional securities market. For the crypto industry, this is区块链技术 (blockchain technology) "gaining another foothold" in the traditional financial market, another milestone progress for the industry as a whole.

So does this mean the future of the crypto market is becoming increasingly黯淡 (bleak)? I believe not. I believe that with the overall progress of the industry, the future trend of "tokenization of everything" is unstoppable, and securities are just one of the万物 (myriad things). The crypto market will still be a place where miracles happen. Believe in the future.

Preguntas relacionadas

QWhat are the key features of the NYSE's new digital platform for tokenized securities?

AThe NYSE's new digital platform will support a tokenized trading experience, including 7x24 hour operation, instant settlement (T+0), dollar-based order entry, and stablecoin-based fund transfers. It integrates the NYSE Pillar matching engine with a blockchain-based post-trade system and has the capability to support multi-chain settlement and custody.

QHow does the NYSE's approach to tokenized securities differ from Nasdaq's proposed 'hybrid model'?

AThe NYSE is building a new, independent platform for tokenized securities trading, aiming for a more radical transformation with features like T+0, 24/7 trading, fractional shares, and stablecoin support. In contrast, Nasdaq's hybrid model integrates tokenized securities as an optional 'digital representation' into its existing system, maintaining compatibility with current infrastructure like the T+1 settlement cycle and minimizing disruption.

QWhat is the primary motivation behind traditional exchanges like the NYSE and Nasdaq moving towards longer trading hours and tokenization?

AThe primary motivation is to compete in the new landscape of globalized securities trading. This includes attracting more international investors and companies seeking listings by offering more accessible trading hours (like 24/5 or 24/7), reducing settlement risk, improving price discovery efficiency, and embracing the operational efficiencies demonstrated by the cryptocurrency markets.

QWhat potential risks does the article associate with the move to 24/7 trading and T+0 settlement for traditional stocks?

APotential risks include more volatile and emotional trading, the possibility of liquidity becoming fragmented, and an increased potential for price manipulation and insider trading, especially during the traditional market's former closed periods, which could become a breeding ground for such activities.

QAccording to the article, what is the potential short-term impact on the cryptocurrency market from the NYSE's new platform?

AIn the short term, the article suggests a potential 'siphoning effect' where stablecoin liquidity on-chain could be drawn towards trading tokenized stocks on the NYSE platform. This could temporarily reduce the probability of a 'altcoin season' in the crypto market as capital flows to this new, major demand outlet for stablecoins.

Lecturas Relacionadas

Low Investment Isn't Apple's Immunity Pass

While Meta and Google face investor scrutiny over ballooning AI capital expenditures, Apple's minimal AI investment has paradoxically become a strength. Its market cap recently reclaimed the global top spot, surpassing $5 trillion. The irony is deep: Apple's own AI efforts have lagged, with "Apple Intelligence" delayed and core talent lost, forcing reliance on partners like Google Gemini and Alibaba's Qianwen. Its Q3 FY2026 (Q2 CY) earnings initially seemed stellar. Revenue hit $109.4B (up 16% YoY), with iPhone and Mac sales, growing 22% and 29% respectively, driving most of the growth. However, the stock fell over 8% post-earnings. The primary concern was a weaker Q4 revenue growth forecast of 9-11%, below expectations, due to looming supply chain constraints. Apple is feeling the indirect cost of the AI boom. Soaring memory and chip prices, fueled by massive data center investments from Microsoft, Amazon, and others, are forcing Apple to raise Mac and iPad prices significantly. The upcoming iPhone launch is also expected to see substantial price hikes. Despite avoiding heavy AI infrastructure spending—its capital expenditures are actually down 28%—Apple cannot escape the industry-wide supply and cost pressures. While Apple's operating cash flow remains robust, its substantial R&D spending (up 32% YoY) has yet to yield major AI breakthroughs. As Tim Cook prepares to step down as CEO, Apple faces a challenging transition: balancing its premium hardware success against the strategic and cost pressures of the AI era it has so far cautiously navigated.

marsbitHace 17 min(s)

Low Investment Isn't Apple's Immunity Pass

marsbitHace 17 min(s)

PA Graphics Explanation | One Chart to Understand the Major Web3 Events in August 2026

**PANews Crypto Calendar: Key Web3 Events in August 2026** PANews introduces its revamped crypto calendar, featuring comprehensive coverage, flexible filtering, and easy export options. The market in August will be shaped by multiple key events across macroeconomics, regulation, tokenomics, and project developments: * **Macro & Policy:** Key US economic data releases (July Non-Farm Payrolls, CPI), the Federal Reserve meeting minutes, and the Jackson Hole Economic Symposium will be in focus. On the regulatory front, the US Senate plans to release a new draft of the *CLARITY Act*, while the EU's expanded crypto ban against Belarus comes into effect. * **Token Unlocks:** Significant token unlocks are scheduled for assets including ENA, AVAX, CONX, ZRO, and KAITO, which may influence market volatility. * **Project Updates & Shutdowns:** Several services, including Exchange Art, Ctrl Wallet, Zapper, NFTfi, and Summer.fi, are set to cease operations or undergo major adjustments. Users are advised to manage their assets accordingly. * **Corporate Activity:** Q2 earnings reports from companies like SpaceX, Circle, and Nvidia are due. Unitree Robotics will initiate its IPO subscription on the STAR Market, and Moonshot AI plans to begin a Pre-IPO financing round. * **Industry Events:** Major conferences such as Bitcoin Asia 2026 and the 2026 Digital Expo will take place. The overarching market narrative for August will revolve around macroeconomic expectations, regulatory developments, token unlock schedules, and ongoing industry consolidation.

marsbitHace 27 min(s)

PA Graphics Explanation | One Chart to Understand the Major Web3 Events in August 2026

marsbitHace 27 min(s)

Wall Street's Most Famous 'Cassandra' Now Has His Sights Set on Nvidia

Michael Burry, the famed "Big Short" investor, has once again captured Wall Street's attention with a series of short positions against major tech and semiconductor stocks, most notably Nvidia. In late June and July, through his "Cassandra Unchained" newsletter, Burry disclosed short bets against Nvidia, Tesla, Applied Materials, Caterpillar, the SOXX semiconductor ETF, and later, Micron Technology. His core thesis revolves around potential distortions in the AI infrastructure boom, specifically questioning whether extended depreciation schedules (e.g., 6 years vs. a realistic 2-3 years for AI chips) by cloud giants like Microsoft and Google artificially inflate profits. He also raises concerns about possible "off-balance-sheet circular financing," where chip demand might be propped up by vendor-backed funding to clients. Nvidia's stock experienced volatility following these disclosures, briefly dipping but largely holding near Burry's reported entry points, leaving his positions roughly flat or slightly underwater as of late July. This move is part of a pattern for Burry, whose track record since his legendary 2008 bet is mixed. He has faced notable losses, such as on Tesla in 2021, while scoring on broader market turns like the 2020 pandemic crash. His methodology focuses intensely on free cash flow and scrutinizing original financial documents to spot overvaluation and structural risks, but it often struggles with timing the market. The article contrasts Burry's stance with other prominent investors. Steve Eisman, another "Big Short" figure, is not shorting Nvidia, citing strong fundamentals but expressing nervousness about sustainability. Jim Chanos agrees with the broad "accounting mismatch" concern—comparing it to the dot-com bubble—but targets financial leverage in private equity firms rather than the chip stocks themselves. While Nvidia's short interest remains relatively low at 1.3-1.4% of float, the massive stock size means absolute short losses have been significant, exceeding $5 billion earlier this year. The piece concludes that for ordinary investors, the key takeaway is not replicating specific short bets but learning from the critical frameworks these investors use: questioning rosy accounting, identifying structural vulnerabilities, and maintaining skepticism during market euphoria, even if pinpointing the exact catalyst for a downturn remains elusive.

marsbitHace 52 min(s)

Wall Street's Most Famous 'Cassandra' Now Has His Sights Set on Nvidia

marsbitHace 52 min(s)

Weekly Selection丨Epic Stock Market Volatility, Changxin Tech's IPO Reshapes Storage Landscape, Saylor Aims to Re-Anchor STRC Around September 8th

PANews Weekly Digest: Market Turmoil, Tech Breakthroughs, and Crypto Developments. The week saw significant volatility across global markets. South Korea's KOSPI index experienced extreme turbulence, including multiple trading halts, largely driven by sharp declines in AI hardware stocks like SK Hynix. In contrast, China's Changxin Xinqiao (CXC) achieved a landmark IPO with a market cap surpassing 4 trillion yuan, marking a major success for the domestic DRAM industry after a decade of losses. In the crypto and Web3 space, several key narratives emerged. AI is driving demand for new infrastructure, with projects like AI agent wallets and programmable payments gaining traction, attracting interest from firms like Coinbase. The Bitcoin mining sector is pivoting, with companies like MARA focusing on energy management as electricity becomes a core AI-era asset. Meanwhile, the RWA (Real World Assets) sector faces a "utilization puzzle," with hundreds of billions in on-chain assets remaining dormant. Notable market movements included a historic single-day surge of over 17% for the KOSPI index and a significant migration of $16.5 billion in staked ETH within the Lido ecosystem. Michael Saylor announced a target to re-peg the STRC stablecoin around September 8th. Other highlights include discussions on Ethereum's ambitious 2030 roadmap for scaling and privacy, analysis showing high protocol revenues not always translating to token price gains, and warnings from Citi about potential extreme commodity price shocks by late 2026.

marsbitHace 57 min(s)

Weekly Selection丨Epic Stock Market Volatility, Changxin Tech's IPO Reshapes Storage Landscape, Saylor Aims to Re-Anchor STRC Around September 8th

marsbitHace 57 min(s)

When the Market Begins to Question AI Capex: A Full Analysis of Q2 Earnings Reports from Five Tech Giants

In late July 2026, five major US tech giants—Alphabet, Intel, Microsoft, Meta, and Apple—released their Q2 earnings reports. While all companies exceeded revenue and profit expectations, driven by strong AI-related business growth, investor reactions diverged sharply due to concerns over escalating AI capital expenditures (capex) and their impact on free cash flow. Alphabet reported strong revenue growth and a surging cloud business, but its stock fell after announcing a doubled year-on-year capex and negative quarterly free cash flow for the first time. Intel posted its strongest revenue growth in over 15 years, but its stock experienced volatile trading after significantly raising its full-year capex guidance. Microsoft saw its stock surge after beating estimates and, crucially, lowering its capex forecast while projecting positive free cash flow. Meta faced the most severe sell-off as its profits declined despite revenue beats, with free cash flow plunging over 90% and its capex guidance raised. Apple reported record June-quarter results, but its stock plummeted after providing Q4 revenue guidance that fell short of expectations, citing supply chain constraints and forex headwinds. The overall takeaway is that the market's focus has shifted from validating AI demand to scrutinizing the timeline for returns on massive AI investments. Companies demonstrating a clearer path to managing capex and preserving free cash flow, like Microsoft, were rewarded, while those signaling continued aggressive spending faced investor skepticism.

Odaily星球日报Hace 1 hora(s)

When the Market Begins to Question AI Capex: A Full Analysis of Q2 Earnings Reports from Five Tech Giants

Odaily星球日报Hace 1 hora(s)

Trading

Spot
活动图片