Data: 75% of Traders on Hyperliquid Are Losing Money. What Are the Profitable Ones Using?

marsbitPublicado a 2026-05-20Actualizado a 2026-05-20

Resumen

On Hyperliquid, approximately 75% of addresses are losing money, indicating that manual traders are increasingly competing against automated systems. Profitable traders primarily employ one of three approaches: 1) Running systematic, high-frequency strategies (e.g., one address executed 261k trades with a 64.75% win rate), 2) Placing high-conviction, asymmetric bets with large positions (e.g., 50 trades yielding $4.48M at a 28% win rate), or 3) Using algorithms for execution while making manual macro judgments. The article argues that traditional methods like chart patterns or reacting to social media news are often already priced in by bots, making such traders the "exit liquidity" for systematic players. Success now depends on unique narrative timing, structural insights, or conviction during market capitulation.

Author: Stacy Muur

Compiled by: Deep Tide TechFlow

Deep Tide Guide: Three-quarters of addresses on Hyperliquid are losing money. It's not bad luck; the rules of the game have changed. While you're still looking at candlestick patterns for formations, arbitrage bots have already made their profit. Data shows that truly profitable traders either use algorithmic systematic execution or place large bets on asymmetric opportunities with high conviction. Manual retail traders watching screens are becoming the exit liquidity for others.

About 75% of addresses on Hyperliquid are in a loss-making position.

The reality is that people trading manually on Hyperliquid are competing against systems that never rest. The trading opportunity you just discovered has likely already been priced in by the system.

When you see a certain pattern, chances are it has already been arbitraged.

Extreme funding rates are balanced in an instant.

Technical patterns have already appeared across more than 50 order books.

News headlines are priced in as soon as they appear.

What the most profitable traders are doing:

→1. Running systematic strategies (the second most profitable address executed 261,000 trades this month with a 64.75% win rate)

→ 2. Holding high-conviction positions, betting on asymmetric returns (a wallet made $4.48 million with just 50 trades and a 28% win rate)

→ 3. Using algorithms as execution tools while making macro judgments manually

If you have timing in narratives, structural insight, or conviction when everyone else capitulates, you can still make profitable trades.

But if your trades are based on chart patterns or news you saw on X, you are likely just exit liquidity.

Preguntas relacionadas

QAccording to the article, what percentage of addresses on Hyperliquid are losing money, and what is presented as the primary reason?

AApproximately 75% of addresses on Hyperliquid are losing money. The primary reason is that manual traders are competing against automated, systemized strategies that execute trades faster and more efficiently, often pricing in opportunities before a human trader can act.

QWhat are the two main strategies used by the most profitable traders on Hyperliquid, as described in the article?

AThe two main strategies are: 1. Running systematic, automated strategies (one example executed 261,000 trades with a 64.75% win rate). 2. Holding high-conviction positions to bet on asymmetric opportunities (one wallet made $4.48M with only 50 trades, despite a 28% win rate).

QThe article suggests that several common trading signals are often ineffective. Name at least three of these signals.

AThree common but often ineffective signals mentioned are: 1. Technical chart patterns (which appear across many order books). 2. Extreme funding rates (which get arbitraged instantly). 3. News headlines (which are priced in immediately upon release).

QWhat role does the article suggest algorithms can play for a trader who still wants to make manual, high-level decisions?

AThe article suggests using algorithms as an execution tool. A trader can make macro or high-level directional judgments manually, and then use an algorithm to handle the rapid, systematic execution of trades based on that judgment.

QAccording to the article's conclusion, what kind of manual trader is most likely to succeed, and what kind is most likely to fail?

AA manual trader who succeeds is likely one acting on deep narrative timing, unique structural insights, or having strong conviction when others are capitulating. A manual trader who fails is likely one whose decisions are based on commonly seen chart patterns or news headlines found on social media (like X), as they become 'exit liquidity' for others.

Lecturas Relacionadas

Ethereum's Last Major Buyer: How Much Longer Can It Hold On?

The article examines the precarious situation of Bitmine, a major and aggressive institutional buyer of Ethereum (ETH), which is nearing its goal of accumulating 5% of the total ETH supply. Despite holding significant unrealized losses exceeding $10.5 billion due to a high average purchase price, Bitmine continues to buy ETH, recently financing its purchases through a $274 million perpetual preferred stock offering with a 9.5% annual dividend. The analysis highlights several critical pressures on this model. Bitmine relies heavily on ETH staking yields (3-4%) to potentially cover its high dividend obligations. However, if ETH's price remains low or falls further, these yields, paid in ETH, lose dollar value, creating a sustainability gap. The article questions what will support ETH's price once Bitmine completes its 5% target and potentially slows or stops its purchases, as other institutional buyers like ETFs have shown net outflows. The conclusion outlines three scenarios: a pessimistic view where financing dries up and ETH could fall sharply; a base case of continued buying and range-bound prices; and an optimistic outlook driven by new institutional demand and favorable regulation. Ultimately, the piece questions who will become the next major marginal buyer to support ETH's price if Bitmine's "flywheel" of buying slows down.

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Ethereum's Last Major Buyer: How Much Longer Can It Hold On?

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Record Institutional Bitcoin Selling Now Exceeds Miner Output By 460%

Institutional selling of Bitcoin has reached a historic high, with net selling by entities like spot ETFs and digital asset treasury companies now equivalent to 464% of the daily mining output, according to analysis by Capriole Investments. This marks a sharp reversal from the accumulation seen during April and May's rally. The record negative "Net Institutional Buying" metric is primarily driven by ETF outflows, while corporate holders continue net buying. Amid this institutional distribution, Bitcoin's price recently dipped below $61,000 before recovering to around $62,300, showing signs of consolidation.

bitcoinistHace 1 hora(s)

Record Institutional Bitcoin Selling Now Exceeds Miner Output By 460%

bitcoinistHace 1 hora(s)

How Much Longer Can Ethereum's Last Major Buyer Hold On?

"The article analyzes the precarious position of Bitmine, currently the largest and most aggressive marginal buyer of Ethereum (ETH). Despite holding a massive position of approximately 5.66 million ETH (nearing its 5% supply target) and generating staking income, the company faces over $10 billion in unrealized losses due to a high average purchase price. With ETH prices depressed, its equity has plummeted nearly 90%. To sustain its buying spree, Bitmine recently issued $274 million in perpetual preferred shares with a 9.5% annual dividend. The core dilemma is whether staking yields (3-4%) can long-term support these high dividend obligations without significant ETH price appreciation. The article warns that once Bitmine achieves its 5% goal and potentially stops buying, the ETH market risks losing its key support pillar. Other institutional buyers, like ETH ETFs, have shown net outflows, while potential new demand from stablecoin legislation or RWA tokenization remains slow to materialize. The conclusion questions who will provide the next wave of sustained buying pressure to support ETH's price, highlighting a critical uncertainty for the asset's near-term trajectory."

链捕手Hace 1 hora(s)

How Much Longer Can Ethereum's Last Major Buyer Hold On?

链捕手Hace 1 hora(s)

Raising Interest Rates Is Not a Tech Killer, EPS Is: A Strategy for Discarding the Weak and Retaining the Strong After the AI Theme's Sharp Decline

**Summary: Rising Interest Rates Are Not the Killer of Tech; EPS Is: The "Keep the Strong, Ditch the Weak" Strategy After the AI Theme Plunge** The author argues that the sharp sell-off in tech and AI-related stocks, triggered by a strong US jobs report that heightened Fed rate hike fears, represents a "pullback to pick up passengers" rather than a "car crash." The true end of a tech bull market is not determined by an extra 25 basis point hike, but by industry overcapacity and the disproval of earnings per share (EPS) expectations. Historical analysis shows that during past rate hike cycles, the Nasdaq-100 often outperformed, provided EPS growth remained strong. The current phase is seen as a shift from a "broad narrative-driven rally" to a "focused verification stage" for AI. The investment strategy should be to "keep the strong, ditch the weak." * **Retain exposure** to high-conviction AI infrastructure leaders with clear order visibility, stable margins, strong cash flow, and upward EPS revisions (e.g., AI servers, advanced packaging, optical modules, key cloud suppliers). * **Reduce exposure** to high-beta, narrative-driven stocks with unclear profit paths (e.g., some quantum computing, space, or speculative chip stocks), especially on rebounds. Valuation concerns should focus on whether earnings can catch up to high multiples, not on high P/E alone. Crowded positioning signals a concentration into quality assets, not necessarily a market top. The upcoming Q2 earnings season will be a key validation point. The core principle is to hold stocks with proven EPS, while using macro events (CPI data, central bank meetings) to manage timing and risk.

marsbitHace 2 hora(s)

Raising Interest Rates Is Not a Tech Killer, EPS Is: A Strategy for Discarding the Weak and Retaining the Strong After the AI Theme's Sharp Decline

marsbitHace 2 hora(s)

CLARITY Act Hits New Roadblock As Ethics Agreement Collapses In Senate Talks

The CLARITY Act has encountered a new obstacle as a bipartisan Senate group's agreement on ethics provisions collapsed. Republicans reportedly reversed their position on a key element that would have allowed state attorneys general to sue the Department of Justice for failing to enforce ethics rules related to President Trump. Democrats viewed this as an "about face" from a prior tentative deal. As a counter-proposal, Republicans suggested limiting enforcement authority to the Attorney General and mentioned impeachment as a potential remedy for violations. The impasse leaves the crypto market structure bill's path to a full Senate vote uncertain. Another major hurdle involves law enforcement groups' concerns that the bill could hinder investigations into blockchain-related crimes like money laundering. The White House Crypto Council is scheduled to meet with these groups to address these issues, particularly around the Blockchain Regulatory Certainty Act. Key Democratic senators have stated their support for the CLARITY Act is contingent on adequately addressing both ethics and law enforcement concerns.

bitcoinistHace 3 hora(s)

CLARITY Act Hits New Roadblock As Ethics Agreement Collapses In Senate Talks

bitcoinistHace 3 hora(s)

Trading

Spot

Futuros