Data: 75% of Traders on Hyperliquid Are Losing Money. What Are the Profitable Ones Using?

marsbitPublicado a 2026-05-20Actualizado a 2026-05-20

Resumen

On Hyperliquid, approximately 75% of addresses are losing money, indicating that manual traders are increasingly competing against automated systems. Profitable traders primarily employ one of three approaches: 1) Running systematic, high-frequency strategies (e.g., one address executed 261k trades with a 64.75% win rate), 2) Placing high-conviction, asymmetric bets with large positions (e.g., 50 trades yielding $4.48M at a 28% win rate), or 3) Using algorithms for execution while making manual macro judgments. The article argues that traditional methods like chart patterns or reacting to social media news are often already priced in by bots, making such traders the "exit liquidity" for systematic players. Success now depends on unique narrative timing, structural insights, or conviction during market capitulation.

Author: Stacy Muur

Compiled by: Deep Tide TechFlow

Deep Tide Guide: Three-quarters of addresses on Hyperliquid are losing money. It's not bad luck; the rules of the game have changed. While you're still looking at candlestick patterns for formations, arbitrage bots have already made their profit. Data shows that truly profitable traders either use algorithmic systematic execution or place large bets on asymmetric opportunities with high conviction. Manual retail traders watching screens are becoming the exit liquidity for others.

About 75% of addresses on Hyperliquid are in a loss-making position.

The reality is that people trading manually on Hyperliquid are competing against systems that never rest. The trading opportunity you just discovered has likely already been priced in by the system.

When you see a certain pattern, chances are it has already been arbitraged.

Extreme funding rates are balanced in an instant.

Technical patterns have already appeared across more than 50 order books.

News headlines are priced in as soon as they appear.

What the most profitable traders are doing:

→1. Running systematic strategies (the second most profitable address executed 261,000 trades this month with a 64.75% win rate)

→ 2. Holding high-conviction positions, betting on asymmetric returns (a wallet made $4.48 million with just 50 trades and a 28% win rate)

→ 3. Using algorithms as execution tools while making macro judgments manually

If you have timing in narratives, structural insight, or conviction when everyone else capitulates, you can still make profitable trades.

But if your trades are based on chart patterns or news you saw on X, you are likely just exit liquidity.

Preguntas relacionadas

QAccording to the article, what percentage of addresses on Hyperliquid are losing money, and what is presented as the primary reason?

AApproximately 75% of addresses on Hyperliquid are losing money. The primary reason is that manual traders are competing against automated, systemized strategies that execute trades faster and more efficiently, often pricing in opportunities before a human trader can act.

QWhat are the two main strategies used by the most profitable traders on Hyperliquid, as described in the article?

AThe two main strategies are: 1. Running systematic, automated strategies (one example executed 261,000 trades with a 64.75% win rate). 2. Holding high-conviction positions to bet on asymmetric opportunities (one wallet made $4.48M with only 50 trades, despite a 28% win rate).

QThe article suggests that several common trading signals are often ineffective. Name at least three of these signals.

AThree common but often ineffective signals mentioned are: 1. Technical chart patterns (which appear across many order books). 2. Extreme funding rates (which get arbitraged instantly). 3. News headlines (which are priced in immediately upon release).

QWhat role does the article suggest algorithms can play for a trader who still wants to make manual, high-level decisions?

AThe article suggests using algorithms as an execution tool. A trader can make macro or high-level directional judgments manually, and then use an algorithm to handle the rapid, systematic execution of trades based on that judgment.

QAccording to the article's conclusion, what kind of manual trader is most likely to succeed, and what kind is most likely to fail?

AA manual trader who succeeds is likely one acting on deep narrative timing, unique structural insights, or having strong conviction when others are capitulating. A manual trader who fails is likely one whose decisions are based on commonly seen chart patterns or news headlines found on social media (like X), as they become 'exit liquidity' for others.

Lecturas Relacionadas

Base Launches 'Human Verification', Is the Airdrop on the Agenda?

Base has launched "Base Verify Onchain," a new verification mechanism aimed at solving the problem of Sybil attacks and duplicate participation in on-chain activities like airdrops, rewards, voting, or minting. While blockchains can track wallet addresses, they cannot determine if multiple wallets belong to the same person. The system works by connecting off-chain identity verification with on-chain smart contract rules. Developers can set specific eligibility criteria in their contracts (e.g., requiring a verified X account or a Coinbase One membership). Users connect their wallet and sign a message, which is sent to Base Verify's off-chain service. This service checks if the user meets the pre-set conditions against verified credentials. If they do, it issues a short-lived cryptographic proof containing an identityHash. The application then submits this proof to the smart contract. The contract verifies the proof's validity, checks expiration, and crucially, uses the identityHash to ensure the same verified identity cannot participate more than once, even if using a different wallet address. This identityHash is unique per application contract, preventing cross-application tracking. Base Verify Onchain is positioned as a tool for reliably enforcing participation rules ("who" and "how many times") in specific on-chain scenarios. It is not a general identity system or KYC solution. Its announcement has sparked speculation about a potential future Base token airdrop, for which this tool could be used to prevent abuse. However, Base has previously stated that work on a network token is still in early exploration stages.

marsbitHace 9 min(s)

Base Launches 'Human Verification', Is the Airdrop on the Agenda?

marsbitHace 9 min(s)

Insider's Teleprompter: How a White House Staffer Made $100,000 on Trump's Words

Gabriel Perez, a White House employee who operated the teleprompter for U.S. President Donald Trump during public speeches, has left federal government service. This follows allegations that he used non-public information about the content and timing of Trump's speeches to place bets on the prediction market platform Kalshi, earning over $100,000. Suspicious activity, showing a deviation from typical user behavior, was detected by Kalshi's own monitoring service and reported to the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC). Kalshi's rules explicitly prohibit trading based on information gained from one's job or position. While the White House confirmed Perez's departure, it did not specify if he resigned or was fired, nor did it comment on potential investigations. This case marks a high-profile instance of alleged insider trading on a prediction market, raising questions about the industry's ability to prevent such incidents and the efficacy of oversight methods that rely on detecting statistical anomalies in user behavior.

cryptonews.ruHace 18 min(s)

Insider's Teleprompter: How a White House Staffer Made $100,000 on Trump's Words

cryptonews.ruHace 18 min(s)

Ten European Banks Unite in RL1 Blockchain Association

Ten major European financial institutions, including ABN AMRO, Crédit Mutuel, DekaBank, and Standard Chartered's SC Ventures, have launched the Regulated Layer One (RL1) blockchain association. Registered as a European Cooperative Society in Luxembourg, RL1 aims to build a unified, permissioned blockchain infrastructure for regulated markets and tokenized assets like digital money, bonds, and securities lending. The network is based on technology from the German fintech SWIAT, which has processed over €700 million in transactions. Governance is shared equally among members. Former SWIAT managing director Henning Vollbehr will lead RL1, with talks underway for other institutions like NatWest to join. The initiative seeks to reduce market fragmentation caused by disparate distributed ledgers. However, the current transaction volume on the underlying SWIAT platform—just over 50 deals in three years—highlights the significant technical challenge of scaling the network to handle real interbank trading volumes.

cryptonews.ruHace 18 min(s)

Ten European Banks Unite in RL1 Blockchain Association

cryptonews.ruHace 18 min(s)

The Former CEO of Facebook's Stablecoin Project, the Mastermind Behind America's Most Potent Financial Weapon

Stuart Levey, a former U.S. Treasury official, revolutionized the global sanctions game in the mid-2000s. Confronted with ineffective sanctions against Iran, he realized the key was not just government mandates but targeting the financial system directly. His pivotal insight was to persuade major international banks, leveraging threats of massive fines and loss of access to the crucial U.S. dollar clearing system, to voluntarily cut ties with Iranian entities. This approach, turning dollar access into a powerful geopolitical "choke point," proved highly effective in isolating Iran. However, the article argues that overuse of such financial sanctions is now prompting targeted nations and even allies to seek alternatives, including cryptocurrencies and stablecoins, to bypass the U.S.-dominated system. Notably, Levey later became CEO of Facebook's stablecoin project Diem, aiming to ensure digital currencies did not undermine U.S. financial power. The piece frames this as part of a broader push towards "de-dollarization," driven by the very economic warfare tactics Levey helped pioneer.

marsbitHace 23 min(s)

The Former CEO of Facebook's Stablecoin Project, the Mastermind Behind America's Most Potent Financial Weapon

marsbitHace 23 min(s)

Hungary repeals crypto checks as first MiCA license is granted

Hungary has repealed its strict national cryptocurrency validation requirement after parliament voted to scrap the rule, which had forced some service providers to halt operations. The move coincides with the National Bank of Hungary granting the country's first license under the EU's Markets in Crypto-Assets (MiCA) regulation to local platform CoinCash. The repealed rule, part of a 2024 law, mandated that a licensed validator verify details like asset origin and customer information for certain crypto conversions before issuing a compliance declaration. This added an extra layer of approval on top of MiCA requirements. Coupled with a shortened MiCA transition deadline, the regulatory environment led platforms like CoinCash to suspend services temporarily. Finance Minister Kármán András stated the previous regulations had disrupted the market but that recovery signs are now visible. With the validation step removed, broader licensing under MiCA remains. CoinCash, having received its MiCA authorization covering services like exchange and custody, plans to gradually resume and expand its offerings.

cointelegraphHace 28 min(s)

Hungary repeals crypto checks as first MiCA license is granted

cointelegraphHace 28 min(s)

Trading

Spot