Cryptocurrency's Great Collapse: Veteran Yi Lihua Loses $700 Million in a Week

marsbitPublicado a 2026-02-09Actualizado a 2026-02-09

Resumen

The cryptocurrency market experienced a historic crash, erasing all gains from the post-Trump rally, with Bitcoin recording its largest weekly drop in three years. Prominent Chinese crypto figure Yi Lihua suffered catastrophic losses, liquidating 400,000 Ethereum over six days for a total loss of approximately $780 million, becoming one of the most significant "whales" hunted during the downturn. The crash was triggered by a sharp drop in silver and gold prices, exacerbated by hawkish signals from the U.S. Federal Reserve. This led to a broad sell-off in risk assets, including cryptocurrencies. Traditional investors, who had entered the market via Bitcoin ETFs approved in 2024, were quick to exit, causing substantial outflows from these funds. Analysts pointed out that this bull cycle, unlike previous ones driven by technological innovations like DeFi or smart contracts, was primarily fueled by narratives—such as Trump's pro-crypto policies and MicroStrategy's corporate treasury model—rather than fundamental advancements. This lack of substantive innovation made the market's high valuations particularly vulnerable when macro conditions shifted. The event is seen as a brutal end to the old "narrative-driven" era of crypto, forcing the market to seek real value anchors. While some funds have begun bottom-fishing, the short-term outlook remains bleak, with Bitcoin struggling to recover from its lows around $68,000.

Author: Xie Zhaoqing, Tencent Finance "Insight"

The cryptocurrency market has erased all gains brought by Trump's inauguration, experiencing an epic plunge. The term "risk," temporarily forgotten by greed, once again stares down all investors with its most ferocious visage.

Over the past week, Bitcoin experienced its largest single-week drop in three years. February 5th became an unexpected day for crypto market participants: Bitcoin fell 13% that day, marking its largest single-day drop since June 2022, and briefly fell below $61,000 in the early hours of February 6th.

In this sharp correction, crypto veteran Yi Lihua "liquidated" 400,000 Ethereum within a week, incurring losses of $700 million, becoming the number one "whale" ruthlessly hunted in this round of暴跌.

This violent回调 caught the market off guard, including those long-term bullish "diamond hands." Worse still, many bullish investors still haven't pinpointed the exact cause of this crash.

Multiple crypto market investors in Hong Kong or Singapore told Tencent News "Insight" that while they couldn't identify a single cause for the暴跌, they unanimously agreed that the immediate trigger was the flash crash in silver and gold prices, which subsequently accelerated the decline of Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies.

On January 30th, as news broke that the US "hawk" Kevin Warsh was nominated as Fed Chair, market expectations shifted towards the Fed maintaining high interest rates to curb inflation, leading to a stronger US dollar. Silver plummeted over 30% that day. Subsequently, global risk assets came under pressure and fell successively.

A crypto industry entrepreneur in Hong Kong analyzed for Tencent News "Insight" that influenced by Bitcoin's quadrennial halving mechanism, the "four-year cycle" theory of the crypto market remains valid, but with the叠加 of external macro factors, market volatility has significantly increased. The Bitcoin mining reward halving every four years remains the core logic of the "four-year cycle."

"This round of the crypto market's上涨行情 was primarily driven by 'narratives': expectations of pro-crypto policies under Trump's administration, expectations regarding the Fed's policy path, and corporate treasury models like MicroStrategy (MSTR), all seen as bullish factors."

However, including the aforementioned entrepreneur, many industry insiders believe these expectations mostly remain at the narrative level, lacking substantive business innovation.

Believers in the crypto market are convinced: once a narrative is accepted by the market, traditional capital will continuously flow in, thereby driving up Bitcoin demand and prices further. However, these narratives have now clearly "stumbled," losing their real-world support. Unlike staunch crypto market believers, traditional capital or institutions typically rank crypto assets last on their asset allocation lists. Once market volatility intensifies, crypto assets are the first to be sold off.

Yi Lihua's $700 million loss is not just the Waterloo of a top player; it also宣告 the failure of the "old narratives" on which the crypto market has long relied. The market has long been沉醉于 the iron law of the "four-year halving" cycle, the illusion of capital brought by ETF合规, Trump's policy红利, and MicroStrategy-style treasury leverage games. However, this bull run is different from previous ones; it lacks substantive innovation as its骨架, built merely on macro expectations and emotional narratives like a house of cards. When the Fed's hawkish signals popped the bubble, the era of sustaining high valuations solely through storytelling came to an abrupt halt. This marks the crypto market undergoing a brutal祛魅: "faith" without the support of underlying application innovation appears vulnerable when liquidity recedes. The old wealth creation logic has collapsed, forcing the market to search for a true value anchor in the winter.

01 Collapse of Faith: A $700 Million Lesson

The list of crypto market "evangelists" who suffered heavy losses in this Bitcoin暴跌 includes, but is not limited to, Michael Saylor, Tom Lee, and veteran Yi Lihua.

Michael Saylor's listed company, MicroStrategy, currently holds 713,502 Bitcoins, making it the publicly traded company holding the most Bitcoin globally. Tom Lee, known as Wall Street's "Prediction Emperor," is currently the Chairman of the Board of Bitmine, the listed company holding the most Ethereum. Both are long-term, staunch holders of Bitcoin and Ethereum.

Public data shows that the holdings of the listed companies affiliated with Michael Saylor and Tom Lee have seen significant paper losses: MicroStrategy has lost approximately $124 billion, while Bitmine has lost around $60 billion.

Yi Lihua might be the whale "snipered" the fastest in this wave of暴跌. As a public market bull, the 6 account addresses of Yi Lihua's fund are fully transparent.

Starting February 1st, pressured by leverage, Yi Lihua and his team were forced to continuously offload Ethereum, a process the entire network almost witnessed in real-time as they fell into a "death spiral."

Yi Lihua might have once considered continuing the gamble. In the first 4 days of February, he sold only about 190,000 Ethereum and even paused selling on February 5th, still holding 460,000 Ethereum at that time.

On February 4th, Yi Lihua was still expressing on social media that he was "bullish on this round of the bull market" and called it "the best time to buy spot." Public data shows that to deleverage, his liquidation average price dropped from over $2,000 to $1,500.

Yi Lihua is an early participant in the crypto market, reportedly successfully exiting before the "October 11th Event" in 2025, cashing out over $300 million. On October 11, 2025, within 24 hours, Bitcoin's price fell off a cliff from a high of $120,000;粗略 statistics at the time indicated全网爆仓金额 exceeded $190 billion.

Just 3 days later, Yi Lihua no longer held his view and began加速 selling the Ethereum held by his fund, Trend Research.

Data from Arkham shows that on February 6th, Yi Lihua might have decided to give up抵抗, dumping the remaining 440,000 Ethereum in one go. Between 9 PM and 12 AM that night, nearly 60,000 Ethereum were sold.

Yi Lihua might have already made the decision to liquidate during the day on February 6th. Tencent News "Insight" learned that Yi Lihua appeared near Causeway Bay in Hong Kong on the afternoon of February 6th and stayed until around 10 PM before leaving. Yi Lihua on site did not show任何异样. Meanwhile, his team was executing an accelerated liquidation operation.

As of February 7th, the fund under Yi Lihua held only 20,000 Ethereum, with cumulative losses exceeding $700 million.

Some early crypto market investors told Tencent News "Insight": "Selling 630,000 Ethereum means this time, Yi Lihua彻底 surrendered."

The entire process was extremely fast, "losing nearly $800 million in 6 days." Data platform Arkham shows that from陆续建仓 starting November 11, 2025, to January 25, 2026, Yi Lihua's holdings peaked at 651,000 Ethereum; selling began on February 1st, and liquidation took only 6 days.

"A staunch believer like him has already experienced multiple crypto market bull and bear cycles. After making the decision to liquidate, all that might be left is to wait for the next opportunity to翻身," an early market participant told Tencent News "Insight".

Yi Lihua may have become the most well-known Chinese crypto market "veteran" sniped in this round of暴跌. Arkham shows Yi Lihua's cumulative losses in this round reached $779 million, with peak losses一度 hitting $848 million.

02 Capital Backlash: The Cold Exit of Traditional Funds

"Also heavily hit in this暴跌 were some traditional investors who entered the crypto market over the past two years," Albert Luxon, a fund manager at a macro hedge fund in Singapore, told Tencent News "Insight". These traditional funds mostly entered by buying ETFs.

The US approved Bitcoin ETFs in January 2024, after which Bitcoin's price continued to rise, attracting significant traditional capital. Public data shows that US Bitcoin ETFs reached a historical peak in scale in October 2025, when the total assets under management of 12 Bitcoin ETFs were approximately $168 billion. Bitcoin's price also soared to a then all-time high, exceeding $120,000.

"Once market volatility occurs, these traditional funds will prioritize reducing their exposure to the more volatile Bitcoin assets," Albert Luxon told Tencent News "Insight".

Data confirms this. On January 29th, when markets including US stocks experienced significant波动, outflows from Bitcoin ETFs noticeably increased. Public data shows that on January 29th and 30th, during剧烈波动 in US stock and commodity markets, the net outflows from the 12 Bitcoin ETFs were $817 million and $509 million, respectively. Meanwhile, on February 4th and 5th, when Bitcoin's price暴跌, their net outflows were $544 million and $434 million, respectively.

Tencent News "Insight" learned from some private bankers that indeed many high-net-worth clients redeemed their crypto asset allocations over the past week.

03 Narrative幻灭: A New Crypto Winter After False Prosperity

Most would not deny that a new crypto winter has arrived: from Bitcoin's peak of over $120,000 in October 2025 to the current ~$68,000, the price has nearly halved.

Faced with the暴跌, investors are panicking. Explanations for the大跌 vary widely: some believe early investors have taken massive profits after experiencing a bull run; others think Bitcoin's entry into the compliant market, through products like Bitcoin ETFs, has diluted Bitcoin's scarcity; still others attribute it to "liquidity drying up"—almost a universal factor in all financial market crashes.

Allen Ding, head of research at New Huo Technology, said these explanations all have some merit, but the true core driving factor might not be a single answer. He believes the consensus itself might have diverged. In his view, some staunch believers think Bitcoin has now integrated partially into mainstream finance, achieving a certain "milestone," equivalent to "graduating from faith."

Crypto evangelist and investor Anthony Pompliano, analyzing the reasons for Bitcoin's暴跌 on Friday, stated that Bitcoin breaking through $100,000 itself was a significant "milestone."

Many industry insiders, including Allen Ding and Albert Luxon, the macro hedge fund manager in Singapore, stated that "profit-taking" was one of the key drivers of this暴跌.

They believe a large number of early investors were eager to lock in profits, gains that stemmed from the "狂热情绪" triggered by Trump's election promise to make the US the "global crypto hub," which pushed up the prices of assets like Bitcoin and Ethereum significantly.

The returns for these relatively early investors were staggering. Taking Bitcoin as an example, its price soared twofold from Trump's decision to run for office to early October 2025.

"暴跌" or "暴涨" are not uncommon in the crypto market. These seasoned从业者 told Tencent News "Insight" that this round of涨跌 is significantly different from previous ones: the bull market since 2024 has been more about "narratives" than driven by genuine industry innovation.

The Hong Kong-based entrepreneur mentioned that in the crypto market's quadrennial bull-bear cycle, the earliest in 2013 saw the birth of exchanges, 2017 saw smart contracts emerge, and 2022 saw the emergence of DeFi (Decentralized Finance) products: these innovations provided fundamental support for the previous bull runs.

However, this 2024 bull run has nothing to do with innovation; it's primarily "narrative-driven."

He cited examples, from the initial "Trump narrative" to the MSTR treasury model, none of which changed the fundamentals. While Trump did indicate major policies after taking office, the market overlooked the fact that the Trump family was掠夺式地 "sucking money" from the market using cryptocurrency. The treasury company model created by Michael Saylor (the MSTR model), where a listed company buys Bitcoin as an asset, led MicroStrategy to hold over 710,000 Bitcoins. This indeed drove up the stock price and the coin price, with the company's market cap一度 exceeding $1.2 trillion, but this model is unsustainable—the company lost over $120 billion in the last quarter alone.

Tencent News "Insight" learned that in August 2025, top Chinese crypto富豪 like Changpeng Zhao (CZ) and Li Lin were eager to try this model but先后 abandoned it by October 2025.

"Without innovation, relying solely on narratives cannot sustain a prolonged bull market. But they also cannot judge how long a bear market without new narrative接力 will last."

Some more optimistic individuals believe this winter might end faster than previous ones. Currently, aside from Yi Lihua, no other top富豪 or major companies have collapsed or are in crisis, nor are there charges of regulatory violations against institutions—such situations have多次 triggered investor trust crises in past market crashes.

Bitcoin's biggest bull, Michael Saylor, told investors on February 6th that the only way to cope with the current downturn is to hold on—ignore the market volatility—and need to look at the full 4-year cycle.

On February 7th, Bitcoin's price slightly recovered to $68,000, still near its lows over the past two-plus years. This winter will not end shortly, and Bitcoin still has a long way to go before reaching its next milestone of breaking $100,000.

But some bargain-hunting funds have already started acting. Tencent News "Insight" learned that a Hong Kong-based fund began entering the market to buy the dip on February 6th, though the specific scale is unknown. Additionally, New Huo Technology, which provides crypto asset private banking services in Hong Kong, has received many inquiries about buying over the past 2 days.

Preguntas relacionadas

QWho is Yilihua and what was his significant loss in the cryptocurrency market crash?

AYilihua is a veteran in the cryptocurrency circle who suffered a catastrophic loss of approximately $700 million by liquidating 400,000 Ethereum within a week during the market crash.

QWhat was identified as the immediate trigger for the sharp decline in Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies?

AThe immediate trigger was the flash crash in silver and gold prices, which accelerated the downturn in cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin.

QWhich companies or individuals, besides Yilihua, were mentioned as suffering significant paper losses in the crash?

AMichael Saylor's MicroStrategy had a paper loss of about $124 billion, and Tom Lee's Bitmine had a paper loss of approximately $60 billion.

QWhat key factor is cited as different about this bull market compared to previous ones, making it less sustainable?

AThis bull market was primarily driven by narratives, such as Trump's pro-crypto policies and MicroStrategy's treasury model, rather than substantive technological innovations like those seen in previous cycles.

QHow did traditional institutional investors, who entered via ETFs, behave during the market volatility?

ATraditional institutional investors prioritized reducing their exposure to volatile cryptocurrency assets, leading to significant outflows from Bitcoin ETFs during periods of market stress.

Lecturas Relacionadas

Sequoia Dialogue with Jensen Huang: Computing Model Undergoes a 60-Year Transformation; You Won't Be Replaced by AI, But You Will Be Dimensionality-Reduced by 'Those Who Master AI'

NVIDIA founder and CEO Jensen Huang, in a conversation with Sequoia Capital's Konstantine Buhler, argues that we are witnessing the most significant computing shift in 60 years—from retrieval-based to generative computing. Instead of just storing and retrieving data, future systems will generate highly personalized content (text, images, video) on demand, powered by massive "AI factories." Huang envisions a global "intelligence network" that will envelop the planet, following the historical patterns of energy and communication grids. He outlines a five-layer investment framework: 1) Energy, 2) Chips/Computers, 3) Infrastructure (data centers), 4) AI Models, and 5) Applications. He predicts this ecosystem will reach a scale of $20 trillion annually. Crucially, Huang pushes back against fears of AI-driven job loss. He distinguishes between specific "tasks" (e.g., typing, analyzing images) and overall "jobs" (e.g., CEO, radiologist). While AI automates tasks, it increases efficiency and demand for the higher-value problem-solving aspects of professions, thus creating more jobs and "up-leveling" careers. The real risk, he asserts, is not being replaced by AI, but being outperformed by someone who effectively leverages it. He urges everyone to embrace AI as a tool for augmented capability and innovation.

marsbitHace 6 min(s)

Sequoia Dialogue with Jensen Huang: Computing Model Undergoes a 60-Year Transformation; You Won't Be Replaced by AI, But You Will Be Dimensionality-Reduced by 'Those Who Master AI'

marsbitHace 6 min(s)

"I Don't Need a Better Model Anymore": A Panorama of AI Users Under a Reddit Hot Post

Titled "I Don't Need a Better Model Anymore": AI User Reactions on Reddit Anthropic recently released Claude Fable 5, its first publicly available 'Mythos'-tier model, achieving 80.3% on the SWE-Bench Pro benchmark and significantly outperforming its predecessor and competitors. However, a viral Reddit post titled "Claude Fable made me realize I don't need better models anymore" highlighted a growing user sentiment of "good enough." Top comments expressed "model fatigue," with users stating that earlier models like Opus 4.5/4.8 already sufficed for their workflows. High cost was a key concern, as Fable 5's API is nearly twice the price of Opus 4.8, with users questioning the return on investment and suggesting the field has hit a plateau. The most frequent complaint targeted Fable 5's stringent safety filters. Designed to intercept high-risk requests (e.g., cybersecurity), the system was perceived as overly conservative. Users reported frequent rejections for routine security-related tasks, leading to automatic fallbacks to the older Opus model. Paying users were particularly frustrated, feeling they paid a premium for a less usable product. Dissenting voices came from users with heavy, complex tasks. For workloads like high-energy physics simulations with thousands of code lines, Fable 5's improved long-context understanding and error detection represented a significant, worthwhile leap—described as moving from a "college player to an NBA starter." The debate underscores a divergence between benchmark performance and practical utility. For most users, current models meet their needs, making further advances relevant only for extreme use-cases. The discussion also raised concerns about a potential "Public AI Freeze," where the most powerful models (like the restricted Mythos 5) remain exclusive to enterprises and governments, while public offerings stagnate. The launch presents two report cards: one of technical excellence and another of user skepticism. Fable 5's ultimate reception may depend on Anthropic's ability to refine its safety filters and justify its cost for specialized, high-demand users.

marsbitHace 13 min(s)

"I Don't Need a Better Model Anymore": A Panorama of AI Users Under a Reddit Hot Post

marsbitHace 13 min(s)

When AI Traffic Surpasses Humans, How Do You Prove You're Human?

With AI-generated web traffic surpassing human activity, websites face a crisis as AI agents bypass ads, avoid clicks, and scrape data without generating revenue. This disrupts the ad-based internet economy, diverting traffic and reducing site visits. In response, sites are blocking AI crawlers and deploying traps like Cloudflare's "honeypot" pages. Traditional CAPTCHAs are now ineffective against advanced AI. The focus has shifted to behavioral biometrics—analyzing unique human patterns such as cursor movement, typing rhythm, and keystroke dynamics. Companies like IBM and BioCatch use this data to distinguish humans from bots, even detecting fraud through behavioral inconsistencies. Two competing approaches aim to verify human identity centrally. Sam Altman’s World (formerly Worldcoin) uses iris scanning to create unique credentials, though it faces privacy concerns and regulatory bans. Alternatively, cryptographic zero-knowledge proofs offer anonymous verification without revealing personal data, championed by Vitalik Buterin to avoid centralized surveillance. However, both systems have flaws. Centralized solutions risk biometric data misuse, while decentralized models may be exploited through identity rental markets in economically unequal regions. Despite challenges, the author favors cryptographic methods for preserving privacy over pervasive behavioral monitoring that permanently captures and controls personal biometric data.

marsbitHace 22 min(s)

When AI Traffic Surpasses Humans, How Do You Prove You're Human?

marsbitHace 22 min(s)

2026 Landscape of Decentralized AI: Why is Blockchain the Inevitable "Antidote" for AI?

**The 2026 Landscape of Decentralized AI: Why Blockchain is the "Cure" AI Cannot Ignore** Decentralized AI addresses fundamental bottlenecks of centralized AI: scarce and expensive computational resources, excessive control concentration, unverifiable model outputs, and increasing difficulty in acquiring training data due to privacy and regulation. Blockchain offers a path to make intelligence open, verifiable, and economically accessible. The technical stack comprises three layers: 1. **Applications & Services**: The main crypto use cases are "Agentic Finance" (converting natural language into on-chain actions) and "Agentic Payments" for machine-to-machine commerce. Projects like Giza, Infinity Labs, Coinvest AI, and x402 (handling 173M+ transactions) are key players. 2. **Middleware**: This coordination layer enables agents to discover, identify, and transact. Notable projects include Gokite AI (specialized L1), Virtuals (an OS for the agent economy), and especially Bittensor—a network of specialized subnets forming competitive AI micro-economies. 3. **Infrastructure**: The capital-intensive layer providing raw resources. It includes decentralized compute (Akash, Render, Aethir), verifiable inference (Venice AI, OpenGradient), distributed training (Prime Intellect, Templar AI), decentralized storage (Filecoin, Walrus), and privacy/verification layers (Nillion, Arcium, Phala Network) using technologies like ZKPs, MPC, and TEEs. The outlook for 2026-2027 indicates AI demand outpacing infrastructure, with AI agents as a primary growth engine. Computation is becoming an asset class, with on-chain markets as its financial layer. Tokenomics is emerging as a structural advantage for coordinating capital, compute, and data in decentralized AI networks. While still early—with adoption uneven and revenue often trailing token incentives—projects like Bittensor, NEAR, and Virtuals demonstrate a shift from speculative narrative to a new model for coordinating intelligence.

marsbitHace 25 min(s)

2026 Landscape of Decentralized AI: Why is Blockchain the Inevitable "Antidote" for AI?

marsbitHace 25 min(s)

a16z Crypto Partner: Cash Flow is the Moat

Cash Flow as the Moat: A Playbook for Crypto Founders Historically, the most enduring businesses have been built by positioning themselves within the "flow of funds"—facilitating the creation and transfer of value in a network and extracting a portion of it. Cryptocurrency is the first modern technology natively built for this purpose. For startups, failing to architect products and businesses to leverage these principles means missing a major opportunity. Blockchains are inherently network businesses. Each transaction settles on a shared ledger, and every new participant strengthens the underlying network for all. Well-designed network tokens amplify this by aligning users, developers, and validators around growing the network, with value flowing back to contributors in a transparent feedback loop. This model is not new; companies from railroads and Standard Oil to Google, Meta, and AWS have thrived by inserting themselves into critical flows of value (goods, attention, compute). Financial markets make it even clearer: firms like Visa and major market makers generate immense revenue not by predicting markets but by being in the path of transactions. The combination of fund flow and network effects creates one of the most durable business structures. The high margins in traditional finance (payments, custody, lending, FX) represent prime targets. Crypto founders have the opportunity to build the next version—programmable, instant, global, and natively in the flow of funds. The frontier extends beyond finance to areas like computing/GPUs, AI training data, energy, robotics, and space—markets without entrenched intermediaries, ripe for building new, efficient value rails on programmable infrastructure. Founders should ask: Are you in the flow of funds today? Does your revenue scale 10x with the value of activity on your platform? Where in your target market are profit margins highest relative to value created? The opportunity is clear: embed your startup into the new flows of value and let the network effects accumulate.

marsbitHace 27 min(s)

a16z Crypto Partner: Cash Flow is the Moat

marsbitHace 27 min(s)

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片