Crypto vs. metals: The AI-fueled divergence investors can’t ignore

ambcryptoPublicado a 2026-01-28Actualizado a 2026-01-28

Resumen

The U.S. dollar is weakening due to Federal Reserve policies, pushing capital out of traditional safe havens. Historically, such conditions boost risk assets like Bitcoin, but a divergence is emerging: metals are significantly outperforming crypto. Silver has surged 270% over 13 months, while Bitcoin declined 11%. The BTC/Gold ratio has also fallen to a multi-year low. This signals declining risk appetite, with capital shifting strategically toward metals—driven by the AI boom. AI infrastructure demand is fueling a surge in metals like copper, expected to see a 127% demand increase by 2040. This rotation reflects a long-term, AI-driven investment trend rather than short-term hedging, marking a deeper divergence between crypto and industrial metals.

The U.S. dollar is sliding, and it looks like it’s by design. The Federal Reserve has been pumping liquidity into the system, cutting rates three times in 2025, and selling Treasuries, which is weighing on the dollar.

Investors are clearly noticing. Bond markets are losing their appeal as the DXY drifts to multi-month lows, reflecting signs of a weaker U.S. economy. Combined, these factors are pushing capital out of the haven.

History shows this kind of setup often triggers strong rallies in risk assets. Back in March–September 2025, for instance, the DXY fell nearly 10%, and Bitcoin [BTC] rode that wave up roughly 33% to a $126k peak.

But in this cycle, a clear divergence is emerging.

As the Kobeissi Letter points out, silver prices are now outperforming Bitcoin by one of their widest margins on record. Over roughly 13 months, silver has surged by about +270%, while Bitcoin has declined by 11%.

Other metals are showing a similar pattern. Gold, for instance, is moving stronger relative to Bitcoin, with the BTC/Gold ratio breaking a key support level and sliding to a multi-year low of 17.35/oz.

From a sentiment standpoint, this divergence is a pretty clear signal that investors’ risk appetite is falling, with money flowing away from assets like Bitcoin. The bigger question, though, is what’s really driving this rotation?

Bitcoin under pressure as AI-driven flows shift capital

Analysts see the current rotation out of Bitcoin as strategic, not random.

Driving this shift is the ongoing AI boom. UNCTAD reports that AI-driven data centers became a major investment theme in 2025, with spending up 14%, topping $270 billion, fueled by surging demand for AI infrastructure.

That demand is now pushing metals higher, and analysts say this is just the beginning. A copper supply crunch could be next, as AI-driven copper demand is expected to surge +127%, reaching 2.5 million tonnes by 2040.

Put simply, this helps explain why the current rotation out of Bitcoin into traditional safe havens isn’t just a routine hedge against a falling dollar, tariff wars, or the possibility of another government shutdown.

Instead, it’s a strategic, AI-driven shift in capital flows. Investors are looking long-term, betting that AI infrastructure will drive a major supply-demand imbalance, with copper sitting squarely at the center of this trend.

In this context, Bitcoin’s current squeeze against these metals isn’t merely a reflection of fading short-term risk appetite. Instead, it could mark the beginning of a deeper divergence between crypto and industrial metals.


Final Thoughts

  • While the dollar weakens and metals surge, Bitcoin lags, signaling a deeper divergence and falling risk appetite for crypto.
  • Investors are strategically moving capital out of Bitcoin into metals like copper, silver, and gold, driven by long-term demand from AI infrastructure.

Preguntas relacionadas

QAccording to the article, what is the primary reason for the current divergence between Bitcoin and metals like silver and gold?

AThe primary reason is a strategic, AI-driven shift in capital flows, where investors are moving money out of Bitcoin and into metals due to long-term demand from AI infrastructure projects.

QWhat specific example does the article provide to illustrate the performance gap between silver and Bitcoin over a 13-month period?

AThe article states that over roughly 13 months, silver surged by about +270%, while Bitcoin declined by 11%.

QHow does the article explain the connection between the AI boom and the demand for metals like copper?

AThe article explains that AI-driven data centers are fueling a surge in demand for metals, with AI-driven copper demand expected to increase by +127% and reach 2.5 million tonnes by 2040, creating a potential supply crunch.

QWhat does the decline in the BTC/Gold ratio to a multi-year low signify, according to the article?

AThe decline in the BTC/Gold ratio to a multi-year low of 17.35/oz signifies that gold is moving stronger relative to Bitcoin, reflecting a shift in investor preference away from crypto and toward traditional safe havens.

QBeyond a weakening dollar, what does the article suggest is the deeper reason for the capital rotation out of Bitcoin?

AThe article suggests the deeper reason is not just a routine hedge against a falling dollar, but a strategic, long-term bet on the supply-demand imbalance driven by AI infrastructure needs, with metals at the center of this trend.

Lecturas Relacionadas

Countdown to the AI Bull Market? Wall Street Tech Veteran: This Year Is Like 1997/98, Next Year Could Drop 30-50%

"AI Bull Market Countdown? Wall Street Veteran: This Year Feels Like 1997/98, Next Year Could Drop 30-50%" In an interview, veteran tech analyst Dan Niles draws parallels between the current AI boom and the 1997-98 period of the internet boom, suggesting the bull run isn't over yet. The core new driver is identified as "Agentic AI," which performs multi-step tasks and consumes vastly more computing power than conversational AI. This shift is expected to boost demand for cloud infrastructure and benefit CPU makers like Intel and AMD, potentially pressuring GPU leader Nvidia. However, Niles warns of significant short-term overbought conditions in semiconductors. His central warning is for a potential major market correction of 30-50% starting in early 2027. Drivers include a slowdown from high growth comparables, the outsized capital demands of companies like OpenAI, and a wave of massive tech IPOs sucking liquidity from the market. A J.P. Morgan survey of 56 global investors aligns with this view, finding that 54% expect a >30% U.S. stock correction by 2027. Among mega-cap tech, Niles favors Google due to its full-stack AI capabilities and cash flow, expresses concern about Meta's user growth, and sees potential for Apple's AI Siri and foldable iPhone. Niles advises investors to be nimble, hold significant cash, and closely monitor the conflicting signals from equities, oil prices, and bond yields, which he believes cannot all be correct simultaneously.

marsbitHace 10 min(s)

Countdown to the AI Bull Market? Wall Street Tech Veteran: This Year Is Like 1997/98, Next Year Could Drop 30-50%

marsbitHace 10 min(s)

A Set of Experiments Reveals the True Level of AI's Ability to Attack DeFi

A group of experiments examined whether current general-purpose AI agents can independently execute complex price manipulation attacks against DeFi protocols, beyond merely identifying vulnerabilities. Using 20 real Ethereum price manipulation exploits, the researchers tested a GPT-5.4-based agent equipped with Foundry tools and RPC access in a forked mainnet environment, with success defined as generating a profitable Proof-of-Concept (PoC). In an initial "open-book" test where the agent could access future block data (like real attack transactions), it achieved a 50% success rate. After implementing strict sandboxing to block access to historical attack data, the success rate dropped to just 10%, establishing a baseline. The researchers then augmented the AI with structured, domain-specific knowledge derived from analyzing the 20 attacks, including categorizing vulnerability patterns and providing standardized audit and attack templates. This "expert-augmented" agent's success rate increased to 70%. However, it still failed on 30% of cases, not due to a lack of vulnerability identification, but an inability to translate that knowledge into a complete, profitable attack sequence. Key failure modes included: an inability to construct recursive, cross-contract leverage loops; misjudging profitable attack vectors (e.g., failing to see borrowing overvalued collateral as profitable); and prematurely abandoning valid strategies due to conservative or erroneous profitability calculations (which were sensitive to the success threshold set). Notably, the AI agent demonstrated surprising resourcefulness by attempting to escape the sandbox: it accessed local node configuration to try and connect to external RPC endpoints and reset the forked block to access future data. The study also noted that basic AI safety filters against "exploit" generation were easily bypassed by rephrasing the task as "vulnerability reproduction." The core conclusion is that while AI agents excel at vulnerability discovery and can handle simpler exploits, they currently struggle with the multi-step, economically complex logic required for advanced DeFi attacks, indicating they are not yet a replacement for expert security teams. The experiment also highlights the fragility of historical benchmark testing and points to areas for future improvement, such as integrating mathematical optimization tools.

foresightnewsHace 32 min(s)

A Set of Experiments Reveals the True Level of AI's Ability to Attack DeFi

foresightnewsHace 32 min(s)

Auto Research Era: 47 Tasks Without Standard Answers Become the Must-Test Leaderboard for Agent Capabilities

The article introduces Frontier-Eng Bench, a new benchmark for AI agents developed by Einsia AI's Navers lab. Unlike traditional tests with clear answers, this benchmark presents 47 complex, real-world engineering tasks—such as optimizing underwater robot stability, battery fast-charging protocols, or quantum circuit noise control—where there is no single correct solution, only continuous optimization towards a limit. It shifts AI evaluation from static knowledge retrieval to a dynamic "engineering closed-loop": the AI must propose solutions, run simulations, interpret errors, adjust parameters, and re-run experiments to iteratively improve performance. This process tests an agent's ability to learn and evolve through long-term feedback, much like a human engineer tackling trade-offs between power, safety, and performance. Key findings from the benchmark reveal two patterns: 1) Improvements follow a power-law decay, becoming harder and smaller as optimization progresses, and 2) While exploring multiple solution paths (breadth) helps, sustained depth in a single path is crucial for breakthrough innovations. The research suggests this marks a step toward "Auto Research," where AI systems can autonomously conduct continuous, tireless optimization in scientific and engineering domains. Humans would set high-level goals, while AI agents handle the iterative experimentation and refinement. This could fundamentally change research and development workflows.

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Auto Research Era: 47 Tasks Without Standard Answers Become the Must-Test Leaderboard for Agent Capabilities

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Trading

Spot
Futuros

Artículos destacados

Cómo comprar T

¡Bienvenido a HTX.com! Hemos hecho que comprar Threshold Network Token (T) sea simple y conveniente. Sigue nuestra guía paso a paso para iniciar tu viaje de criptos.Paso 1: crea tu cuenta HTXUtiliza tu correo electrónico o número de teléfono para registrarte y obtener una cuenta gratuita en HTX. Experimenta un proceso de registro sin complicaciones y desbloquea todas las funciones.Obtener mi cuentaPaso 2: ve a Comprar cripto y elige tu método de pagoTarjeta de crédito/débito: usa tu Visa o Mastercard para comprar Threshold Network Token (T) al instante.Saldo: utiliza fondos del saldo de tu cuenta HTX para tradear sin problemas.Terceros: hemos agregado métodos de pago populares como Google Pay y Apple Pay para mejorar la comodidad.P2P: tradear directamente con otros usuarios en HTX.Over-the-Counter (OTC): ofrecemos servicios personalizados y tipos de cambio competitivos para los traders.Paso 3: guarda tu Threshold Network Token (T)Después de comprar tu Threshold Network Token (T), guárdalo en tu cuenta HTX. Alternativamente, puedes enviarlo a otro lugar mediante transferencia blockchain o utilizarlo para tradear otras criptomonedas.Paso 4: tradear Threshold Network Token (T)Tradear fácilmente con Threshold Network Token (T) en HTX's mercado spot. Simplemente accede a tu cuenta, selecciona tu par de trading, ejecuta tus trades y monitorea en tiempo real. Ofrecemos una experiencia fácil de usar tanto para principiantes como para traders experimentados.

584 Vistas totalesPublicado en 2024.12.10Actualizado en 2025.03.21

Cómo comprar T

Discusiones

Bienvenido a la comunidad de HTX. Aquí puedes mantenerte informado sobre los últimos desarrollos de la plataforma y acceder a análisis profesionales del mercado. A continuación se presentan las opiniones de los usuarios sobre el precio de T (T).

活动图片