Crypto Hacks Drop to $26.5M in February Amid Security Gains

TheNewsCryptoPublicado a 2026-03-02Actualizado a 2026-03-02

Resumen

Crypto hacks and scams plummeted to a multi-year low in February, totaling approximately $26.5 million across 15 incidents. This represents a significant 69.2% decrease from January's $86 million in losses. The two largest attacks accounted for the majority: a $10 million price manipulation hack on YieldBlox’s lending pool and an $8.9 million private key exploit on IoTeX. Security firm PeckShield attributed the sharp decline to a lack of "mega-hacks" and a shift in focus due to market volatility. Analysts suggest capital is becoming more selective, rewarding protocols with stronger security, and that improved risk controls, audits, and AI-powered tools are contributing to a broader trend of enhanced crypto security.

Last month recorded the lowest level of crypto hacks and scams since March 2025, having $26.5 million stolen since February, as reported by the blockchain security company PeckShield.

Around 15 cases were reported in the month, in which two accounted for the majority of the losses, with the biggest accounting for the $10 million theft from YieldBlox’s DAO-managed lending pool through a price manipulation hack on February 21, as reported by PeckShield at X on March 1.

The second-biggest hack targeted the decentralised identity protocol IoTeX, which lost around $8.9 million to a private key exploit on Feb 21. In total, February indicates a 69.2% month-on-month fall from January, which listed more than $86 million in losses.

What Did the Spokesperson Mention?

A spokesperson from PeckShield mentioned that mega-hacks, like the $1.5 billion Bybit hack in February last year, did not inflate last month’s statistics, and market volatility resulted in a significant cooling period in exploit activity.

The spokesperson further mentioned that a sharp market correction in early February, having Bitcoin slip below $70,000, moved the focus of the industry toward institutional deleveraging and math-based sell-offs.

At the time of high-volatility periods, the tactical aim mostly shifts away from protocol exploits toward navigating market liquidity. Dominick John, a Kronos Research analyst, mentioned that the shift could also show tighter risk controls, stronger counterparty standards and amplified real-time monitoring over major venues.

He further went on, mentioning that Capital is shifting to become more selective, rewarding protocols with mature security frameworks. John mentioned losses could carry on to slip by the year as audits, monitoring, and institutional risk frameworks mature.

AI might also intensify the shift, backing automated code reviews, anomaly detection, and pre-deployment attack simulations to catch vulnerabilities earlier in the lifecycle. Crypto security is intensifying, and protocols are doubling down on audits, formal verification, and real-time monitoring.

Highlighted Crypto News Today:

Will AAVE Reset Monthly Momentum or Lose Steam and Remain in the Red?

TagsBybitCrypto AttackHack

Preguntas relacionadas

QWhat was the total amount stolen in crypto hacks and scams in February, as reported by PeckShield?

A$26.5 million.

QWhich two major hacks accounted for the majority of the losses in February, and what were the amounts?

AThe $10 million theft from YieldBlox’s DAO-managed lending pool and the $8.9 million hack targeting the IoTeX protocol.

QWhat was the month-on-month percentage decrease in crypto losses from January to February?

AA 69.2% decrease.

QAccording to the spokesperson, what factor contributed to a significant cooling period in exploit activity?

AMarket volatility.

QHow might AI contribute to improving crypto security, as mentioned in the article?

ABy backing automated code reviews, anomaly detection, and pre-deployment attack simulations to catch vulnerabilities earlier.

Lecturas Relacionadas

'Backstabbing' or 'Win-Win'? How Likely Is TradeXYZ to Break Away from Hyperliquid and Go Solo?

The article discusses the growing debate over whether TradeXYZ, which dominates Hyperliquid's HIP-3 market with over 90% of its volume, might break away to build its own independent trading platform. This possibility is fueled by TradeXYZ's immense market influence and the common industry trend of successful projects seeking more control and profit capture. Key arguments for a potential split include TradeXYZ's overwhelming contribution to Hyperliquid's metrics and the financial incentive to retain all transaction fees, as it currently splits them 50/50 with Hyperliquid. The piece draws parallels to other cases, like Anthropic's "Claude Code" competing with its former partner Cursor, suggesting "betrayal" can occur when business leverage shifts. However, strong counterarguments suggest a split is unlikely or would be detrimental. TradeXYZ relies on Hyperliquid's high-performance infrastructure and its platform as a primary user acquisition channel. Building a comparable system would be challenging. Furthermore, the founders of both projects share a history of trust and mutual admiration. The analysis concludes that a separation would likely be a lose-lose scenario: Hyperliquid would lose a major growth narrative and trading volume, while TradeXYZ would face technical hurdles, user migration issues, and reputational damage, potentially allowing competitors to seize market share. The most rational path is seen as continued collaboration, with TradeXYZ potentially negotiating better terms while leveraging Hyperliquid's established strengths.

marsbitHace 4 min(s)

'Backstabbing' or 'Win-Win'? How Likely Is TradeXYZ to Break Away from Hyperliquid and Go Solo?

marsbitHace 4 min(s)

The Artificial Intelligence Economy Could Accelerate the Establishment of Dominance for Dollar-Pegged Stablecoins

Economists from the ASEAN+3 Macroeconomic Research Office (AMRO) suggest that the winner in the artificial intelligence (AI) race may not be the country developing the most powerful AI model, but the one whose currency underpins these models and their infrastructure. Their thesis outlines a potential cycle where AI-related costs—such as energy for data centers, infrastructure, and usage fees—are denominated in U.S. dollars. As AI grows into a massive industry, this could significantly increase global demand for U.S. dollar liquidity (first channel of dollar dominance). A second channel involves the currency used for payments between AI agents, expected to become widespread in logistics, inventory, and treasury management. Dollar-pegged stablecoins could provide the programmable settlements required for such agent commerce. These two channels may converge, creating a self-reinforcing "dollar loop" where AI computational payments are settled in stablecoins. Stablecoins could gain an early advantage over alternatives like CBDCs due to existing network effects, further entrenching dollar dominance. This would also boost demand for U.S. Treasury bonds used as collateral for stablecoin reserves. The report warns ASEAN+3 nations of over-reliance on this dollar loop and suggests developing regional data centers and tokenized money based on local currencies to participate in the AI economy without reinforcing dollar dependency.

cryptonews.ruHace 7 min(s)

The Artificial Intelligence Economy Could Accelerate the Establishment of Dominance for Dollar-Pegged Stablecoins

cryptonews.ruHace 7 min(s)

Base Claims Its Distribution Advantage Can Outlast Robinhood Chain's Initial Surge

Base, a layer-2 blockchain, argues that its established distribution network will outlast Robinhood Chain's initial popularity surge. While Robinhood Chain quickly attracted 230,000 daily active users and over $9 billion in DEX volume (primarily from meme coins) shortly after launch, its core feature of tokenized stocks saw minimal use. Base acknowledged shortcomings in focusing on social blockchain products and lagging in areas like perpetual contracts, predictions markets, and on-chain tokenized stocks—a move Robinhood got right. In response, Base highlights its nearly three-year head start in building infrastructure. It emphasizes its x402 payment protocol, which has processed 187.8 million agent payments, its $3.9 billion in stablecoin deposits (mostly USDC), and its integration with partners like Visa, Shopify, and JPMorgan for institutional and merchant settlements. Base contends these capabilities for corporate payments and stablecoin liquidity represent a more durable and defensible ecosystem than Robinhood's retail trading metrics. Coinbase plans to launch its own on-chain, share-backed tokenized stocks on Base, which would directly challenge Robinhood's key differentiating feature. Base's strategy bets that its deep-rooted distribution and institutional partnerships will prove harder to overcome than Robinhood's early, meme-driven volume, which may fade after the initial launch hype.

cryptonews.ruHace 9 min(s)

Base Claims Its Distribution Advantage Can Outlast Robinhood Chain's Initial Surge

cryptonews.ruHace 9 min(s)

Trading

Spot
活动图片