Confidential LIBRA Advisory Agreement Between Co‑Creator And President Milei Revealed

bitcoinistPublicado a 2026-03-04Actualizado a 2026-03-04

Resumen

A new chapter has unfolded in the LIBRA cryptocurrency scandal involving Argentine President Javier Milei. Judicial findings reveal a draft "confidential agreement" allegedly signed by Milei and LIBRA co-creator Hayden Mark Davis on January 30, 2025—two weeks before the token's launch. The document was discovered on devices seized from lobbyist Mauricio Novelli, a key figure in the case and close associate of Milei. This contradicts Milei’s earlier denials of any formal agreement with Davis. The token’s value surged after Milei’s public endorsement on February 14, 2025, but subsequently collapsed, causing an estimated $251 million in investor losses. Forensic experts also noted significant data deletion from Novelli’s devices, including missing communications with Cardano founder Charles Hoskinson, who previously accused Novelli of soliciting payments for a meeting with Milei. The investigation continues amid allegations of corruption and fraud.

A new chapter has unfolded in the ongoing LIBRA cryptocurrency scandal, as fresh judicial findings suggest that the relationship between Argentine President Javier Milei and LIBRA co-creator Hayden Mark Davis may have been closer than previously acknowledged.

The controversy traces back to February 14, 2025, when President Milei publicly promoted the LIBRA token. The endorsement triggered a rapid surge in the cryptocurrency’s price, followed by a collapse that wiped out an estimated $251 million in investor funds.

Now, according to local media reports citing court sources, computer forensics experts from Argentina’s Public Prosecutor’s Office have identified draft versions of a “confidential agreement” allegedly signed by Milei and Davis on January 30, 2025 — two weeks before LIBRA’s launch and subsequent crash.

LIBRA Deal Amid Milei Denials

The drafts were discovered on at least one electronic device seized from Argentine lobbyist Mauricio Novelli, a central figure in the case and a close associate of the president since the end of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Federal prosecutor Eduardo Taiano ordered the seizure of Novelli’s devices as part of the investigation. Experts later reported that the draft agreement appeared in exchanges between Novelli and Davis, suggesting efforts to finalize the document before it was formally executed.

The existence of such drafts stands in tension with Milei’s public denials. In multiple interviews following the scandal in February 2025, the president rejected claims that he had signed any agreement with Davis and sought to distance himself from the LIBRA operation.

Further details emerged in a January 9 ruling issued by the Directorate of Technological Support for Criminal Investigations (Datip), a specialized forensic unit within the Public Prosecutor’s Office.

According to the ruling, several copies of the draft “confidential agreement” were located during the forensic review of Novelli’s communications with Davis. The exchanges appeared to relate to preparations for the document’s eventual signing by the president.

Alleged Payment Requests Surface

The Datip report further underscored Novelli’s central role in the LIBRA affair. Investigators described him as a key intermediary connecting multiple actors.

His communications included exchanges with President Milei and Karina Milei, as well as with Davis, Terrones Godoy, Morales, and Julian Peh, the Singaporean CEO of KIP Protocol.

However, the forensic examination was hindered by significant data deletion. Experts informed Prosecutor Taiano that numerous messages, files, and even entire conversations had been permanently erased from devices belonging to Novelli and other defendants.

Among the missing exchanges were communications between Novelli and Cardano (ADA) founder Charles Hoskinson. After the LIBRA collapse, Hoskinson publicly accused Novelli and Terrones Godoy of demanding five-figure dollar payments in exchange for arranging a meeting with President Milei during the Tech Forum.

According to Hoskinson, they suggested that “magical things would happen” if he agreed. He declined. Investigators were unable to recover those deleted conversations in full.

The daily chart shows the total crypto market cap at $2.3 trillion. Source: TOTAL on TradingView.com

Featured image from BBC, chart from TradingView.com

Preguntas relacionadas

QWhat is the central allegation revealed by the judicial findings regarding President Milei and LIBRA co-creator Hayden Mark Davis?

AThe judicial findings allege that Argentine President Javier Milei and LIBRA co-creator Hayden Mark Davis signed a 'confidential agreement' on January 30, 2025, two weeks before the token's launch and subsequent crash, contradicting the president's public denials.

QWhat event triggered the LIBRA price surge and subsequent collapse that caused significant investor losses?

APresident Milei's public promotion of the LIBRA token on February 14, 2025, triggered a rapid price surge followed by a collapse that wiped out an estimated $251 million in investor funds.

QWho is Mauricio Novelli and what key evidence was found on his electronic devices?

AMauricio Novelli is an Argentine lobbyist and close associate of President Milei. Forensic experts found draft versions of the 'confidential agreement' between Milei and Davis on his seized electronic devices, within communications between Novelli and Davis.

QWhat significant obstacle did investigators face during the forensic examination of the devices?

AThe forensic examination was hindered by significant data deletion, where numerous messages, files, and entire conversations had been permanently erased from devices belonging to Novelli and other defendants.

QWhat allegation did Charles Hoskinson, founder of Cardano (ADA), make regarding Mauricio Novelli and Terrones Godoy?

ACharles Hoskinson accused Mauricio Novelli and Terrones Godoy of demanding five-figure dollar payments in exchange for arranging a meeting with President Milei during the Tech Forum, suggesting that 'magical things would happen' if he agreed, which he declined.

Lecturas Relacionadas

pump.fun's New Feature Brings 'Black Mirror' Into Reality

The article begins by recounting a dark fictional story from *Black Mirror* (Season 7, Episode 1 "Common People"), where a man is forced to perform humiliating tasks online to pay for his wife's life-sustaining medical subscription. It then draws a parallel to a new real-world feature on the crypto platform pump.fun called "Pump.fun Go," which allows users to post and complete paid bounty tasks. This feature gained mainstream attention, often negatively, through extreme examples. A prominent case involved a bounty of 40 SOL (~$2,600) offered to permanently tattoo "$bountywork" on one's forehead. An Indian man completed the task, stating the money "changed his life," and later earned significantly more from a related meme coin. Another bounty paid 200 SOL (~$14,000) for a "bounty.fun" forehead tattoo, with the participant simply stating, "We need the money." The article highlights how this system can amplify darkness, citing the dev behind $Bountywork who spent thousands on bounties for attention-grabbing stunts like eating bugs or drinking hot sauce for small sums. It compares this to past tragic live-streaming incidents where people harmed themselves for money, noting regulation cannot stop those in desperate need. However, it also points to positive, altruistic bounties that have emerged, such as organizing anti-work rallies in New York, performing random acts of kindness for strangers, organizing community food drives, or even helping an elderly person cross the street. The piece concludes by acknowledging the platform reflects both the dark and light sides of human nature when actions are given a price, hoping for more of the latter.

marsbitHace 6 min(s)

pump.fun's New Feature Brings 'Black Mirror' Into Reality

marsbitHace 6 min(s)

As the US and Japan Hike Interest Rates, Which Asset Class is Most at Risk?

This week, global markets face two major events: the Bank of Japan's likely interest rate hike and the US Federal Reserve's FOMC meeting. For risk assets, it is a pivotal and volatile week. In the US, expectations for rate cuts have faded dramatically. May's higher-than-expected CPI and resilient jobs data have shifted the Fed's focus from potential cuts to the possibility of future hikes. New Fed Chair Wash is unlikely to raise rates at this meeting, but any hawkish shift in communication, the dot plot, or the policy statement could lead markets to price in tighter policy, pushing up short-term Treasury yields and strengthening the dollar. High-valuation growth stocks, AI-related assets, and small-cap stocks reliant on cheap funding are most vulnerable to rising rates. In Japan, a 25 basis point hike is almost fully priced in (98.3% probability), which would bring the policy rate to 1%, its highest since 1995. The concern is not the hike itself, but its potential to unwind the massive "carry trade," where investors borrowed low-yielding yen to invest globally. Historically, Japan's rate hikes have coincided with global market stress (2000, 2007, 2024). While this well-telegraphed hike may be digested smoothly, two key factors increase uncertainty: 1) Governor Ueda's absence due to illness, putting communication in the hands of less-familiar deputies, and 2) the Fed meeting occurring just days later, creating potential for a compounded market reaction if both central banks sound hawkish. Asset implications: * **Bonds:** US short-term yields sensitive to Fed signals. Japan's rate hike could pressure its massive US Treasury holdings. * **Currencies:** Dollar likely supported by Fed; Yen's reaction hinges on BoJ's forward guidance. * **Equities:** US growth stocks, small-caps most at risk. Japanese stocks face pressure from a stronger yen. * **Crypto:** Assets like Bitcoin face headwinds from higher rates and tighter liquidity; high-beta altcoins are even more vulnerable. The convergence of these two central bank meetings amplifies market volatility risks, with potential spillovers across asset classes globally.

marsbitHace 11 min(s)

As the US and Japan Hike Interest Rates, Which Asset Class is Most at Risk?

marsbitHace 11 min(s)

Data Decrypts the BTC Cycle: Three Major Bottom Signals Illuminate Simultaneously, Q4 Could Be a Crucial Turning Point Window?

"Decoding the Bitcoin Cycle: Three Bottom Signals Flash Simultaneously, Is Q4 the Key Turning Point?" The article analyzes Bitcoin's current market position, comparing it to historical cycles. BTC has corrected over 52% from its October 2025 peak of $126,198 to around $59,100 in June 2026. While significant, this drawdown is milder than the 77-86% declines seen in past bear markets. The analysis is framed within Bitcoin's four-year halving cycle. Past cycles show a pattern: prices peak 12-18 months post-halving, bottom 12-14 months after the peak, with lows typically occurring roughly 17 months before the next halving. Following the April 2024 halving and the October 2025 peak, this pattern suggests a potential bottoming window around Q4 2026, ahead of the expected 2028 halving. Three key on-chain metrics are signaling undervaluation: The MVRV Z-Score has dropped near 0.27, approaching historic bottom zones. The market price is only about 9% above the network's average realized price of ~$53,600, a rare low premium. Bitcoin's price recently touched its 200-week moving average (~$62,200), a level that aligned with bottoms in 2015, 2018, and 2020. While US spot Bitcoin ETFs saw record outflows in May/June 2026, indicating retail panic, whale addresses (holding 100+ BTC) reached a yearly high. Entities like MicroStrategy resumed buying, and long-term holders control a near-record 78% of the supply, suggesting accumulation. A major macro overhang was partially removed with a US-Iran ceasefire agreement in mid-June 2026, which eased oil prices and triggered a sharp BTC rally. However, persistent inflation means high-interest rates remain a constraint. The conclusion notes that genuine investment opportunities often arise when confidence is lowest, amidst narratives that "this time is different." While not guaranteeing an immediate bottom, the confluence of cycle timing, undervaluation signals, and shifting macro risks suggests late 2026 may be a critical period for reassessing risk/reward and patient accumulation for long-term believers.

marsbitHace 11 min(s)

Data Decrypts the BTC Cycle: Three Major Bottom Signals Illuminate Simultaneously, Q4 Could Be a Crucial Turning Point Window?

marsbitHace 11 min(s)

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片