CLARITY Act Next Up: What Happens After The Stablecoin Deal—And Why Mid-May Matters

bitcoinistPublicado a 2026-05-04Actualizado a 2026-05-04

The CLARITY Act is moving into a tight, time-sensitive phase after the Senate Banking Committee released its draft on Friday. With the stablecoin compromise text now out in the open, attention is shifting to the long-awaited next step: a Senate Banking Committee markup.

CLARITY Act Heads Toward Committee Action

As Bitcoinist reported over the weekend, under the draft, the CLARITY Act would bar crypto firms from paying customers “any form of interest or yield” for simply holding payment stablecoins—language designed to reflect how banks pay interest on deposits.

At the same time, the bill would allow companies to offer rewards or incentives, as long as those incentives are not functionally or economically equivalent to interest earned on bank deposits.

On Monday, Eleanor Terrett of Crypto In America reported that many in crypto are framing the draft as a win for banks, arguing that a broad “no yield” approach hands banks an advantage. Banks, however, appear to be concerned that the compromise may not go far enough to stop crypto companies from finding workarounds.

The sticking point is the clause aimed at preventing rewards that are “economically or functionally equivalent” to interest on bank deposits—an effort to close loopholes, but one that may still leave room for interpretation.

A Senate Banking staffer captured that frustration in remarks shared on Friday: “Time for everyone to move on from yield. Banks should not turn a modest win into a loss.”

With the stablecoin yield provision cleared, the CLARITY Act appears to be approaching its final hurdles before Chairman Tim Scott schedules a Senate Banking Committee markup.

Per the report, industry leaders believe the markup could be announced later this week and held during the week of the 11th, when Congress returns from recess. If that timeline doesn’t work, another possible window is the week of the 18th, before the Senate leaves for the Memorial Day recess.

Final Language Not Done Yet

Behind the scenes, the focus is also shifting to “finishing touches” on other parts of the legislation. Industry insiders told Crypto In America that DeFi-related provisions—specifically the Blockchain Regulatory Certainty Act (BRCA)—and protections for software developers are likely to be finalized this week.

Ethics-related issues are also still in play. Sources familiar with the process told Crypto In America that negotiations on ethics provisions are ongoing, and that talks could continue even after the CLARITY Act clears the Senate Banking Committee.

While the legislative groundwork seems to be coming together, the question remains whether the markup and eventual vote will be bipartisan. Supporters are looking for Democratic buy-in, and one DeFi industry leader told Crypto In America that the next two weeks are critical.

The leader also said that bipartisan approval is key to getting the CLARITY Act done, adding that without Democrats, the measure can’t move forward. At the same time, it’s unclear whether the process will stay along party lines, as it did in the Senate Agriculture Committee in January.

The daily chart shows the total crypto market cap valuation at $2.59 trillion as of Monday. Source: TOTAL on TradingView.com

Featured image created with OpenArt, chart from TradingView.com

Lecturas Relacionadas

QCP Capital Analysts Explained Why Bitcoin Stalled at $63,000

QCP Capital's latest report explains that Bitcoin has stalled around $63,000, testing the lower boundary of its recent trading range ($62,500–$64,000). The retreat wasn't due to a single catalyst but stems from several cross-market pressures: heightened geopolitical risks, rising oil prices, uncertainty around global liquidity, and a muted reaction to positive U.S. macroeconomic data. While U.S. inflation and jobs data softened, reducing expectations of imminent Fed tightening, Bitcoin's price response has been subdued. This highlights the importance of other factors like trader positioning, liquidity conditions, and overall risk appetite. The regulatory landscape is progressing on two tracks: congressional legislation (like the CLARITY Act) is delayed, but SEC rulemaking continues. Corporate treasury activity, exemplified by Strategy's new Bitcoin monetization program, now creates a potential two-way flow, adding complexity to supply dynamics. Geopolitical tensions around the Strait of Hormuz keep oil prices elevated, impacting crypto indirectly through inflation expectations and financial conditions. Historical seasonality shows August and September are typically weak for Bitcoin, but this is descriptive, not predictive, in today's ETF-driven market. In conclusion, Bitcoin has shown resilience by absorbing multiple negative forces without a decisive breakdown. However, it has failed to convert improving macro fundamentals into sustained upward momentum. The market awaits key events like the U.S. PCE data, the Jackson Hole symposium, and the September FOMC meeting for a potential catalyst to break the current range.

cryptonews.ruHace 3 min(s)

QCP Capital Analysts Explained Why Bitcoin Stalled at $63,000

cryptonews.ruHace 3 min(s)

Did DeepSeek Intentionally Make an Unfriendly Agent?

DeepSeek is shifting its strategy from being a low-cost model provider to building a foundational ecosystem for AI agents. This pivot is marked by two recent moves: increasing the price of its flagship V4 Pro model and launching the DeepSeek Harness agent framework. Previously, DeepSeek's success was built on creating powerful, affordable models and open-sourcing them to drive adoption. Now, the focus is moving "beyond the model" to the runtime environment where agents operate. Harness is key to this new approach. Unlike integrated agent products from competitors, Harness deconstructs the agent stack—separating the model, tools, skills, workflows, and UI into modular, replaceable components. Its core innovation is the Cordis kernel, which enables dynamic loading, unloading, and management of plugins, allowing agents to modify their own capabilities during execution. Significantly, Harness does not lock users into DeepSeek's models; it allows integration with third-party models. This suggests DeepSeek's ambition is not to control the model layer but to establish the standard runtime environment for future agents—akin to an operating system for the agent era. The V4 Pro price increase aligns with this shift: the model transitions from a loss-leading acquisition tool to a core revenue engine within a broader ecosystem. Harness is currently complex and developer-focused, prioritizing ecosystem builders over end-users. Its success will be measured not by immediate user numbers, but by the plugins, agents, and platforms built upon it. DeepSeek's long-term bet is that controlling the agent runtime will be more valuable than merely providing the underlying models, potentially redefining how AI agents are created and evolved.

marsbitHace 38 min(s)

Did DeepSeek Intentionally Make an Unfriendly Agent?

marsbitHace 38 min(s)

Metrics Ventures Market Observation: Talk is Cheap

This monthly market analysis extends its timeline to incorporate critical July comments from the Fed Chair, noting that bond markets have already priced in perceived policy shortcomings. The report observes a growing divergence: equity markets, after some deleveraging, continue a "trust-based" rally, while bond and currency markets signal persistent distrust. Precious metals bottoming suggests a central bank consensus that the era of "competitive currency devaluation" is ending, with verbal interventions losing power. Looking forward to Q3-Q4, the analysis remains bullish on supply-constrained global resources like copper and power, as well as gold, which prices ongoing monetary失信. It argues that digital assets are unlikely to see major outperformance until excess liquidity is released and AI growth rates are fully priced. Key market views include: 1. Commodities like gold remain primary liquidity absorbers over Bitcoin, with recent consolidation seen as healthy. 2. The bull trend for RMB-denominated assets (e.g., STAR 50 Index) is firmly established. 3. Key resource country indices and currencies are near inflection points, with spot copper already at new highs. The report suggests resource equities, particularly in China's market, are at the end of their consolidation phase, offering attractive valuations with embedded optionality on rising metal prices. It highlights the predictive significance of recent US-Japan FX interventions and Treasury-Fed dynamics, suggesting a shift towards less communication and data management to maintain stability. A long position in resource assets is presented as a positive expected-value strategy over a multi-year horizon.

marsbitHace 2 hora(s)

Metrics Ventures Market Observation: Talk is Cheap

marsbitHace 2 hora(s)

The Value, Growth, and Risks of Prediction Markets

The article discusses the explosive growth and complex nature of prediction markets in the United States, focusing on their value, risks, and regulatory challenges. Key drivers include sports betting, which fueled a 1795% year-over-year trading volume increase in Q2 2026, with platforms like Kalshi and Polymarket dominating. These markets offer significant potential as superior hedging tools for businesses and more efficient price discovery mechanisms than traditional polls or derivatives for events like Fed rate decisions, elections, or GPU prices. They also serve as customer acquisition channels for platforms like Robinhood. However, major challenges persist. A central conflict exists between federal regulators (CFTC), which classify event contracts as derivatives under its jurisdiction, and state authorities, which view sports-related contracts as illegal gambling, leading to numerous lawsuits. There is significant consumer protection risk: data shows most retail users lose money to professional traders, platforms market high-risk products like parlays, and protections (e.g., age limits, addiction help) are weaker than in state-regulated sports betting. The "self-certification" process allows rapid contract launches but creates regulatory uncertainty. The author argues prediction markets are fundamentally "better markets" but currently fail to provide adequate consumer safeguards. Proposals include integrating protection mechanisms (cooling-off periods, position limits), aligning risk warnings with product risks, creating paths from speculation to long-term investing, and applying specific consumer protections and taxes to sports contracts. The piece concludes by urging stakeholders to address these issues before a potential regulatory backlash undermines the markets' legitimate utility.

marsbitHace 2 hora(s)

The Value, Growth, and Risks of Prediction Markets

marsbitHace 2 hora(s)

Trading

Spot
活动图片