China Tightens Crypto Ban; Hong Kong To Still Proceed With Its Plan

TheNewsCryptoPublicado a 2026-02-11Actualizado a 2026-02-11

Resumen

China has intensified its ban on cryptocurrency activities, with eight authorities led by the central bank issuing a joint notice reaffirming that crypto-related businesses are illegal. The policy expands scrutiny to offshore offerings and overseas activities by domestic entities, explicitly prohibiting the issuance of renminbi-pegged stablecoins abroad. While tokenization of real-world assets is acknowledged under regulated conditions, all digital finance activities must operate within state-approved systems. In contrast, Hong Kong plans to proceed with issuing stablecoin licenses by March, reviewing 36 applications, a move analysts view as a strategic hedge rather than a reversal of Beijing’s stance.

The recent policy adjustment of China seems more like a crackdown instead of a structural reordering. As reported by Bloomberg, it has tightened the cryptocurrency activity once again.

On Friday, 8 Chinese authorities headed by the central bank issued a joint notice on risks associated with the digital assets. It restates that the crypto-associated businesses stay illegal financial activities.

It also expands the investigation to offshore offerers and to overseas conduct by domestic actors. The structure of the document has equal weightage as of its tone, and it reiterates the ban. Specifically, the notice bans anybody from issuing renminbi-pegged stablecoins abroad.

However, it serves tokenisation of real-world assets as a clear tool of governance, and domestic activity is still constrained. Still, a special case is noted in the rulebook: cases approved by competent authorities and run via designated financial market infrastructure.

To impose these laws, the central government has planned to roll out a collaborative effort amalgamating local and national oversight. The collaborative effort has targeted removing regulatory arbitrage so far used by Chinese tech and finance companies.

These firms mostly used neighbouring jurisdictions to test with blockchain-based assets outside Beijing’s direct oversight. By tightening the tether on stablecoins as well as RWAs, Beijing has indicated that the upcoming generation of digital finance must stay completely within state-sanctioned, permissioned systems.

The Robust Move Being Unaffected

However, Hong Kong’s central bank is moving forward with plans to issue an initial batch of stablecoin licences in March, regardless of China’s prolonged opposition to crypto activity. Although, analysts state that the stablecoin plans of Hong Kong are more of a hedge than a reversal of position of Beijing.

The Chief Executive Officer of the Hong Kong Monetary Authority, Eddie Yue, stated at a Legislative Council meeting on February 2 that we anticipate that by March we will be capable of making a decision.

He further added that the authority was reviewing an initial portion of 36 stablecoin issuer applications, as per the official interpreter.

Highlighted Crypto News Today:

Bankman-Fried Petitions Federal Court for Retrial in FTX Collapse Case

TagschinaHong KongStablecoin

Criptos en tendencia

Preguntas relacionadas

QWhat is the main action taken by Chinese authorities regarding cryptocurrency activities according to the recent notice?

AChinese authorities, led by the central bank, issued a joint notice reiterating that cryptocurrency-related businesses are illegal financial activities and banning anyone from issuing renminbi-pegged stablecoins abroad.

QHow does the new policy affect offshore activities and domestic actors?

AThe policy expands investigations to offshore offerers and overseas conduct by domestic actors, aiming to eliminate regulatory arbitrage used by tech and finance companies in neighboring jurisdictions.

QWhat exception is noted in the rulebook for cryptocurrency activities?

AThe rulebook allows exceptions for cases approved by competent authorities and run via designated financial market infrastructure.

QHow is Hong Kong responding to China's cryptocurrency ban?

AHong Kong is proceeding with plans to issue an initial batch of stablecoin licenses in March, reviewing 36 applications, despite China's opposition.

QWhat does Beijing's tightening of regulations on stablecoins and RWAs indicate about the future of digital finance?

AIt indicates that the next generation of digital finance must operate entirely within state-sanctioned, permissioned systems.

Lecturas Relacionadas

GPT-5.6 Countdown: Abandon the Illusion of a Single API, Computational Iteration Can't Outpace a Single Page of Compliance

In mid-June, three seemingly independent industry events—the compliance-driven throttling of Fable 5, the open-sourcing of GLM-5.2, and the leaked release timeline for GPT-5.6—are pushing the global AI industry toward a watershed moment. These shifts signal a fundamental restructuring of the industry's underlying logic. First, **"usability" has substantially overtaken "advanced capabilities"** as the primary weight, pushing the global large language model (LLM) supply chain into a "dual-track" phase of controlled closed-source and local open-source coexistence. Second, **the competitive moats of closed-source giants are shifting**. Their technical focus is moving from "language intelligence" toward "spatial intelligence (world models)"—a domain heavily reliant on computing power. Third, faced with常态化 transnational compliance risks, **a "model-agnostic" decoupled design has become a survival necessity for application-layer developers to maintain business continuity.** The article details how Anthropic's Fable 5, despite its advanced engineering feats, was restricted for non-U.S. citizens within 72 hours of launch, highlighting how geopolitical compliance can instantly limit even the most advanced models. In response, the open-source camp, exemplified by Zhipu AI's MIT-licensed GLM-5.2, is gaining market share by offering stable performance improvements and significant cost advantages (up to 70% savings for enterprises), while achieving full adaptation with domestic semiconductor platforms. Meanwhile, closed-source leaders like OpenAI are pivoting. The anticipated GPT-5.6 reportedly shifts focus from language to spatial intelligence and world models, aiming to rebuild a generational gap in areas like 3D understanding, simulation, and industrial design that demand immense compute. The core conclusion is that the LLM supply chain's logic has changed. Enterprises must now evaluate infrastructure based on a composite of technical performance and policy compliance. For developers, complete reliance on a single closed-source API poses unacceptable risk. Implementing a truly model-agnostic architecture—enabling swift switches to compliant, locally deployable open-source alternatives—is no longer just good practice but a fundamental baseline for business continuity.

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

GPT-5.6 Countdown: Abandon the Illusion of a Single API, Computational Iteration Can't Outpace a Single Page of Compliance

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Is the 'Token Subsidy War' Among AI Giants Almost Over?

The article discusses the ongoing "token subsidy war" among AI giants like OpenAI and Anthropic, questioning whether it's nearing its end. It reveals that current AI subscription prices are heavily subsidized, with some plans offering tokens at up to 70 times the actual cost to attract and retain heavy users, especially developers and enterprises. This strategy mirrors past internet-era subsidy battles, but with a key difference: AI tokens lack "lock-in" effects. Unlike ride-hailing or food delivery apps, users can easily switch between AI providers as APIs become standardized, making it difficult for companies to raise prices post-subsidy. The piece highlights a structural asymmetry in the competition. Giants like Google, with massive advertising revenue, can afford to subsidize tokens indefinitely, akin to using "tokens as a weapon." In contrast, venture-backed companies like OpenAI and Anthropic face pressure to become profitable, especially as they approach IPO. The article cites Google Ventures founder Bill Maris, who suggests Google could slash token prices by 80%, putting immense pressure on competitors. Two potential endgames are presented: the "internet service" model (subsidize, monopolize, then raise prices) and the "utility" model (tokens become a standardized, low-margin commodity like electricity). Given the low switching costs, the latter seems more likely. The competition may not have a single winner but could instead accelerate AI's evolution into a foundational, infrastructure-level technology, akin to a public utility. For now, users continue to benefit from heavily subsidized token costs.

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Is the 'Token Subsidy War' Among AI Giants Almost Over?

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Beyond the Stadium: The Profitable Games Surrounding the World Cup

"Beyond the Pitch: The Profit Game Around the World Cup" The FIFA World Cup transcends being a sporting spectacle, evolving into a massive global arena for speculation and profit-seeking. The 2026 tournament has amplified this dynamic, creating a multi-layered ecosystem of financial opportunism alongside the football. **Prediction markets** have surged into the mainstream. Platforms like Polymarket and Kalshi saw trading volumes for World Cup contracts soar, attracting new users with their financial trading model and high-profile, chain-based wealth stories that overshadow traditional sports betting in terms of growth and narrative. However, **traditional sportsbooks** remain the dominant force, leveraging established user habits, legal markets, and comprehensive product offerings to handle the vast majority of speculative wagers, with projections suggesting record-breaking betting volumes. Capital markets also react. **"Concept stocks"** in countries like South Korea and Japan experience volatile price swings based on team performance and anticipated fan spending on items like chicken, beer, and viewing parties, effectively becoming a stock market reflecting fan sentiment. The **ticket resale market** has become a sophisticated arena for arbitrage. Prices fluctuate wildly based on team draws and star power, with sellers sometimes listing tickets they don't yet own in a practice akin to short-selling, while FIFA's own "Right to Buy" tokens add another layer of speculative trading. **Collectibles and merchandise** offer another avenue. Panini sticker albums, with their inherent scarcity and nostalgic value, can become high-value collectibles. Limited-edition or locally themed jerseys command significant premiums on secondary markets, and even counterfeit vendors profit from fans' desire for affordable match-day identity. The **cryptocurrency** space has seen a frenzy of speculative, unauthorized World Cup-themed meme coins on chains like Solana. These tokens, often exploiting team names and player imagery, experience extreme pump-and-dump cycles, creating stories of massive gains for a few early entrants and steep losses for many others. Finally, an entire industry thrives on **providing information and tools** to other speculators. Developers create platforms like SeatSidekick to track ticket inventory and prices, while paid Telegram groups and subscriptions sell betting tips and predictions, monetizing the widespread desire for an informational edge. In essence, the World Cup has become a compressed, global laboratory for speculation. While the games determine champions on the field, a parallel, complex network of financial transactions—spanning prediction contracts, bets, stocks, tickets, collectibles, crypto, and information services—settles its own scores in the global market.

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Beyond the Stadium: The Profitable Games Surrounding the World Cup

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

How Does Codex Use a Computer? Three Entry Points and Permission Boundaries

This article explains the three primary methods for Codex to interact with a computer, each with distinct use cases, permission boundaries, and trust levels. **1. Computer Use:** This offers the broadest access, allowing Codex to visually control and interact with the graphical user interface of authorized macOS/Windows apps, system settings, and even iOS simulators. It's ideal for tasks lacking APIs or structured tools, such as operating legacy software or multi-app workflows. However, it's the slowest method and has the widest permission scope, requiring careful supervision for sensitive actions. **2. Chrome Extension:** This grants Codex access to the user's logged-in Chrome browser state, including cookies, profiles, and open tabs. It's best for tasks requiring user identity across websites like Gmail, LinkedIn, Salesforce, or internal dashboards. Its key advantage is multi-tab control for complex workflows. While more powerful for browser-based tasks than Computer Use, it carries higher sensitivity as actions are performed under the user's identity. **3. In-App Browser:** This is a browser isolated within the Codex thread, separate from the user's personal browsing data. It excels in web development and debugging scenarios—previewing local servers, testing responsive layouts, or annotating designs directly on the page. Its isolation is a strength for development but a limitation for tasks requiring login sessions. The core principle is to choose the narrowest, safest, and most structured interface for the task. Use plugins or MCPs first, resort to visual control (Computer Use) only for GUI-dependent tasks, employ the Chrome extension for identity-reliant browser work, and prefer the In-App Browser for isolated development. **Appshots** are clarified as a fourth, complementary tool for *inputting* context—capturing a screenshot of a window to point Codex to something—rather than a method for Codex to *act*. Together, this layered approach highlights a key to AI agent productization: not granting unlimited permissions, but constraining them within clear boundaries for specific tasks while preserving user oversight.

marsbitHace 3 hora(s)

How Does Codex Use a Computer? Three Entry Points and Permission Boundaries

marsbitHace 3 hora(s)

Trading

Spot
Futuros

Artículos destacados

Cómo comprar BAN

¡Bienvenido a HTX.com! Hemos hecho que comprar Comedian (BAN) sea simple y conveniente. Sigue nuestra guía paso a paso para iniciar tu viaje de criptos.Paso 1: crea tu cuenta HTXUtiliza tu correo electrónico o número de teléfono para registrarte y obtener una cuenta gratuita en HTX. Experimenta un proceso de registro sin complicaciones y desbloquea todas las funciones.Obtener mi cuentaPaso 2: ve a Comprar cripto y elige tu método de pagoTarjeta de crédito/débito: usa tu Visa o Mastercard para comprar Comedian (BAN) al instante.Saldo: utiliza fondos del saldo de tu cuenta HTX para tradear sin problemas.Terceros: hemos agregado métodos de pago populares como Google Pay y Apple Pay para mejorar la comodidad.P2P: tradear directamente con otros usuarios en HTX.Over-the-Counter (OTC): ofrecemos servicios personalizados y tipos de cambio competitivos para los traders.Paso 3: guarda tu Comedian (BAN)Después de comprar tu Comedian (BAN), guárdalo en tu cuenta HTX. Alternativamente, puedes enviarlo a otro lugar mediante transferencia blockchain o utilizarlo para tradear otras criptomonedas.Paso 4: tradear Comedian (BAN)Tradear fácilmente con Comedian (BAN) en HTX's mercado spot. Simplemente accede a tu cuenta, selecciona tu par de trading, ejecuta tus trades y monitorea en tiempo real. Ofrecemos una experiencia fácil de usar tanto para principiantes como para traders experimentados.

576 Vistas totalesPublicado en 2024.12.11Actualizado en 2026.06.02

Cómo comprar BAN

Discusiones

Bienvenido a la comunidad de HTX. Aquí puedes mantenerte informado sobre los últimos desarrollos de la plataforma y acceder a análisis profesionales del mercado. A continuación se presentan las opiniones de los usuarios sobre el precio de BAN (BAN).

活动图片