BTC Faces Triple Resistance at $80,000 Milestone, HYPE Hits New Highs Signaling Potential | Invited Analysis

Odaily星球日报Publicado a 2026-05-26Actualizado a 2026-05-26

Resumen

This weekly analysis maintains a structured framework, focusing on Bitcoin (BTC) and HYPE, dissecting their multi-timeframe price action to identify key support and resistance zones and formulate actionable trading plans. The previous week's short position on BTC yielded a 2.78% gain, reinforcing the "signal-driven, disciplined" approach. For Bitcoin, the core scenario revolves around the battle between the 78,500–79,500 USD resistance zone and the 73,500–75,000 USD support area. The daily chart shows BTC within a rising channel; a failure to hold support at the channel's midline could lead to a test of the lower boundary. The 4-hour chart details an 8-segment corrective structure from the 82,850 USD high. Two short-term strategies are proposed: (A) Selling on a failed rally into the 78.5k-79.5k zone, with a stop above 80,600, or (B) Selling a confirmed breakdown below the 73.5k-75k support, with a stop above 76,500. Medium-term positioning remains neutral. For HYPE, the 4-hour chart indicates a five-wave advance from the May 14th low, now showing potential exhaustion and a top warning signal near 65 USD. The core view is to watch for a potential short-term peak formation. The recommended strategy is to avoid chasing the rally and instead look for a long setup upon a pullback to the 47.5–50 USD support zone, provided clear stabilization and model confirmation signals appear. The report concludes with a detailed review of the prior BTC short trade, executed based on model s...

Continuing with our structured analytical framework this week, we dissect the current movements of Bitcoin and HYPE from multiple time dimensions, assess the struggle between buyers and sellers around key resistance and support zones, and formulate specific, actionable operational plans accordingly.

Last week's short position successfully yielded a 2.78% profit, once again validating the trading logic of 'signal-driven, strict discipline'. However, a single profitable trade does not necessarily indicate that the market direction is definitively correct – the market always retains the possibility of exceeding expectations.

The core variable for this week remains the battle between the $78,500–$79,500 resistance zone and the $73,500–$75,000 support zone. The outcome will be answered by the market itself.

Summary of Core Trading Views for This Week:

• Analysis of BTC's multi-cycle price structure. (Detailed in Part I)

• BTC price forecast and mid-term, short-term operational strategies for this week. (Detailed in Part II)

• Analysis of HYPE's hourly chart structure. (Detailed in Part III)

• HYPE price forecast and short-term operational strategy for this week. (Detailed in Part IV)

Market Verification of Last Week's Trading Strategies and Core Views:

• BTC Short-term Trading Results: Bitcoin completed one short-term short position (1x leverage) last week, achieving a profit of approximately 2.78%. (Detailed in Table I)

• Market Verification of BTC Price Forecast: In last week's article, we noted: If the price effectively breaks below the support zone of $78,500–$79,500, it will test the support strength near $75,000. The current market movement verifies our previous forecast.

I. Analysis of Bitcoin's Multi-Cycle Price Structure

1. BTC Daily Chart Structure Analysis

Bitcoin _ Daily Chart:

Figure 1

• As shown in (Figure 1), since establishing a stage low near $60,000 on February 6, 2026, Bitcoin's daily chart has constructed and maintained a clearly structured ascending channel: its lower boundary is formed by connecting the lows of February 6 and March 29, while the upper boundary is drawn parallel to the lower boundary through the high of March 17.

• In our April 27th weekly review, we pointed out: "The current price is facing dual pressure from the channel's upper boundary and the $79,500 to $80,600 resistance zone, making a breakthrough likely difficult". Subsequent market action confirmed this assessment. After nearly 20 days of tug-of-war between bulls and bears, although a new rebound high of $82,850 was reached on May 6, it failed to effectively break through this zone's resistance, and the price subsequently began to fluctuate downward.

From the current structure, the price has retraced from near the channel's upper boundary to the mid-channel area. If the price fails to find effective support near the mid-channel and resume its uptrend, the probability of subsequently seeking support at the channel's lower boundary is increasing.

2. In-Depth Analysis of BTC's Hourly Chart Structure

Bitcoin _ 4-Hour Chart

Figure 2

As shown in (Figure 2), from the May 6 high of $82,850 to the ongoing adjustment;

• On the 4-hour chart, it can be subdivided into an 8-segment adjustment structure: from "Segment 27-28" to "Segment 34-35"; Central D: Due to the overlapping of segments 28-29, 29-30, and 30-31, they constitute Central D.

• From the 4-hour chart structure, segment 34-35 is about to rebound to the $78,500–$79,500 zone. If the price faces resistance and falls back after rebounding to this zone, failing to form an effective breakthrough, the market is likely to continue the current fluctuating adjustment pattern and test the core support band of $73,500–$75,000 again.

II. Bitcoin Price Forecast and Operational Strategy for This Week

1. BTC Price Forecast for This Week:

Core View This Week: Focus on the outcome of the battle between bulls and bears for the $78,500–$79,500 resistance zone and the $73,500–$75,000 support zone.

2. Core Resistance Levels:

• First Resistance Zone: $78,500–$79,500 (near the boundaries of two central zones)

• Second Resistance Zone: $83,500–$84,500 (previous dense trading area)

3. Core Support Levels:

• First Support Zone: $73,500–$75,000 (previous key support area)

• Second Support Zone: $69,500–$70,500 (previous key support area)

4. Operational Strategy for This Week (Excluding Impact of Sudden News)

1. Mid-term Strategy:

Bitcoin _ Daily Chart: (Position Monitoring Model)

Figure 3

Position Monitoring Model: As shown in (Figure 3), based on trading rules, the market's mid-term direction is not yet clear. This week's mid-term strategy is to maintain a no-position, wait-and-see approach.

2. Short-term Strategy: Utilize 30% of capital, set stop-loss points, and look for "spread" opportunities based on support and resistance levels. (Using 30-minute/60-minute as the operational cycle).

3. In short-term operations, to dynamically respond to complex market developments, we have prepared two specific operational plans in advance: Plan A/B.

Plan A: Rebound Meets Resistance, Sell High.

• Entry: When the price rebounds to the $78,500–$79,500 zone and encounters resistance, combined with a top signal from the quantitative model, a short position below 30% can be established.

• Risk Control: Initial stop-loss set above $80,600.

• Exit: When the price adjusts near important support levels combined with model signals, gradually close the position to take profits.

Plan B: Effectively Breaks Support, Follow the Trend Short.

• Entry: When the price effectively breaks below the $73,500–$75,000 support zone combined with a model top signal, a short position below 30% can be established.

• Risk Control: Initial stop-loss set above $76,500.

• Exit: When the price falls to important support levels combined with model signals, gradually close the position to take profits.

III. HYPE Price Structure Analysis

HYPE_4-Hour Chart

Figure 4

1. As shown in (Figure 4), the uptrend in HYPE starting from the May 14 low of $38.14 can be divided into a five-segment structure on the 4-hour chart: segments 40-41, 41-42, 42-43, 43-44, 44-45.

2. Our proprietary "Spread Trading Model" indicates that near endpoint 45, a top warning signal (white dot) has been triggered.

3. From the "Momentum Quantification Model" perspective, the rising segment (44-45) near $65 has shown signs of weakening upward momentum.

4. If the price forms a momentum bearish divergence state at "endpoint 45" and resonates with the top warning signal from the "Spread Trading Model", the probability of the price forming a short-term high here increases significantly.

IV. HYPE Price Forecast and Short-Term Operational Strategy for This Week

1. HYPE Price Forecast for This Week:

Core View on HYPE This Week:

• Observe whether "endpoint 45" can form a short-term high since the rise began on May 14.

• If a short-term high is formed, subsequently, look for short-term long opportunities when the price retraces to key support areas (e.g., $47.5 to $50) and shows clear signs of stabilization.

2. HYPE Short-Term Operational Strategy for This Week: (Buy on Support)

Currently, the strategy of "avoid blind chasing of highs, buy on dips" should be followed. If the price retraces to the $47.5 to $50 zone, finds support, and shows stabilization signals, combined with bottom signals triggered by both models, consider a light long position. Position size must be controlled below 30%, and strict stop-loss discipline must be maintained.

V. Operational Review

1. Short-Term Operation Review:(See Table I)

We strictly followed the operational plan. Based on trading signals from our proprietary "Spread Trading Model" and "Momentum Quantification Model", we completed one short-term (short) operation last week, achieving a trading profit of 2.78%.

1. Bitcoin Short-Term Trading Details Summary: (Leverage*1x)

Table I

2. Short-Term Trading Review: (See Figure VI)

• Entry Strategy:

a. When the price rebounded near $78,500, encountered resistance, showed pressure signals, and the candlestick formed a "top reversal" bearish signal;

b. The "Spread Trading Model" triggered a top warning signal (white dot), and the "Momentum Quantification Model" formed a momentum bearish divergence signal.

Therefore, we established a 30% short position at $77,782.

• Exit Strategy:

a. When the price fell near $75,000 and found support, and the candlestick formed a "bottom reversal" signal;

b. The "Spread Trading Model" triggered a strong bottom warning signal (red dot + white dot), resonating with a bottom signal from the "Momentum Quantification Model".

Therefore, we closed all positions near $75,616.

• Summary: This trade successfully yielded a profit of approximately 2.78%.

BTC_30 Minute Chart: (Momentum Quantification Model + Spread Trading Model)

Figure V (Short-Term Trading Illustration)

VI. Special Note:

1. When opening a position: Immediately set the initial stop-loss point.

2. When profit reaches 1%: Move the stop-loss to the entry cost price (break-even point) to ensure capital safety.

3. When profit reaches 2%: Move the stop-loss to the 1% profit level.

4. Continuous Tracking: Thereafter, for every additional 1% profit, move the stop-loss up by 1%, dynamically protecting and locking in profits.

Financial markets are ever-changing; all market analysis and trading strategies require dynamic adjustment. All views, analytical models, and operational strategies mentioned in this article are derived from personal technical analysis, intended solely for personal trading log purposes, and do not constitute any investment advice or operational basis. The market carries risks; investment requires caution. Please do not make decisions based on this.

Criptos en tendencia

Preguntas relacionadas

QAccording to the article's analysis, what are the two main resistance and support zones for Bitcoin this week?

AThe core resistance zone is 78,500-79,500 USD, and the core support zone is 73,500-75,000 USD.

QWhat was the primary technical reason for the author's successful short trade on Bitcoin the previous week?

AThe trade was executed based on a confluence of signals: the price encountered resistance near 78,500 USD forming a top reversal candlestick pattern, and both the author's 'Price Difference Trading Model' and 'Dynamic Energy Quantification Model' triggered top warning signals, including momentum divergence.

QBased on the analysis, what is the key condition for HYPE to present a potential short-term buying opportunity?

AA short-term buying opportunity for HYPE may arise if the price pulls back to the 47.5 to 50 USD support zone, shows clear signs of stabilization, and is confirmed by bottom signals from the author's trading models.

QWhat is the author's current medium-term (midline) strategy for Bitcoin, as indicated by their 'Position Monitoring Model'?

AAccording to the 'Position Monitoring Model', the medium-term market direction is not yet clear. Therefore, the author is maintaining a strategy of staying out of the market (holding no medium-term positions) and observing.

QIn the article's proposed short-term trading plans for Bitcoin, what are the two main scenarios (Plan A and Plan B)?

APlan A: Sell short on rallies if the price rebounds to the 78,500-79,500 USD resistance zone and encounters selling pressure. Plan B: Sell short on breakouts if the price effectively breaks below the 73,500-75,000 USD support zone.

Lecturas Relacionadas

The "Impossible Triad" Is Fundamentally a Pseudo-Problem

The article argues that blockchain's fundamental limitation is not the scalability trilemma (decentralization, scalability, security), which has been largely solved, but the lack of **privacy** and, until recently, clear **legitimacy**. Blockchain is described as a slow, expensive, globally shared computer whose core value is censorship resistance and verifiability. While ideal for native digital assets like money (e.g., stablecoins), its default transparency acts as a **tax**, exposing all transactions and enabling MEV extraction, which deters serious institutional capital. Simultaneously, its permissionless nature created regulatory ambiguity. The piece contends that **privacy** is the missing critical feature. It rejects the false choice between total transparency and complete anonymity. Modern cryptography (like zero-knowledge proofs) enables **compliant privacy**: users can prove facts (solvency, KYC status, compliance) without revealing the underlying sensitive data (specific holdings, identities). This preserves auditability for regulators and eliminates the leak of financial information. With recent regulatory progress (e.g., the GENIUS Act) addressing legitimacy, adding default, provably compliant privacy becomes a pure upgrade. It transforms blockchain from a costly, public ledger into a confidential settlement layer, finally bridging the gap to mainstream institutional and individual adoption of on-chain finance.

链捕手Hace 8 hora(s)

The "Impossible Triad" Is Fundamentally a Pseudo-Problem

链捕手Hace 8 hora(s)

Optical Chips: Collective Capacity Expansion

The global optical chip industry is experiencing a massive wave of expansion driven by surging AI data center demand. Major players across the US, Japan, Europe, and China are aggressively investing to ramp up production capacity. In the US, Coherent is expanding its 6-inch Indium Phosphide (InP) semiconductor fab in Texas, supported by CHIPS Act funding and a $2 billion strategic investment from NVIDIA. Lumentum is building a new factory for InP optical devices, and Nokia is scaling its advanced photonic chip packaging and testing capabilities. NVIDIA's investments aim to secure future supply of critical lasers and optical interconnect products for AI infrastructure. Japan's JX Advanced Metals, a leading InP substrate supplier, plans a multi-billion yen investment to increase its capacity 7-10 times, strengthening its grip on the crucial upstream materials market. In Europe, IQE and Tower Semiconductor settled a patent dispute and signed a multi-year InP epitaxial wafer supply agreement, highlighting that next-generation silicon photonics platforms will integrate high-performance InP components. STMicroelectronics and Sivers Semiconductors are also expanding silicon photonics production and partnerships. China is rapidly building out its domestic supply chain. Dongshan Precision's subsidiary, Source Photonics, announced a $12 billion project to expand optical chip and module production. Companies like Sanan Optoelectronics and Yunnan Germanium are scaling up InP chip manufacturing and substrate production, moving towards vertical integration from materials to modules. While debate continues around the exact future architecture—whether CPO (Co-Packaged Optics), NPO, or pluggables will dominate—analysts like Morgan Stanley argue the underlying driver is unchangeable: the explosive growth in bandwidth demand. This will inevitably increase the volume of optical engines, lasers, and related content per GPU, regardless of the final technical path. The competition for "more light" in the AI era has intensified into a global, full-chain capacity race.

marsbitHace 11 hora(s)

Optical Chips: Collective Capacity Expansion

marsbitHace 11 hora(s)

Stablecoins Finally Find Real Yield: An In-Depth Look at On-Chain Reinsurance Re | A Conversation with Re Founder Karan Saroya

Stablecoin Real Yield Found: A Deep Dive into On-Chain Reinsurance with Re's Karan Saroya As stablecoin supply exceeds $170 billion, the search for sustainable, non-speculative yield intensifies. Re, an on-chain reinsurance platform, provides an answer: connecting stablecoin capital to the trillion-dollar traditional reinsurance market. Re operates as a regulated reinsurer, accepting stablecoin deposits as collateral to back US insurance companies. These insurers pay premiums, generating yield that flows back to on-chain depositors. Currently supporting 35 insurers and underwriting $500 million, Re projects scaling to over $1 billion soon. Key insights from a Bankless podcast with founder Karan Saroya and investor Avichal of Electric Capital: 1. **Uncorrelated, Real-World Yield:** Re offers stablecoin holders access to reinsurance returns (targeting 12-14%+), an asset class entirely separate from crypto or equity markets. 2. **Operational Efficiency via Smart Contracts:** Re replaces traditional, labor-intensive capital fundraising with smart contracts, allowing a ~12-person team to compete with industry giants. 3. **Regulatory Leverage:** For every $1 of collateral, regulations allow backing $5-7 in written premiums. This leverage amplifies returns from the underlying risk-free rate. 4. **DeFi Integration:** Depositors receive receipt tokens, which can be used in protocols like Morpho for "looping," potentially pushing yields to 18-20%+. 5. **The "DeFi Mullet" Model:** A compliant front-end (regulated reinsurer) paired with a decentralized back-end (smart contracts, DeFi capital markets). 6. **RE Governance Token:** Modeled on Lloyd's of London, the token governs the central capital pool's allocation, counterparty acceptance, and parameters. 7. **Real Economic Impact:** Capital funds real-world productivity (factories, clinics, businesses) via insurance, moving beyond crypto's internal loops. The discussion highlights a pivotal moment: DeFi's supply-side infrastructure is now met by real demand for productive yield, potentially kickstarting a flywheel where vast on-chain stablecoin capital seeks these real-world returns.

链捕手Hace 12 hora(s)

Stablecoins Finally Find Real Yield: An In-Depth Look at On-Chain Reinsurance Re | A Conversation with Re Founder Karan Saroya

链捕手Hace 12 hora(s)

1996 or 1999? Walsh's First Test is 'How to View AI'

"1996 or 1999? Wall's First Big Test Is 'How to View AI'" Federal Reserve Chairman Wall's initial challenge is not whether to raise or cut rates, but a more fundamental judgment: what kind of boom is the current AI boom? This will determine the Fed's policy path and define his legacy. Economics is split between two opposing views, according to reporter Nick Timiraos. One sees imminent productivity gains that will increase supply and cool inflation, allowing the Fed to hold steady. The other argues that while productivity benefits are distant, demand shocks are here now, and waiting for data confirmation risks missing the intervention window, forcing sharper rate hikes later. Wall has signaled a leaning toward the first view, echoing 1996-era Alan Greenspan, who embraced strong, productivity-driven growth without fear of inflation. However, Wall faces a different macro environment than Greenspan did, with tariff pressures, expanding fiscal deficits, and diminishing globalization benefits, which could force more significant inflation pressures even if AI benefits materialize. Wall's logic, expressed before taking office, is that AI-driven productivity gains won't show in official data for years. If the Fed waits for confirmation, it might mistakenly tighten policy and choke off the very growth that could suppress inflation. This argues for using forward-looking narratives over lagging data. Chicago Fed President Austan Goolsbee presents a key counter-argument. He distinguishes between expected and unexpected productivity booms. A widely anticipated boom, like the current AI wave, can cause people to spend future wealth gains in advance, overheating the economy before productivity actually rises, thus requiring preemptive rate hikes. He cites rising costs for AI data centers as evidence of such overheating. Fed Governor Christopher Waller offers a rebuttal to Goolsbee, noting the "expected spending" mechanism only works if people can borrow against future income, which many households cannot do due to borrowing constraints. Wall also faces a paradox related to his desire to reduce the Fed's use of "forward guidance" (pre-announcing policy moves). This practice was established in 1999 when Greenspan began signaling hikes to avoid market shocks. If the economy follows a less optimistic path, Wall may be forced to choose between using the guidance he wants to abolish or risking market volatility by staying silent. The ultimate question defining Wall's first major test remains: Is this 1996 or 1999?

marsbitHace 13 hora(s)

1996 or 1999? Walsh's First Test is 'How to View AI'

marsbitHace 13 hora(s)

Trading

Spot
Futuros

Artículos destacados

Cómo comprar HYPE

¡Bienvenido a HTX.com! Hemos hecho que comprar Hyperliquid (HYPE) sea simple y conveniente. Sigue nuestra guía paso a paso para iniciar tu viaje de criptos.Paso 1: crea tu cuenta HTXUtiliza tu correo electrónico o número de teléfono para registrarte y obtener una cuenta gratuita en HTX. Experimenta un proceso de registro sin complicaciones y desbloquea todas las funciones.Obtener mi cuentaPaso 2: ve a Comprar cripto y elige tu método de pagoTarjeta de crédito/débito: usa tu Visa o Mastercard para comprar Hyperliquid (HYPE) al instante.Saldo: utiliza fondos del saldo de tu cuenta HTX para tradear sin problemas.Terceros: hemos agregado métodos de pago populares como Google Pay y Apple Pay para mejorar la comodidad.P2P: tradear directamente con otros usuarios en HTX.Over-the-Counter (OTC): ofrecemos servicios personalizados y tipos de cambio competitivos para los traders.Paso 3: guarda tu Hyperliquid (HYPE)Después de comprar tu Hyperliquid (HYPE), guárdalo en tu cuenta HTX. Alternativamente, puedes enviarlo a otro lugar mediante transferencia blockchain o utilizarlo para tradear otras criptomonedas.Paso 4: tradear Hyperliquid (HYPE)Tradear fácilmente con Hyperliquid (HYPE) en HTX's mercado spot. Simplemente accede a tu cuenta, selecciona tu par de trading, ejecuta tus trades y monitorea en tiempo real. Ofrecemos una experiencia fácil de usar tanto para principiantes como para traders experimentados.

225 Vistas totalesPublicado en 2024.12.11Actualizado en 2026.06.02

Cómo comprar HYPE

Discusiones

Bienvenido a la comunidad de HTX. Aquí puedes mantenerte informado sobre los últimos desarrollos de la plataforma y acceder a análisis profesionales del mercado. A continuación se presentan las opiniones de los usuarios sobre el precio de HYPE (HYPE).

活动图片