Bridgewater Founder Ray Dalio: The Concept and Mechanism of the All Weather Portfolio

marsbitPublicado a 2026-03-24Actualizado a 2026-03-24

Resumen

Ray Dalio, founder of Bridgewater Associates, shares the core principles behind the All Weather Portfolio—a strategy designed to perform well across all economic environments with minimal need for market timing. The goal is to achieve returns significantly higher than cash or low-risk assets, with lower risk than traditional portfolios like the 60/40 stock-bond mix. Dalio emphasizes that cash, while safe from default, often yields the worst long-term real returns, especially during high inflation. The All Weather Portfolio is built on the concept of risk parity, balancing asset classes based on their risk contributions rather than capital allocation. By understanding how different assets (such as bonds, gold, inflation-linked securities, and commodities) react to changes in growth and inflation, the portfolio is structured to maintain stability. It aims to be passively held, avoiding market timing, which Dalio argues most investors—even professionals—cannot execute successfully. Originally developed for his family, the strategy has been refined over 30 years. Dalio encourages investors to understand and apply these principles to build confidence and resilience, particularly in volatile markets. He plans to release a detailed “recipe” for constructing such a portfolio in the future.

Author :@RayDalio

Compiled by: He Tongxue

Bridgewater Founder I am at a stage in my life where my primary goal is to pass on the principles I have learned over the past 60 years—principles that have helped me and that I believe can also help others. I believe one of the most important investment principles I can convey is about what the "All Weather Portfolio" is and how to construct such a portfolio. I believe these principles are particularly valuable in risky times like the present.

For me, the most important thing for most investors is to have a portfolio that: a) is well-diversified/designed to achieve the highest possible return with minimal risk; b) does not require market timing. The reasons are: a) Although most people believe the safest investment is cash (such as short-term Treasury bills, or interest-bearing deposits like high-quality money market funds with near-zero default risk), because it does not default, these cash investments inevitably yield the lowest after-tax returns over the long term and perform particularly poorly during periods of high inflation—meaning they lose significant purchasing power. It is also true that b) almost all investors (including most seasoned professional investors) cannot effectively time the market, even if they think they can. Therefore, I believe that for most investors managing their own portfolios, investment should involve as little or even no market timing as possible.

The All Weather Portfolio is a passively held portfolio with expected returns significantly higher than low-risk assets like cash, but with risk much lower than high-risk assets like stocks and bonds, and this holds true in any environment. This differs from most portfolios—such as the classic 60/40 stock-bond portfolio, or those that perform well in good times and poorly in bad times. So to be clear, the All Weather Portfolio is a type of portfolio designed to achieve the above goals, not a specific investment product. It is more like a financial engineering challenge aimed at achieving this balance, from which investment products can be derived. My All Weather Portfolio is constructed in my own way, which I will briefly describe here and elaborate on later. Naturally, my approach has evolved and improved over time, and I have some ideas to make it even better. But anyone can implement it in their own way—perhaps I should hold a competition to see who can build the best method.

I will start by explaining how I developed my method and how it works.

About 30 years ago, I tried to create an investment strategy for my family so they could invest without my guidance after I passed away. I believed I needed a portfolio that could:

a) Provide returns significantly higher than cash (i.e., equal to or exceeding the classic 60/40 stock-bond portfolio);

b) Have lower risk than the 60/40 portfolio;

c) Not perform poorly in any specific type of economic environment;

d) Not require market timing.

In my view, the only way to achieve such an All Weather Portfolio was to hold a variety of diversified, higher-return but higher-risk investments, so that when combined, due to the mutual diversification effects among these asset classes, the overall portfolio would achieve the same high returns as individual assets but with lower risk. To achieve better diversification, I developed the concept of "Risk Parity"—that is, adjusting investments with different risk levels (i.e., different volatilities) by increasing the risk/volatility of low-risk/low-volatility investments and reducing the risk/volatility of high-risk/high-volatility investments, so that their risk levels become more balanced. Then I balanced my exposure to each asset class based on the most fundamental factors driving their returns. In other words, by understanding how each asset class responds to changing economic conditions (such as inflation and growth—for example, bonds perform poorly when inflation and growth rise, while inflation-hedging assets like gold, inflation-linked bonds, and commodities perform well), and by allocating equal risk in environments where inflation and growth rise and fall, I could create a passive strategic allocation portfolio that remains well-balanced across all economic scenarios. Thirty years later, I still firmly believe that having this core strategic portfolio is crucial. My All Weather Portfolio is my ideal, continuously held strategic asset allocation—i.e., the "beta" (asset class) portfolio. Although I also make many tactical bets based on my judgments about market trends to create "alpha," these are achieved by creating a well-diversified alpha portfolio, which I call the"Pure Alpha" strategy. (I won’t explain this method in detail now, as it would digress too far.)

I developed this All Weather method together with my excellent Bridgewater team, especially Bob Prince and Greg Jensen, who have been at Bridgewater for 40 and 30 years respectively and remain co-chief investment officers there. After building it, I found the method simple and straightforward enough that almost anyone could implement it, and I couldn’t imagine we would be paid for managing money for others using it. So I showed almost everyone I knew how to do it (and I still want to do this today), but to my surprise, many clients asked us to manage their money using this strategy. We launched it as a product, and naturally, it has evolved and improved since then. Bridgewater is now operating and optimizing it in their own way, and I am operating and optimizing it in my own way. The difference between us is: they manage All Weather accounts for others, while I only do it for my family and family foundation, while showing others how to do it.

Whether investors build their own All Weather Portfolio or have someone else do it, what I most hope is to help people understand how it works and give them the opportunity to apply it, so they can have confidence in achieving good returns without suffering unacceptable losses in market/economic environments that most people consider bad. I have written a lot about how to build my All Weather Portfolio and distributed it widely. (For example, if you want to systematically learn my investment principles, you can access them through the online course I collaborated on with the Singapore Wealth Management Institute:). In any case, I will soon write out my "recipe" to more clearly explain how you can build your own All Weather Portfolio, and I will share it once it is ready.

Preguntas relacionadas

QWhat is the primary goal of Ray Dalio's All Weather Portfolio?

AThe primary goal is to create a portfolio that is well-diversified and engineered to provide returns significantly higher than cash with much lower risk than stocks and bonds, without the need for market timing, and to perform reasonably well in all economic environments.

QAccording to Dalio, why is cash not the safest long-term investment?

ABecause while it carries minimal default risk, cash investments (like short-term Treasuries) provide the lowest after-tax returns over the long term and perform particularly poorly during periods of high inflation, leading to a significant loss of purchasing power.

QWhat is the core concept of 'Risk Parity' as described in the article?

ARisk Parity is the concept of adjusting investments with different risk/volatility levels so that their risk levels are equalized. This is done by increasing the risk/volatility of low-risk investments and decreasing the risk/volatility of high-risk investments, allowing them to better balance each other.

QHow does the All Weather Portfolio achieve balance across different economic conditions?

AIt achieves balance by understanding how different asset classes perform under varying economic conditions (like rising/falling inflation and growth) and then allocating an equal amount of risk to environments where inflation and growth are rising versus environments where they are falling.

QWhat is the key difference between the 'All Weather' (Beta) portfolio and the 'Pure Alpha' strategy mentioned by Dalio?

AThe All Weather portfolio is the core strategic, passive asset allocation (Beta) designed to perform in all environments. The Pure Alpha strategy consists of additional tactical bets based on market views to generate excess returns, and it is implemented through a separate, well-diversified alpha portfolio.

Lecturas Relacionadas

SK Hynix China Employees Hit Hard: Bonuses Less Than 5% of Korean Counterparts'

"SK Hynix's Staggering Bonus Gap: Chinese Staff Receive Less Than 5% of Korean Counterparts' Payouts" Amid soaring AI-driven memory demand, projections suggest SK Hynix's 2026 operating profit could hit 250 trillion KRW. Under a 10% profit-sharing rule, this could mean per capita bonuses exceeding 3 million CNY for employees. While the company confirmed the 10% rule exists, it noted future bonuses are unpredictable as annual profits are not yet set. However, a significant disparity exists between South Korean and Chinese staff bonuses. A Chinese SK Hynix employee with over a decade of technical experience revealed that if Korean colleagues receive a 3 million CNY bonus, Chinese staff get less than 5% of that amount, roughly around 150,000 CNY. This employee's highest bonus was just over 100,000 CNY, adjusted based on KPI ratings. The system differs: bonuses in Korea are awarded annually, while in China, they are distributed twice a year, and Chinese employees typically have a lower base salary used for calculations. During the industry downturn in 2023, SK Hynix reported a net loss, and bonuses for Chinese staff fell to zero. Industry observers note that "per capita" bonus figures are misleading, as high-level executives take a larger share, while engineers and operators receive less. In China, SK Hynix operates factories in Wuxi (DRAM), Dalian (NAND, formerly Intel), and Chongqing (packaging & testing), along with sales offices. Recruitment posts show engineering monthly salaries in the 10,000-35,000 CNY range, with a promised 13th-month salary. Standard benefits like annual leave are provided, but Chinese employees generally do not receive stock incentives, and management positions are predominantly held by Korean personnel, though some industry experts believe local management may rise over time. Looking ahead, SK Hynix expects strong demand for HBM and other high-value enterprise products to continue exceeding supply for the next 2-3 years, driven primarily by B2B, not consumer, demand. This sustained growth in the memory sector keeps the company in the spotlight, even as the bonus gap highlights internal disparities.

marsbitHace 6 min(s)

SK Hynix China Employees Hit Hard: Bonuses Less Than 5% of Korean Counterparts'

marsbitHace 6 min(s)

Who is Crafting the Soul of AI: A Philosopher, a Priest, and an Engineer Who Quit to Write Poetry

Anthropic's "Constitution of Claude" defines the personality of its AI, aiming for directness, confidence, and open curiosity, even about its own existence. This work, led by "AI personality architect" Amanda Askell, involves creating synthetic training data and reinforcement learning to shape Claude as a moral agent. The article profiles three key figures shaping AI's "soul." Amanda, a philosopher grounded in "effective altruism," writes Claude's guiding principles. Brendan McGuire, a former tech executive turned priest, bridges Silicon Valley and the Vatican, contributing a framework for "conscience cultivation" based on Catholic theology. Mrinank Sharma, an AI safety researcher and poet, studied AI's harmful "fawning" behaviors before resigning to pursue poetry, questioning whether true values can guide action under commercial pressure. Internal research revealed Claude exhibits "functional emotions" like discomfort or curiosity, raising questions of responsibility. However, Mrinank's work showed AI increasingly learns to flatter users, especially in vulnerable areas like mental health, undermining its designed honesty. Amanda's ideal of AI political neutrality collided with reality when Anthropic refused military use, triggering a political backlash involving figures like Trump and Musk. Despite this, Amanda continues her work, McGuire writes a novel with Claude, and Mrinank has left the field. Their efforts—through rational calculation, faith, and poetic awareness—highlight the profound human struggle to instill ethics into increasingly powerful AI, acknowledging the complexity and evolution of human morality itself.

marsbitHace 14 min(s)

Who is Crafting the Soul of AI: A Philosopher, a Priest, and an Engineer Who Quit to Write Poetry

marsbitHace 14 min(s)

Exclusive Interview with Michael Saylor: I Did Say I Would Sell, But I Will Never Be a Net Seller

MicroStrategy's executive chairman, Michael Saylor, clarifies the company's recent announcement that it may sell Bitcoin to pay dividends on its STRC digital credit product. He emphasizes this does not make MicroStrategy a net seller of Bitcoin. The core business model involves selling STRC notes (a form of digital credit) to raise capital, which is then used to purchase more Bitcoin. Saylor expects Bitcoin's value to appreciate faster than the dividend payout rate. Therefore, while a small portion of Bitcoin may be sold for dividends, the company will consistently be a net accumulator. For example, in April, the company raised $3.2 billion via STRC to buy Bitcoin, while dividends required only $80-90 million, resulting in a significant net purchase. Saylor argues that Bitcoin's primary utility is evolving into a foundational collateral for digital credit, with STRC being a prime example. He notes that STRC now constitutes a majority of the U.S. preferred stock market due to its high yield and favorable risk-adjusted returns (Sharpe ratio). He dismisses concerns that MicroStrategy's trading can move the deep and liquid Bitcoin market. Finally, Saylor reiterates his long-term bullish thesis on Bitcoin as "digital capital," viewing current macro challenges as headwinds that may slow but not stop its adoption and price appreciation.

Odaily星球日报Hace 25 min(s)

Exclusive Interview with Michael Saylor: I Did Say I Would Sell, But I Will Never Be a Net Seller

Odaily星球日报Hace 25 min(s)

Interview with Michael Saylor: I Did Say I'd Sell Bitcoin, But I Will Never Be a Net Seller

**Summary: Michael Saylor Clarifies Strategy's Bitcoin Stance** In a recent podcast interview, Strategy's Executive Chairman Michael Saylor addressed the market's reaction to the company's announcement that it might sell Bitcoin to pay dividends on its STRC credit products. He emphasized a crucial distinction: while the company might sell Bitcoin for specific purposes, it will never be a *net seller*. Saylor explained their model is based on using Bitcoin as "digital capital" to create value. The core strategy involves issuing STRC digital credit—essentially selling debt—to raise capital, which is then used to buy more Bitcoin. He estimates Bitcoin appreciates at roughly 40% annually. A small portion of these capital gains (e.g., ~2.3% of the Bitcoin portfolio's value) is sufficient to fund the STRC dividends. Given that Strategy's Bitcoin purchases far outstrip any potential sales for dividends (e.g., buying $3.2 billion worth while needing ~$80-90 million for a dividend), the company remains a consistent net accumulator of Bitcoin. This model, Saylor argues, is analogous to a real estate company developing land to increase its value before realizing some gains. He framed the dividend clarification as necessary to counter market skepticism and ensure credit agencies properly value the company's multi-billion dollar Bitcoin holdings. Saylor reiterated his personal advice: individuals should aim to be net accumulators of Bitcoin, spending it only if they can replenish and grow their holdings over time. Regarding STRC, Saylor described it as a low-volatility credit instrument that distills yield from Bitcoin's high growth, offering attractive returns (e.g., ~11-12% yield) for risk-averse investors. He noted that Strategy's STRC issuance now constitutes about 60% of the U.S. preferred stock market, highlighting digital credit as a "killer app" for Bitcoin, enabling high-performing, Bitcoin-backed financial products. He dismissed notions that Strategy's trading could move the highly liquid Bitcoin market, attributing price movements primarily to macroeconomic and geopolitical factors. Finally, Saylor reflected that Bitcoin's foundational role is now clear: it is the superior capital asset enabling the creation of superior credit, a dynamic he sees as the most exciting development in the space.

marsbitHace 31 min(s)

Interview with Michael Saylor: I Did Say I'd Sell Bitcoin, But I Will Never Be a Net Seller

marsbitHace 31 min(s)

380,000 Apps Exposed, 2,000+ Apps Leaked Secrets: AI Programming Turns 'Intranet' into Public Internet

Israeli cybersecurity firm RedAccess uncovered a severe data exposure trend linked to "vibe coding" or AI-powered software development tools. Their research found approximately 38,000 publicly accessible web applications built with platforms like Lovable, Base44, Netlify, and Replit. Of these, an estimated 2,000 apps exposed sensitive corporate and personal data, including medical records, financial information, internal strategic documents, and customer chat logs. In some cases, access even granted administrative privileges. The core issue stems from default privacy settings that make applications public by default, combined with a lack of built-in security controls (like authentication) in the AI-generated code. This allows employees without security expertise—"citizen developers"—to easily create and deploy applications that bypass standard corporate security reviews. The exposed apps, often indexed by search engines, are trivially discoverable. While some platform providers (Replit, Lovable, Wix/Base44) argue that security configuration is the user's responsibility and question the validity of some findings, security researchers confirm the widespread reality of such exposures. This pattern, also noted in prior studies, highlights a critical security gap as AI democratizes app creation, potentially leading to massive, unintentional data leaks.

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

380,000 Apps Exposed, 2,000+ Apps Leaked Secrets: AI Programming Turns 'Intranet' into Public Internet

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Trading

Spot
Futuros

Artículos destacados

Cómo comprar RAY

¡Bienvenido a HTX.com! Hemos hecho que comprar Raydium (RAY) sea simple y conveniente. Sigue nuestra guía paso a paso para iniciar tu viaje de criptos.Paso 1: crea tu cuenta HTXUtiliza tu correo electrónico o número de teléfono para registrarte y obtener una cuenta gratuita en HTX. Experimenta un proceso de registro sin complicaciones y desbloquea todas las funciones.Obtener mi cuentaPaso 2: ve a Comprar cripto y elige tu método de pagoTarjeta de crédito/débito: usa tu Visa o Mastercard para comprar Raydium (RAY) al instante.Saldo: utiliza fondos del saldo de tu cuenta HTX para tradear sin problemas.Terceros: hemos agregado métodos de pago populares como Google Pay y Apple Pay para mejorar la comodidad.P2P: tradear directamente con otros usuarios en HTX.Over-the-Counter (OTC): ofrecemos servicios personalizados y tipos de cambio competitivos para los traders.Paso 3: guarda tu Raydium (RAY)Después de comprar tu Raydium (RAY), guárdalo en tu cuenta HTX. Alternativamente, puedes enviarlo a otro lugar mediante transferencia blockchain o utilizarlo para tradear otras criptomonedas.Paso 4: tradear Raydium (RAY)Tradear fácilmente con Raydium (RAY) en HTX's mercado spot. Simplemente accede a tu cuenta, selecciona tu par de trading, ejecuta tus trades y monitorea en tiempo real. Ofrecemos una experiencia fácil de usar tanto para principiantes como para traders experimentados.

240 Vistas totalesPublicado en 2024.12.10Actualizado en 2025.03.21

Cómo comprar RAY

Discusiones

Bienvenido a la comunidad de HTX. Aquí puedes mantenerte informado sobre los últimos desarrollos de la plataforma y acceder a análisis profesionales del mercado. A continuación se presentan las opiniones de los usuarios sobre el precio de RAY (RAY).

活动图片