Bridgewater Founder Ray Dalio: The Concept and Mechanism of the All Weather Portfolio

marsbitPublicado a 2026-03-24Actualizado a 2026-03-24

Resumen

Ray Dalio, founder of Bridgewater Associates, shares the core principles behind the All Weather Portfolio—a strategy designed to perform well across all economic environments with minimal need for market timing. The goal is to achieve returns significantly higher than cash or low-risk assets, with lower risk than traditional portfolios like the 60/40 stock-bond mix. Dalio emphasizes that cash, while safe from default, often yields the worst long-term real returns, especially during high inflation. The All Weather Portfolio is built on the concept of risk parity, balancing asset classes based on their risk contributions rather than capital allocation. By understanding how different assets (such as bonds, gold, inflation-linked securities, and commodities) react to changes in growth and inflation, the portfolio is structured to maintain stability. It aims to be passively held, avoiding market timing, which Dalio argues most investors—even professionals—cannot execute successfully. Originally developed for his family, the strategy has been refined over 30 years. Dalio encourages investors to understand and apply these principles to build confidence and resilience, particularly in volatile markets. He plans to release a detailed “recipe” for constructing such a portfolio in the future.

Author :@RayDalio

Compiled by: He Tongxue

Bridgewater Founder I am at a stage in my life where my primary goal is to pass on the principles I have learned over the past 60 years—principles that have helped me and that I believe can also help others. I believe one of the most important investment principles I can convey is about what the "All Weather Portfolio" is and how to construct such a portfolio. I believe these principles are particularly valuable in risky times like the present.

For me, the most important thing for most investors is to have a portfolio that: a) is well-diversified/designed to achieve the highest possible return with minimal risk; b) does not require market timing. The reasons are: a) Although most people believe the safest investment is cash (such as short-term Treasury bills, or interest-bearing deposits like high-quality money market funds with near-zero default risk), because it does not default, these cash investments inevitably yield the lowest after-tax returns over the long term and perform particularly poorly during periods of high inflation—meaning they lose significant purchasing power. It is also true that b) almost all investors (including most seasoned professional investors) cannot effectively time the market, even if they think they can. Therefore, I believe that for most investors managing their own portfolios, investment should involve as little or even no market timing as possible.

The All Weather Portfolio is a passively held portfolio with expected returns significantly higher than low-risk assets like cash, but with risk much lower than high-risk assets like stocks and bonds, and this holds true in any environment. This differs from most portfolios—such as the classic 60/40 stock-bond portfolio, or those that perform well in good times and poorly in bad times. So to be clear, the All Weather Portfolio is a type of portfolio designed to achieve the above goals, not a specific investment product. It is more like a financial engineering challenge aimed at achieving this balance, from which investment products can be derived. My All Weather Portfolio is constructed in my own way, which I will briefly describe here and elaborate on later. Naturally, my approach has evolved and improved over time, and I have some ideas to make it even better. But anyone can implement it in their own way—perhaps I should hold a competition to see who can build the best method.

I will start by explaining how I developed my method and how it works.

About 30 years ago, I tried to create an investment strategy for my family so they could invest without my guidance after I passed away. I believed I needed a portfolio that could:

a) Provide returns significantly higher than cash (i.e., equal to or exceeding the classic 60/40 stock-bond portfolio);

b) Have lower risk than the 60/40 portfolio;

c) Not perform poorly in any specific type of economic environment;

d) Not require market timing.

In my view, the only way to achieve such an All Weather Portfolio was to hold a variety of diversified, higher-return but higher-risk investments, so that when combined, due to the mutual diversification effects among these asset classes, the overall portfolio would achieve the same high returns as individual assets but with lower risk. To achieve better diversification, I developed the concept of "Risk Parity"—that is, adjusting investments with different risk levels (i.e., different volatilities) by increasing the risk/volatility of low-risk/low-volatility investments and reducing the risk/volatility of high-risk/high-volatility investments, so that their risk levels become more balanced. Then I balanced my exposure to each asset class based on the most fundamental factors driving their returns. In other words, by understanding how each asset class responds to changing economic conditions (such as inflation and growth—for example, bonds perform poorly when inflation and growth rise, while inflation-hedging assets like gold, inflation-linked bonds, and commodities perform well), and by allocating equal risk in environments where inflation and growth rise and fall, I could create a passive strategic allocation portfolio that remains well-balanced across all economic scenarios. Thirty years later, I still firmly believe that having this core strategic portfolio is crucial. My All Weather Portfolio is my ideal, continuously held strategic asset allocation—i.e., the "beta" (asset class) portfolio. Although I also make many tactical bets based on my judgments about market trends to create "alpha," these are achieved by creating a well-diversified alpha portfolio, which I call the"Pure Alpha" strategy. (I won’t explain this method in detail now, as it would digress too far.)

I developed this All Weather method together with my excellent Bridgewater team, especially Bob Prince and Greg Jensen, who have been at Bridgewater for 40 and 30 years respectively and remain co-chief investment officers there. After building it, I found the method simple and straightforward enough that almost anyone could implement it, and I couldn’t imagine we would be paid for managing money for others using it. So I showed almost everyone I knew how to do it (and I still want to do this today), but to my surprise, many clients asked us to manage their money using this strategy. We launched it as a product, and naturally, it has evolved and improved since then. Bridgewater is now operating and optimizing it in their own way, and I am operating and optimizing it in my own way. The difference between us is: they manage All Weather accounts for others, while I only do it for my family and family foundation, while showing others how to do it.

Whether investors build their own All Weather Portfolio or have someone else do it, what I most hope is to help people understand how it works and give them the opportunity to apply it, so they can have confidence in achieving good returns without suffering unacceptable losses in market/economic environments that most people consider bad. I have written a lot about how to build my All Weather Portfolio and distributed it widely. (For example, if you want to systematically learn my investment principles, you can access them through the online course I collaborated on with the Singapore Wealth Management Institute:). In any case, I will soon write out my "recipe" to more clearly explain how you can build your own All Weather Portfolio, and I will share it once it is ready.

Criptos en tendencia

Preguntas relacionadas

QWhat is the primary goal of Ray Dalio's All Weather Portfolio?

AThe primary goal is to create a portfolio that is well-diversified and engineered to provide returns significantly higher than cash with much lower risk than stocks and bonds, without the need for market timing, and to perform reasonably well in all economic environments.

QAccording to Dalio, why is cash not the safest long-term investment?

ABecause while it carries minimal default risk, cash investments (like short-term Treasuries) provide the lowest after-tax returns over the long term and perform particularly poorly during periods of high inflation, leading to a significant loss of purchasing power.

QWhat is the core concept of 'Risk Parity' as described in the article?

ARisk Parity is the concept of adjusting investments with different risk/volatility levels so that their risk levels are equalized. This is done by increasing the risk/volatility of low-risk investments and decreasing the risk/volatility of high-risk investments, allowing them to better balance each other.

QHow does the All Weather Portfolio achieve balance across different economic conditions?

AIt achieves balance by understanding how different asset classes perform under varying economic conditions (like rising/falling inflation and growth) and then allocating an equal amount of risk to environments where inflation and growth are rising versus environments where they are falling.

QWhat is the key difference between the 'All Weather' (Beta) portfolio and the 'Pure Alpha' strategy mentioned by Dalio?

AThe All Weather portfolio is the core strategic, passive asset allocation (Beta) designed to perform in all environments. The Pure Alpha strategy consists of additional tactical bets based on market views to generate excess returns, and it is implemented through a separate, well-diversified alpha portfolio.

Lecturas Relacionadas

On the Eve of Circle's Earnings Report, Wall Street Shows Major Divergence in CRCL Valuation

On the eve of Circle (CRCL) releasing its quarterly earnings report, Wall Street analysts are deeply divided over the company's valuation. Morgan Stanley downgraded Circle from "Equal Weight" to "Underweight," slashing its price target from $106 to $38. Analyst James Faucette argues the market overestimates the growth potential of Circle's core USDC stablecoin, noting its circulation hasn't increased since Q3 2025 and new use cases beyond remittances and card spending are limited. He warns that slowing USDC growth could pressure the crucial "reserve income" and shift revenue toward lower-margin transaction fees. In stark contrast, TD Cowen initiated coverage with a "Buy" rating and an $82 price target. Analyst Bryan Bergin believes the market underestimates Circle's potential to evolve from a stablecoin issuer into a broader digital financial infrastructure platform. He forecasts a ~31% annual growth rate for USDC through 2030 and expects faster growth in fee-based revenue from services like payments, RWA tokenization, and its Arc network. A key external factor adding uncertainty is the stalled progress of the CLARITY Act in the US Senate, whose delay could dampen institutional adoption expectations for stablecoins. The core disagreement lies in whether Circle's future hinges on USDC circulation growth or a successful platform-based transformation. The upcoming earnings report is keenly awaited for insights into reserve income trends and the progress of newer business verticals.

marsbitHace 3 min(s)

On the Eve of Circle's Earnings Report, Wall Street Shows Major Divergence in CRCL Valuation

marsbitHace 3 min(s)

Hong Kong Stock Market in July: Super IPOs Coexist with Wave of Breakings, Hard Tech Still the Main Theme

The Hong Kong IPO market in July presented a "two-tiered" scenario characterized by both a mega-IPO and a significant wave of new stock listings falling below their issue price ("breaking issue"). The highlight was Zhongji Innolight's (stock code: 03308.HK) listing on July 30, which raised approximately HK$53.41 billion. This marked the largest IPO on the Hong Kong exchange in nearly seven years since Alibaba's secondary listing. A prominent trend was the continued dominance of A+H listings, with companies like Luxshare (02475.HK) and others contributing significantly to the total monthly fundraising of around HK$116 billion. In stark contrast, the market saw a sharp rise in "broken issues." Out of 17 new listings for the month, 7 broke issue on their debut, with the rate climbing to 47% by month-end. Factors contributing to this included an intense concentration of listings (15 in one week), profit-taking by investors, and a market reassessment of valuations, particularly for companies with unclear commercial prospects. Despite the sell-off, hard tech remained the core theme, accounting for over 70% of July's listings. Key sectors were semiconductors and AI/autonomous driving. However, market enthusiasm became highly selective, with extreme over-subscription for certain niche players while others were heavily sold off. This signals a shift from speculative fervor towards a more value-driven assessment. Looking ahead, recent listing reforms by the Hong Kong Exchanges are expected to attract more tech firms. With a large pipeline of over 350 companies awaiting listing, including potential large offerings like SHEIN, the market is poised for continued activity. Analysts view July's correction not as a downturn but as a healthy valuation reset, emphasizing the need for investors to carefully discern company fundamentals.

marsbitHace 5 min(s)

Hong Kong Stock Market in July: Super IPOs Coexist with Wave of Breakings, Hard Tech Still the Main Theme

marsbitHace 5 min(s)

Wall Street Shows Sharp Divergence in CRCL Valuation on the Eve of Circle's Earnings Report

On the eve of its earnings report on August 5th, significant divergence emerged on Wall Street regarding the valuation of Circle (CRCL). Morgan Stanley downgraded Circle from "Equal Weight" to "Underweight," slashing its target price from $106 to $38. Analyst James Faucette argues that the market has overestimated the growth potential of USDC, noting stagnant circulation since Q3 2025 and a lack of major new use cases beyond remittances and card spending. He warns that slower USDC growth could pressure Circle's core "reserve income" and shift its revenue mix toward lower-margin transaction fees, making current valuations excessive. In contrast, TD Cowen initiated coverage with a "Buy" rating and an $82 target price. Analyst Bryan Bergin believes the market underestimates Circle's potential to evolve from a stablecoin issuer into a broader digital financial infrastructure platform. He focuses on future services like payments, asset management, RWA tokenization, and blockchain infrastructure, forecasting a ~31% CAGR for USDC circulation through 2030 and faster growth in fee-based revenues. A key external variable is the delayed progress of the CLARITY Act, whose uncertainty may pressure market sentiment by slowing regulatory clarity for stablecoins. Ultimately, the split centers on whether Circle's value hinges on USDC growth or its platform transformation. The upcoming earnings report will be scrutinized for details on reserve income, payment services, and RWA initiatives.

Odaily星球日报Hace 8 min(s)

Wall Street Shows Sharp Divergence in CRCL Valuation on the Eve of Circle's Earnings Report

Odaily星球日报Hace 8 min(s)

July Security Report: Total Losses Approximately $97 Million, Cross-Chain Bridge Attacks Concentrated with Over $35 Million

In July 2026, the cryptocurrency sector suffered total losses of approximately $97 million, with hacker attacks and contract vulnerabilities accounting for about $94 million. A significant trend was the shift in attack vectors from smart contract code to off-chain infrastructure, signature key leaks, and governance manipulation. Major incidents included: * **Ostium ($23.75M loss):** An attacker gained access to its off-chain price oracle signing system, manipulated BTC prices, and drained funds. * **AFX Trade Bridge ($24.15M loss):** The private validator key for its cross-chain bridge was compromised, allowing unauthorized withdrawals. * **BonkDAO ($20M loss):** An attacker acquired enough tokens to pass a malicious governance proposal and drain the treasury, exploiting low voting thresholds. * **Bonzo Lend ($9.05M loss):** A third-party oracle provider's signature verification was exploited to inject manipulated token prices. * **Verus Bridge ($7.55M loss):** A repeat attack exploiting the same unpatched bridge vulnerability. * **B2 Network ($3.86M loss):** An attacker seized the upgrade authority for a staking contract. Cross-chain bridges remained a prime target, with concentrated attacks causing over $35 million in losses. Phishing scams resulted in roughly $3 million in losses, employing sophisticated methods like fake mobile apps and physical counterfeit letters targeting Ledger users. Key takeaways are the acceleration of attacks on off-chain infrastructure, the persistent vulnerability of cross-chain bridges, and the rising prominence of governance-layer exploits. Recommendations include enhancing off-chain key management with multi-sig security, implementing stricter governance controls, and increasing user vigilance against phishing.

marsbitHace 43 min(s)

July Security Report: Total Losses Approximately $97 Million, Cross-Chain Bridge Attacks Concentrated with Over $35 Million

marsbitHace 43 min(s)

Trading

Spot

Artículos destacados

Cómo comprar RAY

¡Bienvenido a HTX.com! Hemos hecho que comprar Raydium (RAY) sea simple y conveniente. Sigue nuestra guía paso a paso para iniciar tu viaje de criptos.Paso 1: crea tu cuenta HTXUtiliza tu correo electrónico o número de teléfono para registrarte y obtener una cuenta gratuita en HTX. Experimenta un proceso de registro sin complicaciones y desbloquea todas las funciones.Obtener mi cuentaPaso 2: ve a Comprar cripto y elige tu método de pagoTarjeta de crédito/débito: usa tu Visa o Mastercard para comprar Raydium (RAY) al instante.Saldo: utiliza fondos del saldo de tu cuenta HTX para tradear sin problemas.Terceros: hemos agregado métodos de pago populares como Google Pay y Apple Pay para mejorar la comodidad.P2P: tradear directamente con otros usuarios en HTX.Over-the-Counter (OTC): ofrecemos servicios personalizados y tipos de cambio competitivos para los traders.Paso 3: guarda tu Raydium (RAY)Después de comprar tu Raydium (RAY), guárdalo en tu cuenta HTX. Alternativamente, puedes enviarlo a otro lugar mediante transferencia blockchain o utilizarlo para tradear otras criptomonedas.Paso 4: tradear Raydium (RAY)Tradear fácilmente con Raydium (RAY) en HTX's mercado spot. Simplemente accede a tu cuenta, selecciona tu par de trading, ejecuta tus trades y monitorea en tiempo real. Ofrecemos una experiencia fácil de usar tanto para principiantes como para traders experimentados.

332 Vistas totalesPublicado en 2024.12.10Actualizado en 2026.06.02

Cómo comprar RAY

Discusiones

Bienvenido a la comunidad de HTX. Aquí puedes mantenerte informado sobre los últimos desarrollos de la plataforma y acceder a análisis profesionales del mercado. A continuación se presentan las opiniones de los usuarios sobre el precio de RAY (RAY).

活动图片