Bitcoin Monthly Chart Adjustment Structure Established, HYPE Entry Opportunity Emerges | Exclusive Analysis

marsbitPublicado a 2026-06-08Actualizado a 2026-06-08

Resumen

Bitcoin Monthly Correction Structure Confirmed, HYPE Entry Opportunity Emerges | Guest Analysis Last week's analysis correctly identified that the $60,000 level for Bitcoin was an intermediate point, not the bottom of the current correction. This was validated on June 5th when the price broke below this key support, dropping to around $59,100. The monthly-level a-b-c three-wave corrective structure from the October 2025 high of $126,200 is now fully established, with the market currently in the c-wave decline phase. The cumulative adjustment time is less than 35 days, indicating the structure is far from complete. This week's focus will be tracking the rebound's strength and resistance performance. The two key resistance zones of $65,000 and $69,500~$70,500 will be crucial observation points for determining the subsequent trend. For HYPE, last week's top warning signal was also validated, with the price falling up to 27% from its $75.87 high. The token has now entered a support zone, presenting a potential short-term entry opportunity. From a strategic standpoint, the medium-term outlook remains bearish, awaiting optimal timing to add short positions upon a rebound. **Key Trading Views Summary:** * **BTC:** The analysis maintains a bearish medium-term bias. Strategy involves building short positions on rebounds towards $65,000 or the $69,500~$70,500 resistance area. A break below the $59,000-$60,000 support could trigger additional short entries. Short-term trading (30%...

In last week's report, we explicitly stated that $60,000 was an intermediate node in this correction cycle, not the bottom – a judgment directly validated by the market on June 5th: the price broke below this level, touching a low of $59,100. Thus, the monthly-level a-b-c three-wave correction structure from the October 2025 high of $126,200 has been fully established. The market is currently in the c-wave decline phase, with a total correction time of less than 35 days, indicating the structure is far from complete.

This week, we will focus on tracking the rebound height and resistance performance. The two major resistance zones at $65,000 and $69,500~$70,500 will be the core observation windows for judging subsequent trends.

Regarding HYPE, the top signal we warned about last week was also validated, with the price falling up to 27% from $75.87. This week, it has entered a stage for short-term positioning in the support zone. Strategically, we maintain a mid-term bearish outlook, awaiting opportune windows to add positions after a rebound.

Summary of Core Trading Views for This Week:

• BTC multi-timeframe structural analysis (Detailed in Part 1)

• BTC market outlook and mid/short-term trading strategies for this week (Detailed in Part 2)

• HYPE hourly chart structural analysis (Detailed in Part 3)

• HYPE market outlook and short-term trading strategy for this week (Detailed in Part 4)

Market Validation of Last Week's Trading Strategies and Core Views:

• BTC Market Outlook Validation: Last week's article pointed out: Bitcoin maintains a volatile downtrend after a weak rebound, with the short-term strategy focusing on "selling high." The current market movement validates our previous forecast.

• HYPE Market Outlook Validation: Last week's article pointed out: HYPE faces multiple resistances around $75.87, making a short-term top there highly probable. The current market movement closely aligns with our forecast.

I. Bitcoin Multi-Timeframe Structural Analysis

BTC Daily Chart Structural Analysis (Based on price action since the low on February 6, 2026)

Bitcoin _ Daily Candlestick Chart:

Figure 1

1. Dynamic Analysis of Bitcoin Market Structure Based on Wave Theory (Re-examination of key turning points since the October 2025 high correction)

As shown in (Figure 1), after hitting a historical high of approximately $126,200 in October 2025, the Bitcoin market entered a deep correction phase. By early February 2026, the price touched a low of $60,000 on February 6th, followed by a rebound lasting about 90 days. During this period, the market fiercely debated whether "$60,000 is the endpoint of this correction or just an intermediate low." Our analysis consistently favored the latter view, identifying it as a阶段性 low rather than the final bottom. We believed the rise starting on February 6th was a rebound within a larger corrective structure, not a trend reversal, and subsequent corrections would still break below the $60,000 level.

Following is a review of the analysis progression based on the technical framework:

1. Initial Assessment (Mid-February): Corrective rebound within C-wave (i.e., C-2 rebound wave)

In the weekly review on February 16, we explicitly stated that the rally starting from the February 6 low was, in nature, a "C-2 wave" oversold rebound within a larger "C-wave" correction. This would be followed by a "C-3 wave" correction, making a break below $60,000 highly likely.

2. Mid-term Revision (Late April): Re-classification of wave structure

In the weekly review on April 20, we noted: As the rebound extended in time and space, by April 19th, this rally had lasted about 73 days, exceeding the duration of the 54-day "B-wave" rebound significantly. Therefore, we redefined this upward movement as a larger "D-wave rebound." This would be followed by an "E-wave" correction, which would very likely break the $60,000 support.

3. Later Upgrade (Mid-May): Re-assessment of correction magnitude

In the weekly review on May 18, we emphasized again: By May 17, this rebound had lasted about 100 days, approaching the time taken for the decline from $126,200 to $60,000 (about 122 days). This led us to judge that the entire corrective pattern might have upgraded to a monthly-level correction. Consequently, we re-classified the wave structure.

4. Summary: The entire analytical process is one of dynamically tracking the evolution of market structure. Throughout, we consistently maintained that $60,000 was a significant intermediate point within the larger corrective process, not the ultimate bottom of this bear market cycle. So far, with the price breaking below the key $60,000 support on June 5th, touching lows near $59,100, the overall market movement validates our previous judgment about a breakdown below this level.

2. Wave Division Based on BTC Monthly Chart Structure

Bitcoin _ Monthly Candlestick Chart:

Figure 2

1. Bitcoin monthly chart shows: From January 1, 2017, to present (using this complete data segment only), the current structure can be subdivided into 4 phases:

• Phase 0-1 (Uptrend): From $751 (2017-01-01) to $69,000 (2021-11-10), lasting about 59 months (~1774 days).

• Phase 1-2 (Correction): From $69,000 (2021-11-10) to $15,476 (2022-11-21), lasting about 13 months (~376 days). Maximum drawdown about 77.57%.

• Phase 2-3 (Uptrend): From $15,476 (2022-11-21) to $126,200 (2025-10-06), lasting about 35 months (1050 days). This main uptrend wave set a new all-time high, with a maximum gain of about 715.46%.

• Phase 3-4 (Correction): From $126,200 (2025-10-06) to present, running for about 8 months (~243 days), with a maximum drawdown of 53.17%.

2. As shown in (Figure 2), the correction beginning from the previous high of $126,200 (Phase 3-4) can be preliminarily determined as a monthly-level a-b-c three-wave corrective structure. The market is currently in the c-wave decline phase.

• a-wave (Decline): $126,200 (2025-10-06) to $60,000 (2026-02-06), lasting about 4 months (~122 days), with a maximum drawdown of about 52.5%.

• b-wave (Rebound): $60,000 (2026-02-06) to $82,850 (2026-05-06), lasting 3 months (~90 days), with a maximum gain of about 38.1%.

• c-wave (Decline): $82,850 (2026-05-06) to present, running for 33 days. On June 5th, the price broke below the $60,000 support, probing lows near $59,100. This breakdown confirms the establishment of the c-wave (decline wave).

BTC Hourly Chart Structural Deep Dive (Using 4-hour as analysis周期)

Bitcoin _ 4-Hour Candlestick Chart

Figure 3

1. As shown in (Figure 3), the correction since the May 6th high of $82,850 can be subdivided into a 10-segment corrective structure in the 4-hour chart. It contains two declining central pivots: Pivot D and Pivot E. The overall structure is clear, presenting a typical complex correction pattern.

2. From the 4-hour structural perspective, it is currently in the 36-37 segment rebound. The first resistance above is located near $65,000; a significant resistance zone lies between $69,500~$70,500.

II. Bitcoin Current Operational Assessment

1. BTC Market Outlook for This Week:

Core Views for the Week:

• Monitor the test results of bulls and bears around the $65,000 level and the $69,500~$70,500 resistance zone.

• Also observe the support effect when the price retests the $59,000~$60,000 area.

2. Core Resistance Levels:

• First Resistance Zone: Around $65,000 (previous important low point)

• Second Resistance Zone: $69,500~$70,500 area (previous high-volume成交区)

3. Core Support Levels:

• First Support Zone: $59,000~$60,000 area (previous important support)

• Second Support Level: Around $55,000 (previous important support)

4. Trading Strategy for This Week (Excluding impact of突发 news)

1. Mid-term Strategy:

Bitcoin _ Daily Candlestick Chart (Position Monitoring Model)

Figure 4

Position Monitoring Model: As shown in (Figure 4), the current price has effectively broken below the "Bull-Bear Channel," with technical patterns confirming a shift to a bear-dominated structure. Last week, the market showed a non-resistance unilateral sharp decline with weak intraday rebound momentum. Such market conditions do not align with our established principles for mid-term trend-following position building, hence we maintain a neutral mid-term position for observation.

If a technical rebound occurs this week, mid-term short positions can be gradually built based on the following three-tier strategy:

• Sell on Weak Rebound: If the price rebounds near $65,000 showing signs of stalling, preliminary mid-term short positions of 20% can be established.

• Add at Strong Resistance: If the price further rebounds to the $69,500~$70,500 area and shows clear承压 signs, mid-term short positions can be increased to 60%.

• Sell on Breakdown: If the rebound near $65,000 fails and the price falls back, effectively breaking below the $59,000~$60,000 support zone, short positions can be added顺势 to 60%.

2. Short-term Strategy: Utilize 30%仓位, set stop-loss points, and look for "spread" opportunities based on support and resistance levels (using 30-minute/60-minute as operational周期).

3. For short-term operations, to dynamically应对 complex market演变, we have prepared two specific operational plans, A and B.

• Plan A: Sell High on Rebound Resistance.

• Entry: If the price rebounds near $65,000 showing stalling signals, combined with quantitative model top signals, a 15% short position can be established.

• Risk Control: Set initial stop-loss.

• Exit: When the correction approaches important support levels combined with model signals, gradually close positions to take profits.

• Plan B: Add Positions at Strong Resistance Zone.

• Add Position: If the price further rebounds to the $69,500~$70,500 area showing stalling signals, combined with quantitative model top signals, short positions can be increased to 30%.

• Risk Control: Set initial stop-loss.

• Exit: When the correction approaches important support levels combined with model signals, gradually close positions to take profits.

• Plan C: Sell on Effective Breakdown of Support.

• Entry: If the rebound near $65,000 fails and the price falls back, effectively breaking below the $59,000~$60,000 support zone, combined with model top signals, short positions can be increased to 30%.

• Risk Control: Set initial stop-loss.

• Exit: When the decline reaches important support levels combined with model signals, gradually close positions to take profits.

III. HYPE Hourly Chart Structural Analysis:

HYPE_4-Hour Candlestick Chart

Figure 5

1. As shown in (Figure 5), on the 4-hour timeframe, HYPE has clearly constructed a seven-segment structure containing an "uptrend pivot" from the May 14th low of $38.14 to the June 2nd high of $75.87.

2. Last week's review had already提示: As "Endpoint 47" showed momentum divergence and overlapped with a top warning signal from the "Spread Trading Model," the two formed a共振. Therefore, forming a short-term high there was highly probable. Market movement confirmed this judgment: the price adjusted from "Endpoint 47" ($75.87) to "Endpoint 48" ($55.47), with a maximum decline of 26.89%.

3. Currently, HYPE price has stabilized and rebounded in the $55 support area, currently in the 48-49 rebound process. The resistance above lies in the $62.5 to $64.57 area. If the price rebounds there and falls back under pressure, it will continue searching for stronger support downwards.

IV. HYPE Market Outlook and Short-term Trading Strategy for This Week (06.08~06.14)

1. HYPE Market Outlook for This Week:

1. Core Resistance Levels:

• First Resistance Zone: $62.5 - $64.57 area;

• Second Resistance Zone: $68 - $70 area;

2. Core Support Levels:

• First Support Zone: $55 - $57 area;

• Second Support Zone: $47 - $49 area;

Core Views on HYPE for the Week:

• Observe the test results of price against resistance and support levels.

2. HYPE Short-term Trading Strategy for This Week (Buy on Support)

Short-term HYPE trading this week should adhere to the strategy of "buying low on dips, avoiding chasing rallies."

Short-term Strategy: Try long on stabilization in support zone.

When HYPE price retests the key support zones of $55-57 or the deeper $47-49 area, shows signs of stopping decline and stabilizing, and combines with bottom signals triggered by both models, consider testing a long position with light仓.仓位 must be controlled below 30%, strictly adhering to stop-loss discipline.

V. Special Notes:​​

1. When opening a position: Immediately set the initial stop-loss.

2. When profit reaches 1%: Move the stop-loss to the entry cost (breakeven point), ensuring principal safety.

3. When profit reaches 2%​​: Move the stop-loss to the 1% profit position.

4. Continuous tracking: Thereafter, for every additional 1% profit,同步移动 the stop-loss by 1%, dynamically protecting and locking in profits.

The financial markets change rapidly. All market analysis and trading strategies require dynamic adjustments. All views, analytical models, and operational strategies mentioned in this article are derived from personal technical analysis and are solely for personal trading journal purposes. They do not constitute any investment advice or operational basis. Markets involve risks; investment requires caution. Do not make decisions based solely on this content.

Preguntas relacionadas

QAccording to the article's technical analysis, what is the current wave structure of Bitcoin's monthly-level adjustment since its October 2025 high?

AAccording to the analysis, the adjustment since the October 2025 high of 126,200 USD is a monthly-level a-b-c three-wave correction structure. The market is currently in the c-wave decline phase.

QWhat are the two key resistance zones identified for Bitcoin's potential rebound this week?

AThe two key resistance zones identified are around 65,000 USD and the 69,500~70,500 USD area.

QWhat was the main market validation mentioned for HYPE's price action from the previous week's analysis?

AThe previous week's analysis warned of a top signal for HYPE around 75.87 USD. This was validated as the price corrected from that high by a maximum of 27% to around 55.47 USD.

QWhat is the core short-term trading strategy suggested for HYPE this week?

AThe core short-term strategy for HYPE is to buy on dips ('buy low, avoid chasing rallies'). Specifically, to consider light long positions if the price shows signs of stabilizing in the key support zones of 55-57 USD or 47-49 USD, with position size controlled below 30% and strict stop-loss discipline.

QWhat general risk management rule does the article advise regarding stop-loss placement after opening a position?

AThe article advises setting an initial stop-loss immediately upon opening a position. When profit reaches 1%, the stop-loss should be moved to the breakeven point. At a 2% profit, it should be moved to lock in 1% profit. Subsequently, the stop-loss should be trailed upward by 1% for every additional 1% gain to dynamically protect profits.

Lecturas Relacionadas

The Semiconductor Industry's Most Obscure Chokepoint Material: It Has Multiplied in Price Unnoticed, and China Just Banned Its Export

"Helium: The Silent Choke Point in Semiconductors" Helium, despite being the universe's second most abundant element, is critically scarce on Earth. It cannot be synthesized artificially and escapes Earth's gravity once released, making it a non-renewable resource. Yet, it is indispensable for advanced semiconductor manufacturing, requiring ultra-high purity (99.9999%) for processes like wafer etching, leak detection, and thermal management in lithography tools, with no viable substitutes. This low-profile resource, whose price has doubled unnoticed, suddenly gained attention when China imposed an export ban on July 10th. The ban is a response to a severe global shortage triggered months earlier. In March, missile attacks damaged the world's largest helium production hub in Qatar's Ras Laffan, halting a third of global supply with repairs expected to take 3-5 years. Concurrently, Russia tightened export controls, and the US sold off its federal helium reserve. Approximately 200 specialized transport containers, each worth ~$1 million, were stranded with perishable cargo. Global spot prices skyrocketed, and chipmakers like TSMC warned of potential impacts. China, which imports over 84% of its helium (primarily from Qatar and Russia), faces a severe squeeze. Despite being helium-poor, China has developed domestic extraction technology over five years, processing byproduct gases from LNG plants to produce ultra-pure helium. Domestic output, while still only covering less than 20% of demand, enabled the recent export ban aimed at securing domestic supply for its own expanding chip industry. The industry now faces "Helium Shortage 5.0." With key global sources constrained for years, this invisible gas—once wasted on party balloons—has become a critical, geopolitically charged bottleneck for chips, healthcare (MRI machines), and beyond, forcing the world to finally treat it as the finite strategic resource it is.

marsbitHace 4 min(s)

The Semiconductor Industry's Most Obscure Chokepoint Material: It Has Multiplied in Price Unnoticed, and China Just Banned Its Export

marsbitHace 4 min(s)

Early Investor of Unitree Bets on a Brain-Computer Interface Company

"Wabo Technologies, a brain-computer interface (BCI) startup, has secured new funding from Vertex Ventures (under Temasek), Hongtai Fund, Chengdu Future Industry Fund, and Huifengda Capital. Vertex Ventures is known for its early bet on Unitree Robotics. Inspired by the sci-fi film "Avatar," founder Zhang Xingzhi has pursued human-machine interaction for over a decade. He established Wabo in late 2025, coinciding with China's push for BCI as a future industry. Unlike companies focused solely on medical hardware, Wabo positions itself as a model company. Its core mission is to develop a "Human Neural Intent Model" that decodes EEG, EMG, and behavioral signals to understand a user's goals, confirmations, corrections, and stop intentions before physical action, translating them into standardized control signals for machines, robots, or smart devices. The young, full-stack team, backed by academic collaborators from Tianjin University and Fudan University, quickly attracted investors. The company had previously raised a seed round from Ceyuan Capital. Investors were impressed by Wabo's systematic capabilities in data collection, signal processing, and engineering, seeing potential beyond a single hardware product toward a reusable layer of human intent interpretation. Applications span medical rehabilitation, smart homes, embodied AI, and even space exploration, with Wabo partnering with Tianjin University on pioneering "space BCI" research. Wabo plans a dual-headquarters strategy, with Shanghai focusing on high-end R&D and model development, and Chengdu handling hardware, product development, and supply chain. The BCI sector in China is heating up, with over 30 financing deals in early 2026. Zhang believes future competition will center on who can build a sustainable data-model-scenario loop. He predicts industry consolidation within three years, with only companies that master this闭环 surviving. The vision from "Avatar" is inching closer to reality."

marsbitHace 19 min(s)

Early Investor of Unitree Bets on a Brain-Computer Interface Company

marsbitHace 19 min(s)

ChangXin Technology: A Cyclical Stock Standing Atop the Cycle Peak

Changxin Technology: A Cyclical Stock at the Peak On July 27, 2026, Changxin Technology topped the A-share market with a market capitalization of 3.28 trillion yuan, surging 465% on its first trading day. The company, which lost 16.3 billion yuan in 2023, reported an estimated net profit of 50-57 billion yuan for the first half of 2026. Its dramatic reversal mirrors the volatile DRAM (Dynamic Random Access Memory) cycle. The DRAM industry is inherently cyclical, with booms and busts every 3-4 years. This is due to product standardization and a significant time lag in supply adjustment. When prices rise, manufacturers expand capacity, but new production takes 2-3 years to come online, often leading to oversupply and price crashes when demand cools. Changxin's performance perfectly tracks this cycle. It recorded deep losses in 2023-2024 during the industry downturn, turned its first annual profit in 2025, and saw profits skyrocket in Q1 2026. This surge is primarily price-driven. The AI boom has led major players like Samsung and SK Hynix to shift 70-80% of new capacity to high-margin HBM (High Bandwidth Memory), creating a severe shortage and price explosion in general-purpose DRAM markets where Changxin competes. However, a massive global capacity expansion is underway. The top three manufacturers have announced nearly $70 billion in capital expenditure for 2026. Changxin itself plans to expand from three to seven 12-inch wafer fabs. This investment will translate into significant new supply in 2-3 years. While DRAM prices are expected to remain high through 2026-2027, price growth is already slowing, and a potential downturn is forecast for around 2028 as new capacity ramps up. A key challenge for Changxin is catching up in the critical HBM segment. While it has delivered HBM3 samples, leaders are already mass-producing more advanced HBM3E. Success in HBM is crucial for gaining true cyclical resilience. In conclusion, Changxin is a commendable company that has broken foreign monopolies in DRAM. Its long-term growth narrative—driven by import substitution and AI—is valid. Yet, its current valuation of 5-6x forward P/E, typical for a cyclical stock at its peak, suggests much future growth is already priced in. AI may extend the current cycle but cannot eliminate the industry's inherent volatility. For investors, the critical question is preparedness for the inevitable downturn when the cycle turns.

marsbitHace 24 min(s)

ChangXin Technology: A Cyclical Stock Standing Atop the Cycle Peak

marsbitHace 24 min(s)

What If the CLARITY Act Ultimately Fails to Pass?

This article examines the potential consequences if the CLARITY Act, a major US crypto market structure bill, fails to pass in the Senate. Having cleared the House in July 2025 and a key committee in May 2026, the bill's passage into law this year is now considered uncertain, with prediction markets showing its probability dropping from 82% in February to 35%. The article analyzes three main areas of impact should the bill fail. First, for the crypto market, analysts believe a negative reaction is limited and partially priced in already, with Bitcoin's recent weakness attributed more to macro factors. The specific details of the failed bill would matter more than its failure alone. Second, for US stocks, Coinbase (COIN) could see short-term pressure, with analysts citing a potential drop to the $140-$160 range, though its long-term thesis is not solely tied to the bill. For Circle, failure might be neutral or even positive long-term, as a passed bill could invite more stablecoin competition. Bitcoin-treasury firms like Strategy (MSTR) are seen as more directly tied to Bitcoin's price than the legislation. Third, in Washington, the failure is framed within a broader political struggle. Democratic resistance is partly linked to concerns over former President Trump's crypto holdings, making the bill a political tool. If it fails in 2026, the industry would likely rely on existing frameworks like the GENIUS Act and agency-level rules. Missing the August window likely pushes any significant progress to 2027, a period of political reshuffling after midterm elections, making consensus harder to achieve.

Odaily星球日报Hace 1 hora(s)

What If the CLARITY Act Ultimately Fails to Pass?

Odaily星球日报Hace 1 hora(s)

Trading

Spot
活动图片