After Two Years and 36 Applicants Narrowed to 2! Hong Kong's First Batch of Stablecoin Licenses Issued, HSBC and Standard Chartered Successfully Break Through

Odaily星球日报Publicado a 2026-04-10Actualizado a 2026-04-10

Resumen

Hong Kong has issued its first batch of stablecoin licenses to two institutions after a two-year regulatory process. The Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA) granted approval to HSBC and AnchorFin Tech Limited, a joint venture involving Standard Chartered Bank, HKT, and Animoca Brands. The licensed entities are expected to launch regulated stablecoins by mid-to-late this year. The move marks a major milestone in Hong Kong’s digital asset development, following the introduction of a sandbox arrangement in March 2024 and the formal enactment of the Stablecoin Ordinance in August 2025. Initially, over 70 companies showed interest in applying, but only 36 eventually submitted applications. The HKMA emphasized a cautious and quality-focused approach to licensing. This development is seen as a key step in strengthening Hong Kong’s position as an international digital asset hub. It is expected to promote the use of compliant stablecoins in areas such as cross-border payments, tokenized securities, and decentralized finance (DeFi), while ensuring user protection and risk management. The issuance of the first licenses is viewed not as an endpoint, but as the beginning of a broader expansion of Hong Kong’s stablecoin ecosystem.

Original | Odaily Planet Daily (@OdailyChina)

Author | Golem (@web3_golem)

Hong Kong's first batch of stablecoin licenses has finally been issued.

At 5 PM on April 10th, the Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA) announced that the first batch of stablecoin issuer licenses were granted to two institutions: HSBC Bank and Anchor FinTech Company Limited (a joint venture established by Standard Chartered Bank (Hong Kong) Limited, Hong Kong Telecom (HKT), and ANX Group). It also stated that, according to the current business plans of the two institutions, regulated stablecoins in Hong Kong will be launched successively from the middle to the second half of this year.

Mr. Eddie Yue, Chief Executive of the HKMA, said: "The issuance of the stablecoin issuer licenses is an important milestone in the development of digital assets in Hong Kong. The regulatory regime provides an orderly operating environment, allowing stablecoin issuers to apply innovative technology while properly safeguarding user rights and managing related risks, enabling the healthy, responsible, and sustainable development of Hong Kong's stablecoin ecosystem. I look forward to the issuers launching their businesses as planned, actively exploring development opportunities while managing risks well, promoting the application of compliant stablecoins, addressing pain points in financial and economic activities, creating value for the public and enterprises, and driving the healthy development of Hong Kong's digital assets."

Previous news indicated that the HKMA had completed the final review of the first batch of applications in mid-March 2026. The HKMA received a total of 36 applications.

After Two Years, Hong Kong's Compliant Stablecoins Finally Land

The issuance of Hong Kong's first batch of stablecoin licenses marks a new phase in the implementation of Hong Kong's stablecoin regulatory system. However, the market waited a full two years for this compliant stablecoin license to materialize, making it an achievement reached after a precise博弈 (game/balancing act) between financial innovation and regulatory safety in Hong Kong.

Rewind two years to March 2024, when the Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA) officially launched the "Stablecoin Issuer Sandbox Arrangement." This was a crucial starting point for Hong Kong's stablecoin regulation moving towards practical implementation. The market saw the Hong Kong regulator's open attitude towards crypto finance, which attracted applications from multiple institutions, including traditional financial giants and native Web3 enterprises, to participate in the sandbox experiment.

In July of the same year, after four months of review, the HKMA announced the sandbox participants. Five institutions, including JD CoinChain Technology (Hong Kong) Limited, RD InnoTech Limited, Standard Chartered Bank (Hong Kong) Limited, ANX Group Limited, and Hong Kong Telecom (HKT) Limited, obtained participation qualifications. Market expectations were ignited because this indicated that Hong Kong's stablecoin regulation had entered the stage of specific institutional testing and regulatory磨合 (breaking-in/磨合), and Hong Kong was not far from bringing stablecoins into the formal regulatory framework.

Hong Kong's stablecoin sandbox experiment lasted for one year. On August 1, 2025, Hong Kong's "Stablecoin Ordinance" came into effect, and the stablecoin issuer regulatory system was officially implemented. This was a key node in the development of Hong Kong's virtual assets, marking the entry of Hong Kong's stablecoins into the era of licensed regulation.

The second half of 2025 also coincided with the peak of narratives intersecting crypto and traditional finance, such as RWA, stock tokenization, and listed company crypto treasuries. After the Hong Kong "Stablecoin Ordinance" took effect, the market expected Hong Kong's crypto finance to enter a great navigation era. Therefore, when the HKMA opened the first round of stablecoin issuer license applications, it was reported that over 70 companies intended to apply for Hong Kong stablecoin licenses, including financial institutions, Web2 internet companies, and blockchain enterprises.

But just as the situation was heating up, Hong Kong's stablecoin and RWA businesses faced a regulatory cool-down. In September 2025, market rumors emerged that companies involved in stablecoin and RWA businesses in Hong Kong were "warned" to keep a low profile in their business and statements related to stablecoins and RWA. Simultaneously, the participation of Chinese-funded enterprises in Hong Kong's stablecoin business was strictly controlled. According to a Caixin report at the time, because Hong Kong's stablecoin business was still in its infancy, excessive participation by Chinese-funded entities might bring risks, so it was necessary to isolate the risks first.

This temporary incident directly led to a sharp decrease in the number of enterprises applying for Hong Kong stablecoin licenses. Not only did Chinese-funded banks and state-owned enterprises withdraw, but Web2 internet companies also suspended their stablecoin issuance plans. In October 2025, informed sources revealed that Ant Group, affiliated with Alibaba, and JD.com had suspended their related plans to issue stablecoins in Hong Kong. Ultimately, the HKMA received only 36 stablecoin license applications from institutions, and the market calmed down accordingly.

In early February this year, Mr. Eddie Yue, Chief Executive of the HKMA, stated that they aimed to issue Hong Kong's first batch of stablecoin issuer licenses by March this year. He emphasized: "The number of licenses issued in the first batch will certainly be small, with the goal being稳妥 (prudence/safety first)."

Back to the present, it has been over 8 months since the Hong Kong "Stablecoin Ordinance" came into effect. The issuance of Hong Kong's first batch of stablecoin licenses finally landed today. Over these two years, the market has been hyped, capital has been hot, concepts have been speculated on, and regulation has also been controlled. After going through countless hardships, the path for Hong Kong's compliant stablecoins has finally been fully traversed from "sandbox testing — legislative landing — application review — official licensing".

The Great Era of Hong Kong Stablecoins is Coming

Undoubtedly, the issuance of Hong Kong's first batch of stablecoin licenses is another important milestone on its way to becoming an "International Digital Asset Financial Center".

For Hong Kong, this licensing means that stablecoin regulation is no longer just at the institutional level. With the actual launch of stablecoin businesses by licensed institutions, such as cross-border payments, digital securities, and DeFi fields, Hong Kong's digital financial market will gain more vitality and grasp more discourse power in the future world digital financial system, seizing the strategic high ground of "digital currency sovereignty".

Looking more specifically at the market level, after the first batch of licenses are issued, the Hong Kong crypto market has the opportunity to regain some vitality. In the past, many people thought of forums, summits, and expectations when mentioning Hong Kong stablecoins—it was lively, but always half a step away from real business. Now, the first batch of licensed enterprises can finally legally conduct stablecoin businesses, practically exploring the potential of the Hong Kong market in areas such as cross-border payments, institutional settlements, and on-chain finance.

Of course, the issuance of the first batch of licenses does not mean the overall market situation is settled. Although first movers will have a leading advantage, it doesn't mean latecomers cannot catch up. Only when the second and third batches of licenses are issued in the future will the market truly enter the stage of competing on scenarios, execution capabilities, and products and services.

Therefore, the first batch of licenses is not the climax of the Hong Kong stablecoin story; on the contrary, it is just the beginning. The great era of Hong Kong stablecoins is about to begin.

Preguntas relacionadas

QWhich two institutions were granted the first stablecoin issuer licenses in Hong Kong?

AHSBC and AnchorX Financial Technology Limited (a joint venture between Standard Chartered Bank Hong Kong, HKT, and Ant Group).

QWhen did the Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA) announce the issuance of the first stablecoin licenses?

AAt 5 p.m. on April 10th.

QHow many applications did the HKMA receive for the stablecoin issuer license?

AThe HKMA received 36 applications.

QWhat was the name of the regulatory sandbox arrangement launched by the HKMA in March 2024 for stablecoin issuers?

AThe 'stablecoin issuer sandbox arrangement'.

QWhen did Hong Kong's 'Stablecoin Ordinance' officially come into effect?

AThe 'Stablecoin Ordinance' officially came into effect on August 1, 2025.

Lecturas Relacionadas

The U.S. Government Blocked the Anthropic Model. It Wasn't About 'Jailbreaking' at All.

Last Friday, the U.S. Commerce Department issued an enforcement letter that forced Anthropic to take its two most advanced AI models, Fable 5 and Mythos 5, offline. The stated reason was unspecified national security concerns, initially linked to potential "jailbreaks" of the models' safeguards. However, new details suggest the action stemmed more from a deteriorating relationship between the Trump administration and Anthropic, rather than a genuine technical threat. According to reports, the government cited a little-known export control regulation, compelling Anthropic to block access for all non-U.S. persons, including its own international employees. The company complied, shutting down the models without a court order or specific technical details from the government. Cybersecurity expert Katie Moussouris revealed she was privately shown a research paper detailing a potential safeguard bypass in Fable 5. She argued the described method was minor and did not warrant an export ban, stating that attempts to "fix" it would only weaken the model's defensive capabilities. Moussouris and other experts have since called for the order to be revoked, warning it dangerously removes advanced cybersecurity tools from U.S. defenders. Analysts like Justin Hendrix suggest the move appears retaliatory and sets a dangerous precedent, signaling that the U.S. government can unilaterally shut down a tech company's products. The incident has raised concerns about the reliability of American AI and the potential for political interference in the tech industry, serving as a warning to the broader sector.

marsbitHace 5 min(s)

The U.S. Government Blocked the Anthropic Model. It Wasn't About 'Jailbreaking' at All.

marsbitHace 5 min(s)

Ray Dalio: AI Bull Market Continues to Soar, Should Investors Go All In or Cash Out and Leave the Field?

In his latest notes, Ray Dalio addresses a critical question for investors amid the AI-driven stock market surge: how should one allocate assets during a transformative technological revolution? Dalio emphasizes that technological advancement does not automatically make related stocks attractive. Historical tech cycles—marked by excitement, crowding, volatility, and eventual shakeouts—show that even long-term winners like Microsoft and Apple experienced severe drawdowns. Today's AI sector faces similar uncertainties: overinvestment, intensifying competition, geopolitical tensions (e.g., Taiwan's chip supply), tax policy shifts, anti-AI sentiment, and potential disruption from future technologies like quantum computing. Dalio's core argument focuses on the highly concentrated market structure, where a few tech giants dominate major indices. He warns investors against unknowingly holding concentrated, correlated exposures. Instead of chasing a handful of AI leaders, he advocates for a robust, diversified portfolio of 15 or more high-quality, uncorrelated investments, risk-balanced to match an investor's volatility tolerance. Mathematically, such diversification significantly improves the risk-return ratio—for example, holding 15 uncorrelated assets can boost the ratio by over four times compared to a single concentrated bet. Dalio cautions that future equity returns appear low, with his bubble indicator suggesting real returns could be negative over the next 5-10 years. He stresses that knowing what you don't know is as important as knowing what you do. In an environment of high uncertainty and concentration, avoiding large, concentrated bets on AI stocks is prudent. The optimal strategy is disciplined diversification—the "holy grail" of investing—to navigate this technologically driven cycle with lower risk and comparable or better returns.

marsbitHace 9 min(s)

Ray Dalio: AI Bull Market Continues to Soar, Should Investors Go All In or Cash Out and Leave the Field?

marsbitHace 9 min(s)

The World Cup has only been played for a few days, but some AI prediction models have already been crowned as oracles, while others have stumbled badly.

The 2026 FIFA World Cup has sparked significant interest not only on the pitch but also in AI-driven match prediction. Major models like Qwen, Copilot, and ChatGPT are being used to forecast outcomes, scores, upsets, red cards, and key player performances. Qwen gained early attention by accurately predicting Mexico's 2-0 win over South Africa (including a red card risk) and South Korea's 2-1 victory over the Czech Republic in the opening matches. Copilot's pre-tournament predictions had notable successes, such as correctly calling the Mexico 2-0 scoreline, South Korea's 2-1 win, and Brazil's 1-1 draw with Morocco. However, it also had clear misses, failing to predict upsets like Australia's 2-0 win over Turkey or Switzerland's draw with Qatar. ChatGPT provided detailed analytical reasoning, correctly predicting Mexico's 2-0 win, but its full-tournament predictions tended to favor favorites, missing several underdog results and draws. Tests pitting multiple models (ChatGPT, Gemini, Grok, Claude) against the same match, like Mexico vs. South Africa, showed varying predictions, with only some hitting the exact score. In summary, while AI models like Qwen have shown promising early results in specific match details, and others have had isolated successes, they collectively struggle to consistently identify upsets and underdog performances. AI is becoming an additional reference tool for prediction markets but is far from a definitive source.

marsbitHace 9 min(s)

The World Cup has only been played for a few days, but some AI prediction models have already been crowned as oracles, while others have stumbled badly.

marsbitHace 9 min(s)

Missed Out on SpaceX's IPO? Take a Look at SpaceX's Complete Supply Chain

SpaceX is now public, but its high valuation and losses may deter some investors. However, the real opportunity, as seen with Apple, Tesla, and Nvidia, may lie in its extensive supply chain. SpaceX, funded primarily by its profitable Starlink service, spends hundreds of billions annually on components for its rockets, satellites, and planned orbital AI data centers, creating significant revenue streams for suppliers. Key suppliers are categorized by their indispensability. The first group includes irreplaceable players like **NVIDIA** (GPUs for AI supercomputers), **Eutelsat (SATS)** (spectrum rights), **Filtronic** (millimeter-wave amplifiers), **Materion (MTRN)** (beryllium alloys), and **STMicroelectronics (STM)** (phased array chips). The second category comprises suppliers costly to replace due to long certification cycles or deep integration, such as **Honeywell (HON)** (flight controls), **Carpenter Technology (CRS)** (specialty steel), **Hexcel (HXL)** (carbon fiber), **Broadcom (AVGO)** (data switching), and **Linde** (industrial gases). The third group involves high-volume, cost-critical manufacturers for mass-produced items like Starlink terminals. Major players here include Taiwanese contract manufacturer **Wistron NeWeb (6285)** and several Chinese-listed firms: **Sunway Communication (300136)**, **Parker Advanced Materials (605123)**, **Western Superconducting (002149)**, and **Yingliu Co., Ltd. (603308)**. Other niche providers include **Tianyin Electromechanical**, **Tongyu Communication**, **Trimble (TRMB)**, **Astronics (ATRO)**, and **CTSH**. The timing is now relevant because: 1) SpaceX's procurement is accelerating with plans for 100 launches in 2026, 30 million Starlink terminals, and orbital data centers. 2) Its IPO has brought unprecedented transparency to its supply chain. 3) This phase mirrors early days of the Tesla supply chain boom. The investment thesis shifts from betting on SpaceX's stock to betting on the steady, order-book-driven revenues of its essential suppliers. Risks remain, such as commodity cycles, geopolitical factors, and technological shifts, but the supply chain offers a potentially less speculative path to participate in SpaceX's growth.

marsbitHace 27 min(s)

Missed Out on SpaceX's IPO? Take a Look at SpaceX's Complete Supply Chain

marsbitHace 27 min(s)

Jane Street: The Most Powerful Behind-the-Scenes Operator in the Crypto Industry

Jane Street: Crypto's Most Powerful Behind-the-Scenes Operator A recent 13F filing revealed Jane Street, the secretive Wall Street quant giant, drastically reduced its Bitcoin ETF holdings while increasing stakes in Ethereum ETFs. This move highlights its role not as a directional investor, but as a critical infrastructure player extracting "tolls" from crypto's institutionalization. The firm, founded in 2000 and famously lacking a CEO, has systematically embedded itself across crypto markets. It acts as a key Authorized Participant (AP) and market maker for major Bitcoin and Ethereum ETFs, profiting from arbitrage between ETF shares and underlying assets. Its approach combines quantitative prowess with a willingness to hold positions for structural arbitrage, differing from pure high-frequency traders. Jane Street faces allegations related to the 2022 Terra (LUNA) collapse. A lawsuit claims it used non-public information to withdraw $85 million in UST minutes before a critical withdrawal by Terraform Labs, allegedly exacerbating the crash and avoiding over $200 million in losses. The company denies the claims. Further indicating its reach, a wallet suspected to be operated by Jane Street ("JaneStreetIndia") was identified on the prediction market Polymarket. This bot executed over 11,000 high-frequency trades on short-term crypto price movements with a near-perfect win rate, showcasing a套利 strategy divorced from traditional prediction. Beyond trading, Jane Street holds equity in crypto infrastructure like Kraken, 1inch, and Arbitrum, and mining stocks. Its strategy is clear: avoid betting on winners, but secure a position in the market's essential plumbing. By becoming a ubiquitous part of the liquidity infrastructure—from ETFs to OTC trading and potentially链上 markets—Jane Street operates as a market force itself, raising questions about whether crypto's decentralized,散户-friendly alpha is being permanently eroded by traditional finance's most sophisticated players.

Foresight NewsHace 30 min(s)

Jane Street: The Most Powerful Behind-the-Scenes Operator in the Crypto Industry

Foresight NewsHace 30 min(s)

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片