‘A decent 60% chance’ – Galaxy Research weighs crypto bill ahead of Jan. 15

ambcryptoPublicado a 2026-01-07Actualizado a 2026-01-07

Resumen

Galaxy Research estimates a 60% chance that the crypto market structure bill will advance, with a key Senate Banking Committee markup scheduled for January 15. Democrats are pushing for stricter DeFi regulations, including sanctions compliance, Treasury authority, and a $200 million fundraising cap for issuers. While some view these demands as reasonable, unresolved issues like stablecoin yields and developer protections remain. The 2026 elections could further impact the bill's progress, as political dynamics may delay it. Prediction site Kalshi gives the bill a 79% chance of passing before 2027, but only 49% before May.

Galaxy Research is optimistic that the crypto market structure bill could advance, despite a few contentious issues.

Following the recent bipartisan Senate meeting, Alex Thorn, Head of Research at Galaxy Research, said there was still a “decent 60%” chance that the bill would be passed.

However, he noted that the odds could change depending on the outcome of the Senate Banking Committee markup, scheduled for the 15th of January.

“Republicans are pushing for the markup...Unclear if the two sides can come together and make that bipartisan, as plenty of issues are still outstanding.”

Will Democrats’ demand stall the bill?

Thorn added that the Democrats maintained their stance on DeFi regulation with three key requests from the Republicans.

First, all front-end DeFi platforms must comply with U.S sanctions. In other words, the platforms must block out sanctioned entities, such as North Korea, or face legal liability.

Additionally, DeFi exchanges must grant “special measures” authority to the treasury, and U.S. regulators should issue rulemaking for “non-decentralized” DeFi.

Put differently, the Democrats called for proper DeFi regulation, a stance that delayed the previous markup deadline in September 2025.

Whether it will become another deal-breaker on the 15th of January remains to be seen.

But moderate Democrat and Nevada Senator Catherine Cortez Masto said she “definitely” expects a markup next week. She added,

“We’re still having conversations, but it’s been very productive — open on both sides to working through all of the issues.”

The party also asked for a $200 million cap on the amount issuers can raise and additional investor protections.

Some crypto supporters like venture capitalist Nic Carter viewed the above demands as “pretty reasonable.”

But the stablecoin yield, ethics targeting the Donald Trump family, and software developer protection were key unresolved issues.

In fact, regarding the stablecoin yield, the crypto industry has vowed not to back down, calling it a “national security” issue as China moves to undercut U.S. dominance in the sector.

U.S elections factor

But the 2026 elections could affect the bill’s momentum.

According to investment bank TD Cowen, the Democrats aren’t incentivized to swiftly pass the bill as they believe they may regain control after the November elections. In fact, Trump is worried that he could be impeached if Republicans lose House control.

Jaret Seiberg, managing director of TD Cowen’s Washington research arm, noted in a recent client update that Trump’s conflict of interest topic could delay it by three years.

“We do not believe Democrats would accept this deal unless it also pushed the rest of the bill out three years.”

That said, the overall odds of passage per prediction site Kalshi were 79% before 2027 and 49% before May.


Final Thoughts

  • The Senate Banking Committee is set to markup the crypto market structure bill on January 15, despite Democrats’ hardline stance on DeFi.
  • The chance of the bill’s passage was nearly 50/50 before May, but elections could impact its momentum.

Preguntas relacionadas

QWhat is the probability that the crypto market structure bill will be passed, according to Galaxy Research's Alex Thorn?

AAlex Thorn, Head of Research at Galaxy Research, said there is a 'decent 60%' chance that the bill will be passed.

QWhat are the three key demands from Democrats regarding DeFi regulation?

AThe Democrats' three key demands are: 1) All front-end DeFi platforms must comply with U.S. sanctions and block sanctioned entities. 2) DeFi exchanges must grant 'special measures' authority to the treasury. 3) U.S. regulators should issue rulemaking for 'non-decentralized' DeFi.

QWhat event on January 15th could change the odds of the bill's passage?

AThe Senate Banking Committee markup, scheduled for January 15th, could change the odds of the bill's passage.

QAccording to the article, what is a major unresolved issue that the crypto industry has vowed not to back down on?

AA major unresolved issue is the stablecoin yield, which the crypto industry has vowed not to back down on, calling it a 'national security' issue.

QHow could the 2026 U.S. elections impact the momentum of the crypto bill?

AThe 2026 elections could impact the bill's momentum because Democrats may not be incentivized to pass it swiftly if they believe they will regain control after the November elections. A conflict of interest topic related to Trump could potentially delay the bill by three years.

Lecturas Relacionadas

Gensyn AI: Don't Let AI Repeat the Mistakes of the Internet

In recent months, the rapid growth of the AI industry has attracted significant talent from the crypto sector. A persistent question among researchers intersecting both fields is whether blockchain can become a foundational part of AI infrastructure. While many previous AI and Crypto projects focused on application layers (like AI Agents, on-chain reasoning, data markets, and compute rentals), few achieved viable commercial models. Gensyn differentiates itself by targeting the most critical and expensive layer of AI: model training. Gensyn aims to organize globally distributed GPU resources into an open AI training network. Developers can submit training tasks, nodes provide computational power, and the network verifies results while distributing incentives. The core issue addressed is not decentralization for its own sake, but the increasing centralization of compute power among tech giants. In the era of large models, access to GPUs (like the H100) has become a decisive bottleneck, dictating the pace of AI development. Major AI companies are heavily dependent on large cloud providers for compute resources. Gensyn's approach is significant for several reasons: 1) It operates at the core infrastructure layer (model training), the most resource-intensive and technically demanding part of the AI value chain. 2) It proposes a more open, collaborative model for compute, potentially increasing resource utilization by dynamically pooling idle GPUs, similar to early cloud computing logic. 3) Its technical moat lies in solving complex challenges like verifying training results, ensuring node honesty, and maintaining reliability in a distributed environment—making it more of a deep-tech infrastructure company. 4) It targets a validated, high-growth market with genuine demand, rather than pursuing blockchain integration without purpose. Ultimately, the boundaries between Crypto and AI are blurring. AI requires global resource coordination, incentive mechanisms, and collaborative systems—areas where crypto-native solutions excel. Gensyn represents a step toward making advanced training capabilities more accessible and collaborative, moving beyond a niche controlled by a few giants. If successful, it could evolve into a fundamental piece of AI infrastructure, where the most enduring value in the AI era is often created.

marsbitHace 11 hora(s)

Gensyn AI: Don't Let AI Repeat the Mistakes of the Internet

marsbitHace 11 hora(s)

Why is China's AI Developing So Fast? The Answer Lies Inside the Labs

A US researcher's visit to China's top AI labs reveals distinct cultural and organizational factors driving China's rapid AI development. While talent, data, and compute are similar to the West, Chinese labs excel through a pragmatic, execution-focused culture: less emphasis on individual stardom and conceptual debate, and more on teamwork, engineering optimization, and mastering the full tech stack. A key advantage is the integration of young students and researchers who approach model-building with fresh perspectives and low ego, prioritizing collective progress over personal credit. This contrasts with the US culture of self-promotion and "star scientist" narratives. Chinese labs also exhibit a strong "build, don't buy" mentality, preferring to develop core capabilities—like data pipelines and environments—in-house rather than relying on external services. The ecosystem feels more collaborative than tribal, with mutual respect among labs. While government support exists, its scale is unclear, and technical decisions appear driven by labs, not state mandates. Chinese companies across sectors, from platforms to consumer tech, are building their own foundational models to control their tech destiny, reflecting a broader cultural drive for technological sovereignty. Demand for AI is emerging, with spending patterns potentially mirroring cloud infrastructure more than traditional SaaS. Despite challenges like a less mature data industry and GPU shortages, Chinese labs are propelled by vast talent, rapid iteration, and deep integration with the open-source community. The competition is evolving beyond a pure model race into a contest of organizational execution, developer ecosystems, and industrial pragmatism.

marsbitHace 13 hora(s)

Why is China's AI Developing So Fast? The Answer Lies Inside the Labs

marsbitHace 13 hora(s)

3 Years, 5 Times: The Rebirth of a Century-Old Glass Factory

Corning, a 175-year-old glass company, is experiencing a dramatic revival as a key player in AI infrastructure, driven by surging demand for high-performance optical fiber in data centers. AI data centers require vastly more fiber than traditional ones—5 to 10 times as much per rack—to handle high-speed data transmission between GPUs. This structural demand shift, coupled with supply constraints from the lengthy expansion cycle for fiber preforms, has created a significant supply-demand gap. Nvidia has invested in Corning, along with Lumentum and Coherent, in a $4.5 billion total commitment to secure the optical supply chain for AI. Corning's competitive edge lies in its expertise in producing ultra-low-loss, high-density, and bend-resistant specialty fiber, which is critical for 800G+ and future 1.6T data rates. Its deep involvement in co-packaged optics (CPO) with partners like Nvidia further solidifies its position. While not the largest fiber manufacturer globally, Corning's revenue from enterprise/data center clients now exceeds 40% of its optical communications sales, and it has secured multi-year supply agreements with major hyperscalers including Meta and Nvidia. Financially, Corning's optical communications revenue has surged, doubling from $1.3 billion in 2023 to over $3 billion in 2025. Its stock price has risen nearly 6-fold since late 2023. Key future catalysts include the rollout of Nvidia's CPO products and the scale of undisclosed customer agreements. However, risks include high current valuations and potential disruption from next-generation technologies like hollow-core fiber. The company's long-term bet on light over electricity, maintained even through the telecom bubble crash, is now being validated by the AI boom.

marsbitHace 13 hora(s)

3 Years, 5 Times: The Rebirth of a Century-Old Glass Factory

marsbitHace 13 hora(s)

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片