Five Historic Indicators Simultaneously Flash, Bitcoin Bear Market Bottoming

链捕手Publicado a 2026-07-27Actualizado a 2026-07-27

Resumen

Summary: Bitcoin is exhibiting a confluence of five historical indicators suggesting it may be at or near a long-term cycle bottom. The analysis notes diminishing marginal returns for a passive "always long" strategy, increasing the need for conditional investment approaches. Key indicators: 1. **Nasdaq/BTC RSI:** The 14-week RSI moving average of the Nasdaq 100/BTC ratio has reached a record high of 72.6, indicating Bitcoin is at its most oversold level relative to the Nasdaq in history. Historically, similar extremes have preceded strong 1-3 year outperformance for Bitcoin. 2. **Gold/BTC RSI:** Similarly, the Gold/BTC RSI reached a record high in February 2026, signaling extreme oversold conditions. Past instances led to Bitcoin outperforming gold and USD over multi-year horizons. 3. **Realized Price (On-Chain Cost Basis):** Bitcoin's current price (~$43,400) is 18% below its realized price ($53,000). Historically, price trading below this level has occurred only 12% of the time and has marked the final stages of bear markets, followed by significant positive long-term returns. 4. **Long-Term Forward Returns:** Analysis of periods when the Nasdaq/BTC RSI was above 66 shows asymmetric upside for Bitcoin/USD and BTC/Nasdaq returns over 1-3 years, though the magnitude of returns has diminished each cycle. 5. **Cycle Clock:** Historically, Bitcoin bear market lows have occurred approximately 60 weeks after the prior all-time high. The current cycle is ~40 weeks in, ...

Original:Blockworks Research

Translation: Odaily Planet Daily Golem

Key Summary:

  • Bitcoin is currently down 50% from its all-time high, the bear market has lasted over 40 weeks. A series of long-term cycle indicators suggest the market may be at or near price and time cycle lows.
  • This month, Bitcoin hit its most oversold level ever against the Nasdaq index, and in February this year, it also reached its most oversold level ever against gold. Approaching these extreme levels historically has typically signaled long-term cycle lows and presaged Bitcoin's outperformance and positive returns over the next 1-3 years.
  • Bitcoin's Realized Price (the total on-chain cost basis of the circulating Bitcoin supply) is currently $53,000, 18% below the spot price. Historically, every bear market low has seen Bitcoin price below the Realized Price. Bitcoin price has only spent 12% of its history below the Realized Price. Starting from such time points, Bitcoin has delivered considerable returns over 1-3 year timeframes.
  • Historical bear market cycles have typically bottomed around week 60 after the all-time high, suggesting the low for this cycle may form in late November 2026.
  • Taken together, the current confluence of factors suggests the period from now until December 2026 may be an extremely attractive time for long-term Bitcoin reaccumulation.

Diminishing Returns and the Need for Conditional Investing

Since March 2021, Bitcoin's price has remained flat; since November 2017, Bitcoin has remained flat against the Nasdaq index for nearly nine years. Over these timespans, Bitcoin's performance relative to equity indices has been flat, while its volatility has been significantly higher. On a risk-adjusted basis, Bitcoin has underperformed equity indices.

This context is crucial for how Bitcoin is held. As Bitcoin rallies and declines, its marginal gains diminish. The passive, always-long strategy that worked for holders across past cycles is now failing. Thus, achieving outperformance increasingly requires seizing opportunities to time additions to, or reductions from, Bitcoin holdings.

To locate these windows, the indicators presented here are conditional signals. They lie dormant for most of history, with their strongest signals occurring in the tails, only a few times per decade.

Presently, these signals have fired simultaneously, and all point to the same conclusion: Bitcoin is likely at or near the price low of its long-term cycle.

Indicator One: Nasdaq/Bitcoin Relative Strength Signal

The first signal is constructed on the Nasdaq 100 index to Bitcoin ratio, based on weekly closes over the last 875 periods. We calculate a 14-period Relative Strength Index (RSI) for this ratio, smoothed with a 14-period Simple Moving Average.

A rising RSI indicates the Nasdaq is overbought relative to Bitcoin; a declining RSI indicates the opposite. This is not an intraday trading indicator. It is the 14-week moving average of a 14-week oscillator, with overbought and oversold regimes lasting multi-year market cycles, not days or weeks.

Nasdaq/BTC RSI

Nasdaq overboughtness is a rare event. The RSI moving average has only spent 5.78% of its history above 65, and only 0.35% above 70. These thresholds have only been breached in four periods: February 2015, February 2019, August 2022, and the period beginning in late January 2026 and persisting to the present.

The current reading must be analyzed in three ways:

  • First, the current 72.6 level is an all-time high, exceeding the previous peak of 68.5 in September 2022 by 4.1 points. All readings above 70 have occurred in the last month.
  • Second, this current episode has lasted 24 weeks, a record duration, far exceeding the 11 weeks in 2015, 4 weeks in 2019, and 10 weeks in 2022.
  • Third, this has only occurred four times in the last 16 years; the present situation is among the rarest phenomena of this indicator. By this measure, this is the most overbought the Nasdaq has ever been relative to Bitcoin, or, inversely, viewed over longer timeframes, this is the most oversold Bitcoin has ever been relative to the Nasdaq.

Indicator Two: Long-Term Forward Returns

Marked by each instance where the Nasdaq/Bitcoin RSI exceeded 66, the forward return profiles for both BTC/USD and BTC/NAS100 in the three historical episodes show upward asymmetry, but only over longer horizons.

BTC/USD and BTC/NAS100 Forward Return Profiles Comparison

Nasdaq/BTC RSI Forward Returns

Two important properties of this table stand out:

  • The first is the time horizon. Short-term forward returns carry almost no information, as the magnitude and direction are minor and inconsistent over 30-120 days, e.g., Bitcoin holdings in 2022 were down 29.1% after 120 days but up 397% after three years. The relative strength signal is largely uninformative for the next one to three months.
  • The second is the decay in return magnitude. Three-year Bitcoin returns in each cycle are about one-quarter to one-third of the prior cycle's, consistent with the diminishing marginal returns discussed above. In all observations, Bitcoin meaningfully outperformed the Nasdaq over the subsequent three years.

Indicator Three: Gold/Bitcoin Relative Strength Signal

If the Nasdaq represents Bitcoin's status as a risk asset, gold represents its status as a monetary store of value.

Constructing a similar metric on the Gold/Bitcoin ratio, we observe a similar dataset, with readings above 66 being rare, exhibiting mean-reverting properties, and clustered around extremes. By this measure, February 2026 was the most overbought period in Gold/Bitcoin history.

Gold/Bitcoin RSI

Peak RSI readings in this pair coincide with long-term cycle price lows for Bitcoin, demonstrating a typical profile. The forward return profile of this indicator is analogous to the Nasdaq findings studied above: over 1-3 year horizons, Bitcoin has historically outperformed both gold and the US dollar from such extreme RSI readings.

BTC/USD and XAU/BTC Forward Return Profiles Comparison

Indicator Four: Bitcoin Realized Price (On-Chain Cost Basis)

Bitcoin's Realized Price estimates the total on-chain cost basis of all Bitcoin in circulation. Unlike spot price, which reflects Bitcoin's current market value, Realized Price measures the average price at which the existing supply last moved on-chain, thus estimating the on-chain cost basis. Historically, Realized Price has represented a deeper valuation level for Bitcoin.

Bitcoin On-Chain Realized Price

Realized Price is a reference level, not a floor. Currently, Bitcoin's Realized Price is $53,000, 18% below the spot price. Bitcoin spot price has only spent 12% of its history below the Realized Price.

Like the RSI indicators above, this is a tail-of-cycle signal. Historically, every bear market low in Bitcoin spot price has occurred below the Realized Price, and historically, after entering this zone, price typically declines further before bottoming. Thus, a decline to or below $53,000 would be consistent with history, not contrary to it.

From entry into this zone, forward returns have historically been positive and sizable.

Bitcoin Price Trajectory After Spot Price Falls Below Realized Price

Measuring from the first weekly close below Realized Price in each cycle, the historical data shows pronounced positive performance over the next 150 weeks. The magnitudes of these numbers decline each cycle, aligning with the decay trend seen in RSI metrics, but the direction is consistent.

Historically, Bitcoin's first close below Realized Price has marked the terminal phase of bear markets, not their onset or middle. Nonetheless, the spot-to-realized price multiple has collapsed from previous highs of over 20x, indicating reduced market froth.

Indicator Five: The Cycle Clock

The final indicator is the most straightforward, illustrating the historical structure of Bitcoin bear markets, measured in both price and time.

Bitcoin Bear Market Duration

In the 2013, 2017, and 2021 cycles, Bitcoin price lows typically occurred around week 60 after the all-time high. The current cycle is in week 40, with a drawdown of 50%, broadly tracking the first three cycles. If the week 60 pattern holds, a Bitcoin low would form in late November 2026.

Despite the Nasdaq 100/Bitcoin and Gold/Bitcoin RSI readings showing extremes, the drawdown this cycle remains consistent with historical drawdown paths.

The time dimension also compresses the intervals between cycles, with each cycle falling back to a new all-time high in progressively shorter timeframes. In other words, the time required to return to the prior all-time high is shorter than in the previous cycle. Assuming this trend continues, a new all-time high should occur within 120 weeks of the prior one, implying a new high by February 2028.

These two observations themselves contain no mechanism; they are empirical regularities across a few cycles. They act as time anchors, layered on top of the conditional signals above, to bound Bitcoin's remaining downside. If the historical structure holds, Bitcoin is roughly 20 weeks from its low, or may have already bottomed.

The Path Forward for Bitcoin Price

Given the current context, the following composite scenario combines the backdrop and historical outcomes outlined above to paint a range of potential paths for Bitcoin over the next three years. This is not a forecast or assertion of likely outcomes, but aims to answer: if the present situation resolves similarly to past analogous situations, where would price go?

Assuming diminishing marginal gains on both up and down moves, a discount to realized price, and referencing historical drawdown paths in both price and time, we construct Bitcoin price path possibilities under these conditions. Each possibility is drawn from Bitcoin's three-year trajectory following a signal firing, scaled by varying intensities from 0.33 to 0.80 to account for cyclical return compression. The bands mark the scaled-down bounds of the historical distribution, not the range within which markets are likely to move.

The shaded bands show the range of these possibilities.

Bitcoin Forward Price Path Projection

These bands are scaled recreations of the historical paths following indicator signals. All these outcomes are satisfactory; they describe plausible scenarios of history repeating, not all possible outcomes, and exclude the possibility of signal failure.

While returns are expected to be mixed by the end of 2026, by 2027 and 2028, the return distribution clearly shifts toward a positively skewed and upward asymmetric trajectory. Given the current market environment and projected path, the coming quarters may present an exceptionally attractive opportunity for long-term investment in Bitcoin.

Bitcoin Price Projection for the Next 3 Years

Risks and Limitations

Each indicator should be evaluated and weighted on its own merits. These indicators should not be interpreted as mechanisms or causal factors for Bitcoin cycle lows, but as manifestations that have coincided with and share characteristics of historically observed long-term cycle lows.

Furthermore, the listed indicators are not exhaustive of all metrics that can approximate long-term cycle price lows. The sample sizes underlying these analyses are small. The RSI moving average shows effective samples of four distinct cycles, one of which is not yet resolved; realized price studies are based on four cycles; and cycle symmetry is based on the first three completed cycles. With such small samples, historical forward return distributions can describe historical trajectories, but a single cycle of deviation will meaningfully weaken all presented relationships.

Additionally, the presented signals should not be considered independent corroborations. RSI readings, proximity to realized price, and cycle clock position are largely measures of the same fact: Bitcoin has undergone a significant, sustained drawdown from highs. In any deep, sustained drawdown, each indicator should trend toward extremes, so their co-occurrence is more a measurement of a single observation in multiple ways than multiple independent and unique observations.

Structural changes may result in this cycle diverging. The current cycle is the first featuring ETF adoption, significant corporate holdings, and more complex derivative trading via options and perpetual futures. The four-year cycle framework may ultimately prove to be a description of four observations, not a persistent feature of the asset.

Finally, the RSI signals are relative. Bitcoin outperforming the Nasdaq or gold can occur as both assets rise or as both fall at different rates. Bitcoin's nominal price could be dragged lower if equities or gold correct from current highs, even if RSI signals are favorable for Bitcoin. The signals presented here have little predictive power for moves before November, reflecting only the asymmetry of forward price moves over 1-3 years.

Conclusion

Nevertheless, considering the indicators above, the conclusion drawn is that Bitcoin is likely at or near a cycle low that may form before year-end, after which an uptrend may resume.

Each signal is firing near extreme levels rare in its history, and previously, each has presaged meaningful outperformance and positive returns for Bitcoin over the next several years against equities. If the low is not yet in, the period between now and that low likely presents an extremely attractive long-term range for Bitcoin reaccumulation. These signals lie dormant for most of history; they are now flashing 'green.'

Preguntas relacionadas

QAccording to the article, what are the five key indicators that suggest Bitcoin may be at or near a long-term cycle bottom?

AThe five key indicators are: 1. Nasdaq/BTC Relative Strength Signal (showing extreme overbought conditions for Nasdaq vs. Bitcoin, i.e., extreme oversold for Bitcoin). 2. Historical Return Expectations following such RSI signals, which show positive asymmetric returns for Bitcoin over a 1-3 year horizon. 3. Gold/BTC Relative Strength Signal (also showing historically high overbought conditions for gold relative to Bitcoin). 4. Bitcoin's Realized Price (the on-chain cost basis), which is currently above the spot price, a condition that historically precedes cycle bottoms. 5. The Cycle Clock, indicating that historical bear market lows have typically occurred around week 60 after a peak, projecting a potential low around late November 2026 for the current cycle.

QWhat does the article say about Bitcoin's Realized Price and its significance in the current market context?

ABitcoin's Realized Price (approximately $53,000) is the average on-chain acquisition cost of the circulating supply. The current spot price is about 18% below this realized price. Historically, Bitcoin's price has spent only 12% of its time below the realized price, and every historical bear market low has occurred when the price fell below it. This suggests that being at or below the realized price is characteristic of the final stages of a bear market and has historically been followed by significant positive returns over the next 1-3 years.

QBased on the historical 'Cycle Clock' pattern described, when does the article suggest the current Bitcoin bear market could potentially bottom?

ABased on the historical pattern where previous cycle lows occurred around week 60 after the all-time high, and with the current cycle being in week 40 (as of the article's writing), the article suggests the potential low for this cycle could form around late November 2026.

QWhat cautionary points or limitations does the article mention regarding the presented indicators and analysis?

AThe article mentions several limitations: 1. The analysis is based on a small sample size (e.g., only a few completed cycles). 2. The indicators are not independent proofs but different measurements of the same underlying condition—a deep and sustained price drawdown. 3. Structural changes in the current cycle (like ETF adoption, corporate holdings, complex derivatives) could cause a deviation from historical patterns. 4. The RSI signals are relative; Bitcoin outperforming Nasdaq or gold does not guarantee its absolute USD price will rise if those other assets decline sharply. 5. The signals have little predictive power for short-term price movements (e.g., the next few months).

QWhat is the overall conclusion of the article regarding the investment opportunity in Bitcoin?

AThe article concludes that the convergence of the five rare and extreme indicators suggests Bitcoin is likely at or near a long-term cycle bottom, potentially forming by the end of 2026. It argues that the period from now until that potential low represents a highly attractive long-term accumulation zone for Bitcoin. Historically, similar signal conditions have been followed by substantial positive and asymmetric returns for Bitcoin over a 1-3 year timeframe, outperforming stocks and gold.

Lecturas Relacionadas

Miners Advised Not to Buy GPUs for AI and to Focus on Infrastructure

A founder at an energy investment forum advises bitcoin miners not to purchase GPUs for AI themselves, but to instead focus on infrastructure like power and data center space. Mike Alfred of Alpine Fox stated that while AI infrastructure demand is a long-term, 20-30 year trend, it presents a key choice for miners. The first, riskier model involves owning and operating GPUs, which requires financing expensive hardware that quickly becomes obsolete. The second, more conservative model is akin to real estate: providing colocation services where clients bring their own servers, and the miner sells space, power, cooling, and water. Alfred noted this model is easier to finance. Most existing bitcoin mining sites are difficult and expensive to convert for AI, as AI data centers require far higher construction costs, redundant fiber connections, backup power, complex cooling, and near 100% uptime. A hybrid model, where mining acts as a flexible load to use excess power during AI data center construction or from generation facilities, was discussed. However, participants concluded this is only viable with very cheap power; otherwise, developers are better off focusing solely on AI. Miners are increasingly being evaluated for their available power capacity and project portfolios rather than just bitcoin output. Panelists also warned of risks in the AI sector, predicting at least one major default or contract breach among AI tenants, lenders, or landlords before bitcoin's next halving in 2028.

cryptonews.ruHace 6 min(s)

Miners Advised Not to Buy GPUs for AI and to Focus on Infrastructure

cryptonews.ruHace 6 min(s)

Millisecond 'Pay-to-Cut': How Did Hyperliquid's Priority Fee Turn into a Multi-Million Dollar Business?

"Millisecond 'Paid Queue-Jumping': How Hyperliquid's Priority Fee Became a Multi-Million Dollar Annual Business" In traditional finance, high-frequency trading firms spend millions on infrastructure for millisecond advantages. Hyperliquid has translated this race onto the blockchain with its "Priority Fee" system, creating an open economic game for speed. This system auctions two types of priority: **Gossip Priority** for faster data feeds (via a Dutch auction every 3 minutes), and **Order Priority** for front-of-queue trade execution (users bid a fee for lower latency). This converts a hardware race into a transparent, market-priced mechanism. Since launch, this feature has generated over $5M in protocol revenue. Projected annualized buybacks from this income exceed $30M, accounting for ~7% of total protocol revenue. The demand stems from large traders and market makers on Hyperliquid, for whom milliseconds can mean the difference between profit/loss or avoiding liquidation. Market makers pay these fees as "protection" to ensure their orders execute first, which in turn improves liquidity for all users. Crucially, Hyperliquid internalizes Maximum Extractable Value (MEV) that typically leaks to external validators or searchers, creating a new revenue stream beyond trading fees. The mechanism also strengthens HYPE's tokenomics. While 97% of trading fees fund secondary market buybacks (via the Assistance Fund), Priority Fees are **directly burned**, adding a second deflationary engine. Furthermore, fees for order priority are deducted from users' undelegated HYPE balances, encouraging large traders to hold and lock up tokens, reducing circulating supply. However, a key challenge remains: balancing the speed needs of institutional players with fair market access for retail users, as those who cannot pay high fees may suffer worse slippage during volatility. In summary, Hyperliquid's Priority Fee is a novel model that monetizes latency, captures MEV for the protocol, and enhances its native token's value through burning and lock-ups.

marsbitHace 11 min(s)

Millisecond 'Pay-to-Cut': How Did Hyperliquid's Priority Fee Turn into a Multi-Million Dollar Business?

marsbitHace 11 min(s)

The Truth Behind Digital Banking: The Fragile Ecosystem Supporting 1.46 Billion Users

The article "The Truth About Digital Banks: The Fragile Ecosystem Behind 1.46 Billion Users" provides a data-driven analysis of the digital banking sector based on a verified list of 368 active neobanks as of July 2026. While these platforms collectively serve 1.46 billion users, with Asia (817 million users) and institutions like WeBank and Nubank dominating the landscape, the sector faces significant structural vulnerabilities. A key finding is that only 127 of the 368 neobanks hold full banking licenses. The majority operate atop third-party infrastructure providers like Banking-as-a-Service (BaaS) platforms, creating systemic risk where the failure of a single provider, as seen in past cases like Wirecard and Synapse, can jeopardize multiple consumer brands. Furthermore, the industry experiences a steady, quiet stream of failures, mergers, and shutdowns that often go unreported. The analysis also examines the adoption of artificial intelligence (AI), finding only 67 platforms (18%) have deployed AI at scale, with many innovators based in emerging markets like Nigeria and the Philippines. The infrastructure layer is highly concentrated, with 106 providers supporting the entire ecosystem of 368 consumer-facing brands. The article concludes with three predictions: the unlicensed gap will close through acquisitions or exits; an AI credit model is likely to fail in the next economic downturn; and a nascent but significant trend is the emergence of financial services designed for AI agents rather than humans.

marsbitHace 26 min(s)

The Truth Behind Digital Banking: The Fragile Ecosystem Supporting 1.46 Billion Users

marsbitHace 26 min(s)

Digital Asset Trading Platform Uphold Cuts 17% of Global Workforce Amid 'Crypto Winter'

Cryptocurrency trading platform Uphold has laid off approximately 17% of its global workforce, affecting 85 full-time employees and contractors. The cuts are part of a strategic shift to reallocate resources towards its rapidly growing corporate services business, as retail cryptocurrency trading activity has declined amid the ongoing market downturn. CEO Simon McLaughlin stated the company is restructuring after years of significant growth and remains confident in the long-term prospects of digital assets and blockchain technology. Founded in 2015, Uphold offers trading and custody services for cryptocurrencies, fiat, stocks, and precious metals. It has recently expanded to provide infrastructure for banks, fintech firms, and broker-dealers to integrate crypto services. The layoffs occur against a backdrop of a prolonged crypto market slump, with total market capitalization falling to around $2.1 trillion by Q2 2024. Factors include weakened trading volumes, reduced retail participation, interest rate hikes, geopolitical uncertainty, and net outflows from U.S. spot Bitcoin ETFs. Uphold clarified it is not shutting down its UK operations or any international offices. The company highlighted strong growth in its corporate platform and announced plans to evolve its consumer app into a broader blockchain-based financial assistant by 2026, offering U.S. stocks, tokenized securities, lending, credit cards, and DeFi yield opportunities.

cryptonews.ruHace 26 min(s)

Digital Asset Trading Platform Uphold Cuts 17% of Global Workforce Amid 'Crypto Winter'

cryptonews.ruHace 26 min(s)

Trading

Spot
活动图片