Gold Stands Above $4,600: Can Central Bank and ETF Buying Support the Next Pullback?

Publicado a 2026-08-25Actualizado a 2026-08-25

Resumen

Weakening employment, cooling inflation, and geopolitical risks have driven gold to break above $4,600, while the return of funds to Asian gold ETFs and continuous central bank gold purchases form medium to long-term support. However, the buying by funds provides a bottom cushion, which does not mean the gold price won't correct from its highs.

After the international gold price broke through $4,600, the market's most frequent discussions revolve around the Federal Reserve and geopolitical risks. However, what truly determines whether a pullback can be absorbed is often the capital flow. Citing data, the Daily Economic News reported that Asian gold ETFs resumed net inflows in July, and the trend of central banks reducing U.S. Treasuries while increasing gold holdings continues.

Short-term Rally Driven by Multiple Factors in Concert

Weakening U.S. labor market data and cooling inflation have led the market to postpone expectations for further Fed rate hikes. A weaker U.S. dollar and lower yields have reduced the holding cost of gold. At the same time, the deadlock in U.S.-Iran negotiations, risks in the Strait of Hormuz, and stagflation concerns fueled by high oil prices have increased the safe-haven premium for gold.

When interest rate trades and safe-haven trades both point towards gold, prices are prone to break through rapidly. However, such convergence also attracts a large amount of short-term capital. Once one of these logics reverses, volatility can significantly amplify.

ETF Inflows Reflect Market Sentiment Repair

The report indicates that Asian gold ETFs recorded approximately $744 million in net inflows in July, ending two consecutive months of capital outflows. ETF capital is more sensitive than central bank reserves; it can both follow trends and exit quickly when macroeconomic expectations shift. Therefore, consecutive inflows are more indicative of whether a trend can sustain than a single month's figure.

If ETFs maintain net inflows during a gold pullback, it suggests that allocation demand is absorbing selling pressure. If prices rise at high levels but ETF inflows slow down, caution is warranted as the rally may rely more on leverage and short-term chasing.

Central Bank Gold Purchases Form Longer-Term Support

Central bank gold purchases are typically not aimed at capturing price fluctuations over a few days but are driven by foreign exchange reserve diversification and credit risk management. The reduction in U.S. Treasury holdings by foreign investors and the continued increase in gold reserves by some central banks have created a long-term narrative of "reducing Treasuries, increasing gold" in the market.

However, central bank buying provides a structural floor; it does not eliminate short-term pullbacks. Even with ongoing long-term allocation demand, gold could still fall back to previous breakout zones due to a dollar rebound, rising yields, or profit-taking.

Institutions suggest observing a range roughly between $4,500 and $4,800. The current price has entered the upper half of this range. Further gains would require sustained ETF inflows, continued dollar weakness, and no significantly more hawkish signals from the Fed. If a pullback can hold above $4,600, it indicates the quality of the breakout remains sound. If it breaks below and continues to weaken, attention should shift to whether genuine allocation buying emerges near $4,500.

The medium-term story for gold is still supported by central bank buying, fiscal credibility, and reserve diversification. However, short-term prices have already fully reacted to the positive news. To gauge the next market move, it is better to observe ETF flows, the U.S. dollar, yields, and whether $4,600 holds, rather than just reading news headlines.

Lecturas Relacionadas

U.S. Aims at Iran's Crypto Sector Due to Oil Payments Exceeding $100 Billion

The U.S. Treasury Department has expanded sanctions on Iran to target its digital asset sector, citing over $100 million in cryptocurrency payments allegedly used to facilitate Iranian oil sales. The Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) announced new sectoral sanctions covering digital assets, technology, gold, aviation, and shipping, alongside sanctions against nearly 60 entities, individuals, and vessels linked to nuclear, missile, cyber, and oil networks. The move allows OFAC to sanction foreign persons and firms operating in or supporting Iran’s crypto sector, which the Treasury stated is increasingly used as a "tool of choice" to circumvent sanctions, including by the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC). Specific targets include Ukrainian broker Ivan Obukhov and his UAE-registered firm Foscom FZE, accused of processing over $100 million in crypto payments to facilitate oil sales for the IRGC’s Quds Force. This follows recent U.S. actions against Iran-linked crypto exchanges, including sanctions against UK-based Zedcex and Zedxion in January, four Iranian exchanges including Nobitex in June, and exchanges Shelbit and Aban Tether in August. Unlike previous targeted sanctions, the new measures establish a framework to penalize broader involvement in Iran’s crypto sector, significantly expanding OFAC’s authority under Executive Order 13902. Designated persons’ U.S.-linked property will be blocked, and foreign banks facilitating significant transactions for them may face U.S. account restrictions.

cryptonews.ruHace 25 min(s)

U.S. Aims at Iran's Crypto Sector Due to Oil Payments Exceeding $100 Billion

cryptonews.ruHace 25 min(s)

Conversation with Charles Zhang: Amidst the AI Frenzy, Why Pursue 'Anti-Efficiency' Content?

Dialogue with Charles Zhang: In the Era of AI's Sprint, Why Create "Anti-Efficiency" Content Standing out among China's early internet pioneers, Charles Zhang, founder and CEO of Sohu, maintains a distinct personal identity. He keeps a consistent public presence and embodies traits of high-energy individuals: sleeping only 4-5 hours daily, running 5km or marathons, and hosting frequent offline tech forums and dialogues with Nobel laureates. He has shifted focus from external business expansion to internal self-reconstruction, adhering to his own pace. "People aren't afraid of being busy; the busier you are, the better your health. Having nothing to do can lead to emotional issues and poor health." Marking the 10th anniversary of his live-streamed "Charles Zhang's English Class," he recently took it offline for a real-world classroom session. Following this, he discussed the course's decade-long journey, Sohu Video's content ecosystem, and the value of content in the AI era. **Pen and Mouth Diligence: A Class Against Instant Mastery** His English class began in August 2016 on "Qianfan Live." He spends about 40 minutes daily preparing, reviewing dozens of news headlines, reading five in detail, and selecting three for the lesson. Over ten years, he has completed over 2000 live sessions totaling more than 110,000 minutes, with over 52 million views. Initially, the stream was a way to "talk more" and combat emotional struggles. He started by repeating after TV news anchors, then moved to live-streaming with the launch of Qianfan Live. It was 40% for personal emotional regulation ("like a monk chanting sutras"), 30% to deliver authentic news, and 30% to promote the new platform. This daily "ritual" helped him overcome depression, leading to what he calls his "peak life state." From a product perspective, it was counter-intuitive—launched without prior market research or growth strategies, based on the founder's personal need that resonated with users. Yet, his content creation follows a strict routine. The decade of covering geopolitics, economics, tech, health, and society has built a vast "knowledge compound interest" system. In an age of AI summaries and algorithmic content, Zhang insists on "hard work": meticulous reading, handwritten notes, and manually created teaching materials, refusing AI-generated content. The English class is now a fixed daily rhythm; preparing for his weekly physics class requires a full day of solitary deduction on a blackboard. In his live streams, Zhang positions himself as a "content creator," not a CEO or teacher. He sees physics as extreme brain training and English as a "sensor" to understand the world. This explains why a top entrepreneur persists for a decade in seemingly "unprofessional" pursuits—it's the information input and psychological healing method he found during a low point. It's fundamentally an "anti-efficiency" commitment. He believes the meaning of reading lies in finding community and spiritual support, not just fleeting conversation points. For today's media, he states: "Reading news isn't the goal. As humans with many confusions, we need reference points, to find a group, find kindred spirits, or seek support and spiritual nourishment. Large language models can't satisfy these starting points; they only give you information." This offers solace and a value defense for media professionals impacted by AI summaries. **"Don't Think Earth Stops Turning Because AI Arrived"** A content creator expressed anxiety: after feeding their article to AI, it produced a more comprehensive, profound version, making their work feel valueless. Zhang responded with an analogy: "Carrots from the market, with a bit of soil, not glossy, taste delicious and flavorful. Tomatoes forced by chemical fertilizer have no taste at all." He sees AI giving world content a "plastic feel," but acknowledges its significant role in improving information access efficiency, especially in physics and social science research where he often queries AI for quick professional answers. The key, Zhang stresses, is that the outside world still needs to guide our perspective. LLMs provide "information," while the outside world offers "viewpoints." He cares deeply about *what* that external viewpoint is and *how* someone thinks about an issue. "Don't think the Earth stops turning because AI arrived," he analyzes. AI currently replaces rule-based work, noting significant impact on the software industry with many programmers laid off as even less experienced people can now write decent code. However, AI cannot yet replace arts, social sciences, emotions, and creative content. "Hollywood remains thriving, producing great works. Oscars will continue, Nobel Literature Prizes will still be awarded—all by real people, with works conceived by real people." While wary of AI, Zhang isn't anti-technology and is open to its applications. Sohu itself has launched AI assistants. In Sohu's AI practice, Zhang defines his role as a "large language model corpus provider." He believes LLM training is inseparable from human-original content as its data foundation, so original content retains irreplaceable value. "The era of self-media indeed offers everyone new ways to discover their strengths and achieve growth." He suggests every young person should consider self-media. Most importantly, the bottom line of content creation should be "authenticity." If using AI avatars, they must be clearly labeled; not doing so and misleading viewers wastes their time, especially when people still prefer real human content. Behind AI's sprint lie unavoidable realities. As AI quickly provides seemingly perfect answers, people grow accustomed to accepting "summarized" results, omitting processes of questioning, deduction, and trial-and-error, leading to a decline in deep thinking. Zhang's "anti-efficiency" practice with his two live-streamed classes is his answer to AI's狂奔: In an algorithm-driven era chasing ultimate efficiency, don't expect AI to fill inner voids. Read books, speak in front of a camera, sweat on a running track, and build connections with real people.

marsbitHace 35 min(s)

Conversation with Charles Zhang: Amidst the AI Frenzy, Why Pursue 'Anti-Efficiency' Content?

marsbitHace 35 min(s)

Trading

Spot
活动图片