Anthropic's $65 Billion Annual Revenue Could Reshape AI Company Valuations

cryptonews.ruPublicado a 2026-08-18Actualizado a 2026-08-18

Resumen

Anthropic's rapid revenue surge, with projected annual revenue reaching $65 billion as of late July, is poised to fundamentally reshape AI company valuations ahead of its potential IPO, possibly this fall. Investment bankers predict it could set a new industry benchmark, with a projected valuation exceeding $2 trillion, making it the largest IPO ever. Growth has accelerated dramatically, from nearly $9 billion in ARR at end-2025 to $47 billion in May and $65 billion by July, with 2026 revenue projected between $100-$120 billion. Notably, bankers and investors are basing Anthropic's valuation on far-future 2028 revenue projections of $190-$200 billion, using an enterprise-value-to-revenue multiple rather than current profits. This method, common for high-growth SaaS but novel for AI giants, could ease valuation justifications for other AI firms if accepted by public markets. Real demand underpins the figures, with adoption data showing Anthropic leading OpenAI in U.S. corporate adoption (43.5% vs. 39.7%). However, the high-stakes valuation model hinges on revenue far outstripping enormous future costs for chips, model training, and talent. If successful, Anthropic's IPO could establish a new AI valuation paradigm; if not, it risks creating an investor trap.

Anthropic has rapidly scaled its sales, and this is expected to impact the valuation metrics of the entire artificial intelligence sector. As of the end of July, the company's projected revenue exceeded $65 billion, and investment bankers have begun to view its initial public offering as a potential precedent for other AI companies awaiting listing, aiming to set valuation benchmarks for other major enterprises in the AI field.

This is significant as Anthropic is forecasted to go public earlier than OpenAI, possibly this fall. Investment banks have informed both companies that whoever goes public first "will create a model for the entire industry." Anthropic is targeting a valuation exceeding $2 trillion, which would make this IPO the largest in history.

Growth Rate Tripled in Seven Months

Investors continue to use the growth curve as a key metric. By the end of 2025, Anthropic's annual revenue was nearly $9 billion, or a projected annualized run rate based on recent data. In May, this figure increased to $47 billion, and by the end of July, it reached $65 billion. According to Anthropic's own statement made in May, "our annualized revenue exceeded $47 billion at the beginning of this month."

Investors expect this trend to continue, projecting revenue of $100 to $120 billion for 2026. OpenAI's revenue, while companies may measure it differently, doubled, reaching $40 billion this year compared to $20 billion at the end of 2025. Anthropic's growth trajectory is drawing investor attention as they prepare for its IPO.

Bankers Are Valuing Their Investments for 2028, Not Today

The implications of Anthropic's IPO could extend far beyond this specific company. Anthropic has informed participants in the IPO process that it expects revenue of $190 to $200 billion in 2028—information previously unknown. Banks and investors are using an enterprise value-to-revenue multiple based on these forward projections instead of current profit figures—a method typically used for fast-growing software companies in the past, not traditional public corporations.

Regarding the 2028 target, Anthropic's $965 billion valuation from its May Series H funding round is approximately five times its projected future revenue. Cryptopolitan compared metrics: Palantir trades at about 53 times its forecasted revenue, while SpaceX and Cloudflare are around 41.6 times, although these figures are based on 2026 estimates.

The key point here is not that Anthropic's stock is undervalued. Rather, it's that the company wouldn't merit such a high multiple based on the revenue bankers are projecting for it now. If public investors accept multiples based on revenue a couple of years out, it will be easier for other AI companies to justify their current valuations based on future revenue.

The Demand Behind This Number

From a business perspective, the forecasts are supported by real demand. Ramp's July AI Index shows Anthropic leading OpenAI in adoption metrics among U.S. companies: 43.5% of U.S. companies pay for either a subscription or tokens from Anthropic, compared to 39.7% for OpenAI. In May, Anthropic raised $65 billion from Altimeter Capital, Dragoneer, Greenoaks, and Sequoia Capital, enabling it to invest in compute resources, research, and enterprise products that fuel its growth.

However, this valuation model also raises the stakes. The 2028 forecast assumes that revenue will be able to sustain a significant advantage while exceeding enormous costs for chips, model training, and personnel. Ramp's data also points to constraints that businesses face when investing their resources into cutting-edge AI technologies.

If economic conditions improve, Anthropic's IPO will likely usher in a new valuation strategy for the AI sector. Conversely, constructing complex valuation strategies based on price-to-revenue ratios two years out could become a trap for investors.

Preguntas relacionadas

QWhat is the projected annual revenue of Anthropic as of the end of July, according to the article?

AThe projected annual revenue of Anthropic exceeded $65 billion as of the end of July.

QWhy is the timing of Anthropic's potential IPO considered significant for the AI industry?

AIt is considered significant because Anthropic is projected to go public before OpenAI, possibly this autumn. Investment bankers have indicated that whichever company goes public first will 'set the model for the entire industry.'

QWhat key metric are bankers and investors using to value Anthropic for its potential IPO, instead of current profit figures?

AThey are using a forward-looking metric based on the company's projected revenue for 2028, applying an enterprise value-to-revenue multiple to these future projections instead of current profit figures.

QAccording to the Ramp AI Index cited in the article, how does Anthropic's adoption rate among US companies compare to OpenAI's as of July?

AAccording to the July Ramp AI Index, 43.5% of US companies pay for either a subscription or tokens from Anthropic, compared to 39.7% for OpenAI, indicating Anthropic leads in adoption among US businesses.

QWhat is a potential risk for investors mentioned in the article regarding the new valuation strategy based on future revenue projections?

AThe potential risk is that creating complex valuation strategies based on the price-to-revenue ratio projected two years into the future could become a trap for investors if the underlying business performance does not meet the high expectations.

Lecturas Relacionadas

Is the Signal That Triggered During Previous Bitcoin Bull Rallies Repeating? Warning!

Cryptocurrency analysis platform CryptoQuant reports that Bitcoin is approaching a critical level based on the MVRV Z-Score indicator, but the current situation does not yet confirm the start of a new bull market. The Z-Score is nearing its 365-day moving average, a key level that has historically signaled a market regime shift. Historically, a sustained break above this 365-day moving average signaled a transition from a recovery phase to an expansion phase, preceding major bull markets in 2017 and 2020-2021. Currently, however, the indicator remains below this average. A confirmed break and hold above it could signal renewed unrealized network profit and the start of a new growth period. Conversely, a rejection from this level might indicate insufficient overall market profitability to support a broader bull rally. The analysis notes a key difference from past cycles: during previous major cyclical lows, the MVRV Z-Score fell below zero into undervalued territory, which has not occurred in the recent correction. This could suggest Bitcoin is undergoing a structurally shallower correction or that a capitulation event on the scale of past macro lows is not yet complete. Additionally, the Z-Score has formed lower peaks in each successive cycle, indicating that market valuation excesses are becoming more constrained over time even if price reaches new highs. For a bullish scenario to materialize, according to CryptoQuant, the MVRV Z-Score must recover and sustain above its 365-day moving average. A bounce rejection would suggest the market is in a "recovery" mode, while a return of the indicator toward zero could reinforce the view that the current correction is not yet over.

cryptonews.ruHace 53 min(s)

Is the Signal That Triggered During Previous Bitcoin Bull Rallies Repeating? Warning!

cryptonews.ruHace 53 min(s)

Morpho Stablecoin Yield Strategy: Same Curator, 3.96% vs. 7.7% Return Gap

**Summary of "Morpho Stablecoin Yield Strategy: 3.96% vs 7.7% from the Same Curator"** This article analyzes a yield opportunity on Morpho, a permissionless lending protocol, where depositors can bypass curated vaults to directly supply stablecoins to individual lending pools for higher returns. The core observation is a significant yield gap: a conservative vault managed by "Steakhouse Financial" offers a 7-day average APY of 3.96%, while its higher-risk vault offers 5.09%. Meanwhile, directly depositing into a specific pool (USDC / PT-reUSD-10DEC2026), which several professional vaults like Steakhouse also invest in, yields approximately 7.7%. This ~3.7 percentage point premium compensates depositors for assuming the specific collateral risk (a structured asset expiring Dec 10, 2026) and forgoing the diversification, monitoring, and emergency actions provided by vault managers. The article details the risks: 1) Concentrated exposure to a single collateral type with potential de-pegging or expiry risks. 2) Low immediately withdrawable liquidity (only 5% of the pool's supply), meaning exits may require queuing. 3) No professional oversight for the pool. Key operational advice includes: * Using the number of reputable vaults invested in a pool as a primary filter (for exclusion, not endorsement). * Always calculating the "landed" APY based on one's deposit size and the pool's utilization rate, rather than trusting the listed rate. * Pre-defining strict exit signals (e.g., 2 weeks before collateral expiry, if liquidity falls below a threshold, or if the yield premium narrows). * Acknowledging that the arbitrage window will close as more capital flows into direct pools or product interfaces improve. The analysis concludes that at current low Ethereum gas fees, the cost barrier for this strategy is minimal (~$160 minimum viable position), making risk tolerance—not cost—the deciding factor. The premium represents payment for taking on risks that professional vaults choose to avoid for their conservative products.

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Morpho Stablecoin Yield Strategy: Same Curator, 3.96% vs. 7.7% Return Gap

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Trading

Spot
活动图片