Unveiling the 'White-Haired Stock God' Serenity: The Mental Elixir for Anxious Retail Investors

marsbitPublicado a 2026-06-11Actualizado a 2026-06-11

Resumen

The anonymous stock influencer known as "White-Haired Stock God" Serenity has ignited a frenzy in the A-share market. From June 5-9, Serenity's posts on platform X mentioning A-shares like LeaderDrive, Easun, and Innolight triggered sharp price surges, with some stocks hitting 20% daily limits. Serenity, who claims a 3612% personal return this year, gained fame internationally using a "chokepoint investment" strategy focused on small, monopolistic AI supply chain companies. With over 810k X followers, his influence rivals top analysts. His recent foray into Chinese stocks, which he claims is "for fun" to offer a "foreign perspective," has drawn scrutiny. While Serenity denies holding positions in these A-shares and states his posts are not recommendations, his actions have caused significant market volatility. He monetizes through a $1/month subscription, earning an estimated $54k monthly. Facing accusations of market manipulation, he maintains he promotes "information democracy." Community analysis suggests Serenity is likely an English-speaking Chinese national living in Japan, based on his posting patterns and shared personal details. He maintains anonymity due to past harassment. Ultimately, Serenity is seen by many as a manifestation of the current AI bull market's euphoria—a mysterious, seemingly successful figure who fulfills the market's desire for a "stock god," though such personas often face intense scrutiny when market sentiment shifts.

Author | Golem (@web 3_golem)

In the A-share market, the "White-Haired Stock God" Serenity has completely gone viral.

From June 5th to June 9th, Serenity successively "shilled" three A-shares on platform X. They were the embodiment intelligence robotics concept stock LeaderDrive, the digital intelligence new energy concept stock Yashi, and the leading optical module stock Innolight. The stock prices of the first two were vertically pulled to a 20cm limit-up on the same day, and LeaderDrive has already risen over 30% in June.

The reason Serenity possesses such strong "pumping power" is because before entering the view of domestic A-share investors, he had already gained extremely high popularity in international retail investor communities.

Serenity's investment characteristic is using the "Chokepoint Investment Method" to screen out small monopolistic companies in the AI industry chain that are not fully priced in. Because the over 16 stocks he has shilled this year have all achieved investment returns exceeding 100%, and his personal year-to-date investment return exceeds 3612%, coupled with his professional background as a former AI research scientist and his rigorous analysis of the AI industry and favored companies each time, Serenity has accumulated a large number of loyal retail followers in Europe, America, Japan, and South Korea. His X account subscribers exceed those of Musk, ranking first on the platform. Therefore, his influence on a single stock's price fluctuation surpasses that of ordinary stock analysts.

For example, on May 27th, Serenity posted on platform X announcing he had completed building a position in the European stock XFAB at a market cap of $1.28 billion. XFAB's stock price was subsequently pushed up continuously, with a single-day intraday maximum increase of 77%, and the stock price rose to a high of 13.13 euros. Since then, XFAB's stock price began a continuous decline and is currently trading around 8.8 euros, having returned to pre-shill levels.

Just the day after causing significant volatility in XFAB's stock price, Serenity posted in Chinese on platform X, saying, "Because I see so much support from the Chinese community... I might, just for fun, start writing about my views on a couple of Chinese stocks."

A storm of blood and rain sweeping the A-share market thus began.

Disrupting the A-Share Market Without Holding Positions, Just for Fun?

In hindsight, these two stocks Serenity mentioned were LeaderDrive and Yashi.

On June 5th, Serenity posted in Chinese, specifically emphasizing "written specifically for my Chinese readers," stating that LeaderDrive (688017, 57.73 billion RMB) was his most favored Chinese listed target when positioning in the humanoid robotics sector. The main reason is its absolute dominance in certain robot component supply chains, with over 60% domestic market share and more than 1,800 global customers.

As of now, this post has been viewed over 4 million times and has been disseminated to multiple domestic social media platforms. LeaderDrive's stock price triggered a 20% limit-up on June 5th. By June 10th, in just 4 trading days, the stock price had risen over 30%.

On June 8th, the same market script played out again. Serenity posted a crowdsourced list of over 30 companies in the "800V DC" concept on platform X, which included the A-share company Yashi. The news quickly fermented domestically, with Yashi's stock price happily receiving a 20CM limit-up within an hour, and by June 10th, its increase also exceeded 30%.

Serenity himself even seemed surprised, posting, 'Does everyone know this is just a crowdsourced list? How did 300376 (Yashi) go up 20%?'

Immediately after, he posted again saying, 'These are stocks recommended by fans, not my personal recommendations,' attempting to distance himself from it.

Besides these two stocks, Serenity also mentioned a third A-share, Innolight, on June 9th, stating it was the only Chinese listed company he invested in last year. However, because some AI mistranslated "Innolight" as another A-share listed company, Inno Laser, this caused Inno Laser to be violently pumped nearly 10% within 10 minutes. This "misunderstanding incident" also reveals the retail investors' FOMO towards Serenity himself—"blindly, just asking what to buy, afraid of missing out on the hot stuff."

Serenity's actions quickly drew the attention of domestic financial media and securities analysts, who began speculating about his purpose for "cross-border stock promotion." On June 9th, Cailian Press published a lengthy article warning domestic investors to be wary of overseas information flowing back in. If Serenity's sharing involved profit-sharing, the behavior would be classic "export-for-domestic-sale style cross-border pumping," requiring legal accountability. Some domestic securities analysts even openly vented on social media, "These clowns will be finished sooner or later, thinking they can act lawlessly just because they ran abroad."

Facing domestic media's questioning about him "harvesting retail investors," Serenity responded that shilling A-shares was just because he thought "foreigners could bring a different perspective to A-shares." He also stated, "Although I really like LeaderDrive, I do not hold its stock." Perhaps, as he initially said, the original intention behind all this was just for fun.

Serenity appears almost like a "philanthropist." He emphasizes he does not do any paid promotions or marketing. The only paid thing is a $1 monthly subscription service. He is not a member of any institution or the Illuminati. The reason for his continuous free sharing is his belief that the stock market is a positive-sum game. He hopes retail investors can buy quality stocks without joining any expensive paid communities, even before institutions enter. He claims he is promoting information democratization.

In the investment field, don't overly deify anyone. Serenity may not seek profit, but he certainly seeks fame. Since starting to shill A-shares on June 5th, Serenity's follower count has surged again by over 200,000. As of June 11th, his X platform followers exceed 8.1 million, and account subscribers have grown to 54,000, surpassing Musk (46,000). With such a massive number of subscribers, even at $1, Serenity's fixed monthly income reaches $54,000, easily earning over a million RMB annually.

Serenity's pinned posts celebrate his account subscriber count surpassing Musk, calling it his goal. The fact that an anonymous account can have such high influence and attention makes investors even more curious about his real identity. Behind this account, is it a person, a team, or even just an AI?

Most Likely a Chinese National Living in Japan?

Serenity explains that his reason for remaining anonymous is to be able to freely express ideas online. He stated that when he first published negative views about IREN (a Nasdaq-listed stock), he received threats and harassment from dozens of accounts in real life, which is why he continues to remain anonymous.

Nevertheless, the community has gradually pieced together an image of Serenity from various collected fragments of information. It is highly likely he is a Chinese national living in Japan.

At the end of May, Serenity revealed some personal information. He said he is quite international, currently studying Japanese in Japan. Because he once lived in mainland China for a period and often traveled to Taiwan, he knows a bit of Chinese. Additionally, he played football in Mexico for two or three years, went to South Korea specifically to play League of Legends... his life seems quite comfortable.

Serenity has lived in Japan for at least half a year. At the end of 2025, he often posted photos of his life in Japan on platform X, but since becoming popular, he rarely mentions personal life.

Serenity in Japan

Serenity is a high-frequency poster, averaging 9~10 posts per day, peaking at over 20. Looking at his daily posting frequency using AI statistics, he has about 5 hours of absolute account silence each day. This silence period is likely when Serenity is resting or sleeping. This timeframe corresponds roughly to the early morning hours (3:00 to 8:00) in some Asian time zones (UTC+8, UTC+9). Combined with the previous information, this basically locks Serenity's location to Japan.

The community leans towards thinking Serenity is a Chinese national, but Serenity emphasizes English is his native language. Most of his posts are still in English. Occasional posts in Chinese seem only to cater to Chinese fans. Moreover, if you count posts in different languages, his Japanese post count is higher than his Chinese.

Combining this with Serenity's early experiences—active on Reddit WSB (Odaily Note: Wall Street Bets is the largest US retail trading community) before moving to X, rejected an offer from Nvidia's AI team in 2018, and was reported by overseas renowned media like Bloomberg and Reuters—it is therefore possible to basically rule out Serenity being a Chinese citizen.

Serenity's anonymous identity, non-transparent investment returns, and excessive craving for influence are all increasing market controversy around him. But interestingly, everyone who questions him is also constantly refreshing his homepage.

Stock investment has always seen different idols in different eras: Warren Buffett, Cathie Wood, Roaring Kitty. Each era has its own spiritual totem. Bull markets magnify returns and also magnify faith. When more and more people start making money, we always want to find someone who can "scientifically explain the bubble." Serenity might just be the outward projection of this round of AI bull market sentiment—mysterious, professional, successful, fitting all the public imagination of a "stock god."

But next to the altar is the guillotine, because when the market turns, it will want to find someone to blame for the losses, and Serenity might then be the most suitable candidate. History repeats, the market moves forever forward, people enjoy creating idols and are also adept at "destroying idols." As for who Serenity really is, it probably isn't that important anymore.

Preguntas relacionadas

QWho is Serenity, and what recent impact has he had on the A-share market?

ASerenity, known as the 'White-Haired Stock God,' is an anonymous influential figure in international retail investment communities. Recently, he 'called' three A-share stocks—LeaderDrive (绿的谐波), EAST (易事特), and Innolight (中际旭创)—on platform X, causing significant price surges, with the first two hitting 20cm daily limit-ups. His posts led to increased volatility and widespread attention in the A-share market.

QWhat is Serenity's claimed investment strategy, and what is his reported performance?

ASerenity employs a 'Chokepoint Investment Method,' focusing on small monopoly companies in the AI industry chain that are undervalued. He claims that over 16 stocks he recommended this year have yielded returns exceeding 100%, and his personal investment return for the year-to-date is over 3612%.

QHow does Serenity respond to accusations of market manipulation or 'pump-and-dump' schemes in China?

ASerenity denies any manipulative intent, stating that his discussions about A-shares aim to offer a 'different perspective from foreigners.' He emphasizes that he does not hold positions in stocks like LeaderDrive and claims his actions are 'just for fun.' He also distances himself from recommendations in crowdsourced lists, attributing them to fans.

QWhat is known about Serenity's background and identity based on community investigations?

ACommunity analysis suggests Serenity is likely a Chinese-speaking individual living in Japan. He has shared details about studying Japanese, traveling in Taiwan, and past stays in Mexico and South Korea. His posting patterns indicate he operates in Asian time zones (UTC+8/9). While he claims English as his native language, his ability to use Chinese and Japanese, along with his lifestyle posts from Japan, supports this profile.

QWhat are the potential motivations and risks associated with Serenity's activities according to the article?

AThe article suggests Serenity may seek fame and influence, as seen in his celebration of surpassing Elon Musk in X subscriptions. Financially, his subscription service could generate substantial income. However, his anonymity, opaque investment disclosures, and market impact raise concerns about accountability. The article warns that during market downturns, such figures often become scapegoats for losses, highlighting the cyclical nature of 'creating' and 'destroying' market idols.

Lecturas Relacionadas

Dialogue with Morgan Stanley Executive: Wall Street Isn't Rejecting Bitcoin, It's Just Waiting for the Right Time

In a podcast interview, Amy Oldenburg, Head of Digital Asset Strategy at Morgan Stanley, discusses Wall Street's evolving stance on Bitcoin, explaining the bank's measured approach and the road ahead. Oldenburg, with 26 years at Morgan Stanley, traces her perspective to witnessing transformative tech cycles and her experience in emerging markets, where she observed the need for alternative financial systems like mobile money (e.g., M-Pesa). This background informs her view of Bitcoin's value proposition. She clarifies that Morgan Stanley is "client-driven." Regulatory hurdles, particularly as a bank holding company under Federal Reserve oversight, initially slowed their entry. While the firm couldn't act as quickly as independent asset managers, persistent client demand and a changing regulatory environment led to offerings like their low-fee Bitcoin ETP (MSBT). They are now gradually rolling out spot Bitcoin trading on their E*Trade platform. Regarding advisor adoption, Oldenburg cites a "lack of education" as the primary barrier. Morgan Stanley recommends a 0-2% allocation for more conservative portfolios and 2-4% for aggressive ones, but price volatility and confusion about its place in asset allocation persist. She notes competition for investor attention from AI and commodities. Addressing Bitcoin's price stagnation despite institutional buying, Oldenburg points to a confluence of factors: competing investment narratives (AI, quantum computing) and the complex financial landscape. She suggests a catalyst for Bitcoin as a neutral reserve asset might require a "slow-burn crisis" that exposes fragility in traditional systems. For wider bank adoption, including holding Bitcoin on balance sheets, she identifies the need for regulatory clarity to reduce punitive capital treatment and for the asset to be usable as collateral within financial ecosystems. Looking ahead, Oldenburg predicts steady, moderate adoption growth through 2030 rather than an explosive "J-curve." She emphasizes the importance of differentiating Bitcoin from other crypto assets and expresses concern that the core cypherpunk ethos of self-custody is being diluted as traditional finance enters the space. She concludes that the digital asset field remains in its early stages with significant innovation, like AI agents and micropayments, still to come.

marsbitHace 14 min(s)

Dialogue with Morgan Stanley Executive: Wall Street Isn't Rejecting Bitcoin, It's Just Waiting for the Right Time

marsbitHace 14 min(s)

10% Position Limit Proposed: UK Retail Authorized Funds to Gain Indirect Exposure to Crypto Assets

The UK Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) is consulting on a proposal (CP26/17) that would allow retail funds, including UCITS and most Non-UCITS Retail Schemes (NURS), to invest up to 10% of their total assets in cryptoasset exchange-traded notes (crypto ETNs). This would enable indirect exposure to cryptoassets for mainstream investors through regulated funds. The rule maintains the existing prohibition on funds holding underlying cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin or Ethereum directly. The proposal introduces a strict 10% cap, positioning crypto ETNs as a potential satellite holding within diversified portfolios. Funds must ensure these investments align with their stated objectives and risk profiles. Notably, the cap does not apply to Qualified Investor Schemes (QIS) for professional clients, while Long-Term Asset Funds (LTAFs) would be prohibited from holding crypto ETNs. This move builds on the FCA's 2025 decision to permit retail trading of crypto ETNs on UK regulated exchanges. However, significant compliance burdens fall on fund managers, who must conduct thorough due diligence, assess liquidity, and provide clear risk disclosures to investors. The FCA emphasizes that even a small allocation can significantly impact a fund's risk profile. The policy's practical impact remains uncertain. Widespread adoption depends on whether asset managers deem the potential benefits worth the operational costs, disclosure requirements, and reputational risks. The consultation is open for feedback until July 13, 2026. Ultimately, the proposal represents a cautious, incremental step toward integrating cryptoassets into the regulated fund landscape, rather than a broad opening.

Foresight NewsHace 43 min(s)

10% Position Limit Proposed: UK Retail Authorized Funds to Gain Indirect Exposure to Crypto Assets

Foresight NewsHace 43 min(s)

Public Version of Mythos Officially Launched: Analyzing the Advantages and Limitations of AI Smart Contract Auditing

Publicly available Mythos, Anthropic's AI model, has officially launched, demonstrating both significant potential and limitations in smart contract security auditing. The article analyzes its capabilities through real-world cases. AI excels in identifying subtle, low-level vulnerabilities through pattern recognition and large-scale code screening. A key example is detecting a storage slot collision between a custom rewards mapping and a third-party library's ReentrancyGuard, a vulnerability easily missed in manual audits. In the recent Zcash incident, AI also rapidly discovered a critical soundness bug that had remained hidden for years. However, AI currently struggles with complex, interconnected scenarios. When tested on the Curve LlamaLend sDOLA exploit, which involved manipulating prices across multiple protocols (Curve pools, lending markets) to trigger liquidations, Fable 5 failed to identify the core cross-protocol attack vector. These scenarios require a deep understanding of DeFi economic models and multi-contract interactions. In conclusion, while AI tools like Mythos significantly boost efficiency in finding standardized, syntactic vulnerabilities, they cannot yet replace expert analysis for complex, business-logic, and cross-protocol attacks. An effective audit workflow combines AI's speed for initial screening with human expertise for in-depth, holistic analysis.

marsbitHace 47 min(s)

Public Version of Mythos Officially Launched: Analyzing the Advantages and Limitations of AI Smart Contract Auditing

marsbitHace 47 min(s)

Trade.xyz's Rebase Refusal Sparks Controversy, On-Chain Pre-IPO Market Faces Major Pricing Test

The debate surrounding Trade.xyz's refusal to adjust its SPCX (SpaceX pre-IPO) perpetual contract pricing amid updated share count revelations highlights a key challenge for on-chain pre-IPO markets. While several centralized exchanges (CEXs) paused and repriced their contracts after SpaceX's filing showed a ~10% increase in total shares, Trade.xyz maintained its market-driven pricing logic, which tracks expected per-share price sentiment rather than fundamental valuation metrics like market cap. This discrepancy triggered cross-platform arbitrage and caused leveraged long positions on Trade.xyz to suffer significant losses, as the platform's HIP-3 architecture lacks a native "Rebase" mechanism to neutrally adjust all user positions following such corporate actions. The incident underscores the difficulty for decentralized perpetual exchanges (Perp DEXs) to implement Rebase—a process CEXs handle by centrally pausing markets and adjusting ledger data. On-chain, this requires complex smart contract modifications, increasing gas costs, complexity, and potential attack surfaces. While some DEXs have managed similar adjustments, Trade.xyz's current design does not natively support it, though the team is reportedly exploring solutions for future events like stock splits. Ultimately, the controversy serves as a critical case study for the nascent on-chain pre-IPO sector, raising questions about price discovery reliability, transparent rule disclosure, and the readiness of DeFi infrastructures to handle traditional corporate actions as real-world assets (RWAs) gain traction.

marsbitHace 55 min(s)

Trade.xyz's Rebase Refusal Sparks Controversy, On-Chain Pre-IPO Market Faces Major Pricing Test

marsbitHace 55 min(s)

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片